Association between adenoma location and risk of recurrence

Background and Aims The biological environment varies across the colorectum and may therefore affect neoplastic growth differently in the proximal and distal colon. The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk for recurrent adenomas and their anatomic location based on adenoma location at baseline...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2016-10, Vol.84 (4), p.709-716
Hauptverfasser: Pohl, Heiko, MD, Robertson, Douglas J., MD, MPH, Mott, Leila A., MS, Ahnen, Dennis J., MD, Burke, Carol A., MD, Barry, Elizabeth L., PhD, Bresalier, Robert S., MD, Figueiredo, Jane C., PhD, Shaukat, Aasma, MD, MPH, Sandler, Robert S., MD, MPH, Baron, John A., MD, MS, MSc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 716
container_issue 4
container_start_page 709
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume 84
creator Pohl, Heiko, MD
Robertson, Douglas J., MD, MPH
Mott, Leila A., MS
Ahnen, Dennis J., MD
Burke, Carol A., MD
Barry, Elizabeth L., PhD
Bresalier, Robert S., MD
Figueiredo, Jane C., PhD
Shaukat, Aasma, MD, MPH
Sandler, Robert S., MD, MPH
Baron, John A., MD, MS, MSc
description Background and Aims The biological environment varies across the colorectum and may therefore affect neoplastic growth differently in the proximal and distal colon. The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk for recurrent adenomas and their anatomic location based on adenoma location at baseline colonoscopy. Methods Data were extracted from 3 adenoma prevention trials (n = 2430). Participants had at least 1 adenoma at baseline colonoscopy and underwent subsequent surveillance colonoscopy, at which time metachronous adenomas could be detected. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for metachronous adenomas by location of the baseline lesion and considered the impact of advanced neoplasia and multiplicity. Results At baseline, 522 patients (21.5%) had adenomas only in the proximal colon, 1266 patients (52.1%) had adenomas only in the distal colorectum, and 642 (26.4%) had adenomas in both regions. Overall, 877 patients (36.5%) had metachronous adenomas during the follow-up period. Those with only proximal adenomas at baseline had a higher risk of metachronous adenomas compared with patients with only distal adenomas (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01–1.35). A greater proximal risk was found after restricting the analysis to patients with multiple proximal adenomas versus multiple distal adenomas (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10–1.67). The risk of recurrent adenomas on the same side was 48% higher for patients with only proximal adenomas at baseline compared with those with only distal adenomas at baseline (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.22–1.80). Conclusions Patients with proximal adenomas only have a modestly greater risk of adenoma recurrence than patients with adenomas limited to the distal colon, and have a greater likelihood of adenoma recurrence on the same side compared with patients with distal adenomas. This observation suggests that biological factors may differentially affect neoplasia growth across the colon.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.048
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5586081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510716002716</els_id><sourcerecordid>1820596682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-8520db6e134a927cec5a7a2993524be0dbc76a5a978d415610c35c5817f6a0163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9P2zAUxy20CbqOP2CXKcddEp6d2k6EhITQNpCQdoCdn1zntXNJbWYnIP57HLWgjQMX29L3h-3PY-wLh4oDVyebau2oEvlYgahg0RywGYdWl0rr9gObQVZKyUEfsU8pbQCgETU_ZEdCtVqKup6x0_OUgnVmcMEXSxoeiXxhOvJha4o-2J1gfFdEl-6KsCoi2TFG8pY-s48r0yc63u9z9vvH99uLy_L618-ri_Pr0kothrKRArqlIl4vTCu0JSuNNqJtaykWS8qa1cpI0-qmW3CpONhaWtlwvVIm_6Ces7Nd7_243FJnyQ_R9Hgf3dbEJwzG4f-Kd39wHR5QykZBw3PBt31BDH9HSgNuXbLU98ZTGBPyRoBslcp05ozvrDaGlCKtXq_hgBN03GCGjhN0BIEZes58_fd9r4kXytlwujNQpvTgKGKybiLYuUxzwC64d-vP3qRt77yzpr-jJ0qbMEaf8SPHlAN4M019GjpXACKv9TOVZqcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1820596682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association between adenoma location and risk of recurrence</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Pohl, Heiko, MD ; Robertson, Douglas J., MD, MPH ; Mott, Leila A., MS ; Ahnen, Dennis J., MD ; Burke, Carol A., MD ; Barry, Elizabeth L., PhD ; Bresalier, Robert S., MD ; Figueiredo, Jane C., PhD ; Shaukat, Aasma, MD, MPH ; Sandler, Robert S., MD, MPH ; Baron, John A., MD, MS, MSc</creator><creatorcontrib>Pohl, Heiko, MD ; Robertson, Douglas J., MD, MPH ; Mott, Leila A., MS ; Ahnen, Dennis J., MD ; Burke, Carol A., MD ; Barry, Elizabeth L., PhD ; Bresalier, Robert S., MD ; Figueiredo, Jane C., PhD ; Shaukat, Aasma, MD, MPH ; Sandler, Robert S., MD, MPH ; Baron, John A., MD, MS, MSc</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Aims The biological environment varies across the colorectum and may therefore affect neoplastic growth differently in the proximal and distal colon. The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk for recurrent adenomas and their anatomic location based on adenoma location at baseline colonoscopy. Methods Data were extracted from 3 adenoma prevention trials (n = 2430). Participants had at least 1 adenoma at baseline colonoscopy and underwent subsequent surveillance colonoscopy, at which time metachronous adenomas could be detected. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for metachronous adenomas by location of the baseline lesion and considered the impact of advanced neoplasia and multiplicity. Results At baseline, 522 patients (21.5%) had adenomas only in the proximal colon, 1266 patients (52.1%) had adenomas only in the distal colorectum, and 642 (26.4%) had adenomas in both regions. Overall, 877 patients (36.5%) had metachronous adenomas during the follow-up period. Those with only proximal adenomas at baseline had a higher risk of metachronous adenomas compared with patients with only distal adenomas (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01–1.35). A greater proximal risk was found after restricting the analysis to patients with multiple proximal adenomas versus multiple distal adenomas (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10–1.67). The risk of recurrent adenomas on the same side was 48% higher for patients with only proximal adenomas at baseline compared with those with only distal adenomas at baseline (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.22–1.80). Conclusions Patients with proximal adenomas only have a modestly greater risk of adenoma recurrence than patients with adenomas limited to the distal colon, and have a greater likelihood of adenoma recurrence on the same side compared with patients with distal adenomas. This observation suggests that biological factors may differentially affect neoplasia growth across the colon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.048</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26975233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adenoma - surgery ; Aged ; Colon - pathology ; Colonic Neoplasms - surgery ; Colonoscopy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology ; Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - surgery ; Neoplasms, Second Primary - epidemiology ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Rectum - pathology ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2016-10, Vol.84 (4), p.709-716</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-8520db6e134a927cec5a7a2993524be0dbc76a5a978d415610c35c5817f6a0163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-8520db6e134a927cec5a7a2993524be0dbc76a5a978d415610c35c5817f6a0163</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9453-0587</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.048$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26975233$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pohl, Heiko, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Douglas J., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mott, Leila A., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahnen, Dennis J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Carol A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barry, Elizabeth L., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bresalier, Robert S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Jane C., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaukat, Aasma, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandler, Robert S., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baron, John A., MD, MS, MSc</creatorcontrib><title>Association between adenoma location and risk of recurrence</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background and Aims The biological environment varies across the colorectum and may therefore affect neoplastic growth differently in the proximal and distal colon. The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk for recurrent adenomas and their anatomic location based on adenoma location at baseline colonoscopy. Methods Data were extracted from 3 adenoma prevention trials (n = 2430). Participants had at least 1 adenoma at baseline colonoscopy and underwent subsequent surveillance colonoscopy, at which time metachronous adenomas could be detected. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for metachronous adenomas by location of the baseline lesion and considered the impact of advanced neoplasia and multiplicity. Results At baseline, 522 patients (21.5%) had adenomas only in the proximal colon, 1266 patients (52.1%) had adenomas only in the distal colorectum, and 642 (26.4%) had adenomas in both regions. Overall, 877 patients (36.5%) had metachronous adenomas during the follow-up period. Those with only proximal adenomas at baseline had a higher risk of metachronous adenomas compared with patients with only distal adenomas (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01–1.35). A greater proximal risk was found after restricting the analysis to patients with multiple proximal adenomas versus multiple distal adenomas (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10–1.67). The risk of recurrent adenomas on the same side was 48% higher for patients with only proximal adenomas at baseline compared with those with only distal adenomas at baseline (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.22–1.80). Conclusions Patients with proximal adenomas only have a modestly greater risk of adenoma recurrence than patients with adenomas limited to the distal colon, and have a greater likelihood of adenoma recurrence on the same side compared with patients with distal adenomas. This observation suggests that biological factors may differentially affect neoplasia growth across the colon.</description><subject>Adenoma - surgery</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Colon - pathology</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - surgery</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Second Primary - epidemiology</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Rectum - pathology</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9P2zAUxy20CbqOP2CXKcddEp6d2k6EhITQNpCQdoCdn1zntXNJbWYnIP57HLWgjQMX29L3h-3PY-wLh4oDVyebau2oEvlYgahg0RywGYdWl0rr9gObQVZKyUEfsU8pbQCgETU_ZEdCtVqKup6x0_OUgnVmcMEXSxoeiXxhOvJha4o-2J1gfFdEl-6KsCoi2TFG8pY-s48r0yc63u9z9vvH99uLy_L618-ri_Pr0kothrKRArqlIl4vTCu0JSuNNqJtaykWS8qa1cpI0-qmW3CpONhaWtlwvVIm_6Ces7Nd7_243FJnyQ_R9Hgf3dbEJwzG4f-Kd39wHR5QykZBw3PBt31BDH9HSgNuXbLU98ZTGBPyRoBslcp05ozvrDaGlCKtXq_hgBN03GCGjhN0BIEZes58_fd9r4kXytlwujNQpvTgKGKybiLYuUxzwC64d-vP3qRt77yzpr-jJ0qbMEaf8SPHlAN4M019GjpXACKv9TOVZqcQ</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Pohl, Heiko, MD</creator><creator>Robertson, Douglas J., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Mott, Leila A., MS</creator><creator>Ahnen, Dennis J., MD</creator><creator>Burke, Carol A., MD</creator><creator>Barry, Elizabeth L., PhD</creator><creator>Bresalier, Robert S., MD</creator><creator>Figueiredo, Jane C., PhD</creator><creator>Shaukat, Aasma, MD, MPH</creator><creator>Sandler, Robert S., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Baron, John A., MD, MS, MSc</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9453-0587</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Association between adenoma location and risk of recurrence</title><author>Pohl, Heiko, MD ; Robertson, Douglas J., MD, MPH ; Mott, Leila A., MS ; Ahnen, Dennis J., MD ; Burke, Carol A., MD ; Barry, Elizabeth L., PhD ; Bresalier, Robert S., MD ; Figueiredo, Jane C., PhD ; Shaukat, Aasma, MD, MPH ; Sandler, Robert S., MD, MPH ; Baron, John A., MD, MS, MSc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-8520db6e134a927cec5a7a2993524be0dbc76a5a978d415610c35c5817f6a0163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adenoma - surgery</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Colon - pathology</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - surgery</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Second Primary - epidemiology</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Rectum - pathology</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pohl, Heiko, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Douglas J., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mott, Leila A., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahnen, Dennis J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Carol A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barry, Elizabeth L., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bresalier, Robert S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Jane C., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaukat, Aasma, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandler, Robert S., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baron, John A., MD, MS, MSc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pohl, Heiko, MD</au><au>Robertson, Douglas J., MD, MPH</au><au>Mott, Leila A., MS</au><au>Ahnen, Dennis J., MD</au><au>Burke, Carol A., MD</au><au>Barry, Elizabeth L., PhD</au><au>Bresalier, Robert S., MD</au><au>Figueiredo, Jane C., PhD</au><au>Shaukat, Aasma, MD, MPH</au><au>Sandler, Robert S., MD, MPH</au><au>Baron, John A., MD, MS, MSc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association between adenoma location and risk of recurrence</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>709</spage><epage>716</epage><pages>709-716</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract>Background and Aims The biological environment varies across the colorectum and may therefore affect neoplastic growth differently in the proximal and distal colon. The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk for recurrent adenomas and their anatomic location based on adenoma location at baseline colonoscopy. Methods Data were extracted from 3 adenoma prevention trials (n = 2430). Participants had at least 1 adenoma at baseline colonoscopy and underwent subsequent surveillance colonoscopy, at which time metachronous adenomas could be detected. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for metachronous adenomas by location of the baseline lesion and considered the impact of advanced neoplasia and multiplicity. Results At baseline, 522 patients (21.5%) had adenomas only in the proximal colon, 1266 patients (52.1%) had adenomas only in the distal colorectum, and 642 (26.4%) had adenomas in both regions. Overall, 877 patients (36.5%) had metachronous adenomas during the follow-up period. Those with only proximal adenomas at baseline had a higher risk of metachronous adenomas compared with patients with only distal adenomas (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01–1.35). A greater proximal risk was found after restricting the analysis to patients with multiple proximal adenomas versus multiple distal adenomas (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10–1.67). The risk of recurrent adenomas on the same side was 48% higher for patients with only proximal adenomas at baseline compared with those with only distal adenomas at baseline (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.22–1.80). Conclusions Patients with proximal adenomas only have a modestly greater risk of adenoma recurrence than patients with adenomas limited to the distal colon, and have a greater likelihood of adenoma recurrence on the same side compared with patients with distal adenomas. This observation suggests that biological factors may differentially affect neoplasia growth across the colon.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26975233</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.048</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9453-0587</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2016-10, Vol.84 (4), p.709-716
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5586081
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adenoma - surgery
Aged
Colon - pathology
Colonic Neoplasms - surgery
Colonoscopy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology
Neoplasms, Multiple Primary - surgery
Neoplasms, Second Primary - epidemiology
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
Rectum - pathology
Risk Factors
title Association between adenoma location and risk of recurrence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T13%3A30%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20between%20adenoma%20location%20and%20risk%20of%20recurrence&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Pohl,%20Heiko,%20MD&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=709&rft.epage=716&rft.pages=709-716&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1820596682%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1820596682&rft_id=info:pmid/26975233&rft_els_id=S0016510716002716&rfr_iscdi=true