Software-based evaluation of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning
To use plan analysis software to evaluate a class solution for prostate intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning. Class solutions for radiotherapy planning are increasingly being considered for streamlining planning. Plan analysis software provides an objective approach to evaluating radioth...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy 2017-11, Vol.22 (6), p.441-449 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 449 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 441 |
| container_title | Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Clarke, Sarah Goodworth, Josie Westhuyzen, Justin Chick, Brendan Hoffmann, Matthew Pacey, Jacqueline Greenham, Stuart |
| description | To use plan analysis software to evaluate a class solution for prostate intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning.
Class solutions for radiotherapy planning are increasingly being considered for streamlining planning. Plan analysis software provides an objective approach to evaluating radiotherapy plans.
Three iterations of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning (T1, T2 and Tfinal) were compared to the clinical plan of 74 prostate patients using radiotherapy plan analysis software (Plan IQ™, Sun Nuclear Corporation). A set of institution-specific plan quality metrics (scores) were established, based on best practice guidelines.
For CTV coverage, Tfinal was not significantly different to the clinical plan. With the exception of 95% PTV coverage, Tfinal metrics were significantly better than the clinical plan for PTV coverage. In the scoring analysis, mean dose, 95% and 107% isodose coverage scores were similar for all the templates and clinical plan. 100% coverage of the CTV clinical plan was similar to Tfinal but scored higher than T1 and T2. There were no significant differences between Tfinal and the clinical plan for the metrics and scores associated with organs at risk. The total plan score was similar for Tfinal and the clinical plan, although the scores for volume receiving total dose outside the PTV were higher for Tfinal than for the clinical plan (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.08.001 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5581855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1507136717300640</els_id><sourcerecordid>1937520111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-1f507ba403b58823dd4af2e0487dda4f7d41825c7806676df98af0952317fd8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFu1DAQtRAVXbX9AQ4oRy4JYyeOvRJCQhWllYqQoJytWXtcvMrGwU4W9e_xsqWCC3MZaebNm5n3GHvJoeHA-zfbJk0xNQK4akA3APwZWwnQbd31HTxnKy5B1bzt1Sm7yHkLh1AgpHrBToXWulW9XLHrr9HPPzFRvcFMrqI9DgvOIY5V9BVWdsCcqxyH5XfNx1RNKeYZZ6puPn25q6YBxzGM9-fsxOOQ6eIxn7FvVx_uLq_r288fby7f39a2k3KuuS9nbbCDdiO1Fq1zHXpB0GnlHHZeuY5rIa3S0Peqd36t0cNaipYr7zS2Z-zdkXdaNjtylsY54WCmFHaYHkzEYP7tjOG7uY97I6XmWspC8PqRIMUfC-XZ7EK2NJQ_KC7Z8HWrZJGV8wIVR6gtL-dE_mkNB3NwwWzNwQVzcMGANsWFMvTq7wOfRv5oXgBvjwAqMu0DJZNtoNGSC4nsbFwM_-P_BbvkmXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1937520111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Software-based evaluation of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Clarke, Sarah ; Goodworth, Josie ; Westhuyzen, Justin ; Chick, Brendan ; Hoffmann, Matthew ; Pacey, Jacqueline ; Greenham, Stuart</creator><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Sarah ; Goodworth, Josie ; Westhuyzen, Justin ; Chick, Brendan ; Hoffmann, Matthew ; Pacey, Jacqueline ; Greenham, Stuart</creatorcontrib><description>To use plan analysis software to evaluate a class solution for prostate intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning.
Class solutions for radiotherapy planning are increasingly being considered for streamlining planning. Plan analysis software provides an objective approach to evaluating radiotherapy plans.
Three iterations of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning (T1, T2 and Tfinal) were compared to the clinical plan of 74 prostate patients using radiotherapy plan analysis software (Plan IQ™, Sun Nuclear Corporation). A set of institution-specific plan quality metrics (scores) were established, based on best practice guidelines.
For CTV coverage, Tfinal was not significantly different to the clinical plan. With the exception of 95% PTV coverage, Tfinal metrics were significantly better than the clinical plan for PTV coverage. In the scoring analysis, mean dose, 95% and 107% isodose coverage scores were similar for all the templates and clinical plan. 100% coverage of the CTV clinical plan was similar to Tfinal but scored higher than T1 and T2. There were no significant differences between Tfinal and the clinical plan for the metrics and scores associated with organs at risk. The total plan score was similar for Tfinal and the clinical plan, although the scores for volume receiving total dose outside the PTV were higher for Tfinal than for the clinical plan (P<0.0001).
The radiotherapy plan analysis software was useful for evaluating a class solution for prostate IMRT planning and provided evidence that the class solution produced clinically acceptable plans for these patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1507-1367</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2083-4640</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.08.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28883765</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Urban & Partner Sp. z o.o</publisher><subject>Original research article ; Prostate ; Radiotherapy planning ; Software ; Solutions</subject><ispartof>Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy, 2017-11, Vol.22 (6), p.441-449</ispartof><rights>2017</rights><rights>Crown Copyright © 2017 Published by Elsevier Sp. z o.o. on behalf of Greater Poland CancerCentre. All rights reserved. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-1f507ba403b58823dd4af2e0487dda4f7d41825c7806676df98af0952317fd8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-1f507ba403b58823dd4af2e0487dda4f7d41825c7806676df98af0952317fd8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5581855/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2017.08.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,3550,27924,27925,45995,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28883765$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodworth, Josie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westhuyzen, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chick, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacey, Jacqueline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenham, Stuart</creatorcontrib><title>Software-based evaluation of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning</title><title>Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy</title><addtitle>Rep Pract Oncol Radiother</addtitle><description>To use plan analysis software to evaluate a class solution for prostate intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning.
Class solutions for radiotherapy planning are increasingly being considered for streamlining planning. Plan analysis software provides an objective approach to evaluating radiotherapy plans.
Three iterations of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning (T1, T2 and Tfinal) were compared to the clinical plan of 74 prostate patients using radiotherapy plan analysis software (Plan IQ™, Sun Nuclear Corporation). A set of institution-specific plan quality metrics (scores) were established, based on best practice guidelines.
For CTV coverage, Tfinal was not significantly different to the clinical plan. With the exception of 95% PTV coverage, Tfinal metrics were significantly better than the clinical plan for PTV coverage. In the scoring analysis, mean dose, 95% and 107% isodose coverage scores were similar for all the templates and clinical plan. 100% coverage of the CTV clinical plan was similar to Tfinal but scored higher than T1 and T2. There were no significant differences between Tfinal and the clinical plan for the metrics and scores associated with organs at risk. The total plan score was similar for Tfinal and the clinical plan, although the scores for volume receiving total dose outside the PTV were higher for Tfinal than for the clinical plan (P<0.0001).
The radiotherapy plan analysis software was useful for evaluating a class solution for prostate IMRT planning and provided evidence that the class solution produced clinically acceptable plans for these patients.</description><subject>Original research article</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Radiotherapy planning</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Solutions</subject><issn>1507-1367</issn><issn>2083-4640</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcFu1DAQtRAVXbX9AQ4oRy4JYyeOvRJCQhWllYqQoJytWXtcvMrGwU4W9e_xsqWCC3MZaebNm5n3GHvJoeHA-zfbJk0xNQK4akA3APwZWwnQbd31HTxnKy5B1bzt1Sm7yHkLh1AgpHrBToXWulW9XLHrr9HPPzFRvcFMrqI9DgvOIY5V9BVWdsCcqxyH5XfNx1RNKeYZZ6puPn25q6YBxzGM9-fsxOOQ6eIxn7FvVx_uLq_r288fby7f39a2k3KuuS9nbbCDdiO1Fq1zHXpB0GnlHHZeuY5rIa3S0Peqd36t0cNaipYr7zS2Z-zdkXdaNjtylsY54WCmFHaYHkzEYP7tjOG7uY97I6XmWspC8PqRIMUfC-XZ7EK2NJQ_KC7Z8HWrZJGV8wIVR6gtL-dE_mkNB3NwwWzNwQVzcMGANsWFMvTq7wOfRv5oXgBvjwAqMu0DJZNtoNGSC4nsbFwM_-P_BbvkmXw</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Clarke, Sarah</creator><creator>Goodworth, Josie</creator><creator>Westhuyzen, Justin</creator><creator>Chick, Brendan</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Matthew</creator><creator>Pacey, Jacqueline</creator><creator>Greenham, Stuart</creator><general>Elsevier Urban & Partner Sp. z o.o</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Software-based evaluation of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning</title><author>Clarke, Sarah ; Goodworth, Josie ; Westhuyzen, Justin ; Chick, Brendan ; Hoffmann, Matthew ; Pacey, Jacqueline ; Greenham, Stuart</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-1f507ba403b58823dd4af2e0487dda4f7d41825c7806676df98af0952317fd8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Original research article</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Radiotherapy planning</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Solutions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodworth, Josie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westhuyzen, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chick, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacey, Jacqueline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenham, Stuart</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clarke, Sarah</au><au>Goodworth, Josie</au><au>Westhuyzen, Justin</au><au>Chick, Brendan</au><au>Hoffmann, Matthew</au><au>Pacey, Jacqueline</au><au>Greenham, Stuart</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Software-based evaluation of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning</atitle><jtitle>Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>Rep Pract Oncol Radiother</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>441</spage><epage>449</epage><pages>441-449</pages><issn>1507-1367</issn><eissn>2083-4640</eissn><abstract>To use plan analysis software to evaluate a class solution for prostate intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning.
Class solutions for radiotherapy planning are increasingly being considered for streamlining planning. Plan analysis software provides an objective approach to evaluating radiotherapy plans.
Three iterations of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning (T1, T2 and Tfinal) were compared to the clinical plan of 74 prostate patients using radiotherapy plan analysis software (Plan IQ™, Sun Nuclear Corporation). A set of institution-specific plan quality metrics (scores) were established, based on best practice guidelines.
For CTV coverage, Tfinal was not significantly different to the clinical plan. With the exception of 95% PTV coverage, Tfinal metrics were significantly better than the clinical plan for PTV coverage. In the scoring analysis, mean dose, 95% and 107% isodose coverage scores were similar for all the templates and clinical plan. 100% coverage of the CTV clinical plan was similar to Tfinal but scored higher than T1 and T2. There were no significant differences between Tfinal and the clinical plan for the metrics and scores associated with organs at risk. The total plan score was similar for Tfinal and the clinical plan, although the scores for volume receiving total dose outside the PTV were higher for Tfinal than for the clinical plan (P<0.0001).
The radiotherapy plan analysis software was useful for evaluating a class solution for prostate IMRT planning and provided evidence that the class solution produced clinically acceptable plans for these patients.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Urban & Partner Sp. z o.o</pub><pmid>28883765</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.rpor.2017.08.001</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1507-1367 |
| ispartof | Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy, 2017-11, Vol.22 (6), p.441-449 |
| issn | 1507-1367 2083-4640 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5581855 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Original research article Prostate Radiotherapy planning Software Solutions |
| title | Software-based evaluation of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A46%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Software-based%20evaluation%20of%20a%20class%20solution%20for%20prostate%20IMRT%20planning&rft.jtitle=Reports%20of%20practical%20oncology%20and%20radiotherapy&rft.au=Clarke,%20Sarah&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=441&rft.epage=449&rft.pages=441-449&rft.issn=1507-1367&rft.eissn=2083-4640&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rpor.2017.08.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1937520111%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1937520111&rft_id=info:pmid/28883765&rft_els_id=S1507136717300640&rfr_iscdi=true |