Contrast sensitivity to spatial gratings in moderate and dim light conditions in patients with diabetes in the absence of diabetic retinopathy
ObjectiveTo evaluate the ability of contrast sensitivity (CS) to discriminate loss of visual function in diabetic subjects with no clinical signs of retinopathy relative to that of normal subjects.Research design and methodsIn this prospective cross-sectional study, we measured CS in 46 diabetic sub...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ open diabetes research & care 2017-08, Vol.5 (1), p.e000408-e000408 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e000408 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e000408 |
container_title | BMJ open diabetes research & care |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Safi, Sare Rahimi, Anoushiravan Raeesi, Afsaneh Safi, Hamid Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad Malek, Mojtaba Yaseri, Mehdi Haeri, Mohammad Middleton, Frank A Solessio, Eduardo Ahmadieh, Hamid |
description | ObjectiveTo evaluate the ability of contrast sensitivity (CS) to discriminate loss of visual function in diabetic subjects with no clinical signs of retinopathy relative to that of normal subjects.Research design and methodsIn this prospective cross-sectional study, we measured CS in 46 diabetic subjects with a mean age of 48±6 years, a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 and no signs of diabetic retinopathy. The CS in these subjects was compared with CS measurements in 46 normal control subjects at four spatial frequencies (3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree) under moderate (500 lux) and dim (less than 2 lux) background light conditions.ResultsCS was approximately 0.16 log units lower in patients with diabetes relative to controls both in moderate and in dim background light conditions. Logistic regression classification and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that CS analysis using two light conditions was more accurate (0.78) overall compared with CS analysis using only a single illumination condition (accuracy values were 0.67 and 0.70 in moderate and dim light conditions, respectively).ConclusionsOur results showed that patients with diabetes without clinical signs of retinopathy exhibit a uniform loss in CS at all spatial frequencies tested. Measuring the loss in CS at two spatial frequencies (3 and 6 cycles per degree) and two light conditions (moderate and dim) is sufficiently robust to classify diabetic subjects with no retinopathy versus control subjects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000408 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5574432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1927107545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b468t-d2710c15014248a07b141f183fe563ad9576d7bc78726512351bcab73a8221da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcuOFCEUhonROJNxXsCFIXHjppRrQW9MTMdbMokbXRNu1UWnClqgx_RLzDNLTbWT0ZUbDuR8_w-HH4CXGL3FmPbvzLx32XYEYdEhhBiST8AlQZx0TG7E00f7C3Bdyr4xTYap5M_BBZFSyA0Vl-Bum2LNulRYfCyhhttQT7AmWA66Bj3BXW417goMEc7J-Xb0UEcHXZjhFHZjhTZF15Qp3kOLzsda4K9Qx0Zp46u_79SxKU27x3qYhnMrWJjbGlPTjacX4Nmgp-Kvz_UK_Pj08fv2S3fz7fPX7YebzrBe1s4RgZHFHGFGmNRIGMzwgCUdPO-pdhsueieMFVKQnmNCOTZWG0G1JAQ7Ta_A-9X3cDSzd9YvnzCpQw6zzieVdFB_d2IY1S7dKs4FY5Q0gzdng5x-Hn2pag7F-mnS0adjUXhD-54wIVhDX_-D7tMxxzZeo5ZBBGe8UWSlbE6lZD88PAYjtSSu1sTVkrhaE2-iV4_HeJD8ybcB3Qo08f8Y_gYM8bkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1927107545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrast sensitivity to spatial gratings in moderate and dim light conditions in patients with diabetes in the absence of diabetic retinopathy</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Safi, Sare ; Rahimi, Anoushiravan ; Raeesi, Afsaneh ; Safi, Hamid ; Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad ; Malek, Mojtaba ; Yaseri, Mehdi ; Haeri, Mohammad ; Middleton, Frank A ; Solessio, Eduardo ; Ahmadieh, Hamid</creator><creatorcontrib>Safi, Sare ; Rahimi, Anoushiravan ; Raeesi, Afsaneh ; Safi, Hamid ; Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad ; Malek, Mojtaba ; Yaseri, Mehdi ; Haeri, Mohammad ; Middleton, Frank A ; Solessio, Eduardo ; Ahmadieh, Hamid</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectiveTo evaluate the ability of contrast sensitivity (CS) to discriminate loss of visual function in diabetic subjects with no clinical signs of retinopathy relative to that of normal subjects.Research design and methodsIn this prospective cross-sectional study, we measured CS in 46 diabetic subjects with a mean age of 48±6 years, a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 and no signs of diabetic retinopathy. The CS in these subjects was compared with CS measurements in 46 normal control subjects at four spatial frequencies (3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree) under moderate (500 lux) and dim (less than 2 lux) background light conditions.ResultsCS was approximately 0.16 log units lower in patients with diabetes relative to controls both in moderate and in dim background light conditions. Logistic regression classification and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that CS analysis using two light conditions was more accurate (0.78) overall compared with CS analysis using only a single illumination condition (accuracy values were 0.67 and 0.70 in moderate and dim light conditions, respectively).ConclusionsOur results showed that patients with diabetes without clinical signs of retinopathy exhibit a uniform loss in CS at all spatial frequencies tested. Measuring the loss in CS at two spatial frequencies (3 and 6 cycles per degree) and two light conditions (moderate and dim) is sufficiently robust to classify diabetic subjects with no retinopathy versus control subjects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2052-4897</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2052-4897</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000408</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28878937</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Apoptosis ; Diabetes ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Glaucoma ; Light ; Pathophysiology/Complications ; Retina ; Sensitivity analysis</subject><ispartof>BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2017-08, Vol.5 (1), p.e000408-e000408</ispartof><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2017 © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.</rights><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b468t-d2710c15014248a07b141f183fe563ad9576d7bc78726512351bcab73a8221da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b468t-d2710c15014248a07b141f183fe563ad9576d7bc78726512351bcab73a8221da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://drc.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000408.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://drc.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000408.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27528,27529,27903,27904,53770,53772,77348,77379</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28878937$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Safi, Sare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Anoushiravan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raeesi, Afsaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malek, Mojtaba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaseri, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haeri, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middleton, Frank A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solessio, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmadieh, Hamid</creatorcontrib><title>Contrast sensitivity to spatial gratings in moderate and dim light conditions in patients with diabetes in the absence of diabetic retinopathy</title><title>BMJ open diabetes research & care</title><addtitle>BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care</addtitle><description>ObjectiveTo evaluate the ability of contrast sensitivity (CS) to discriminate loss of visual function in diabetic subjects with no clinical signs of retinopathy relative to that of normal subjects.Research design and methodsIn this prospective cross-sectional study, we measured CS in 46 diabetic subjects with a mean age of 48±6 years, a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 and no signs of diabetic retinopathy. The CS in these subjects was compared with CS measurements in 46 normal control subjects at four spatial frequencies (3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree) under moderate (500 lux) and dim (less than 2 lux) background light conditions.ResultsCS was approximately 0.16 log units lower in patients with diabetes relative to controls both in moderate and in dim background light conditions. Logistic regression classification and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that CS analysis using two light conditions was more accurate (0.78) overall compared with CS analysis using only a single illumination condition (accuracy values were 0.67 and 0.70 in moderate and dim light conditions, respectively).ConclusionsOur results showed that patients with diabetes without clinical signs of retinopathy exhibit a uniform loss in CS at all spatial frequencies tested. Measuring the loss in CS at two spatial frequencies (3 and 6 cycles per degree) and two light conditions (moderate and dim) is sufficiently robust to classify diabetic subjects with no retinopathy versus control subjects.</description><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Pathophysiology/Complications</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><issn>2052-4897</issn><issn>2052-4897</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcuOFCEUhonROJNxXsCFIXHjppRrQW9MTMdbMokbXRNu1UWnClqgx_RLzDNLTbWT0ZUbDuR8_w-HH4CXGL3FmPbvzLx32XYEYdEhhBiST8AlQZx0TG7E00f7C3Bdyr4xTYap5M_BBZFSyA0Vl-Bum2LNulRYfCyhhttQT7AmWA66Bj3BXW417goMEc7J-Xb0UEcHXZjhFHZjhTZF15Qp3kOLzsda4K9Qx0Zp46u_79SxKU27x3qYhnMrWJjbGlPTjacX4Nmgp-Kvz_UK_Pj08fv2S3fz7fPX7YebzrBe1s4RgZHFHGFGmNRIGMzwgCUdPO-pdhsueieMFVKQnmNCOTZWG0G1JAQ7Ta_A-9X3cDSzd9YvnzCpQw6zzieVdFB_d2IY1S7dKs4FY5Q0gzdng5x-Hn2pag7F-mnS0adjUXhD-54wIVhDX_-D7tMxxzZeo5ZBBGe8UWSlbE6lZD88PAYjtSSu1sTVkrhaE2-iV4_HeJD8ybcB3Qo08f8Y_gYM8bkQ</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Safi, Sare</creator><creator>Rahimi, Anoushiravan</creator><creator>Raeesi, Afsaneh</creator><creator>Safi, Hamid</creator><creator>Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad</creator><creator>Malek, Mojtaba</creator><creator>Yaseri, Mehdi</creator><creator>Haeri, Mohammad</creator><creator>Middleton, Frank A</creator><creator>Solessio, Eduardo</creator><creator>Ahmadieh, Hamid</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Contrast sensitivity to spatial gratings in moderate and dim light conditions in patients with diabetes in the absence of diabetic retinopathy</title><author>Safi, Sare ; Rahimi, Anoushiravan ; Raeesi, Afsaneh ; Safi, Hamid ; Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad ; Malek, Mojtaba ; Yaseri, Mehdi ; Haeri, Mohammad ; Middleton, Frank A ; Solessio, Eduardo ; Ahmadieh, Hamid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b468t-d2710c15014248a07b141f183fe563ad9576d7bc78726512351bcab73a8221da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Pathophysiology/Complications</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Safi, Sare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Anoushiravan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raeesi, Afsaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malek, Mojtaba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaseri, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haeri, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middleton, Frank A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solessio, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmadieh, Hamid</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open diabetes research & care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Safi, Sare</au><au>Rahimi, Anoushiravan</au><au>Raeesi, Afsaneh</au><au>Safi, Hamid</au><au>Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad</au><au>Malek, Mojtaba</au><au>Yaseri, Mehdi</au><au>Haeri, Mohammad</au><au>Middleton, Frank A</au><au>Solessio, Eduardo</au><au>Ahmadieh, Hamid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrast sensitivity to spatial gratings in moderate and dim light conditions in patients with diabetes in the absence of diabetic retinopathy</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open diabetes research & care</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e000408</spage><epage>e000408</epage><pages>e000408-e000408</pages><issn>2052-4897</issn><eissn>2052-4897</eissn><abstract>ObjectiveTo evaluate the ability of contrast sensitivity (CS) to discriminate loss of visual function in diabetic subjects with no clinical signs of retinopathy relative to that of normal subjects.Research design and methodsIn this prospective cross-sectional study, we measured CS in 46 diabetic subjects with a mean age of 48±6 years, a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 and no signs of diabetic retinopathy. The CS in these subjects was compared with CS measurements in 46 normal control subjects at four spatial frequencies (3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree) under moderate (500 lux) and dim (less than 2 lux) background light conditions.ResultsCS was approximately 0.16 log units lower in patients with diabetes relative to controls both in moderate and in dim background light conditions. Logistic regression classification and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that CS analysis using two light conditions was more accurate (0.78) overall compared with CS analysis using only a single illumination condition (accuracy values were 0.67 and 0.70 in moderate and dim light conditions, respectively).ConclusionsOur results showed that patients with diabetes without clinical signs of retinopathy exhibit a uniform loss in CS at all spatial frequencies tested. Measuring the loss in CS at two spatial frequencies (3 and 6 cycles per degree) and two light conditions (moderate and dim) is sufficiently robust to classify diabetic subjects with no retinopathy versus control subjects.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>28878937</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000408</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2052-4897 |
ispartof | BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2017-08, Vol.5 (1), p.e000408-e000408 |
issn | 2052-4897 2052-4897 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5574432 |
source | BMJ Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Apoptosis Diabetes Diabetic retinopathy Glaucoma Light Pathophysiology/Complications Retina Sensitivity analysis |
title | Contrast sensitivity to spatial gratings in moderate and dim light conditions in patients with diabetes in the absence of diabetic retinopathy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A56%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrast%20sensitivity%20to%20spatial%20gratings%20in%20moderate%20and%20dim%20light%20conditions%20in%20patients%20with%20diabetes%20in%20the%20absence%20of%20diabetic%20retinopathy&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open%20diabetes%20research%20&%20care&rft.au=Safi,%20Sare&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e000408&rft.epage=e000408&rft.pages=e000408-e000408&rft.issn=2052-4897&rft.eissn=2052-4897&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000408&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1927107545%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1927107545&rft_id=info:pmid/28878937&rfr_iscdi=true |