Contrast sensitivity to spatial gratings in moderate and dim light conditions in patients with diabetes in the absence of diabetic retinopathy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the ability of contrast sensitivity (CS) to discriminate loss of visual function in diabetic subjects with no clinical signs of retinopathy relative to that of normal subjects.Research design and methodsIn this prospective cross-sectional study, we measured CS in 46 diabetic sub...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open diabetes research & care 2017-08, Vol.5 (1), p.e000408-e000408
Hauptverfasser: Safi, Sare, Rahimi, Anoushiravan, Raeesi, Afsaneh, Safi, Hamid, Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad, Malek, Mojtaba, Yaseri, Mehdi, Haeri, Mohammad, Middleton, Frank A, Solessio, Eduardo, Ahmadieh, Hamid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e000408
container_issue 1
container_start_page e000408
container_title BMJ open diabetes research & care
container_volume 5
creator Safi, Sare
Rahimi, Anoushiravan
Raeesi, Afsaneh
Safi, Hamid
Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad
Malek, Mojtaba
Yaseri, Mehdi
Haeri, Mohammad
Middleton, Frank A
Solessio, Eduardo
Ahmadieh, Hamid
description ObjectiveTo evaluate the ability of contrast sensitivity (CS) to discriminate loss of visual function in diabetic subjects with no clinical signs of retinopathy relative to that of normal subjects.Research design and methodsIn this prospective cross-sectional study, we measured CS in 46 diabetic subjects with a mean age of 48±6 years, a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 and no signs of diabetic retinopathy. The CS in these subjects was compared with CS measurements in 46 normal control subjects at four spatial frequencies (3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree) under moderate (500 lux) and dim (less than 2 lux) background light conditions.ResultsCS was approximately 0.16 log units lower in patients with diabetes relative to controls both in moderate and in dim background light conditions. Logistic regression classification and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that CS analysis using two light conditions was more accurate (0.78) overall compared with CS analysis using only a single illumination condition (accuracy values were 0.67 and 0.70 in moderate and dim light conditions, respectively).ConclusionsOur results showed that patients with diabetes without clinical signs of retinopathy exhibit a uniform loss in CS at all spatial frequencies tested. Measuring the loss in CS at two spatial frequencies (3 and 6 cycles per degree) and two light conditions (moderate and dim) is sufficiently robust to classify diabetic subjects with no retinopathy versus control subjects.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000408
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5574432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1927107545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b468t-d2710c15014248a07b141f183fe563ad9576d7bc78726512351bcab73a8221da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcuOFCEUhonROJNxXsCFIXHjppRrQW9MTMdbMokbXRNu1UWnClqgx_RLzDNLTbWT0ZUbDuR8_w-HH4CXGL3FmPbvzLx32XYEYdEhhBiST8AlQZx0TG7E00f7C3Bdyr4xTYap5M_BBZFSyA0Vl-Bum2LNulRYfCyhhttQT7AmWA66Bj3BXW417goMEc7J-Xb0UEcHXZjhFHZjhTZF15Qp3kOLzsda4K9Qx0Zp46u_79SxKU27x3qYhnMrWJjbGlPTjacX4Nmgp-Kvz_UK_Pj08fv2S3fz7fPX7YebzrBe1s4RgZHFHGFGmNRIGMzwgCUdPO-pdhsueieMFVKQnmNCOTZWG0G1JAQ7Ta_A-9X3cDSzd9YvnzCpQw6zzieVdFB_d2IY1S7dKs4FY5Q0gzdng5x-Hn2pag7F-mnS0adjUXhD-54wIVhDX_-D7tMxxzZeo5ZBBGe8UWSlbE6lZD88PAYjtSSu1sTVkrhaE2-iV4_HeJD8ybcB3Qo08f8Y_gYM8bkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1927107545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrast sensitivity to spatial gratings in moderate and dim light conditions in patients with diabetes in the absence of diabetic retinopathy</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Safi, Sare ; Rahimi, Anoushiravan ; Raeesi, Afsaneh ; Safi, Hamid ; Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad ; Malek, Mojtaba ; Yaseri, Mehdi ; Haeri, Mohammad ; Middleton, Frank A ; Solessio, Eduardo ; Ahmadieh, Hamid</creator><creatorcontrib>Safi, Sare ; Rahimi, Anoushiravan ; Raeesi, Afsaneh ; Safi, Hamid ; Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad ; Malek, Mojtaba ; Yaseri, Mehdi ; Haeri, Mohammad ; Middleton, Frank A ; Solessio, Eduardo ; Ahmadieh, Hamid</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectiveTo evaluate the ability of contrast sensitivity (CS) to discriminate loss of visual function in diabetic subjects with no clinical signs of retinopathy relative to that of normal subjects.Research design and methodsIn this prospective cross-sectional study, we measured CS in 46 diabetic subjects with a mean age of 48±6 years, a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 and no signs of diabetic retinopathy. The CS in these subjects was compared with CS measurements in 46 normal control subjects at four spatial frequencies (3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree) under moderate (500 lux) and dim (less than 2 lux) background light conditions.ResultsCS was approximately 0.16 log units lower in patients with diabetes relative to controls both in moderate and in dim background light conditions. Logistic regression classification and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that CS analysis using two light conditions was more accurate (0.78) overall compared with CS analysis using only a single illumination condition (accuracy values were 0.67 and 0.70 in moderate and dim light conditions, respectively).ConclusionsOur results showed that patients with diabetes without clinical signs of retinopathy exhibit a uniform loss in CS at all spatial frequencies tested. Measuring the loss in CS at two spatial frequencies (3 and 6 cycles per degree) and two light conditions (moderate and dim) is sufficiently robust to classify diabetic subjects with no retinopathy versus control subjects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2052-4897</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2052-4897</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000408</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28878937</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Apoptosis ; Diabetes ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Glaucoma ; Light ; Pathophysiology/Complications ; Retina ; Sensitivity analysis</subject><ispartof>BMJ open diabetes research &amp; care, 2017-08, Vol.5 (1), p.e000408-e000408</ispartof><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2017 © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.</rights><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b468t-d2710c15014248a07b141f183fe563ad9576d7bc78726512351bcab73a8221da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b468t-d2710c15014248a07b141f183fe563ad9576d7bc78726512351bcab73a8221da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://drc.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000408.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://drc.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000408.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27528,27529,27903,27904,53770,53772,77348,77379</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28878937$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Safi, Sare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Anoushiravan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raeesi, Afsaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malek, Mojtaba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaseri, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haeri, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middleton, Frank A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solessio, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmadieh, Hamid</creatorcontrib><title>Contrast sensitivity to spatial gratings in moderate and dim light conditions in patients with diabetes in the absence of diabetic retinopathy</title><title>BMJ open diabetes research &amp; care</title><addtitle>BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care</addtitle><description>ObjectiveTo evaluate the ability of contrast sensitivity (CS) to discriminate loss of visual function in diabetic subjects with no clinical signs of retinopathy relative to that of normal subjects.Research design and methodsIn this prospective cross-sectional study, we measured CS in 46 diabetic subjects with a mean age of 48±6 years, a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 and no signs of diabetic retinopathy. The CS in these subjects was compared with CS measurements in 46 normal control subjects at four spatial frequencies (3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree) under moderate (500 lux) and dim (less than 2 lux) background light conditions.ResultsCS was approximately 0.16 log units lower in patients with diabetes relative to controls both in moderate and in dim background light conditions. Logistic regression classification and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that CS analysis using two light conditions was more accurate (0.78) overall compared with CS analysis using only a single illumination condition (accuracy values were 0.67 and 0.70 in moderate and dim light conditions, respectively).ConclusionsOur results showed that patients with diabetes without clinical signs of retinopathy exhibit a uniform loss in CS at all spatial frequencies tested. Measuring the loss in CS at two spatial frequencies (3 and 6 cycles per degree) and two light conditions (moderate and dim) is sufficiently robust to classify diabetic subjects with no retinopathy versus control subjects.</description><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Pathophysiology/Complications</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><issn>2052-4897</issn><issn>2052-4897</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcuOFCEUhonROJNxXsCFIXHjppRrQW9MTMdbMokbXRNu1UWnClqgx_RLzDNLTbWT0ZUbDuR8_w-HH4CXGL3FmPbvzLx32XYEYdEhhBiST8AlQZx0TG7E00f7C3Bdyr4xTYap5M_BBZFSyA0Vl-Bum2LNulRYfCyhhttQT7AmWA66Bj3BXW417goMEc7J-Xb0UEcHXZjhFHZjhTZF15Qp3kOLzsda4K9Qx0Zp46u_79SxKU27x3qYhnMrWJjbGlPTjacX4Nmgp-Kvz_UK_Pj08fv2S3fz7fPX7YebzrBe1s4RgZHFHGFGmNRIGMzwgCUdPO-pdhsueieMFVKQnmNCOTZWG0G1JAQ7Ta_A-9X3cDSzd9YvnzCpQw6zzieVdFB_d2IY1S7dKs4FY5Q0gzdng5x-Hn2pag7F-mnS0adjUXhD-54wIVhDX_-D7tMxxzZeo5ZBBGe8UWSlbE6lZD88PAYjtSSu1sTVkrhaE2-iV4_HeJD8ybcB3Qo08f8Y_gYM8bkQ</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Safi, Sare</creator><creator>Rahimi, Anoushiravan</creator><creator>Raeesi, Afsaneh</creator><creator>Safi, Hamid</creator><creator>Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad</creator><creator>Malek, Mojtaba</creator><creator>Yaseri, Mehdi</creator><creator>Haeri, Mohammad</creator><creator>Middleton, Frank A</creator><creator>Solessio, Eduardo</creator><creator>Ahmadieh, Hamid</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Open Diabetes Research &amp; Care</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Contrast sensitivity to spatial gratings in moderate and dim light conditions in patients with diabetes in the absence of diabetic retinopathy</title><author>Safi, Sare ; Rahimi, Anoushiravan ; Raeesi, Afsaneh ; Safi, Hamid ; Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad ; Malek, Mojtaba ; Yaseri, Mehdi ; Haeri, Mohammad ; Middleton, Frank A ; Solessio, Eduardo ; Ahmadieh, Hamid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b468t-d2710c15014248a07b141f183fe563ad9576d7bc78726512351bcab73a8221da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Pathophysiology/Complications</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Safi, Sare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Anoushiravan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raeesi, Afsaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malek, Mojtaba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaseri, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haeri, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middleton, Frank A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solessio, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmadieh, Hamid</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open diabetes research &amp; care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Safi, Sare</au><au>Rahimi, Anoushiravan</au><au>Raeesi, Afsaneh</au><au>Safi, Hamid</au><au>Aghazadeh Amiri, Mohammad</au><au>Malek, Mojtaba</au><au>Yaseri, Mehdi</au><au>Haeri, Mohammad</au><au>Middleton, Frank A</au><au>Solessio, Eduardo</au><au>Ahmadieh, Hamid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrast sensitivity to spatial gratings in moderate and dim light conditions in patients with diabetes in the absence of diabetic retinopathy</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open diabetes research &amp; care</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e000408</spage><epage>e000408</epage><pages>e000408-e000408</pages><issn>2052-4897</issn><eissn>2052-4897</eissn><abstract>ObjectiveTo evaluate the ability of contrast sensitivity (CS) to discriminate loss of visual function in diabetic subjects with no clinical signs of retinopathy relative to that of normal subjects.Research design and methodsIn this prospective cross-sectional study, we measured CS in 46 diabetic subjects with a mean age of 48±6 years, a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 and no signs of diabetic retinopathy. The CS in these subjects was compared with CS measurements in 46 normal control subjects at four spatial frequencies (3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree) under moderate (500 lux) and dim (less than 2 lux) background light conditions.ResultsCS was approximately 0.16 log units lower in patients with diabetes relative to controls both in moderate and in dim background light conditions. Logistic regression classification and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that CS analysis using two light conditions was more accurate (0.78) overall compared with CS analysis using only a single illumination condition (accuracy values were 0.67 and 0.70 in moderate and dim light conditions, respectively).ConclusionsOur results showed that patients with diabetes without clinical signs of retinopathy exhibit a uniform loss in CS at all spatial frequencies tested. Measuring the loss in CS at two spatial frequencies (3 and 6 cycles per degree) and two light conditions (moderate and dim) is sufficiently robust to classify diabetic subjects with no retinopathy versus control subjects.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>28878937</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000408</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2052-4897
ispartof BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2017-08, Vol.5 (1), p.e000408-e000408
issn 2052-4897
2052-4897
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5574432
source BMJ Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Apoptosis
Diabetes
Diabetic retinopathy
Glaucoma
Light
Pathophysiology/Complications
Retina
Sensitivity analysis
title Contrast sensitivity to spatial gratings in moderate and dim light conditions in patients with diabetes in the absence of diabetic retinopathy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A56%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrast%20sensitivity%20to%20spatial%20gratings%20in%20moderate%20and%20dim%20light%20conditions%20in%20patients%20with%20diabetes%20in%20the%20absence%20of%20diabetic%20retinopathy&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open%20diabetes%20research%20&%20care&rft.au=Safi,%20Sare&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e000408&rft.epage=e000408&rft.pages=e000408-e000408&rft.issn=2052-4897&rft.eissn=2052-4897&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000408&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1927107545%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1927107545&rft_id=info:pmid/28878937&rfr_iscdi=true