Interactions between working memory, reinforcement learning and effort in value-based choice: a new paradigm and selective deficits in schizophrenia

Abstract Background When studying learning, researchers directly observe only the participants’ choices, which are often assumed to arise from a unitary learning process. However, a number of separable systems, such as working memory (WM) and reinforcement learning (RL), contribute simultaneously to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological psychiatry (1969) 2017-05, Vol.82 (6), p.431-439
Hauptverfasser: Collins, Anne GE, Albrecht, Matthew A, Waltz, James A, Gold, James M, Frank, Michael J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 439
container_issue 6
container_start_page 431
container_title Biological psychiatry (1969)
container_volume 82
creator Collins, Anne GE
Albrecht, Matthew A
Waltz, James A
Gold, James M
Frank, Michael J
description Abstract Background When studying learning, researchers directly observe only the participants’ choices, which are often assumed to arise from a unitary learning process. However, a number of separable systems, such as working memory (WM) and reinforcement learning (RL), contribute simultaneously to human learning. Identifying each system’s contributions is essential for mapping the neural substrates contributing in parallel to behavior; computational modeling can help design tasks that allow such a separable identification of processes, and infer their contributions in individuals. Methods We present a new experimental protocol that separately identifies the contributions of RL and WM to learning, is sensitive to parametric variations in both, and allows us to investigate whether the processes interact. In experiments 1-2, we test this protocol with healthy young adults (n=29 and n=52). In experiment 3, we use it to investigate learning deficits in medicated individuals with schizophrenia (n=49 patients, n=32 controls). Results Experiments 1-2 established WM and RL contributions to learning, evidenced by parametric modulations of choice by load and delay, and reward history, respectively. It also showed interactions between WM and RL, where RL was enhanced under high WM load. Moreover, we observed a cost of mental effort, controlling for reinforcement history: participants preferred stimuli they encountered under low WM load. Experiment 3 revealed selective deficits in WM contributions and preserved RL value learning in individuals with schizophrenia compared to controls. Conclusions Computational approaches allow us to disentangle contributions of multiple systems to learning and, consequently, further our understanding of psychiatric diseases.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5573149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0006322317316190</els_id><sourcerecordid>1_s2_0_S0006322317316190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e1109-65ebe60092c213eab51efcc044434ef5a689f4ad3b47c107c076126caf691ae63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUdtq3DAUFKGl2Vx-oegDYkdHsuV1HwIlJG0g0Ie2z-JYPl5rY0tG8u6y_Y58cL1NofRpGIaZc4Zh7COIHATo223euDClo-1zKaDKRZkvcMZWsK5UJgsh37GVEEJnSkp1zi5S2i60khI-sHO51iVU63rFXp_8TBHt7IJPvKH5QOT5IcQX5zd8pDHE4w2P5HwXoqWR_MwHwuhPMvqWU7cIM3ee73HYUdZgopbbPjhLnzhyTwc-YcTWbcY_hkQDLef2xFvqnHVzOpmT7d2vMPWRvMMr9r7DIdH1X7xkPx8fftx_zZ6_fXm6__ycEYCoM11SQ1qIWloJirApgTprRVEUqqCuRL2uuwJb1RSVBVFZUWmQ2mKna0DS6pLdveVOu2ak1i7lIg5mim7EeDQBnflf8a43m7A3ZVkpKOp_AbR8uXcUjR2cdxaHFzpS2oZd9EsBAyZJI8z30yCnPWCxa6iF-g0kJ4_F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interactions between working memory, reinforcement learning and effort in value-based choice: a new paradigm and selective deficits in schizophrenia</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Collins, Anne GE ; Albrecht, Matthew A ; Waltz, James A ; Gold, James M ; Frank, Michael J</creator><creatorcontrib>Collins, Anne GE ; Albrecht, Matthew A ; Waltz, James A ; Gold, James M ; Frank, Michael J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background When studying learning, researchers directly observe only the participants’ choices, which are often assumed to arise from a unitary learning process. However, a number of separable systems, such as working memory (WM) and reinforcement learning (RL), contribute simultaneously to human learning. Identifying each system’s contributions is essential for mapping the neural substrates contributing in parallel to behavior; computational modeling can help design tasks that allow such a separable identification of processes, and infer their contributions in individuals. Methods We present a new experimental protocol that separately identifies the contributions of RL and WM to learning, is sensitive to parametric variations in both, and allows us to investigate whether the processes interact. In experiments 1-2, we test this protocol with healthy young adults (n=29 and n=52). In experiment 3, we use it to investigate learning deficits in medicated individuals with schizophrenia (n=49 patients, n=32 controls). Results Experiments 1-2 established WM and RL contributions to learning, evidenced by parametric modulations of choice by load and delay, and reward history, respectively. It also showed interactions between WM and RL, where RL was enhanced under high WM load. Moreover, we observed a cost of mental effort, controlling for reinforcement history: participants preferred stimuli they encountered under low WM load. Experiment 3 revealed selective deficits in WM contributions and preserved RL value learning in individuals with schizophrenia compared to controls. Conclusions Computational approaches allow us to disentangle contributions of multiple systems to learning and, consequently, further our understanding of psychiatric diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28651789</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Psychiatry</subject><ispartof>Biological psychiatry (1969), 2017-05, Vol.82 (6), p.431-439</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Collins, Anne GE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, Matthew A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waltz, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gold, James M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, Michael J</creatorcontrib><title>Interactions between working memory, reinforcement learning and effort in value-based choice: a new paradigm and selective deficits in schizophrenia</title><title>Biological psychiatry (1969)</title><description>Abstract Background When studying learning, researchers directly observe only the participants’ choices, which are often assumed to arise from a unitary learning process. However, a number of separable systems, such as working memory (WM) and reinforcement learning (RL), contribute simultaneously to human learning. Identifying each system’s contributions is essential for mapping the neural substrates contributing in parallel to behavior; computational modeling can help design tasks that allow such a separable identification of processes, and infer their contributions in individuals. Methods We present a new experimental protocol that separately identifies the contributions of RL and WM to learning, is sensitive to parametric variations in both, and allows us to investigate whether the processes interact. In experiments 1-2, we test this protocol with healthy young adults (n=29 and n=52). In experiment 3, we use it to investigate learning deficits in medicated individuals with schizophrenia (n=49 patients, n=32 controls). Results Experiments 1-2 established WM and RL contributions to learning, evidenced by parametric modulations of choice by load and delay, and reward history, respectively. It also showed interactions between WM and RL, where RL was enhanced under high WM load. Moreover, we observed a cost of mental effort, controlling for reinforcement history: participants preferred stimuli they encountered under low WM load. Experiment 3 revealed selective deficits in WM contributions and preserved RL value learning in individuals with schizophrenia compared to controls. Conclusions Computational approaches allow us to disentangle contributions of multiple systems to learning and, consequently, further our understanding of psychiatric diseases.</description><subject>Psychiatry</subject><issn>0006-3223</issn><issn>1873-2402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUdtq3DAUFKGl2Vx-oegDYkdHsuV1HwIlJG0g0Ie2z-JYPl5rY0tG8u6y_Y58cL1NofRpGIaZc4Zh7COIHATo223euDClo-1zKaDKRZkvcMZWsK5UJgsh37GVEEJnSkp1zi5S2i60khI-sHO51iVU63rFXp_8TBHt7IJPvKH5QOT5IcQX5zd8pDHE4w2P5HwXoqWR_MwHwuhPMvqWU7cIM3ee73HYUdZgopbbPjhLnzhyTwc-YcTWbcY_hkQDLef2xFvqnHVzOpmT7d2vMPWRvMMr9r7DIdH1X7xkPx8fftx_zZ6_fXm6__ycEYCoM11SQ1qIWloJirApgTprRVEUqqCuRL2uuwJb1RSVBVFZUWmQ2mKna0DS6pLdveVOu2ak1i7lIg5mim7EeDQBnflf8a43m7A3ZVkpKOp_AbR8uXcUjR2cdxaHFzpS2oZd9EsBAyZJI8z30yCnPWCxa6iF-g0kJ4_F</recordid><startdate>20170531</startdate><enddate>20170531</enddate><creator>Collins, Anne GE</creator><creator>Albrecht, Matthew A</creator><creator>Waltz, James A</creator><creator>Gold, James M</creator><creator>Frank, Michael J</creator><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170531</creationdate><title>Interactions between working memory, reinforcement learning and effort in value-based choice: a new paradigm and selective deficits in schizophrenia</title><author>Collins, Anne GE ; Albrecht, Matthew A ; Waltz, James A ; Gold, James M ; Frank, Michael J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e1109-65ebe60092c213eab51efcc044434ef5a689f4ad3b47c107c076126caf691ae63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Psychiatry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Collins, Anne GE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, Matthew A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waltz, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gold, James M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, Michael J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biological psychiatry (1969)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Collins, Anne GE</au><au>Albrecht, Matthew A</au><au>Waltz, James A</au><au>Gold, James M</au><au>Frank, Michael J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interactions between working memory, reinforcement learning and effort in value-based choice: a new paradigm and selective deficits in schizophrenia</atitle><jtitle>Biological psychiatry (1969)</jtitle><date>2017-05-31</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>431</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>431-439</pages><issn>0006-3223</issn><eissn>1873-2402</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background When studying learning, researchers directly observe only the participants’ choices, which are often assumed to arise from a unitary learning process. However, a number of separable systems, such as working memory (WM) and reinforcement learning (RL), contribute simultaneously to human learning. Identifying each system’s contributions is essential for mapping the neural substrates contributing in parallel to behavior; computational modeling can help design tasks that allow such a separable identification of processes, and infer their contributions in individuals. Methods We present a new experimental protocol that separately identifies the contributions of RL and WM to learning, is sensitive to parametric variations in both, and allows us to investigate whether the processes interact. In experiments 1-2, we test this protocol with healthy young adults (n=29 and n=52). In experiment 3, we use it to investigate learning deficits in medicated individuals with schizophrenia (n=49 patients, n=32 controls). Results Experiments 1-2 established WM and RL contributions to learning, evidenced by parametric modulations of choice by load and delay, and reward history, respectively. It also showed interactions between WM and RL, where RL was enhanced under high WM load. Moreover, we observed a cost of mental effort, controlling for reinforcement history: participants preferred stimuli they encountered under low WM load. Experiment 3 revealed selective deficits in WM contributions and preserved RL value learning in individuals with schizophrenia compared to controls. Conclusions Computational approaches allow us to disentangle contributions of multiple systems to learning and, consequently, further our understanding of psychiatric diseases.</abstract><pmid>28651789</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.017</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3223
ispartof Biological psychiatry (1969), 2017-05, Vol.82 (6), p.431-439
issn 0006-3223
1873-2402
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5573149
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Psychiatry
title Interactions between working memory, reinforcement learning and effort in value-based choice: a new paradigm and selective deficits in schizophrenia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T18%3A14%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interactions%20between%20working%20memory,%20reinforcement%20learning%20and%20effort%20in%20value-based%20choice:%20a%20new%20paradigm%20and%20selective%20deficits%20in%20schizophrenia&rft.jtitle=Biological%20psychiatry%20(1969)&rft.au=Collins,%20Anne%20GE&rft.date=2017-05-31&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=431&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=431-439&rft.issn=0006-3223&rft.eissn=1873-2402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.017&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_pubme%3E1_s2_0_S0006322317316190%3C/elsevier_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/28651789&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0006322317316190&rfr_iscdi=true