Is It Worth It? Benefits in Research with Adults with Intellectual Disability

Including adults with intellectual disability in research promotes direct benefits to participants and larger societal benefits. Stakeholders may have different views of what count as benefits and their importance. We compared views on benefits in research with adults with intellectual disability am...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Intellectual and developmental disabilities 2016-12, Vol.54 (6), p.440-453
Hauptverfasser: McDonald, Katherine E, Conroy, Nicole E, Olick, Robert S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 453
container_issue 6
container_start_page 440
container_title Intellectual and developmental disabilities
container_volume 54
creator McDonald, Katherine E
Conroy, Nicole E
Olick, Robert S
description Including adults with intellectual disability in research promotes direct benefits to participants and larger societal benefits. Stakeholders may have different views of what count as benefits and their importance. We compared views on benefits in research with adults with intellectual disability among adults with intellectual disability, family and friends, service providers, researchers, and institutional review board members. We found that adults with intellectual disability value direct and indirect research benefits, and want to participate in research that offers them. Other stakeholders generally see less value in direct benefits and predict more tempered interest in research participation as compared to adults with intellectual disability. To promote respectful research participation, research policy and practice should incorporate the views of adults with intellectual disability. [This article was written with "Project ETHICS" Expert Panel, which includes Anna Carroll, Marty Cuddy, Micah Fialka-Feldman, Dan Flanigan, Pat Fratangelo, Lance Gonzalez, Michael Kennedy, Kathleen King, Chris Mansfield, Deb McGowan, Rachel Romer, Margaret Turk, Shquria Velez, Pamela Walker, and Priscilla Worral.]
doi_str_mv 10.1352/1934-9556-54.6.440
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5568891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1122201</ericid><sourcerecordid>1844608735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-768d02873a43be1d54a043c8a355a1ab84be2beda32b778d0d87ca3254e6585b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBCIQuEHkEA5cknxM3EuoPIuKkJCII6W42ypUZoU2wHx97iUVnDyeGd2vJ5F6IDgAWGCnpCC8bQQIksFH2QDzvEG2lkXN1eYF6SHdr1_w1gwlrNt1KO5LBgj2Q66H_lkFJKX1oVpBGfJOTQwscEntkkewYN2Zpp82sgOq66O9R88agLUNZjQ6Tq5tF6Xtrbhaw9tTXTtYf_37KPn66uni9t0_HAzuhiOU8MpD2meyQpTmTPNWQmkElxjzozUTAhNdCl5CbSESjNa5nnUVjI38SI4ZEKKkvXR6dJ33pUzqAw0welazZ2dafelWm3Vf6axU_XafqiYi5QFiQbHvwaufe_ABzWz3sQv6QbazisiOc9wnFBEKV1KjWu9dzBZP0OwWuxBLWJWi8iV4CpTcQ-x6ejvgOuWVfBRcLgUgLNmTV_dEUIpxYR9A4cFjRE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1844608735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is It Worth It? Benefits in Research with Adults with Intellectual Disability</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>McDonald, Katherine E ; Conroy, Nicole E ; Olick, Robert S</creator><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Katherine E ; Conroy, Nicole E ; Olick, Robert S ; Project ETHICS Expert Panel ; the Project ETHICS Expert Panel</creatorcontrib><description>Including adults with intellectual disability in research promotes direct benefits to participants and larger societal benefits. Stakeholders may have different views of what count as benefits and their importance. We compared views on benefits in research with adults with intellectual disability among adults with intellectual disability, family and friends, service providers, researchers, and institutional review board members. We found that adults with intellectual disability value direct and indirect research benefits, and want to participate in research that offers them. Other stakeholders generally see less value in direct benefits and predict more tempered interest in research participation as compared to adults with intellectual disability. To promote respectful research participation, research policy and practice should incorporate the views of adults with intellectual disability. [This article was written with "Project ETHICS" Expert Panel, which includes Anna Carroll, Marty Cuddy, Micah Fialka-Feldman, Dan Flanigan, Pat Fratangelo, Lance Gonzalez, Michael Kennedy, Kathleen King, Chris Mansfield, Deb McGowan, Rachel Romer, Margaret Turk, Shquria Velez, Pamela Walker, and Priscilla Worral.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1934-9491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-9556</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1352/1934-9556-54.6.440</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27893316</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Community Attitudes ; Community Benefits ; Community-Based Participatory Research ; Female ; Health Equity ; Health Promotion ; Humans ; Intellectual Disability ; Intellectual Disability - psychology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Participant Satisfaction ; Participation ; Participatory Research ; Patient Participation ; Quality of Life ; Research Design ; Research Utilization ; Stakeholders ; Value Judgment</subject><ispartof>Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2016-12, Vol.54 (6), p.440-453</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-768d02873a43be1d54a043c8a355a1ab84be2beda32b778d0d87ca3254e6585b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-768d02873a43be1d54a043c8a355a1ab84be2beda32b778d0d87ca3254e6585b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1122201$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27893316$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Katherine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conroy, Nicole E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olick, Robert S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Project ETHICS Expert Panel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Project ETHICS Expert Panel</creatorcontrib><title>Is It Worth It? Benefits in Research with Adults with Intellectual Disability</title><title>Intellectual and developmental disabilities</title><addtitle>Intellect Dev Disabil</addtitle><description>Including adults with intellectual disability in research promotes direct benefits to participants and larger societal benefits. Stakeholders may have different views of what count as benefits and their importance. We compared views on benefits in research with adults with intellectual disability among adults with intellectual disability, family and friends, service providers, researchers, and institutional review board members. We found that adults with intellectual disability value direct and indirect research benefits, and want to participate in research that offers them. Other stakeholders generally see less value in direct benefits and predict more tempered interest in research participation as compared to adults with intellectual disability. To promote respectful research participation, research policy and practice should incorporate the views of adults with intellectual disability. [This article was written with "Project ETHICS" Expert Panel, which includes Anna Carroll, Marty Cuddy, Micah Fialka-Feldman, Dan Flanigan, Pat Fratangelo, Lance Gonzalez, Michael Kennedy, Kathleen King, Chris Mansfield, Deb McGowan, Rachel Romer, Margaret Turk, Shquria Velez, Pamela Walker, and Priscilla Worral.]</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Community Attitudes</subject><subject>Community Benefits</subject><subject>Community-Based Participatory Research</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Equity</subject><subject>Health Promotion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Participant Satisfaction</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Participatory Research</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Research Utilization</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Value Judgment</subject><issn>1934-9491</issn><issn>1934-9556</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBCIQuEHkEA5cknxM3EuoPIuKkJCII6W42ypUZoU2wHx97iUVnDyeGd2vJ5F6IDgAWGCnpCC8bQQIksFH2QDzvEG2lkXN1eYF6SHdr1_w1gwlrNt1KO5LBgj2Q66H_lkFJKX1oVpBGfJOTQwscEntkkewYN2Zpp82sgOq66O9R88agLUNZjQ6Tq5tF6Xtrbhaw9tTXTtYf_37KPn66uni9t0_HAzuhiOU8MpD2meyQpTmTPNWQmkElxjzozUTAhNdCl5CbSESjNa5nnUVjI38SI4ZEKKkvXR6dJ33pUzqAw0welazZ2dafelWm3Vf6axU_XafqiYi5QFiQbHvwaufe_ABzWz3sQv6QbazisiOc9wnFBEKV1KjWu9dzBZP0OwWuxBLWJWi8iV4CpTcQ-x6ejvgOuWVfBRcLgUgLNmTV_dEUIpxYR9A4cFjRE</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>McDonald, Katherine E</creator><creator>Conroy, Nicole E</creator><creator>Olick, Robert S</creator><general>American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Is It Worth It? Benefits in Research with Adults with Intellectual Disability</title><author>McDonald, Katherine E ; Conroy, Nicole E ; Olick, Robert S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-768d02873a43be1d54a043c8a355a1ab84be2beda32b778d0d87ca3254e6585b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Community Attitudes</topic><topic>Community Benefits</topic><topic>Community-Based Participatory Research</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Equity</topic><topic>Health Promotion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Participant Satisfaction</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Participatory Research</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Research Utilization</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Value Judgment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Katherine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conroy, Nicole E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olick, Robert S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Project ETHICS Expert Panel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Project ETHICS Expert Panel</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Intellectual and developmental disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McDonald, Katherine E</au><au>Conroy, Nicole E</au><au>Olick, Robert S</au><aucorp>Project ETHICS Expert Panel</aucorp><aucorp>the Project ETHICS Expert Panel</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1122201</ericid><atitle>Is It Worth It? Benefits in Research with Adults with Intellectual Disability</atitle><jtitle>Intellectual and developmental disabilities</jtitle><addtitle>Intellect Dev Disabil</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>440</spage><epage>453</epage><pages>440-453</pages><issn>1934-9491</issn><eissn>1934-9556</eissn><abstract>Including adults with intellectual disability in research promotes direct benefits to participants and larger societal benefits. Stakeholders may have different views of what count as benefits and their importance. We compared views on benefits in research with adults with intellectual disability among adults with intellectual disability, family and friends, service providers, researchers, and institutional review board members. We found that adults with intellectual disability value direct and indirect research benefits, and want to participate in research that offers them. Other stakeholders generally see less value in direct benefits and predict more tempered interest in research participation as compared to adults with intellectual disability. To promote respectful research participation, research policy and practice should incorporate the views of adults with intellectual disability. [This article was written with "Project ETHICS" Expert Panel, which includes Anna Carroll, Marty Cuddy, Micah Fialka-Feldman, Dan Flanigan, Pat Fratangelo, Lance Gonzalez, Michael Kennedy, Kathleen King, Chris Mansfield, Deb McGowan, Rachel Romer, Margaret Turk, Shquria Velez, Pamela Walker, and Priscilla Worral.]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities</pub><pmid>27893316</pmid><doi>10.1352/1934-9556-54.6.440</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1934-9491
ispartof Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2016-12, Vol.54 (6), p.440-453
issn 1934-9491
1934-9556
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5568891
source MEDLINE; Education Source
subjects Adult
Adults
Attitude of Health Personnel
Community Attitudes
Community Benefits
Community-Based Participatory Research
Female
Health Equity
Health Promotion
Humans
Intellectual Disability
Intellectual Disability - psychology
Male
Middle Aged
Participant Satisfaction
Participation
Participatory Research
Patient Participation
Quality of Life
Research Design
Research Utilization
Stakeholders
Value Judgment
title Is It Worth It? Benefits in Research with Adults with Intellectual Disability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A39%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20It%20Worth%20It?%20Benefits%20in%20Research%20with%20Adults%20with%20Intellectual%20Disability&rft.jtitle=Intellectual%20and%20developmental%20disabilities&rft.au=McDonald,%20Katherine%20E&rft.aucorp=Project%20ETHICS%20Expert%20Panel&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=440&rft.epage=453&rft.pages=440-453&rft.issn=1934-9491&rft.eissn=1934-9556&rft_id=info:doi/10.1352/1934-9556-54.6.440&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1844608735%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1844608735&rft_id=info:pmid/27893316&rft_ericid=EJ1122201&rfr_iscdi=true