Depth of Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Three PETHEMA/GEM Clinical Trials
Purpose To perform a critical analysis on the impact of depth of response in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods Data were analyzed from 609 patients who were enrolled in the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma) 2000 and GEM2005MENOS65 studies for transplant-eligible MM and the GEM...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical oncology 2017-09, Vol.35 (25), p.2900-2910 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2910 |
---|---|
container_issue | 25 |
container_start_page | 2900 |
container_title | Journal of clinical oncology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Lahuerta, Juan-Jose Paiva, Bruno Vidriales, Maria-Belen Cordón, Lourdes Cedena, Maria-Teresa Puig, Noemi Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin Rosiñol, Laura Gutierrez, Norma C Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa Oriol, Albert Teruel, Ana-Isabel Echeveste, María-Asunción de Paz, Raquel de Arriba, Felipe Hernandez, Miguel T Palomera, Luis Martinez, Rafael Martin, Alejandro Alegre, Adrian De la Rubia, Javier Orfao, Alberto Mateos, María-Victoria Blade, Joan San-Miguel, Jesus F |
description | Purpose To perform a critical analysis on the impact of depth of response in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods Data were analyzed from 609 patients who were enrolled in the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma) 2000 and GEM2005MENOS65 studies for transplant-eligible MM and the GEM2010MAS65 clinical trial for elderly patients with MM who had minimal residual disease (MRD) assessments 9 months after study enrollment. Median follow-up of the series was 71 months. Results Achievement of complete remission (CR) in the absence of MRD negativity was not associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with near-CR or partial response (median PFS, 27, 27, and 29 months, respectively; median OS, 59, 64, and 65 months, respectively). MRD-negative status was strongly associated with prolonged PFS (median, 63 months; P < .001) and OS (median not reached; P < .001) overall and in subgroups defined by prior transplantation, disease stage, and cytogenetics, with prognostic superiority of MRD negativity versus CR particularly evident in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. Accordingly, Harrell C statistics showed higher discrimination for both PFS and OS in Cox models that included MRD (as opposed to CR) for response assessment. Superior MRD-negative rates after different induction regimens anticipated prolonged PFS. Among 34 MRD-negative patients with MM and a phenotypic pattern of bone marrow involvement similar to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance at diagnosis, the probability of "operational cure" was high; median PFS was 12 years, and the 10-year OS rate was 94%. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that MRD-negative status surpasses the prognostic value of CR achievement for PFS and OS across the disease spectrum, regardless of the type of treatment or patient risk group. MRD negativity should be considered as one of the most relevant end points for transplant-eligible and elderly fit patients with MM. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.2517 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5568033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1899113119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-6dc0d0b72501929e84889aabaa9a895fa8d152626d400d490f6d62f8b6bcef5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1P4zAQxa0Vq6XA3jkhH7mkHTuxY3NAqkqBXVGBUJH2giwnmVAjNw5xitT_nlR8aDm9w7z3ZkY_Qo4ZjBkHmPyd3Y45MDmWeswFy3-QERM8T_JciD0ygjzlCVPpv31yEOMzAMtUKn6Rfa4yrXKVjcjjBbb9ioaa3mNsQxORuoYuNr53rUe62KIPa3tGp_QuBI8VnTbWb6OLu8hy1SHSu_nyer6YTq7mCzrzrnGl9XTZOevjEflZD4K_P_SQPFzOl7Pr5Ob26s9sepOUAnSfyKqECoqcC2Caa1SZUtrawlptlRa1VdXwluSyygCqTEMtK8lrVciixFpgekjO33vbTbHGqsSm76w3befWttuaYJ35PmncyjyFVyOEVJCmQ8HpR0EXXjYYe7N2sUTvbYNhEw1TWjOWMqYHK7xbyy7E2GH9tYaB2VExAxWzo2KkNjsqQ-Tk__O-Ap8Y0jdJv4f0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1899113119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Depth of Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Three PETHEMA/GEM Clinical Trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Lahuerta, Juan-Jose ; Paiva, Bruno ; Vidriales, Maria-Belen ; Cordón, Lourdes ; Cedena, Maria-Teresa ; Puig, Noemi ; Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin ; Rosiñol, Laura ; Gutierrez, Norma C ; Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa ; Oriol, Albert ; Teruel, Ana-Isabel ; Echeveste, María-Asunción ; de Paz, Raquel ; de Arriba, Felipe ; Hernandez, Miguel T ; Palomera, Luis ; Martinez, Rafael ; Martin, Alejandro ; Alegre, Adrian ; De la Rubia, Javier ; Orfao, Alberto ; Mateos, María-Victoria ; Blade, Joan ; San-Miguel, Jesus F</creator><creatorcontrib>Lahuerta, Juan-Jose ; Paiva, Bruno ; Vidriales, Maria-Belen ; Cordón, Lourdes ; Cedena, Maria-Teresa ; Puig, Noemi ; Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin ; Rosiñol, Laura ; Gutierrez, Norma C ; Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa ; Oriol, Albert ; Teruel, Ana-Isabel ; Echeveste, María-Asunción ; de Paz, Raquel ; de Arriba, Felipe ; Hernandez, Miguel T ; Palomera, Luis ; Martinez, Rafael ; Martin, Alejandro ; Alegre, Adrian ; De la Rubia, Javier ; Orfao, Alberto ; Mateos, María-Victoria ; Blade, Joan ; San-Miguel, Jesus F ; GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Group ; on behalf of the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To perform a critical analysis on the impact of depth of response in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods Data were analyzed from 609 patients who were enrolled in the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma) 2000 and GEM2005MENOS65 studies for transplant-eligible MM and the GEM2010MAS65 clinical trial for elderly patients with MM who had minimal residual disease (MRD) assessments 9 months after study enrollment. Median follow-up of the series was 71 months. Results Achievement of complete remission (CR) in the absence of MRD negativity was not associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with near-CR or partial response (median PFS, 27, 27, and 29 months, respectively; median OS, 59, 64, and 65 months, respectively). MRD-negative status was strongly associated with prolonged PFS (median, 63 months; P < .001) and OS (median not reached; P < .001) overall and in subgroups defined by prior transplantation, disease stage, and cytogenetics, with prognostic superiority of MRD negativity versus CR particularly evident in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. Accordingly, Harrell C statistics showed higher discrimination for both PFS and OS in Cox models that included MRD (as opposed to CR) for response assessment. Superior MRD-negative rates after different induction regimens anticipated prolonged PFS. Among 34 MRD-negative patients with MM and a phenotypic pattern of bone marrow involvement similar to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance at diagnosis, the probability of "operational cure" was high; median PFS was 12 years, and the 10-year OS rate was 94%. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that MRD-negative status surpasses the prognostic value of CR achievement for PFS and OS across the disease spectrum, regardless of the type of treatment or patient risk group. MRD negativity should be considered as one of the most relevant end points for transplant-eligible and elderly fit patients with MM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.2517</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28498784</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Clinical Trials as Topic - methods ; Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Multiple Myeloma - pathology ; Multiple Myeloma - therapy ; Neoplasm, Residual ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Stem Cell Transplantation - methods ; Stem Cell Transplantation - statistics & numerical data ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2017-09, Vol.35 (25), p.2900-2910</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-6dc0d0b72501929e84889aabaa9a895fa8d152626d400d490f6d62f8b6bcef5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-6dc0d0b72501929e84889aabaa9a895fa8d152626d400d490f6d62f8b6bcef5e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3716,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28498784$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lahuerta, Juan-Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paiva, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidriales, Maria-Belen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordón, Lourdes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cedena, Maria-Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puig, Noemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosiñol, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Norma C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oriol, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teruel, Ana-Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echeveste, María-Asunción</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Paz, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Arriba, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Miguel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomera, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alegre, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De la Rubia, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orfao, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateos, María-Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blade, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San-Miguel, Jesus F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Depth of Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Three PETHEMA/GEM Clinical Trials</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Purpose To perform a critical analysis on the impact of depth of response in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods Data were analyzed from 609 patients who were enrolled in the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma) 2000 and GEM2005MENOS65 studies for transplant-eligible MM and the GEM2010MAS65 clinical trial for elderly patients with MM who had minimal residual disease (MRD) assessments 9 months after study enrollment. Median follow-up of the series was 71 months. Results Achievement of complete remission (CR) in the absence of MRD negativity was not associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with near-CR or partial response (median PFS, 27, 27, and 29 months, respectively; median OS, 59, 64, and 65 months, respectively). MRD-negative status was strongly associated with prolonged PFS (median, 63 months; P < .001) and OS (median not reached; P < .001) overall and in subgroups defined by prior transplantation, disease stage, and cytogenetics, with prognostic superiority of MRD negativity versus CR particularly evident in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. Accordingly, Harrell C statistics showed higher discrimination for both PFS and OS in Cox models that included MRD (as opposed to CR) for response assessment. Superior MRD-negative rates after different induction regimens anticipated prolonged PFS. Among 34 MRD-negative patients with MM and a phenotypic pattern of bone marrow involvement similar to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance at diagnosis, the probability of "operational cure" was high; median PFS was 12 years, and the 10-year OS rate was 94%. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that MRD-negative status surpasses the prognostic value of CR achievement for PFS and OS across the disease spectrum, regardless of the type of treatment or patient risk group. MRD negativity should be considered as one of the most relevant end points for transplant-eligible and elderly fit patients with MM.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - pathology</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Stem Cell Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Stem Cell Transplantation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1P4zAQxa0Vq6XA3jkhH7mkHTuxY3NAqkqBXVGBUJH2giwnmVAjNw5xitT_nlR8aDm9w7z3ZkY_Qo4ZjBkHmPyd3Y45MDmWeswFy3-QERM8T_JciD0ygjzlCVPpv31yEOMzAMtUKn6Rfa4yrXKVjcjjBbb9ioaa3mNsQxORuoYuNr53rUe62KIPa3tGp_QuBI8VnTbWb6OLu8hy1SHSu_nyer6YTq7mCzrzrnGl9XTZOevjEflZD4K_P_SQPFzOl7Pr5Ob26s9sepOUAnSfyKqECoqcC2Caa1SZUtrawlptlRa1VdXwluSyygCqTEMtK8lrVciixFpgekjO33vbTbHGqsSm76w3befWttuaYJ35PmncyjyFVyOEVJCmQ8HpR0EXXjYYe7N2sUTvbYNhEw1TWjOWMqYHK7xbyy7E2GH9tYaB2VExAxWzo2KkNjsqQ-Tk__O-Ap8Y0jdJv4f0</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Lahuerta, Juan-Jose</creator><creator>Paiva, Bruno</creator><creator>Vidriales, Maria-Belen</creator><creator>Cordón, Lourdes</creator><creator>Cedena, Maria-Teresa</creator><creator>Puig, Noemi</creator><creator>Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin</creator><creator>Rosiñol, Laura</creator><creator>Gutierrez, Norma C</creator><creator>Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa</creator><creator>Oriol, Albert</creator><creator>Teruel, Ana-Isabel</creator><creator>Echeveste, María-Asunción</creator><creator>de Paz, Raquel</creator><creator>de Arriba, Felipe</creator><creator>Hernandez, Miguel T</creator><creator>Palomera, Luis</creator><creator>Martinez, Rafael</creator><creator>Martin, Alejandro</creator><creator>Alegre, Adrian</creator><creator>De la Rubia, Javier</creator><creator>Orfao, Alberto</creator><creator>Mateos, María-Victoria</creator><creator>Blade, Joan</creator><creator>San-Miguel, Jesus F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Depth of Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Three PETHEMA/GEM Clinical Trials</title><author>Lahuerta, Juan-Jose ; Paiva, Bruno ; Vidriales, Maria-Belen ; Cordón, Lourdes ; Cedena, Maria-Teresa ; Puig, Noemi ; Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin ; Rosiñol, Laura ; Gutierrez, Norma C ; Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa ; Oriol, Albert ; Teruel, Ana-Isabel ; Echeveste, María-Asunción ; de Paz, Raquel ; de Arriba, Felipe ; Hernandez, Miguel T ; Palomera, Luis ; Martinez, Rafael ; Martin, Alejandro ; Alegre, Adrian ; De la Rubia, Javier ; Orfao, Alberto ; Mateos, María-Victoria ; Blade, Joan ; San-Miguel, Jesus F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-6dc0d0b72501929e84889aabaa9a895fa8d152626d400d490f6d62f8b6bcef5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - pathology</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Stem Cell Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Stem Cell Transplantation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lahuerta, Juan-Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paiva, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidriales, Maria-Belen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordón, Lourdes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cedena, Maria-Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puig, Noemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosiñol, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Norma C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oriol, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teruel, Ana-Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echeveste, María-Asunción</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Paz, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Arriba, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Miguel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomera, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alegre, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De la Rubia, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orfao, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateos, María-Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blade, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San-Miguel, Jesus F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lahuerta, Juan-Jose</au><au>Paiva, Bruno</au><au>Vidriales, Maria-Belen</au><au>Cordón, Lourdes</au><au>Cedena, Maria-Teresa</au><au>Puig, Noemi</au><au>Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin</au><au>Rosiñol, Laura</au><au>Gutierrez, Norma C</au><au>Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa</au><au>Oriol, Albert</au><au>Teruel, Ana-Isabel</au><au>Echeveste, María-Asunción</au><au>de Paz, Raquel</au><au>de Arriba, Felipe</au><au>Hernandez, Miguel T</au><au>Palomera, Luis</au><au>Martinez, Rafael</au><au>Martin, Alejandro</au><au>Alegre, Adrian</au><au>De la Rubia, Javier</au><au>Orfao, Alberto</au><au>Mateos, María-Victoria</au><au>Blade, Joan</au><au>San-Miguel, Jesus F</au><aucorp>GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf of the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Depth of Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Three PETHEMA/GEM Clinical Trials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>25</issue><spage>2900</spage><epage>2910</epage><pages>2900-2910</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Purpose To perform a critical analysis on the impact of depth of response in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods Data were analyzed from 609 patients who were enrolled in the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma) 2000 and GEM2005MENOS65 studies for transplant-eligible MM and the GEM2010MAS65 clinical trial for elderly patients with MM who had minimal residual disease (MRD) assessments 9 months after study enrollment. Median follow-up of the series was 71 months. Results Achievement of complete remission (CR) in the absence of MRD negativity was not associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with near-CR or partial response (median PFS, 27, 27, and 29 months, respectively; median OS, 59, 64, and 65 months, respectively). MRD-negative status was strongly associated with prolonged PFS (median, 63 months; P < .001) and OS (median not reached; P < .001) overall and in subgroups defined by prior transplantation, disease stage, and cytogenetics, with prognostic superiority of MRD negativity versus CR particularly evident in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. Accordingly, Harrell C statistics showed higher discrimination for both PFS and OS in Cox models that included MRD (as opposed to CR) for response assessment. Superior MRD-negative rates after different induction regimens anticipated prolonged PFS. Among 34 MRD-negative patients with MM and a phenotypic pattern of bone marrow involvement similar to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance at diagnosis, the probability of "operational cure" was high; median PFS was 12 years, and the 10-year OS rate was 94%. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that MRD-negative status surpasses the prognostic value of CR achievement for PFS and OS across the disease spectrum, regardless of the type of treatment or patient risk group. MRD negativity should be considered as one of the most relevant end points for transplant-eligible and elderly fit patients with MM.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>28498784</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2016.69.2517</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0732-183X |
ispartof | Journal of clinical oncology, 2017-09, Vol.35 (25), p.2900-2910 |
issn | 0732-183X 1527-7755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5568033 |
source | MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Age Factors Aged Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Clinical Trials as Topic - methods Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data Disease-Free Survival Humans Multiple Myeloma - pathology Multiple Myeloma - therapy Neoplasm, Residual Proportional Hazards Models Stem Cell Transplantation - methods Stem Cell Transplantation - statistics & numerical data Survival Rate Treatment Outcome |
title | Depth of Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Three PETHEMA/GEM Clinical Trials |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T11%3A04%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Depth%20of%20Response%20in%20Multiple%20Myeloma:%20A%20Pooled%20Analysis%20of%20Three%20PETHEMA/GEM%20Clinical%20Trials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Lahuerta,%20Juan-Jose&rft.aucorp=GEM%20(Grupo%20Espa%C3%B1ol%20de%20Mieloma)/PETHEMA%20(Programa%20para%20el%20Estudio%20de%20la%20Terap%C3%A9utica%20en%20Hemopat%C3%ADas%20Malignas)%20Cooperative%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=25&rft.spage=2900&rft.epage=2910&rft.pages=2900-2910&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2016.69.2517&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1899113119%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1899113119&rft_id=info:pmid/28498784&rfr_iscdi=true |