Depth of Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Three PETHEMA/GEM Clinical Trials

Purpose To perform a critical analysis on the impact of depth of response in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods Data were analyzed from 609 patients who were enrolled in the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma) 2000 and GEM2005MENOS65 studies for transplant-eligible MM and the GEM...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 2017-09, Vol.35 (25), p.2900-2910
Hauptverfasser: Lahuerta, Juan-Jose, Paiva, Bruno, Vidriales, Maria-Belen, Cordón, Lourdes, Cedena, Maria-Teresa, Puig, Noemi, Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin, Rosiñol, Laura, Gutierrez, Norma C, Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa, Oriol, Albert, Teruel, Ana-Isabel, Echeveste, María-Asunción, de Paz, Raquel, de Arriba, Felipe, Hernandez, Miguel T, Palomera, Luis, Martinez, Rafael, Martin, Alejandro, Alegre, Adrian, De la Rubia, Javier, Orfao, Alberto, Mateos, María-Victoria, Blade, Joan, San-Miguel, Jesus F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2910
container_issue 25
container_start_page 2900
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 35
creator Lahuerta, Juan-Jose
Paiva, Bruno
Vidriales, Maria-Belen
Cordón, Lourdes
Cedena, Maria-Teresa
Puig, Noemi
Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin
Rosiñol, Laura
Gutierrez, Norma C
Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa
Oriol, Albert
Teruel, Ana-Isabel
Echeveste, María-Asunción
de Paz, Raquel
de Arriba, Felipe
Hernandez, Miguel T
Palomera, Luis
Martinez, Rafael
Martin, Alejandro
Alegre, Adrian
De la Rubia, Javier
Orfao, Alberto
Mateos, María-Victoria
Blade, Joan
San-Miguel, Jesus F
description Purpose To perform a critical analysis on the impact of depth of response in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods Data were analyzed from 609 patients who were enrolled in the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma) 2000 and GEM2005MENOS65 studies for transplant-eligible MM and the GEM2010MAS65 clinical trial for elderly patients with MM who had minimal residual disease (MRD) assessments 9 months after study enrollment. Median follow-up of the series was 71 months. Results Achievement of complete remission (CR) in the absence of MRD negativity was not associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with near-CR or partial response (median PFS, 27, 27, and 29 months, respectively; median OS, 59, 64, and 65 months, respectively). MRD-negative status was strongly associated with prolonged PFS (median, 63 months; P < .001) and OS (median not reached; P < .001) overall and in subgroups defined by prior transplantation, disease stage, and cytogenetics, with prognostic superiority of MRD negativity versus CR particularly evident in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. Accordingly, Harrell C statistics showed higher discrimination for both PFS and OS in Cox models that included MRD (as opposed to CR) for response assessment. Superior MRD-negative rates after different induction regimens anticipated prolonged PFS. Among 34 MRD-negative patients with MM and a phenotypic pattern of bone marrow involvement similar to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance at diagnosis, the probability of "operational cure" was high; median PFS was 12 years, and the 10-year OS rate was 94%. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that MRD-negative status surpasses the prognostic value of CR achievement for PFS and OS across the disease spectrum, regardless of the type of treatment or patient risk group. MRD negativity should be considered as one of the most relevant end points for transplant-eligible and elderly fit patients with MM.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.2517
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5568033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1899113119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-6dc0d0b72501929e84889aabaa9a895fa8d152626d400d490f6d62f8b6bcef5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1P4zAQxa0Vq6XA3jkhH7mkHTuxY3NAqkqBXVGBUJH2giwnmVAjNw5xitT_nlR8aDm9w7z3ZkY_Qo4ZjBkHmPyd3Y45MDmWeswFy3-QERM8T_JciD0ygjzlCVPpv31yEOMzAMtUKn6Rfa4yrXKVjcjjBbb9ioaa3mNsQxORuoYuNr53rUe62KIPa3tGp_QuBI8VnTbWb6OLu8hy1SHSu_nyer6YTq7mCzrzrnGl9XTZOevjEflZD4K_P_SQPFzOl7Pr5Ob26s9sepOUAnSfyKqECoqcC2Caa1SZUtrawlptlRa1VdXwluSyygCqTEMtK8lrVciixFpgekjO33vbTbHGqsSm76w3befWttuaYJ35PmncyjyFVyOEVJCmQ8HpR0EXXjYYe7N2sUTvbYNhEw1TWjOWMqYHK7xbyy7E2GH9tYaB2VExAxWzo2KkNjsqQ-Tk__O-Ap8Y0jdJv4f0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1899113119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Depth of Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Three PETHEMA/GEM Clinical Trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Lahuerta, Juan-Jose ; Paiva, Bruno ; Vidriales, Maria-Belen ; Cordón, Lourdes ; Cedena, Maria-Teresa ; Puig, Noemi ; Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin ; Rosiñol, Laura ; Gutierrez, Norma C ; Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa ; Oriol, Albert ; Teruel, Ana-Isabel ; Echeveste, María-Asunción ; de Paz, Raquel ; de Arriba, Felipe ; Hernandez, Miguel T ; Palomera, Luis ; Martinez, Rafael ; Martin, Alejandro ; Alegre, Adrian ; De la Rubia, Javier ; Orfao, Alberto ; Mateos, María-Victoria ; Blade, Joan ; San-Miguel, Jesus F</creator><creatorcontrib>Lahuerta, Juan-Jose ; Paiva, Bruno ; Vidriales, Maria-Belen ; Cordón, Lourdes ; Cedena, Maria-Teresa ; Puig, Noemi ; Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin ; Rosiñol, Laura ; Gutierrez, Norma C ; Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa ; Oriol, Albert ; Teruel, Ana-Isabel ; Echeveste, María-Asunción ; de Paz, Raquel ; de Arriba, Felipe ; Hernandez, Miguel T ; Palomera, Luis ; Martinez, Rafael ; Martin, Alejandro ; Alegre, Adrian ; De la Rubia, Javier ; Orfao, Alberto ; Mateos, María-Victoria ; Blade, Joan ; San-Miguel, Jesus F ; GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Group ; on behalf of the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To perform a critical analysis on the impact of depth of response in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods Data were analyzed from 609 patients who were enrolled in the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma) 2000 and GEM2005MENOS65 studies for transplant-eligible MM and the GEM2010MAS65 clinical trial for elderly patients with MM who had minimal residual disease (MRD) assessments 9 months after study enrollment. Median follow-up of the series was 71 months. Results Achievement of complete remission (CR) in the absence of MRD negativity was not associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with near-CR or partial response (median PFS, 27, 27, and 29 months, respectively; median OS, 59, 64, and 65 months, respectively). MRD-negative status was strongly associated with prolonged PFS (median, 63 months; P &lt; .001) and OS (median not reached; P &lt; .001) overall and in subgroups defined by prior transplantation, disease stage, and cytogenetics, with prognostic superiority of MRD negativity versus CR particularly evident in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. Accordingly, Harrell C statistics showed higher discrimination for both PFS and OS in Cox models that included MRD (as opposed to CR) for response assessment. Superior MRD-negative rates after different induction regimens anticipated prolonged PFS. Among 34 MRD-negative patients with MM and a phenotypic pattern of bone marrow involvement similar to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance at diagnosis, the probability of "operational cure" was high; median PFS was 12 years, and the 10-year OS rate was 94%. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that MRD-negative status surpasses the prognostic value of CR achievement for PFS and OS across the disease spectrum, regardless of the type of treatment or patient risk group. MRD negativity should be considered as one of the most relevant end points for transplant-eligible and elderly fit patients with MM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.2517</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28498784</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Clinical Trials as Topic - methods ; Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Multiple Myeloma - pathology ; Multiple Myeloma - therapy ; Neoplasm, Residual ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Stem Cell Transplantation - methods ; Stem Cell Transplantation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2017-09, Vol.35 (25), p.2900-2910</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-6dc0d0b72501929e84889aabaa9a895fa8d152626d400d490f6d62f8b6bcef5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-6dc0d0b72501929e84889aabaa9a895fa8d152626d400d490f6d62f8b6bcef5e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3716,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28498784$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lahuerta, Juan-Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paiva, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidriales, Maria-Belen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordón, Lourdes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cedena, Maria-Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puig, Noemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosiñol, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Norma C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oriol, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teruel, Ana-Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echeveste, María-Asunción</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Paz, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Arriba, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Miguel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomera, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alegre, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De la Rubia, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orfao, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateos, María-Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blade, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San-Miguel, Jesus F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Depth of Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Three PETHEMA/GEM Clinical Trials</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Purpose To perform a critical analysis on the impact of depth of response in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods Data were analyzed from 609 patients who were enrolled in the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma) 2000 and GEM2005MENOS65 studies for transplant-eligible MM and the GEM2010MAS65 clinical trial for elderly patients with MM who had minimal residual disease (MRD) assessments 9 months after study enrollment. Median follow-up of the series was 71 months. Results Achievement of complete remission (CR) in the absence of MRD negativity was not associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with near-CR or partial response (median PFS, 27, 27, and 29 months, respectively; median OS, 59, 64, and 65 months, respectively). MRD-negative status was strongly associated with prolonged PFS (median, 63 months; P &lt; .001) and OS (median not reached; P &lt; .001) overall and in subgroups defined by prior transplantation, disease stage, and cytogenetics, with prognostic superiority of MRD negativity versus CR particularly evident in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. Accordingly, Harrell C statistics showed higher discrimination for both PFS and OS in Cox models that included MRD (as opposed to CR) for response assessment. Superior MRD-negative rates after different induction regimens anticipated prolonged PFS. Among 34 MRD-negative patients with MM and a phenotypic pattern of bone marrow involvement similar to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance at diagnosis, the probability of "operational cure" was high; median PFS was 12 years, and the 10-year OS rate was 94%. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that MRD-negative status surpasses the prognostic value of CR achievement for PFS and OS across the disease spectrum, regardless of the type of treatment or patient risk group. MRD negativity should be considered as one of the most relevant end points for transplant-eligible and elderly fit patients with MM.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - pathology</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Stem Cell Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Stem Cell Transplantation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1P4zAQxa0Vq6XA3jkhH7mkHTuxY3NAqkqBXVGBUJH2giwnmVAjNw5xitT_nlR8aDm9w7z3ZkY_Qo4ZjBkHmPyd3Y45MDmWeswFy3-QERM8T_JciD0ygjzlCVPpv31yEOMzAMtUKn6Rfa4yrXKVjcjjBbb9ioaa3mNsQxORuoYuNr53rUe62KIPa3tGp_QuBI8VnTbWb6OLu8hy1SHSu_nyer6YTq7mCzrzrnGl9XTZOevjEflZD4K_P_SQPFzOl7Pr5Ob26s9sepOUAnSfyKqECoqcC2Caa1SZUtrawlptlRa1VdXwluSyygCqTEMtK8lrVciixFpgekjO33vbTbHGqsSm76w3befWttuaYJ35PmncyjyFVyOEVJCmQ8HpR0EXXjYYe7N2sUTvbYNhEw1TWjOWMqYHK7xbyy7E2GH9tYaB2VExAxWzo2KkNjsqQ-Tk__O-Ap8Y0jdJv4f0</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Lahuerta, Juan-Jose</creator><creator>Paiva, Bruno</creator><creator>Vidriales, Maria-Belen</creator><creator>Cordón, Lourdes</creator><creator>Cedena, Maria-Teresa</creator><creator>Puig, Noemi</creator><creator>Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin</creator><creator>Rosiñol, Laura</creator><creator>Gutierrez, Norma C</creator><creator>Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa</creator><creator>Oriol, Albert</creator><creator>Teruel, Ana-Isabel</creator><creator>Echeveste, María-Asunción</creator><creator>de Paz, Raquel</creator><creator>de Arriba, Felipe</creator><creator>Hernandez, Miguel T</creator><creator>Palomera, Luis</creator><creator>Martinez, Rafael</creator><creator>Martin, Alejandro</creator><creator>Alegre, Adrian</creator><creator>De la Rubia, Javier</creator><creator>Orfao, Alberto</creator><creator>Mateos, María-Victoria</creator><creator>Blade, Joan</creator><creator>San-Miguel, Jesus F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Depth of Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Three PETHEMA/GEM Clinical Trials</title><author>Lahuerta, Juan-Jose ; Paiva, Bruno ; Vidriales, Maria-Belen ; Cordón, Lourdes ; Cedena, Maria-Teresa ; Puig, Noemi ; Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin ; Rosiñol, Laura ; Gutierrez, Norma C ; Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa ; Oriol, Albert ; Teruel, Ana-Isabel ; Echeveste, María-Asunción ; de Paz, Raquel ; de Arriba, Felipe ; Hernandez, Miguel T ; Palomera, Luis ; Martinez, Rafael ; Martin, Alejandro ; Alegre, Adrian ; De la Rubia, Javier ; Orfao, Alberto ; Mateos, María-Victoria ; Blade, Joan ; San-Miguel, Jesus F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-6dc0d0b72501929e84889aabaa9a895fa8d152626d400d490f6d62f8b6bcef5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - pathology</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Stem Cell Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Stem Cell Transplantation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lahuerta, Juan-Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paiva, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidriales, Maria-Belen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordón, Lourdes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cedena, Maria-Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puig, Noemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosiñol, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Norma C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oriol, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teruel, Ana-Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echeveste, María-Asunción</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Paz, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Arriba, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Miguel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomera, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alegre, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De la Rubia, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orfao, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateos, María-Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blade, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San-Miguel, Jesus F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lahuerta, Juan-Jose</au><au>Paiva, Bruno</au><au>Vidriales, Maria-Belen</au><au>Cordón, Lourdes</au><au>Cedena, Maria-Teresa</au><au>Puig, Noemi</au><au>Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin</au><au>Rosiñol, Laura</au><au>Gutierrez, Norma C</au><au>Martín-Ramos, María-Luisa</au><au>Oriol, Albert</au><au>Teruel, Ana-Isabel</au><au>Echeveste, María-Asunción</au><au>de Paz, Raquel</au><au>de Arriba, Felipe</au><au>Hernandez, Miguel T</au><au>Palomera, Luis</au><au>Martinez, Rafael</au><au>Martin, Alejandro</au><au>Alegre, Adrian</au><au>De la Rubia, Javier</au><au>Orfao, Alberto</au><au>Mateos, María-Victoria</au><au>Blade, Joan</au><au>San-Miguel, Jesus F</au><aucorp>GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf of the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapéutica en Hemopatías Malignas) Cooperative Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Depth of Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Three PETHEMA/GEM Clinical Trials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>25</issue><spage>2900</spage><epage>2910</epage><pages>2900-2910</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Purpose To perform a critical analysis on the impact of depth of response in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods Data were analyzed from 609 patients who were enrolled in the GEM (Grupo Español de Mieloma) 2000 and GEM2005MENOS65 studies for transplant-eligible MM and the GEM2010MAS65 clinical trial for elderly patients with MM who had minimal residual disease (MRD) assessments 9 months after study enrollment. Median follow-up of the series was 71 months. Results Achievement of complete remission (CR) in the absence of MRD negativity was not associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with near-CR or partial response (median PFS, 27, 27, and 29 months, respectively; median OS, 59, 64, and 65 months, respectively). MRD-negative status was strongly associated with prolonged PFS (median, 63 months; P &lt; .001) and OS (median not reached; P &lt; .001) overall and in subgroups defined by prior transplantation, disease stage, and cytogenetics, with prognostic superiority of MRD negativity versus CR particularly evident in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. Accordingly, Harrell C statistics showed higher discrimination for both PFS and OS in Cox models that included MRD (as opposed to CR) for response assessment. Superior MRD-negative rates after different induction regimens anticipated prolonged PFS. Among 34 MRD-negative patients with MM and a phenotypic pattern of bone marrow involvement similar to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance at diagnosis, the probability of "operational cure" was high; median PFS was 12 years, and the 10-year OS rate was 94%. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that MRD-negative status surpasses the prognostic value of CR achievement for PFS and OS across the disease spectrum, regardless of the type of treatment or patient risk group. MRD negativity should be considered as one of the most relevant end points for transplant-eligible and elderly fit patients with MM.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>28498784</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2016.69.2517</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 2017-09, Vol.35 (25), p.2900-2910
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5568033
source MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Age Factors
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Clinical Trials as Topic - methods
Clinical Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data
Disease-Free Survival
Humans
Multiple Myeloma - pathology
Multiple Myeloma - therapy
Neoplasm, Residual
Proportional Hazards Models
Stem Cell Transplantation - methods
Stem Cell Transplantation - statistics & numerical data
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
title Depth of Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Three PETHEMA/GEM Clinical Trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T11%3A04%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Depth%20of%20Response%20in%20Multiple%20Myeloma:%20A%20Pooled%20Analysis%20of%20Three%20PETHEMA/GEM%20Clinical%20Trials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Lahuerta,%20Juan-Jose&rft.aucorp=GEM%20(Grupo%20Espa%C3%B1ol%20de%20Mieloma)/PETHEMA%20(Programa%20para%20el%20Estudio%20de%20la%20Terap%C3%A9utica%20en%20Hemopat%C3%ADas%20Malignas)%20Cooperative%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=25&rft.spage=2900&rft.epage=2910&rft.pages=2900-2910&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2016.69.2517&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1899113119%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1899113119&rft_id=info:pmid/28498784&rfr_iscdi=true