Obesity Prevention in Early Child Care Settings: A Bistate (Minnesota and Wisconsin) Assessment of Best Practices, Implementation Difficulty, and Barriers

Background. Long-term evaluation studies reveal that high-quality early care and education (ECE) programs that include a lifestyle component predict later adult health outcomes. The purpose of this article is to characterize the nutrition and physical activity (PA) practices, including implementatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health education & behavior 2017-02, Vol.44 (1), p.23-31
Hauptverfasser: Nanney, Marilyn S., LaRowe, Tara L., Davey, Cynthia, Frost, Natasha, Arcan, Chrisa, O’Meara, Joyce
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 31
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23
container_title Health education & behavior
container_volume 44
creator Nanney, Marilyn S.
LaRowe, Tara L.
Davey, Cynthia
Frost, Natasha
Arcan, Chrisa
O’Meara, Joyce
description Background. Long-term evaluation studies reveal that high-quality early care and education (ECE) programs that include a lifestyle component predict later adult health outcomes. The purpose of this article is to characterize the nutrition and physical activity (PA) practices, including implementation difficulty and barriers, of licensed center- and family home-based ECE programs serving 2- to 5-year-old children in Minnesota (MN) and Wisconsin (WI). Method. A stratified random sampling procedure was used to select representative cross sections of licensed ECE providers in MN and WI. A total of 2,000 providers (1,000 center-based, 1,000 family home-based) were randomly selected and invited to respond to a 97-item survey with questions representing (1) nutrition and PA practices, (2) barriers to meeting nutrition and PA best practices, and (3) written and implemented nutrition and PA policies. Summated scales were constructed for nutrition-related (range 0-15; Cronbach’s α = .86) and for PA-related best practices (range 0-10; Cronbach’s α = .82). Results. A total of 823 providers returned surveys between August 2010 and March 2011, resulting in a 44% bistate participation rate. Across all programs an average (SD) of 7.0 (4.1) nutrition best practices were already implemented. Center-based providers reported on average 0.8 additional nutrition best practice (7.4 vs. 6.6, p = .01). Across all programs an average (SD) of 5.2 (3.1) PA best practices were already implemented. Center-based providers reported on average one more PA best practice (5.3 vs. 4.3, p < .01). The cost of healthy food and the weather were identified as barriers by 80% of providers, regardless of program type.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1090198116643912
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5563467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1129010</ericid><jstor_id>48588851</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1090198116643912</sage_id><sourcerecordid>48588851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5f7faded39c9536c2f4c9ef27464f0d9a795f4b4afbf70a59b05b657a6c8232e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouq7evQgFz3Uz-WwugpT1C2EF9RzSNlmz1FaTrrD_3khlUS-eMuR555lhEDoBfA4g5QywwqAKACEYVUB20AQ4J7kAIndTnXD-xQ_QYYwrjLFQmO-jAyLTL6dsgmaLykY_bLKHYD9sN_i-y3yXzU1oN1n54tsmK02w2aMdBt8t4xHac6aN9vj7naLnq_lTeZPfL65vy8v7vKYChpw76UxjG6pqxamoiWO1so5IJpjDjTJScccqZlzlJDZcVZhXgksj6oJQYukUXYzet3X1aps6rRZMq9-CfzVho3vj9W_S-Re97D8054IyIZPg7FsQ-ve1jYNe9evQpZ01KJAMhFI0pfCYqkMfY7BuOwGw_jqx_nvi1HI6ttjg6218fgdAUhInno88mqX9MfRf3yoOfdgKWcGLouBAPwEINYwl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1917416993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Obesity Prevention in Early Child Care Settings: A Bistate (Minnesota and Wisconsin) Assessment of Best Practices, Implementation Difficulty, and Barriers</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nanney, Marilyn S. ; LaRowe, Tara L. ; Davey, Cynthia ; Frost, Natasha ; Arcan, Chrisa ; O’Meara, Joyce</creator><creatorcontrib>Nanney, Marilyn S. ; LaRowe, Tara L. ; Davey, Cynthia ; Frost, Natasha ; Arcan, Chrisa ; O’Meara, Joyce</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Long-term evaluation studies reveal that high-quality early care and education (ECE) programs that include a lifestyle component predict later adult health outcomes. The purpose of this article is to characterize the nutrition and physical activity (PA) practices, including implementation difficulty and barriers, of licensed center- and family home-based ECE programs serving 2- to 5-year-old children in Minnesota (MN) and Wisconsin (WI). Method. A stratified random sampling procedure was used to select representative cross sections of licensed ECE providers in MN and WI. A total of 2,000 providers (1,000 center-based, 1,000 family home-based) were randomly selected and invited to respond to a 97-item survey with questions representing (1) nutrition and PA practices, (2) barriers to meeting nutrition and PA best practices, and (3) written and implemented nutrition and PA policies. Summated scales were constructed for nutrition-related (range 0-15; Cronbach’s α = .86) and for PA-related best practices (range 0-10; Cronbach’s α = .82). Results. A total of 823 providers returned surveys between August 2010 and March 2011, resulting in a 44% bistate participation rate. Across all programs an average (SD) of 7.0 (4.1) nutrition best practices were already implemented. Center-based providers reported on average 0.8 additional nutrition best practice (7.4 vs. 6.6, p = .01). Across all programs an average (SD) of 5.2 (3.1) PA best practices were already implemented. Center-based providers reported on average one more PA best practice (5.3 vs. 4.3, p &lt; .01). The cost of healthy food and the weather were identified as barriers by 80% of providers, regardless of program type.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-1981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6127</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1090198116643912</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27198534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Averages ; Barriers ; Best practice ; Best Practices ; Child care ; Child Care Centers ; Child Health ; Childhood obesity ; Children ; Climatology ; Clinical outcomes ; Food ; Health Promotion ; Health status ; Healthy food ; Home based ; Life Style ; Lifestyles ; Nutrition ; Obesity ; Physical activity ; Physical Activity Level ; Physical training ; Policy ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Preschool Children ; Prevention ; Prevention programs ; Program Implementation ; Random sampling ; Sampling ; Surveys ; Theme Section: Diet &amp; Nutrition Interventions ; Weather</subject><ispartof>Health education &amp; behavior, 2017-02, Vol.44 (1), p.23-31</ispartof><rights>2016 Society for Public Health Education</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5f7faded39c9536c2f4c9ef27464f0d9a795f4b4afbf70a59b05b657a6c8232e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48588851$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48588851$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,21798,27901,27902,30976,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1129010$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nanney, Marilyn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaRowe, Tara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frost, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arcan, Chrisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Meara, Joyce</creatorcontrib><title>Obesity Prevention in Early Child Care Settings: A Bistate (Minnesota and Wisconsin) Assessment of Best Practices, Implementation Difficulty, and Barriers</title><title>Health education &amp; behavior</title><addtitle>Health Educ Behav</addtitle><description>Background. Long-term evaluation studies reveal that high-quality early care and education (ECE) programs that include a lifestyle component predict later adult health outcomes. The purpose of this article is to characterize the nutrition and physical activity (PA) practices, including implementation difficulty and barriers, of licensed center- and family home-based ECE programs serving 2- to 5-year-old children in Minnesota (MN) and Wisconsin (WI). Method. A stratified random sampling procedure was used to select representative cross sections of licensed ECE providers in MN and WI. A total of 2,000 providers (1,000 center-based, 1,000 family home-based) were randomly selected and invited to respond to a 97-item survey with questions representing (1) nutrition and PA practices, (2) barriers to meeting nutrition and PA best practices, and (3) written and implemented nutrition and PA policies. Summated scales were constructed for nutrition-related (range 0-15; Cronbach’s α = .86) and for PA-related best practices (range 0-10; Cronbach’s α = .82). Results. A total of 823 providers returned surveys between August 2010 and March 2011, resulting in a 44% bistate participation rate. Across all programs an average (SD) of 7.0 (4.1) nutrition best practices were already implemented. Center-based providers reported on average 0.8 additional nutrition best practice (7.4 vs. 6.6, p = .01). Across all programs an average (SD) of 5.2 (3.1) PA best practices were already implemented. Center-based providers reported on average one more PA best practice (5.3 vs. 4.3, p &lt; .01). The cost of healthy food and the weather were identified as barriers by 80% of providers, regardless of program type.</description><subject>Averages</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Child care</subject><subject>Child Care Centers</subject><subject>Child Health</subject><subject>Childhood obesity</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Health Promotion</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Healthy food</subject><subject>Home based</subject><subject>Life Style</subject><subject>Lifestyles</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Physical Activity Level</subject><subject>Physical training</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>Random sampling</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Theme Section: Diet &amp; Nutrition Interventions</subject><subject>Weather</subject><issn>1090-1981</issn><issn>1552-6127</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouq7evQgFz3Uz-WwugpT1C2EF9RzSNlmz1FaTrrD_3khlUS-eMuR555lhEDoBfA4g5QywwqAKACEYVUB20AQ4J7kAIndTnXD-xQ_QYYwrjLFQmO-jAyLTL6dsgmaLykY_bLKHYD9sN_i-y3yXzU1oN1n54tsmK02w2aMdBt8t4xHac6aN9vj7naLnq_lTeZPfL65vy8v7vKYChpw76UxjG6pqxamoiWO1so5IJpjDjTJScccqZlzlJDZcVZhXgksj6oJQYukUXYzet3X1aps6rRZMq9-CfzVho3vj9W_S-Re97D8054IyIZPg7FsQ-ve1jYNe9evQpZ01KJAMhFI0pfCYqkMfY7BuOwGw_jqx_nvi1HI6ttjg6218fgdAUhInno88mqX9MfRf3yoOfdgKWcGLouBAPwEINYwl</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Nanney, Marilyn S.</creator><creator>LaRowe, Tara L.</creator><creator>Davey, Cynthia</creator><creator>Frost, Natasha</creator><creator>Arcan, Chrisa</creator><creator>O’Meara, Joyce</creator><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Obesity Prevention in Early Child Care Settings</title><author>Nanney, Marilyn S. ; LaRowe, Tara L. ; Davey, Cynthia ; Frost, Natasha ; Arcan, Chrisa ; O’Meara, Joyce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5f7faded39c9536c2f4c9ef27464f0d9a795f4b4afbf70a59b05b657a6c8232e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Averages</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Child care</topic><topic>Child Care Centers</topic><topic>Child Health</topic><topic>Childhood obesity</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Health Promotion</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Healthy food</topic><topic>Home based</topic><topic>Life Style</topic><topic>Lifestyles</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Physical Activity Level</topic><topic>Physical training</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>Random sampling</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Theme Section: Diet &amp; Nutrition Interventions</topic><topic>Weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nanney, Marilyn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaRowe, Tara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frost, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arcan, Chrisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Meara, Joyce</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health education &amp; behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nanney, Marilyn S.</au><au>LaRowe, Tara L.</au><au>Davey, Cynthia</au><au>Frost, Natasha</au><au>Arcan, Chrisa</au><au>O’Meara, Joyce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1129010</ericid><atitle>Obesity Prevention in Early Child Care Settings: A Bistate (Minnesota and Wisconsin) Assessment of Best Practices, Implementation Difficulty, and Barriers</atitle><jtitle>Health education &amp; behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Health Educ Behav</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>23-31</pages><issn>1090-1981</issn><eissn>1552-6127</eissn><abstract>Background. Long-term evaluation studies reveal that high-quality early care and education (ECE) programs that include a lifestyle component predict later adult health outcomes. The purpose of this article is to characterize the nutrition and physical activity (PA) practices, including implementation difficulty and barriers, of licensed center- and family home-based ECE programs serving 2- to 5-year-old children in Minnesota (MN) and Wisconsin (WI). Method. A stratified random sampling procedure was used to select representative cross sections of licensed ECE providers in MN and WI. A total of 2,000 providers (1,000 center-based, 1,000 family home-based) were randomly selected and invited to respond to a 97-item survey with questions representing (1) nutrition and PA practices, (2) barriers to meeting nutrition and PA best practices, and (3) written and implemented nutrition and PA policies. Summated scales were constructed for nutrition-related (range 0-15; Cronbach’s α = .86) and for PA-related best practices (range 0-10; Cronbach’s α = .82). Results. A total of 823 providers returned surveys between August 2010 and March 2011, resulting in a 44% bistate participation rate. Across all programs an average (SD) of 7.0 (4.1) nutrition best practices were already implemented. Center-based providers reported on average 0.8 additional nutrition best practice (7.4 vs. 6.6, p = .01). Across all programs an average (SD) of 5.2 (3.1) PA best practices were already implemented. Center-based providers reported on average one more PA best practice (5.3 vs. 4.3, p &lt; .01). The cost of healthy food and the weather were identified as barriers by 80% of providers, regardless of program type.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Inc</pub><pmid>27198534</pmid><doi>10.1177/1090198116643912</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-1981
ispartof Health education & behavior, 2017-02, Vol.44 (1), p.23-31
issn 1090-1981
1552-6127
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5563467
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Averages
Barriers
Best practice
Best Practices
Child care
Child Care Centers
Child Health
Childhood obesity
Children
Climatology
Clinical outcomes
Food
Health Promotion
Health status
Healthy food
Home based
Life Style
Lifestyles
Nutrition
Obesity
Physical activity
Physical Activity Level
Physical training
Policy
Polls & surveys
Preschool Children
Prevention
Prevention programs
Program Implementation
Random sampling
Sampling
Surveys
Theme Section: Diet & Nutrition Interventions
Weather
title Obesity Prevention in Early Child Care Settings: A Bistate (Minnesota and Wisconsin) Assessment of Best Practices, Implementation Difficulty, and Barriers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T05%3A14%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Obesity%20Prevention%20in%20Early%20Child%20Care%20Settings:%20A%20Bistate%20(Minnesota%20and%20Wisconsin)%20Assessment%20of%20Best%20Practices,%20Implementation%20Difficulty,%20and%20Barriers&rft.jtitle=Health%20education%20&%20behavior&rft.au=Nanney,%20Marilyn%20S.&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=23-31&rft.issn=1090-1981&rft.eissn=1552-6127&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1090198116643912&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E48588851%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1917416993&rft_id=info:pmid/27198534&rft_ericid=EJ1129010&rft_jstor_id=48588851&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1090198116643912&rfr_iscdi=true