Clostridium Difficile Infection in Acute Care Hospitals: Systematic Review and Best Practices for Prevention
OBJECTIVE Prevention of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in acute-care hospitals is a priority for hospitals and clinicians. We performed a qualitative systematic review to update the evidence on interventions to prevent CDI published since 2009. DESIGN We searched Ovid, MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2017-04, Vol.38 (4), p.476-482 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 482 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 476 |
container_title | Infection control and hospital epidemiology |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Louh, Irene K Greendyke, William G Hermann, Emilia A Davidson, Karina W Falzon, Louise Vawdrey, David K Shaffer, Jonathan A Calfee, David P Furuya, E Yoko Ting, Henry H |
description | OBJECTIVE Prevention of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in acute-care hospitals is a priority for hospitals and clinicians. We performed a qualitative systematic review to update the evidence on interventions to prevent CDI published since 2009. DESIGN We searched Ovid, MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, the ISI Web of Knowledge, and grey literature databases from January 1, 2009 to August 1, 2015. SETTING We included studies performed in acute-care hospitals. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS We included studies conducted on hospitalized patients that investigated the impact of specific interventions on CDI rates. INTERVENTIONS We used the QI-Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) to assess the quality of included studies. Interventions were grouped thematically: environmental disinfection, antimicrobial stewardship, hand hygiene, chlorhexidine bathing, probiotics, bundled approaches, and others. A meta-analysis was performed when possible. RESULTS Of 3,236 articles screened, 261 met the criteria for full-text review and 46 studies were ultimately included. The average quality rating was 82% according to the QI-MQCS. The most effective interventions, resulting in a 45% to 85% reduction in CDI, included daily to twice daily disinfection of high-touch surfaces (including bed rails) and terminal cleaning of patient rooms with chlorine-based products. Bundled interventions and antimicrobial stewardship showed promise for reducing CDI rates. Chlorhexidine bathing and intensified hand-hygiene practices were not effective for reducing CDI rates. CONCLUSIONS Daily and terminal cleaning of patient rooms using chlorine-based products were most effective in reducing CDI rates in hospitals. Further studies are needed to identify the components of bundled interventions that reduce CDI rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:476-482. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/ice.2016.324 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5560033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1878181414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-d667af77677096af35b6c186baea60fb6b30f8b512bd4d02627db5aae43f7fca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1P3DAQxS1EBVvKrefKEhcOzWLHiT84IC1LW5CQqFqQuFmOM26Nknixk6347_EKioCTNfJv3sybh9BnSuaUUHHkLcxLQvmcldUWmtG6VgWXrNpGMyKVKmTJbnfRx5TuCCFCKbqDdkvJckHVDHXLLqQx-tZPPT7zznnrO8AXgwM7-jBgP-CFnUbASxMBn4e08qPp0jH-_ZBG6M3oLf4Faw__sBlafAppxD-jyc0WEnYh5grWMGzEPqEPLvfC_vO7h26-f7tenheXVz8ulovLwjJRjUXLuTBOCC4EUdw4VjfcUskbA4YT1_CGESebmpZNW7Wk5KVom9oYqJgTzhq2h06edFdT00Nr8_RoOr2KvjfxQQfj9dufwf_Vf8Ja1zUnhLEscPgsEMP9lC3p3icLXWcGCFPSVApJJa1oldGDd-hdmOKQ7elSklqJiiuVqa9PlI0hpQjuZRlK9CZGnc-lNzHqHGPGv7w28AL_z409AhQOmqY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2805974699</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clostridium Difficile Infection in Acute Care Hospitals: Systematic Review and Best Practices for Prevention</title><source>ProQuest Central Essentials</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Louh, Irene K ; Greendyke, William G ; Hermann, Emilia A ; Davidson, Karina W ; Falzon, Louise ; Vawdrey, David K ; Shaffer, Jonathan A ; Calfee, David P ; Furuya, E Yoko ; Ting, Henry H</creator><creatorcontrib>Louh, Irene K ; Greendyke, William G ; Hermann, Emilia A ; Davidson, Karina W ; Falzon, Louise ; Vawdrey, David K ; Shaffer, Jonathan A ; Calfee, David P ; Furuya, E Yoko ; Ting, Henry H</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE Prevention of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in acute-care hospitals is a priority for hospitals and clinicians. We performed a qualitative systematic review to update the evidence on interventions to prevent CDI published since 2009. DESIGN We searched Ovid, MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, the ISI Web of Knowledge, and grey literature databases from January 1, 2009 to August 1, 2015. SETTING We included studies performed in acute-care hospitals. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS We included studies conducted on hospitalized patients that investigated the impact of specific interventions on CDI rates. INTERVENTIONS We used the QI-Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) to assess the quality of included studies. Interventions were grouped thematically: environmental disinfection, antimicrobial stewardship, hand hygiene, chlorhexidine bathing, probiotics, bundled approaches, and others. A meta-analysis was performed when possible. RESULTS Of 3,236 articles screened, 261 met the criteria for full-text review and 46 studies were ultimately included. The average quality rating was 82% according to the QI-MQCS. The most effective interventions, resulting in a 45% to 85% reduction in CDI, included daily to twice daily disinfection of high-touch surfaces (including bed rails) and terminal cleaning of patient rooms with chlorine-based products. Bundled interventions and antimicrobial stewardship showed promise for reducing CDI rates. Chlorhexidine bathing and intensified hand-hygiene practices were not effective for reducing CDI rates. CONCLUSIONS Daily and terminal cleaning of patient rooms using chlorine-based products were most effective in reducing CDI rates in hospitals. Further studies are needed to identify the components of bundled interventions that reduce CDI rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:476-482.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-823X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-6834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/ice.2016.324</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28300019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Alcohol ; Antimicrobial agents ; Antimicrobial Stewardship ; Auditing ; Bacterial infections ; Chlorine ; Clostridium difficile ; Clostridium Infections - prevention & control ; Clostridium Infections - transmission ; Disease control ; Disinfection ; Equipment and Supplies, Hospital - microbiology ; Fomites - microbiology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Hygiene ; Infection Control - methods ; Intervention ; Nosocomial infections ; Nursing ; Patient Care Bundles ; Patients ; Patients' Rooms ; Personal hygiene ; Prevention ; Probiotics ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2017-04, Vol.38 (4), p.476-482</ispartof><rights>2017 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-d667af77677096af35b6c186baea60fb6b30f8b512bd4d02627db5aae43f7fca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-d667af77677096af35b6c186baea60fb6b30f8b512bd4d02627db5aae43f7fca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2805974699/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2805974699?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21368,21369,23236,27903,27904,33509,33510,33682,33683,33723,33724,43638,43766,43784,64361,64363,64365,72215,73850,74029,74048</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28300019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Louh, Irene K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greendyke, William G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Emilia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Karina W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falzon, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vawdrey, David K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, Jonathan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calfee, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furuya, E Yoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ting, Henry H</creatorcontrib><title>Clostridium Difficile Infection in Acute Care Hospitals: Systematic Review and Best Practices for Prevention</title><title>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</title><addtitle>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE Prevention of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in acute-care hospitals is a priority for hospitals and clinicians. We performed a qualitative systematic review to update the evidence on interventions to prevent CDI published since 2009. DESIGN We searched Ovid, MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, the ISI Web of Knowledge, and grey literature databases from January 1, 2009 to August 1, 2015. SETTING We included studies performed in acute-care hospitals. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS We included studies conducted on hospitalized patients that investigated the impact of specific interventions on CDI rates. INTERVENTIONS We used the QI-Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) to assess the quality of included studies. Interventions were grouped thematically: environmental disinfection, antimicrobial stewardship, hand hygiene, chlorhexidine bathing, probiotics, bundled approaches, and others. A meta-analysis was performed when possible. RESULTS Of 3,236 articles screened, 261 met the criteria for full-text review and 46 studies were ultimately included. The average quality rating was 82% according to the QI-MQCS. The most effective interventions, resulting in a 45% to 85% reduction in CDI, included daily to twice daily disinfection of high-touch surfaces (including bed rails) and terminal cleaning of patient rooms with chlorine-based products. Bundled interventions and antimicrobial stewardship showed promise for reducing CDI rates. Chlorhexidine bathing and intensified hand-hygiene practices were not effective for reducing CDI rates. CONCLUSIONS Daily and terminal cleaning of patient rooms using chlorine-based products were most effective in reducing CDI rates in hospitals. Further studies are needed to identify the components of bundled interventions that reduce CDI rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:476-482.</description><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Antimicrobial Stewardship</subject><subject>Auditing</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Chlorine</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile</subject><subject>Clostridium Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Clostridium Infections - transmission</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disinfection</subject><subject>Equipment and Supplies, Hospital - microbiology</subject><subject>Fomites - microbiology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Infection Control - methods</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Nosocomial infections</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient Care Bundles</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Patients' Rooms</subject><subject>Personal hygiene</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0899-823X</issn><issn>1559-6834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1P3DAQxS1EBVvKrefKEhcOzWLHiT84IC1LW5CQqFqQuFmOM26Nknixk6347_EKioCTNfJv3sybh9BnSuaUUHHkLcxLQvmcldUWmtG6VgWXrNpGMyKVKmTJbnfRx5TuCCFCKbqDdkvJckHVDHXLLqQx-tZPPT7zznnrO8AXgwM7-jBgP-CFnUbASxMBn4e08qPp0jH-_ZBG6M3oLf4Faw__sBlafAppxD-jyc0WEnYh5grWMGzEPqEPLvfC_vO7h26-f7tenheXVz8ulovLwjJRjUXLuTBOCC4EUdw4VjfcUskbA4YT1_CGESebmpZNW7Wk5KVom9oYqJgTzhq2h06edFdT00Nr8_RoOr2KvjfxQQfj9dufwf_Vf8Ja1zUnhLEscPgsEMP9lC3p3icLXWcGCFPSVApJJa1oldGDd-hdmOKQ7elSklqJiiuVqa9PlI0hpQjuZRlK9CZGnc-lNzHqHGPGv7w28AL_z409AhQOmqY</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Louh, Irene K</creator><creator>Greendyke, William G</creator><creator>Hermann, Emilia A</creator><creator>Davidson, Karina W</creator><creator>Falzon, Louise</creator><creator>Vawdrey, David K</creator><creator>Shaffer, Jonathan A</creator><creator>Calfee, David P</creator><creator>Furuya, E Yoko</creator><creator>Ting, Henry H</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Clostridium Difficile Infection in Acute Care Hospitals: Systematic Review and Best Practices for Prevention</title><author>Louh, Irene K ; Greendyke, William G ; Hermann, Emilia A ; Davidson, Karina W ; Falzon, Louise ; Vawdrey, David K ; Shaffer, Jonathan A ; Calfee, David P ; Furuya, E Yoko ; Ting, Henry H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-d667af77677096af35b6c186baea60fb6b30f8b512bd4d02627db5aae43f7fca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Antimicrobial Stewardship</topic><topic>Auditing</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Chlorine</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile</topic><topic>Clostridium Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Clostridium Infections - transmission</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disinfection</topic><topic>Equipment and Supplies, Hospital - microbiology</topic><topic>Fomites - microbiology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Infection Control - methods</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Nosocomial infections</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient Care Bundles</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Patients' Rooms</topic><topic>Personal hygiene</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Louh, Irene K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greendyke, William G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Emilia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Karina W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falzon, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vawdrey, David K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, Jonathan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calfee, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furuya, E Yoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ting, Henry H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Louh, Irene K</au><au>Greendyke, William G</au><au>Hermann, Emilia A</au><au>Davidson, Karina W</au><au>Falzon, Louise</au><au>Vawdrey, David K</au><au>Shaffer, Jonathan A</au><au>Calfee, David P</au><au>Furuya, E Yoko</au><au>Ting, Henry H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clostridium Difficile Infection in Acute Care Hospitals: Systematic Review and Best Practices for Prevention</atitle><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>476</spage><epage>482</epage><pages>476-482</pages><issn>0899-823X</issn><eissn>1559-6834</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE Prevention of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in acute-care hospitals is a priority for hospitals and clinicians. We performed a qualitative systematic review to update the evidence on interventions to prevent CDI published since 2009. DESIGN We searched Ovid, MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, the ISI Web of Knowledge, and grey literature databases from January 1, 2009 to August 1, 2015. SETTING We included studies performed in acute-care hospitals. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS We included studies conducted on hospitalized patients that investigated the impact of specific interventions on CDI rates. INTERVENTIONS We used the QI-Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) to assess the quality of included studies. Interventions were grouped thematically: environmental disinfection, antimicrobial stewardship, hand hygiene, chlorhexidine bathing, probiotics, bundled approaches, and others. A meta-analysis was performed when possible. RESULTS Of 3,236 articles screened, 261 met the criteria for full-text review and 46 studies were ultimately included. The average quality rating was 82% according to the QI-MQCS. The most effective interventions, resulting in a 45% to 85% reduction in CDI, included daily to twice daily disinfection of high-touch surfaces (including bed rails) and terminal cleaning of patient rooms with chlorine-based products. Bundled interventions and antimicrobial stewardship showed promise for reducing CDI rates. Chlorhexidine bathing and intensified hand-hygiene practices were not effective for reducing CDI rates. CONCLUSIONS Daily and terminal cleaning of patient rooms using chlorine-based products were most effective in reducing CDI rates in hospitals. Further studies are needed to identify the components of bundled interventions that reduce CDI rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:476-482.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>28300019</pmid><doi>10.1017/ice.2016.324</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-823X |
ispartof | Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2017-04, Vol.38 (4), p.476-482 |
issn | 0899-823X 1559-6834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5560033 |
source | ProQuest Central Essentials; MEDLINE; ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); Cambridge Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Alcohol Antimicrobial agents Antimicrobial Stewardship Auditing Bacterial infections Chlorine Clostridium difficile Clostridium Infections - prevention & control Clostridium Infections - transmission Disease control Disinfection Equipment and Supplies, Hospital - microbiology Fomites - microbiology Hospitals Humans Hygiene Infection Control - methods Intervention Nosocomial infections Nursing Patient Care Bundles Patients Patients' Rooms Personal hygiene Prevention Probiotics Systematic review |
title | Clostridium Difficile Infection in Acute Care Hospitals: Systematic Review and Best Practices for Prevention |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T07%3A30%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clostridium%20Difficile%20Infection%20in%20Acute%20Care%20Hospitals:%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Best%20Practices%20for%20Prevention&rft.jtitle=Infection%20control%20and%20hospital%20epidemiology&rft.au=Louh,%20Irene%20K&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=476&rft.epage=482&rft.pages=476-482&rft.issn=0899-823X&rft.eissn=1559-6834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/ice.2016.324&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1878181414%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2805974699&rft_id=info:pmid/28300019&rfr_iscdi=true |