Management of vesicovaginal fistulas after gynecologic surgery

Management of vesicovaginal fistulas after gynecologic surgery

In developed nations, surgery, especially gynecologic procedures, is the major cause of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs). We retrospectively evaluated our treatment modalities for VVF repair caused by a gynecologic surgery, and discussed the reasons of selecting certain surgical techniques and their ou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology 2017-03, Vol.14 (1), p.45-51
Hauptverfasser: Tatar, Burak, Oksay, Taylan, Selcen Cebe, Fatma, Soyupek, Sedat, Erdemoğlu, Evrim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Clinical Investigation
Kadın Hastalıkları
Tıp
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 51
container_issue 1
container_start_page 45
container_title Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology
container_volume 14
creator Tatar, Burak
Oksay, Taylan
Selcen Cebe, Fatma
Soyupek, Sedat
Erdemoğlu, Evrim
description In developed nations, surgery, especially gynecologic procedures, is the major cause of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs). We retrospectively evaluated our treatment modalities for VVF repair caused by a gynecologic surgery, and discussed the reasons of selecting certain surgical techniques and their outcomes. We compared the surgical procedure preferences of surgeons and their results with patient and surgeon characteristics for the management of VVFs after an inciting gynecologic surgery in Süleyman Demirel University Hospital, Isparta over a 10-year period. The surgical procedures were undertaken in departments of urology and obstetrics and gynecology. Abdominal repair was chosen for 65%, vaginal repair for 25%, and laparoscopic repair for 10% of patients. For the 75% of the patients that urologists operated, they chose the abdominal route. The mean parity number of patients who underwent abdominal repair was lower than that for vaginal repairs (p
doi_str_mv 10.4274/tjod.46656
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5558317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1940051984</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-ee437bfa72cd47acdf97d7c88596f743c2f8ad80d461ba54793c13ee7b563b953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMoKrUXf4DsTRFak02y2VwEqZ9Q8aLnkM1O1pR0o8luof_erdWipxmYh5eZeRA6JXjKcsGuukWop6woeLGHjnPC5ERSivd3fZ4foXFKC4wxKYWQJD9ER3kpCSWUHaPrZ93qBpbQdlmw2QqSM2GlG9dqn1mXut7rlGnbQcyadQsm-NA4k6U-NhDXJ-jAap9g_FNH6O3-7nX2OJm_PDzNbuYTwwjuJgCMispqkZuaCW1qK0UtTFlyWVjBqMltqesS16wgleZMSGoIBRAVL2glOR2h623uR18toTbDulF79RHdUse1Ctqp_5PWvasmrBTnvKREDAEXPwExfPaQOrV0yYD3uoXQJ0Ukw5gTWbIBPd-irgbtQ-tdC2oR-ji8JKmn27ubueJskztCl1vSxJBSBLtbiGC1saM2dtS3nQE--3vCDv11Qb8AduCMaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1940051984</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management of vesicovaginal fistulas after gynecologic surgery</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tatar, Burak ; Oksay, Taylan ; Selcen Cebe, Fatma ; Soyupek, Sedat ; Erdemoğlu, Evrim</creator><contributor>Çalışkan,Eray</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tatar, Burak ; Oksay, Taylan ; Selcen Cebe, Fatma ; Soyupek, Sedat ; Erdemoğlu, Evrim ; Çalışkan,Eray</creatorcontrib><description>In developed nations, surgery, especially gynecologic procedures, is the major cause of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs). We retrospectively evaluated our treatment modalities for VVF repair caused by a gynecologic surgery, and discussed the reasons of selecting certain surgical techniques and their outcomes. We compared the surgical procedure preferences of surgeons and their results with patient and surgeon characteristics for the management of VVFs after an inciting gynecologic surgery in Süleyman Demirel University Hospital, Isparta over a 10-year period. The surgical procedures were undertaken in departments of urology and obstetrics and gynecology. Abdominal repair was chosen for 65%, vaginal repair for 25%, and laparoscopic repair for 10% of patients. For the 75% of the patients that urologists operated, they chose the abdominal route. The mean parity number of patients who underwent abdominal repair was lower than that for vaginal repairs (p&lt;0.05). For the patients managed with the vaginal route, 20% had a Martius flap, and 80% had a simple excision and repair. For patients operated via the abdominal route, 18% needed omental flap; no tissue interposition was used for the rest. The mean hospitalization time was less in patients managed with transvaginal repair (3.4 days) compared with transabdominal repair (9.2 days) (p&lt;0.05). The choice of repair method depends on surgeon's training (gynecology vs. urology). The vaginal route should be the first choice because it does not compromise the success rate and the mean hospitalization time is less. For the transvaginal approach, access to the lesion is the most important factor for the success of the procedure. No flap is needed for tissues that appear well vascularized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2149-9322</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1307-699X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2149-9330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4274/tjod.46656</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28913134</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği</publisher><subject>Clinical Investigation ; Kadın Hastalıkları ; Tıp</subject><ispartof>Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology, 2017-03, Vol.14 (1), p.45-51</ispartof><rights>Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published by Galenos Publishing House. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-ee437bfa72cd47acdf97d7c88596f743c2f8ad80d461ba54793c13ee7b563b953</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558317/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558317/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27911,27912,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28913134$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Çalışkan,Eray</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tatar, Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oksay, Taylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selcen Cebe, Fatma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soyupek, Sedat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdemoğlu, Evrim</creatorcontrib><title>Management of vesicovaginal fistulas after gynecologic surgery</title><title>Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology</title><addtitle>Turk J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>In developed nations, surgery, especially gynecologic procedures, is the major cause of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs). We retrospectively evaluated our treatment modalities for VVF repair caused by a gynecologic surgery, and discussed the reasons of selecting certain surgical techniques and their outcomes. We compared the surgical procedure preferences of surgeons and their results with patient and surgeon characteristics for the management of VVFs after an inciting gynecologic surgery in Süleyman Demirel University Hospital, Isparta over a 10-year period. The surgical procedures were undertaken in departments of urology and obstetrics and gynecology. Abdominal repair was chosen for 65%, vaginal repair for 25%, and laparoscopic repair for 10% of patients. For the 75% of the patients that urologists operated, they chose the abdominal route. The mean parity number of patients who underwent abdominal repair was lower than that for vaginal repairs (p&lt;0.05). For the patients managed with the vaginal route, 20% had a Martius flap, and 80% had a simple excision and repair. For patients operated via the abdominal route, 18% needed omental flap; no tissue interposition was used for the rest. The mean hospitalization time was less in patients managed with transvaginal repair (3.4 days) compared with transabdominal repair (9.2 days) (p&lt;0.05). The choice of repair method depends on surgeon's training (gynecology vs. urology). The vaginal route should be the first choice because it does not compromise the success rate and the mean hospitalization time is less. For the transvaginal approach, access to the lesion is the most important factor for the success of the procedure. No flap is needed for tissues that appear well vascularized.</description><subject>Clinical Investigation</subject><subject>Kadın Hastalıkları</subject><subject>Tıp</subject><issn>2149-9322</issn><issn>1307-699X</issn><issn>2149-9330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMoKrUXf4DsTRFak02y2VwEqZ9Q8aLnkM1O1pR0o8luof_erdWipxmYh5eZeRA6JXjKcsGuukWop6woeLGHjnPC5ERSivd3fZ4foXFKC4wxKYWQJD9ER3kpCSWUHaPrZ93qBpbQdlmw2QqSM2GlG9dqn1mXut7rlGnbQcyadQsm-NA4k6U-NhDXJ-jAap9g_FNH6O3-7nX2OJm_PDzNbuYTwwjuJgCMispqkZuaCW1qK0UtTFlyWVjBqMltqesS16wgleZMSGoIBRAVL2glOR2h623uR18toTbDulF79RHdUse1Ctqp_5PWvasmrBTnvKREDAEXPwExfPaQOrV0yYD3uoXQJ0Ukw5gTWbIBPd-irgbtQ-tdC2oR-ji8JKmn27ubueJskztCl1vSxJBSBLtbiGC1saM2dtS3nQE--3vCDv11Qb8AduCMaQ</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Tatar, Burak</creator><creator>Oksay, Taylan</creator><creator>Selcen Cebe, Fatma</creator><creator>Soyupek, Sedat</creator><creator>Erdemoğlu, Evrim</creator><general>Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği</general><general>Galenos Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IEBAR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Management of vesicovaginal fistulas after gynecologic surgery</title><author>Tatar, Burak ; Oksay, Taylan ; Selcen Cebe, Fatma ; Soyupek, Sedat ; Erdemoğlu, Evrim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-ee437bfa72cd47acdf97d7c88596f743c2f8ad80d461ba54793c13ee7b563b953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Clinical Investigation</topic><topic>Kadın Hastalıkları</topic><topic>Tıp</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tatar, Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oksay, Taylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selcen Cebe, Fatma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soyupek, Sedat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdemoğlu, Evrim</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Idealonline online kütüphane - Journals</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tatar, Burak</au><au>Oksay, Taylan</au><au>Selcen Cebe, Fatma</au><au>Soyupek, Sedat</au><au>Erdemoğlu, Evrim</au><au>Çalışkan,Eray</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management of vesicovaginal fistulas after gynecologic surgery</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Turk J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>45-51</pages><issn>2149-9322</issn><issn>1307-699X</issn><eissn>2149-9330</eissn><abstract>In developed nations, surgery, especially gynecologic procedures, is the major cause of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs). We retrospectively evaluated our treatment modalities for VVF repair caused by a gynecologic surgery, and discussed the reasons of selecting certain surgical techniques and their outcomes. We compared the surgical procedure preferences of surgeons and their results with patient and surgeon characteristics for the management of VVFs after an inciting gynecologic surgery in Süleyman Demirel University Hospital, Isparta over a 10-year period. The surgical procedures were undertaken in departments of urology and obstetrics and gynecology. Abdominal repair was chosen for 65%, vaginal repair for 25%, and laparoscopic repair for 10% of patients. For the 75% of the patients that urologists operated, they chose the abdominal route. The mean parity number of patients who underwent abdominal repair was lower than that for vaginal repairs (p&lt;0.05). For the patients managed with the vaginal route, 20% had a Martius flap, and 80% had a simple excision and repair. For patients operated via the abdominal route, 18% needed omental flap; no tissue interposition was used for the rest. The mean hospitalization time was less in patients managed with transvaginal repair (3.4 days) compared with transabdominal repair (9.2 days) (p&lt;0.05). The choice of repair method depends on surgeon's training (gynecology vs. urology). The vaginal route should be the first choice because it does not compromise the success rate and the mean hospitalization time is less. For the transvaginal approach, access to the lesion is the most important factor for the success of the procedure. No flap is needed for tissues that appear well vascularized.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği</pub><pmid>28913134</pmid><doi>10.4274/tjod.46656</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2149-9322
ispartof Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology, 2017-03, Vol.14 (1), p.45-51
issn 2149-9322
1307-699X
2149-9330
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5558317
source PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Clinical Investigation
Kadın Hastalıkları
Tıp
title Management of vesicovaginal fistulas after gynecologic surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A12%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20of%20vesicovaginal%20fistulas%20after%20gynecologic%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Turkish%20Society%20of%20Obstetric%20and%20Gynecology&rft.au=Tatar,%20Burak&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=45-51&rft.issn=2149-9322&rft.eissn=2149-9330&rft_id=info:doi/10.4274/tjod.46656&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1940051984%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1940051984&rft_id=info:pmid/28913134&rfr_iscdi=true