Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction: Analysis of the Learning Curve
Objectives: This procedure involves the use of distal tibial bone graft to recreate anterior glenoid bone surface with the goal of preventing further dislocations. Recently, an arthroscopic approach has been proposed for this procedure, which uses a similar technique to the Bankart repair. This appr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine 2017-07, Vol.5 (7_suppl6) |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7_suppl6 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine |
| container_volume | 5 |
| creator | Moga, Iustin Wong, Ivan Coady, Catherine M. |
| description | Objectives:
This procedure involves the use of distal tibial bone graft to recreate anterior glenoid bone surface with the goal of preventing further dislocations. Recently, an arthroscopic approach has been proposed for this procedure, which uses a similar technique to the Bankart repair. This approach requires one additional medial portal (4 total), for graft placement, and this is established using an insideout technique; it avoids damage to the subscapularis tendon, and preserves the capsule and labrum. By comparison, the Arthroscopic Latarjet technique requires four additional new portals and requires splitting of the subscapularis tendon, as well as excision of the capsule and labrum. This study seeks to (1) identify a learning curve for this procedure, and (2) compare this to the learning curve for Arthroscopic Latarjet.
Methods:
Fiftyseven cases of surgically treated recurrent anterior shoulder instability were reviewed. All operations were carried out with the patient in a lateral decubitus position. Twentynine patients were managed with the Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure using coracoid bone graft, and 28 were treated with Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction using distal tibial bone graft. Procedure start and stop times were recorded and procedure durations calculated.
Results:
In the case of Arthroscopic Latarjet, the first 14 cases took an average 184 minutes to perform, with the remaining cases in the cohort averaging 116 minutes each in duration. For Arthroscopic Anatomical Glenoid Reconstruction, the first 14 cases took an average of 90 minutes, with the remaining cases averaging 84 minutes each.
Conclusion:
Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction is faster to perform compared to the Arthroscopic Latarjet. Further investigations into the safety and efficacy of this procedure will help determine whether it is a better choice for surgeons looking to learn the skill of boney augmentation for recurrent anterior instability. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/2325967117S00358 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5555505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2325967117S00358</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2376657381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2518-3ea3f15cded0ee7f3d972a9a15bb91e5d0771ce9b6d443745e719456578d47273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtqwzAQFKWFhjT3Hg09u5Usy7J7KITQpoVAoY-zkKV1ouBIqWQH8veVSegLupcddmdn2EHokuBrQji_yWjGqoJH_IoxZeUJGg2jdJid_sDnaBLCGscqGakoH6HF1Hcr74JyW6OSqZWd20Qwb8E6o5MXUM6GzveqM87eDoR2H0xIXJN0K0gWIL01dpnMer-DC3TWyDbA5NjH6P3h_m32mC6e50-z6SJVGSNlSkHShjClQWMA3lBd8UxWkrC6rggwjTknCqq60HlOec6AkypnBeOlznnG6RjdHXS3fb0BrcB2XrZi681G-r1w0ojfG2tWYul2gg2FWRS4Ogp499FD6MTa9T7-FkRGeRGdaEkiCx9YKgYUPDRfDgSLIXfxN_d4kh5OglzCt-i__E939IL2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2376657381</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction: Analysis of the Learning Curve</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Moga, Iustin ; Wong, Ivan ; Coady, Catherine M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moga, Iustin ; Wong, Ivan ; Coady, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives:
This procedure involves the use of distal tibial bone graft to recreate anterior glenoid bone surface with the goal of preventing further dislocations. Recently, an arthroscopic approach has been proposed for this procedure, which uses a similar technique to the Bankart repair. This approach requires one additional medial portal (4 total), for graft placement, and this is established using an insideout technique; it avoids damage to the subscapularis tendon, and preserves the capsule and labrum. By comparison, the Arthroscopic Latarjet technique requires four additional new portals and requires splitting of the subscapularis tendon, as well as excision of the capsule and labrum. This study seeks to (1) identify a learning curve for this procedure, and (2) compare this to the learning curve for Arthroscopic Latarjet.
Methods:
Fiftyseven cases of surgically treated recurrent anterior shoulder instability were reviewed. All operations were carried out with the patient in a lateral decubitus position. Twentynine patients were managed with the Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure using coracoid bone graft, and 28 were treated with Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction using distal tibial bone graft. Procedure start and stop times were recorded and procedure durations calculated.
Results:
In the case of Arthroscopic Latarjet, the first 14 cases took an average 184 minutes to perform, with the remaining cases in the cohort averaging 116 minutes each in duration. For Arthroscopic Anatomical Glenoid Reconstruction, the first 14 cases took an average of 90 minutes, with the remaining cases averaging 84 minutes each.
Conclusion:
Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction is faster to perform compared to the Arthroscopic Latarjet. Further investigations into the safety and efficacy of this procedure will help determine whether it is a better choice for surgeons looking to learn the skill of boney augmentation for recurrent anterior instability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2325967117S00358</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Orthopedics ; Skin & tissue grafts ; Sports medicine</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2017-07, Vol.5 (7_suppl6)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017 2017 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2518-3ea3f15cded0ee7f3d972a9a15bb91e5d0771ce9b6d443745e719456578d47273</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5555505/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5555505/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moga, Iustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coady, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><title>Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction: Analysis of the Learning Curve</title><title>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</title><description>Objectives:
This procedure involves the use of distal tibial bone graft to recreate anterior glenoid bone surface with the goal of preventing further dislocations. Recently, an arthroscopic approach has been proposed for this procedure, which uses a similar technique to the Bankart repair. This approach requires one additional medial portal (4 total), for graft placement, and this is established using an insideout technique; it avoids damage to the subscapularis tendon, and preserves the capsule and labrum. By comparison, the Arthroscopic Latarjet technique requires four additional new portals and requires splitting of the subscapularis tendon, as well as excision of the capsule and labrum. This study seeks to (1) identify a learning curve for this procedure, and (2) compare this to the learning curve for Arthroscopic Latarjet.
Methods:
Fiftyseven cases of surgically treated recurrent anterior shoulder instability were reviewed. All operations were carried out with the patient in a lateral decubitus position. Twentynine patients were managed with the Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure using coracoid bone graft, and 28 were treated with Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction using distal tibial bone graft. Procedure start and stop times were recorded and procedure durations calculated.
Results:
In the case of Arthroscopic Latarjet, the first 14 cases took an average 184 minutes to perform, with the remaining cases in the cohort averaging 116 minutes each in duration. For Arthroscopic Anatomical Glenoid Reconstruction, the first 14 cases took an average of 90 minutes, with the remaining cases averaging 84 minutes each.
Conclusion:
Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction is faster to perform compared to the Arthroscopic Latarjet. Further investigations into the safety and efficacy of this procedure will help determine whether it is a better choice for surgeons looking to learn the skill of boney augmentation for recurrent anterior instability.</description><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Skin & tissue grafts</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><issn>2325-9671</issn><issn>2325-9671</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtqwzAQFKWFhjT3Hg09u5Usy7J7KITQpoVAoY-zkKV1ouBIqWQH8veVSegLupcddmdn2EHokuBrQji_yWjGqoJH_IoxZeUJGg2jdJid_sDnaBLCGscqGakoH6HF1Hcr74JyW6OSqZWd20Qwb8E6o5MXUM6GzveqM87eDoR2H0xIXJN0K0gWIL01dpnMer-DC3TWyDbA5NjH6P3h_m32mC6e50-z6SJVGSNlSkHShjClQWMA3lBd8UxWkrC6rggwjTknCqq60HlOec6AkypnBeOlznnG6RjdHXS3fb0BrcB2XrZi681G-r1w0ojfG2tWYul2gg2FWRS4Ogp499FD6MTa9T7-FkRGeRGdaEkiCx9YKgYUPDRfDgSLIXfxN_d4kh5OglzCt-i__E939IL2</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Moga, Iustin</creator><creator>Wong, Ivan</creator><creator>Coady, Catherine M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction: Analysis of the Learning Curve</title><author>Moga, Iustin ; Wong, Ivan ; Coady, Catherine M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2518-3ea3f15cded0ee7f3d972a9a15bb91e5d0771ce9b6d443745e719456578d47273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Skin & tissue grafts</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moga, Iustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coady, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moga, Iustin</au><au>Wong, Ivan</au><au>Coady, Catherine M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction: Analysis of the Learning Curve</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>7_suppl6</issue><issn>2325-9671</issn><eissn>2325-9671</eissn><abstract>Objectives:
This procedure involves the use of distal tibial bone graft to recreate anterior glenoid bone surface with the goal of preventing further dislocations. Recently, an arthroscopic approach has been proposed for this procedure, which uses a similar technique to the Bankart repair. This approach requires one additional medial portal (4 total), for graft placement, and this is established using an insideout technique; it avoids damage to the subscapularis tendon, and preserves the capsule and labrum. By comparison, the Arthroscopic Latarjet technique requires four additional new portals and requires splitting of the subscapularis tendon, as well as excision of the capsule and labrum. This study seeks to (1) identify a learning curve for this procedure, and (2) compare this to the learning curve for Arthroscopic Latarjet.
Methods:
Fiftyseven cases of surgically treated recurrent anterior shoulder instability were reviewed. All operations were carried out with the patient in a lateral decubitus position. Twentynine patients were managed with the Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure using coracoid bone graft, and 28 were treated with Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction using distal tibial bone graft. Procedure start and stop times were recorded and procedure durations calculated.
Results:
In the case of Arthroscopic Latarjet, the first 14 cases took an average 184 minutes to perform, with the remaining cases in the cohort averaging 116 minutes each in duration. For Arthroscopic Anatomical Glenoid Reconstruction, the first 14 cases took an average of 90 minutes, with the remaining cases averaging 84 minutes each.
Conclusion:
Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction is faster to perform compared to the Arthroscopic Latarjet. Further investigations into the safety and efficacy of this procedure will help determine whether it is a better choice for surgeons looking to learn the skill of boney augmentation for recurrent anterior instability.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/2325967117S00358</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2325-9671 |
| ispartof | Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2017-07, Vol.5 (7_suppl6) |
| issn | 2325-9671 2325-9671 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5555505 |
| source | SAGE Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Orthopedics Skin & tissue grafts Sports medicine |
| title | Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction: Analysis of the Learning Curve |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A25%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Arthroscopic%20Anatomic%20Glenoid%20Reconstruction:%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Learning%20Curve&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedic%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Moga,%20Iustin&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=7_suppl6&rft.issn=2325-9671&rft.eissn=2325-9671&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2325967117S00358&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2376657381%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2376657381&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2325967117S00358&rfr_iscdi=true |