Validation of the electronic version of the BREAST-Q in the army of women study
Abstract Women undergoing surgery for primary breast cancer can choose between breast conserving therapy and mastectomy (with or without breast reconstruction). Patients often turn to outcomes data to help guide the decision-making process. The BREAST-Q is a validated breast surgery–specific patient...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Breast (Edinburgh) 2017-06, Vol.33, p.44-49 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 49 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 44 |
| container_title | Breast (Edinburgh) |
| container_volume | 33 |
| creator | Fuzesi, Sarah, MD Cano, Stefan J., PhD Klassen, Anne F., DPhil Atisha, Dunya, MD Pusic, Andrea L., MD |
| description | Abstract Women undergoing surgery for primary breast cancer can choose between breast conserving therapy and mastectomy (with or without breast reconstruction). Patients often turn to outcomes data to help guide the decision-making process. The BREAST-Q is a validated breast surgery–specific patient-reported outcome measure that evaluates satisfaction, quality of life, and patient experience. It was originally developed for paper-and-pencil administration. However, the BREAST-Q has increasingly been administered electronically. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of an electronic version of the BREAST-Q in a large online survey. Women with a history of breast cancer surgery recruited from the Love/AVON Army of Women program completed an electronic version of the BREAST-Q in addition to the Impact of Cancer Survey and PTSD Checklist. Traditional psychometric analyses were performed on the collected data. BREAST-Q data were collected from 6748 women (3497 Breast Conserving Therapy module, 1295 Mastectomy module, 1956 Breast Reconstruction module). Acceptability was supported by a high response rate (82%), low frequency of missing data ( |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.breast.2017.02.015 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5551502</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0960977617300346</els_id><sourcerecordid>1876496624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-ed125b0c019e53672919caa8fa8856e3776599eec5f4b4a2d028b56be83ef7ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyCUI5eEsR079gWpVOVDqlRBC1fLcSbUSxIXO1m0_x6HLaVw4WRZM-87H88Q8pxCRYHKV9uqjWjTXDGgTQWsAioekA0VnJUcFDwkG9ASSt008og8SWkLAJpL9ZgcMcUarZTakIsvdvCdnX2YitAX8zUWOKCbY5i8K3YY073Im09nJ5dX5cfCT7_-No77NfYjjDgVaV66_VPyqLdDwme37zH5_Pbs6vR9eX7x7sPpyXnpBFVziR1logUHVKPgsmGaamet6q1SQiLPPQutEZ3o67a2rAOmWiFbVBz7xiI_Jq8PvjdLO2LncJqjHcxN9KONexOsN39HJn9tvoadEUJQASwbvLw1iOH7gmk2o08Oh8FOGJZkqGpkraVkdU6tD6kuhpQi9ndlKJiVhdmaAwuzsjDATGaRZS_ut3gn-r38PzNgXtTOYzTJeZwcdj5mBKYL_n8V_jVwg8_c7PAN95i2YYlThmCoSVlgLtd7WM-BNhyA15L_BCpTsgM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1876496624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the electronic version of the BREAST-Q in the army of women study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Fuzesi, Sarah, MD ; Cano, Stefan J., PhD ; Klassen, Anne F., DPhil ; Atisha, Dunya, MD ; Pusic, Andrea L., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Fuzesi, Sarah, MD ; Cano, Stefan J., PhD ; Klassen, Anne F., DPhil ; Atisha, Dunya, MD ; Pusic, Andrea L., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Women undergoing surgery for primary breast cancer can choose between breast conserving therapy and mastectomy (with or without breast reconstruction). Patients often turn to outcomes data to help guide the decision-making process. The BREAST-Q is a validated breast surgery–specific patient-reported outcome measure that evaluates satisfaction, quality of life, and patient experience. It was originally developed for paper-and-pencil administration. However, the BREAST-Q has increasingly been administered electronically. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of an electronic version of the BREAST-Q in a large online survey. Women with a history of breast cancer surgery recruited from the Love/AVON Army of Women program completed an electronic version of the BREAST-Q in addition to the Impact of Cancer Survey and PTSD Checklist. Traditional psychometric analyses were performed on the collected data. BREAST-Q data were collected from 6748 women (3497 Breast Conserving Therapy module, 1295 Mastectomy module, 1956 Breast Reconstruction module). Acceptability was supported by a high response rate (82%), low frequency of missing data (<5%), and maximum endorsement frequencies (<80%) in all but 17 items. Scale reliability was supported by high Cronbach's α coefficients (≥0.78) and item-total correlations (range of means, 0.65–0.91). Validity was supported by interscale correlations, convergent and divergent hypotheses as well as clinical hypotheses. The electronically administered BREAST-Q yields highly reliable, clinically meaningful data for use in clinical outcomes research. The BREAST-Q can be used in the clinical setting, whether administered electronically or using paper-and-pencil, at the choice of the patient and surgeon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-9776</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3080</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.02.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28279888</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Breast Neoplasms - psychology ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Breast surgery ; BREAST-Q ; Decision Making ; Electronic questionnaires ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Mammaplasty - psychology ; Mastectomy - psychology ; Mastectomy, Segmental - psychology ; Middle Aged ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Patient reported outcomes ; Patient Satisfaction ; PROMS ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Telemedicine - methods</subject><ispartof>Breast (Edinburgh), 2017-06, Vol.33, p.44-49</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-ed125b0c019e53672919caa8fa8856e3776599eec5f4b4a2d028b56be83ef7ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-ed125b0c019e53672919caa8fa8856e3776599eec5f4b4a2d028b56be83ef7ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2017.02.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28279888$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fuzesi, Sarah, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cano, Stefan J., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klassen, Anne F., DPhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atisha, Dunya, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pusic, Andrea L., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the electronic version of the BREAST-Q in the army of women study</title><title>Breast (Edinburgh)</title><addtitle>Breast</addtitle><description>Abstract Women undergoing surgery for primary breast cancer can choose between breast conserving therapy and mastectomy (with or without breast reconstruction). Patients often turn to outcomes data to help guide the decision-making process. The BREAST-Q is a validated breast surgery–specific patient-reported outcome measure that evaluates satisfaction, quality of life, and patient experience. It was originally developed for paper-and-pencil administration. However, the BREAST-Q has increasingly been administered electronically. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of an electronic version of the BREAST-Q in a large online survey. Women with a history of breast cancer surgery recruited from the Love/AVON Army of Women program completed an electronic version of the BREAST-Q in addition to the Impact of Cancer Survey and PTSD Checklist. Traditional psychometric analyses were performed on the collected data. BREAST-Q data were collected from 6748 women (3497 Breast Conserving Therapy module, 1295 Mastectomy module, 1956 Breast Reconstruction module). Acceptability was supported by a high response rate (82%), low frequency of missing data (<5%), and maximum endorsement frequencies (<80%) in all but 17 items. Scale reliability was supported by high Cronbach's α coefficients (≥0.78) and item-total correlations (range of means, 0.65–0.91). Validity was supported by interscale correlations, convergent and divergent hypotheses as well as clinical hypotheses. The electronically administered BREAST-Q yields highly reliable, clinically meaningful data for use in clinical outcomes research. The BREAST-Q can be used in the clinical setting, whether administered electronically or using paper-and-pencil, at the choice of the patient and surgeon.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Breast surgery</subject><subject>BREAST-Q</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Electronic questionnaires</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - psychology</subject><subject>Mastectomy - psychology</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental - psychology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Patient reported outcomes</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>PROMS</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Telemedicine - methods</subject><issn>0960-9776</issn><issn>1532-3080</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyCUI5eEsR079gWpVOVDqlRBC1fLcSbUSxIXO1m0_x6HLaVw4WRZM-87H88Q8pxCRYHKV9uqjWjTXDGgTQWsAioekA0VnJUcFDwkG9ASSt008og8SWkLAJpL9ZgcMcUarZTakIsvdvCdnX2YitAX8zUWOKCbY5i8K3YY073Im09nJ5dX5cfCT7_-No77NfYjjDgVaV66_VPyqLdDwme37zH5_Pbs6vR9eX7x7sPpyXnpBFVziR1logUHVKPgsmGaamet6q1SQiLPPQutEZ3o67a2rAOmWiFbVBz7xiI_Jq8PvjdLO2LncJqjHcxN9KONexOsN39HJn9tvoadEUJQASwbvLw1iOH7gmk2o08Oh8FOGJZkqGpkraVkdU6tD6kuhpQi9ndlKJiVhdmaAwuzsjDATGaRZS_ut3gn-r38PzNgXtTOYzTJeZwcdj5mBKYL_n8V_jVwg8_c7PAN95i2YYlThmCoSVlgLtd7WM-BNhyA15L_BCpTsgM</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Fuzesi, Sarah, MD</creator><creator>Cano, Stefan J., PhD</creator><creator>Klassen, Anne F., DPhil</creator><creator>Atisha, Dunya, MD</creator><creator>Pusic, Andrea L., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Validation of the electronic version of the BREAST-Q in the army of women study</title><author>Fuzesi, Sarah, MD ; Cano, Stefan J., PhD ; Klassen, Anne F., DPhil ; Atisha, Dunya, MD ; Pusic, Andrea L., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-ed125b0c019e53672919caa8fa8856e3776599eec5f4b4a2d028b56be83ef7ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Breast surgery</topic><topic>BREAST-Q</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Electronic questionnaires</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - psychology</topic><topic>Mastectomy - psychology</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental - psychology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Patient reported outcomes</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>PROMS</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Telemedicine - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fuzesi, Sarah, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cano, Stefan J., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klassen, Anne F., DPhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atisha, Dunya, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pusic, Andrea L., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Breast (Edinburgh)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fuzesi, Sarah, MD</au><au>Cano, Stefan J., PhD</au><au>Klassen, Anne F., DPhil</au><au>Atisha, Dunya, MD</au><au>Pusic, Andrea L., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the electronic version of the BREAST-Q in the army of women study</atitle><jtitle>Breast (Edinburgh)</jtitle><addtitle>Breast</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>33</volume><spage>44</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>44-49</pages><issn>0960-9776</issn><eissn>1532-3080</eissn><abstract>Abstract Women undergoing surgery for primary breast cancer can choose between breast conserving therapy and mastectomy (with or without breast reconstruction). Patients often turn to outcomes data to help guide the decision-making process. The BREAST-Q is a validated breast surgery–specific patient-reported outcome measure that evaluates satisfaction, quality of life, and patient experience. It was originally developed for paper-and-pencil administration. However, the BREAST-Q has increasingly been administered electronically. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of an electronic version of the BREAST-Q in a large online survey. Women with a history of breast cancer surgery recruited from the Love/AVON Army of Women program completed an electronic version of the BREAST-Q in addition to the Impact of Cancer Survey and PTSD Checklist. Traditional psychometric analyses were performed on the collected data. BREAST-Q data were collected from 6748 women (3497 Breast Conserving Therapy module, 1295 Mastectomy module, 1956 Breast Reconstruction module). Acceptability was supported by a high response rate (82%), low frequency of missing data (<5%), and maximum endorsement frequencies (<80%) in all but 17 items. Scale reliability was supported by high Cronbach's α coefficients (≥0.78) and item-total correlations (range of means, 0.65–0.91). Validity was supported by interscale correlations, convergent and divergent hypotheses as well as clinical hypotheses. The electronically administered BREAST-Q yields highly reliable, clinically meaningful data for use in clinical outcomes research. The BREAST-Q can be used in the clinical setting, whether administered electronically or using paper-and-pencil, at the choice of the patient and surgeon.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28279888</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.breast.2017.02.015</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0960-9776 |
| ispartof | Breast (Edinburgh), 2017-06, Vol.33, p.44-49 |
| issn | 0960-9776 1532-3080 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5551502 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Adult Aged Breast Neoplasms - psychology Breast Neoplasms - surgery Breast surgery BREAST-Q Decision Making Electronic questionnaires Female Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Mammaplasty - psychology Mastectomy - psychology Mastectomy, Segmental - psychology Middle Aged Patient Reported Outcome Measures Patient reported outcomes Patient Satisfaction PROMS Psychometrics Quality of Life Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires - standards Telemedicine - methods |
| title | Validation of the electronic version of the BREAST-Q in the army of women study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A13%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20electronic%20version%20of%20the%20BREAST-Q%20in%20the%20army%20of%20women%20study&rft.jtitle=Breast%20(Edinburgh)&rft.au=Fuzesi,%20Sarah,%20MD&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=44-49&rft.issn=0960-9776&rft.eissn=1532-3080&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.breast.2017.02.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1876496624%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1876496624&rft_id=info:pmid/28279888&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0960977617300346&rfr_iscdi=true |