The feasibility of using pedometers for self‐report of steps and accelerometers for measuring physical activity in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities across an 18‐month intervention

Background Improving physical activity in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) is recommended to improve weight loss and general health. However, in order to determine the success of physical activity interventions, identification of feasible methods for assessment of physi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of intellectual disability research 2017-08, Vol.61 (8), p.792-801
Hauptverfasser: Ptomey, L. T., Willis, E. A., Lee, J., Washburn, R. A., Gibson, C. A., Honas, J. J., Donnelly, J. E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 801
container_issue 8
container_start_page 792
container_title Journal of intellectual disability research
container_volume 61
creator Ptomey, L. T.
Willis, E. A.
Lee, J.
Washburn, R. A.
Gibson, C. A.
Honas, J. J.
Donnelly, J. E.
description Background Improving physical activity in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) is recommended to improve weight loss and general health. However, in order to determine the success of physical activity interventions, identification of feasible methods for assessment of physical activities is necessary. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of adults with IDD to track daily steps and wear an accelerometer. Methods Overweight/obese adults with mild to moderate IDD followed a diet and physical activity program for 18 months. All participants were asked to wear a pedometer and track steps daily by using a pedometer and to provide accelerometer data for 7 days at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months. Adherence to the pedometer protocol and plausibility of the number of recorded steps were assessed, and these measures along with average wear time of the accelerometer were recorded. Results Data were collected from 149 participants (36.5 ± 12.2 years of age, 57% female). Participants recorded a step value on 81.5% of days across the 18‐month study, with 40.9% of written days classified as plausible. When wearing the accelerometer, 26.8% of participants met the recommended 4‐day/10‐h wear time criterion at baseline, and 22.6, 24.8 and 18.8% met the criterion at 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively. Conclusions Adults with IDD will adhere reasonably well to wearing a pedometer long term, but may be unable to record the step data accurately. Furthermore, adults with IDD have poor compliance with accelerometer protocols, and future studies should determine if a shorter wear time protocol would produce valid data in this population.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jir.12392
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5546616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1918716576</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-7a39fb8e34ebe3a09c90bf17bb4b1ddb781cbc709ac879bf47020b70e16774c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kt-K1DAUh4so7rh64QtIwBu96G7SpEl7I8jin5UFQdbrkKSnOxnSpibpLHPnI_hkPoRPYjozLqtgbkKSj-93cjhF8ZzgM5LX-caGM1LRtnpQrAjldVmJpnlYrHDLWVlxSk-KJzFuMMacMP64OKkagQWt21Xx83oNqAcVrbbOph3yPZqjHW_QBJ0fIEGIqPcBRXD9r-8_Akw-pIWKCaaI1NghZQw4CPfpIRvnsNesd9Ea5TKV7HZJsCNS3exSRLc2rfMxgXNg0rxAWdfBFpyfBhhTvulsVPvSLOQ0E3xcQhFpcjGDH4-CsM209ePT4lGvXIRnx_20-Pr-3fXFx_Lq84fLi7dXpWGMVqVQtO11A5SBBqpwa1qseyK0Zpp0nRYNMdoI3CrTiFb3TOAKa4GBcCGYEfS0eHPwTrMeoDM5PSgnp2AHFXbSKyv_fhntWt74raxrxjnhWfDqKAj-2wwxycHG3EanRvBzlKStciQjNcnoy3_QjZ_DmL-XKdIIwmuxCF8fqH2LAvR3xRAslymReUrkfkoy--J-9Xfkn7HIwPkBuLUOdv83yU-XXw7K38Iw0Dc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1918716576</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The feasibility of using pedometers for self‐report of steps and accelerometers for measuring physical activity in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities across an 18‐month intervention</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Ptomey, L. T. ; Willis, E. A. ; Lee, J. ; Washburn, R. A. ; Gibson, C. A. ; Honas, J. J. ; Donnelly, J. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ptomey, L. T. ; Willis, E. A. ; Lee, J. ; Washburn, R. A. ; Gibson, C. A. ; Honas, J. J. ; Donnelly, J. E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Improving physical activity in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) is recommended to improve weight loss and general health. However, in order to determine the success of physical activity interventions, identification of feasible methods for assessment of physical activities is necessary. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of adults with IDD to track daily steps and wear an accelerometer. Methods Overweight/obese adults with mild to moderate IDD followed a diet and physical activity program for 18 months. All participants were asked to wear a pedometer and track steps daily by using a pedometer and to provide accelerometer data for 7 days at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months. Adherence to the pedometer protocol and plausibility of the number of recorded steps were assessed, and these measures along with average wear time of the accelerometer were recorded. Results Data were collected from 149 participants (36.5 ± 12.2 years of age, 57% female). Participants recorded a step value on 81.5% of days across the 18‐month study, with 40.9% of written days classified as plausible. When wearing the accelerometer, 26.8% of participants met the recommended 4‐day/10‐h wear time criterion at baseline, and 22.6, 24.8 and 18.8% met the criterion at 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively. Conclusions Adults with IDD will adhere reasonably well to wearing a pedometer long term, but may be unable to record the step data accurately. Furthermore, adults with IDD have poor compliance with accelerometer protocols, and future studies should determine if a shorter wear time protocol would produce valid data in this population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-2633</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jir.12392</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28707359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>accelerometer ; Accelerometers ; Accelerometry - methods ; Adult ; Adults ; Compliance ; Developmental disabilities ; Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation ; Diet ; Exercise ; Exercise - physiology ; Exercise Therapy - methods ; Feasibility ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Intellectual disabilities ; Intellectual Disability ; Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation ; Intervention ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Obesity ; Overweight - therapy ; pedometer ; Physical activity ; Self Report ; self‐monitoring ; Weight loss ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of intellectual disability research, 2017-08, Vol.61 (8), p.792-801</ispartof><rights>2017 MENCAP and International Association of the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 MENCAP and International Association of the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-7a39fb8e34ebe3a09c90bf17bb4b1ddb781cbc709ac879bf47020b70e16774c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-7a39fb8e34ebe3a09c90bf17bb4b1ddb781cbc709ac879bf47020b70e16774c73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1705-1643</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjir.12392$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjir.12392$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1412,27905,27906,30980,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28707359$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ptomey, L. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willis, E. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Washburn, R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honas, J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnelly, J. E.</creatorcontrib><title>The feasibility of using pedometers for self‐report of steps and accelerometers for measuring physical activity in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities across an 18‐month intervention</title><title>Journal of intellectual disability research</title><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><description>Background Improving physical activity in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) is recommended to improve weight loss and general health. However, in order to determine the success of physical activity interventions, identification of feasible methods for assessment of physical activities is necessary. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of adults with IDD to track daily steps and wear an accelerometer. Methods Overweight/obese adults with mild to moderate IDD followed a diet and physical activity program for 18 months. All participants were asked to wear a pedometer and track steps daily by using a pedometer and to provide accelerometer data for 7 days at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months. Adherence to the pedometer protocol and plausibility of the number of recorded steps were assessed, and these measures along with average wear time of the accelerometer were recorded. Results Data were collected from 149 participants (36.5 ± 12.2 years of age, 57% female). Participants recorded a step value on 81.5% of days across the 18‐month study, with 40.9% of written days classified as plausible. When wearing the accelerometer, 26.8% of participants met the recommended 4‐day/10‐h wear time criterion at baseline, and 22.6, 24.8 and 18.8% met the criterion at 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively. Conclusions Adults with IDD will adhere reasonably well to wearing a pedometer long term, but may be unable to record the step data accurately. Furthermore, adults with IDD have poor compliance with accelerometer protocols, and future studies should determine if a shorter wear time protocol would produce valid data in this population.</description><subject>accelerometer</subject><subject>Accelerometers</subject><subject>Accelerometry - methods</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Developmental disabilities</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intellectual disabilities</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Overweight - therapy</subject><subject>pedometer</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>self‐monitoring</subject><subject>Weight loss</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0964-2633</issn><issn>1365-2788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kt-K1DAUh4so7rh64QtIwBu96G7SpEl7I8jin5UFQdbrkKSnOxnSpibpLHPnI_hkPoRPYjozLqtgbkKSj-93cjhF8ZzgM5LX-caGM1LRtnpQrAjldVmJpnlYrHDLWVlxSk-KJzFuMMacMP64OKkagQWt21Xx83oNqAcVrbbOph3yPZqjHW_QBJ0fIEGIqPcBRXD9r-8_Akw-pIWKCaaI1NghZQw4CPfpIRvnsNesd9Ea5TKV7HZJsCNS3exSRLc2rfMxgXNg0rxAWdfBFpyfBhhTvulsVPvSLOQ0E3xcQhFpcjGDH4-CsM209ePT4lGvXIRnx_20-Pr-3fXFx_Lq84fLi7dXpWGMVqVQtO11A5SBBqpwa1qseyK0Zpp0nRYNMdoI3CrTiFb3TOAKa4GBcCGYEfS0eHPwTrMeoDM5PSgnp2AHFXbSKyv_fhntWt74raxrxjnhWfDqKAj-2wwxycHG3EanRvBzlKStciQjNcnoy3_QjZ_DmL-XKdIIwmuxCF8fqH2LAvR3xRAslymReUrkfkoy--J-9Xfkn7HIwPkBuLUOdv83yU-XXw7K38Iw0Dc</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Ptomey, L. T.</creator><creator>Willis, E. A.</creator><creator>Lee, J.</creator><creator>Washburn, R. A.</creator><creator>Gibson, C. A.</creator><creator>Honas, J. J.</creator><creator>Donnelly, J. E.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1705-1643</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>The feasibility of using pedometers for self‐report of steps and accelerometers for measuring physical activity in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities across an 18‐month intervention</title><author>Ptomey, L. T. ; Willis, E. A. ; Lee, J. ; Washburn, R. A. ; Gibson, C. A. ; Honas, J. J. ; Donnelly, J. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-7a39fb8e34ebe3a09c90bf17bb4b1ddb781cbc709ac879bf47020b70e16774c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>accelerometer</topic><topic>Accelerometers</topic><topic>Accelerometry - methods</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Developmental disabilities</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intellectual disabilities</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Overweight - therapy</topic><topic>pedometer</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>self‐monitoring</topic><topic>Weight loss</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ptomey, L. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willis, E. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Washburn, R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honas, J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnelly, J. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ptomey, L. T.</au><au>Willis, E. A.</au><au>Lee, J.</au><au>Washburn, R. A.</au><au>Gibson, C. A.</au><au>Honas, J. J.</au><au>Donnelly, J. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The feasibility of using pedometers for self‐report of steps and accelerometers for measuring physical activity in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities across an 18‐month intervention</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>792</spage><epage>801</epage><pages>792-801</pages><issn>0964-2633</issn><eissn>1365-2788</eissn><abstract>Background Improving physical activity in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) is recommended to improve weight loss and general health. However, in order to determine the success of physical activity interventions, identification of feasible methods for assessment of physical activities is necessary. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of adults with IDD to track daily steps and wear an accelerometer. Methods Overweight/obese adults with mild to moderate IDD followed a diet and physical activity program for 18 months. All participants were asked to wear a pedometer and track steps daily by using a pedometer and to provide accelerometer data for 7 days at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months. Adherence to the pedometer protocol and plausibility of the number of recorded steps were assessed, and these measures along with average wear time of the accelerometer were recorded. Results Data were collected from 149 participants (36.5 ± 12.2 years of age, 57% female). Participants recorded a step value on 81.5% of days across the 18‐month study, with 40.9% of written days classified as plausible. When wearing the accelerometer, 26.8% of participants met the recommended 4‐day/10‐h wear time criterion at baseline, and 22.6, 24.8 and 18.8% met the criterion at 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively. Conclusions Adults with IDD will adhere reasonably well to wearing a pedometer long term, but may be unable to record the step data accurately. Furthermore, adults with IDD have poor compliance with accelerometer protocols, and future studies should determine if a shorter wear time protocol would produce valid data in this population.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28707359</pmid><doi>10.1111/jir.12392</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1705-1643</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-2633
ispartof Journal of intellectual disability research, 2017-08, Vol.61 (8), p.792-801
issn 0964-2633
1365-2788
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5546616
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source
subjects accelerometer
Accelerometers
Accelerometry - methods
Adult
Adults
Compliance
Developmental disabilities
Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation
Diet
Exercise
Exercise - physiology
Exercise Therapy - methods
Feasibility
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Intellectual disabilities
Intellectual Disability
Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation
Intervention
Male
Middle Aged
Obesity
Overweight - therapy
pedometer
Physical activity
Self Report
self‐monitoring
Weight loss
Young Adult
title The feasibility of using pedometers for self‐report of steps and accelerometers for measuring physical activity in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities across an 18‐month intervention
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T21%3A23%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20feasibility%20of%20using%20pedometers%20for%20self%E2%80%90report%20of%20steps%20and%20accelerometers%20for%20measuring%20physical%20activity%20in%20adults%20with%20intellectual%20and%20developmental%20disabilities%20across%20an%2018%E2%80%90month%20intervention&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intellectual%20disability%20research&rft.au=Ptomey,%20L.%20T.&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=792&rft.epage=801&rft.pages=792-801&rft.issn=0964-2633&rft.eissn=1365-2788&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jir.12392&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1918716576%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1918716576&rft_id=info:pmid/28707359&rfr_iscdi=true