A Longitudinal Study in Children with Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Time Course for the Second Implanted Ear and Bilateral Performance

Purpose: Whether, and if so when, a second-ear cochlear implant should be provided to older, unilaterally implanted children is an ongoing clinical question. This study evaluated rate of speech recognition progress for the second implanted ear and with bilateral cochlear implants in older sequential...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of speech, language, and hearing research language, and hearing research, 2017-01, Vol.60 (1), p.276-287
Hauptverfasser: Reeder, Ruth M, Firszt, Jill B, Cadieux, Jamie H, Strube, Michael J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 287
container_issue 1
container_start_page 276
container_title Journal of speech, language, and hearing research
container_volume 60
creator Reeder, Ruth M
Firszt, Jill B
Cadieux, Jamie H
Strube, Michael J
description Purpose: Whether, and if so when, a second-ear cochlear implant should be provided to older, unilaterally implanted children is an ongoing clinical question. This study evaluated rate of speech recognition progress for the second implanted ear and with bilateral cochlear implants in older sequentially implanted children and evaluated localization abilities. Method: A prospective longitudinal study included 24 bilaterally implanted children (mean ear surgeries at 5.11 and 14.25 years). Test intervals were every 3-6 months through 24 months postbilateral. Test conditions were each ear and bilaterally for speech recognition and localization. Results: Overall, the rate of progress for the second implanted ear was gradual. Improvements in quiet continued through the second year of bilateral use. Improvements in noise were more modest and leveled off during the second year. On all measures, results from the second ear were poorer than the first. Bilateral scores were better than either ear alone for all measures except sentences in quiet and localization. Conclusions: Older sequentially implanted children with several years between surgeries may obtain speech understanding in the second implanted ear; however, performance may be limited and rate of progress gradual. Continued contralateral ear hearing aid use and reduced time between surgeries may enhance outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0175
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5533558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A481243857</galeid><ericid>EJ1126606</ericid><sourcerecordid>A481243857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-da7042240250bab9cd51bddbfcdc4171e924e2f8f3b78dcdb73f59a1a0aa11063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt9u0zAUxiMEYmPwBoAiIU3cZNhOnD-7QOqqQjdVAtFxbTn2SeMpsYudgPYWPDKn6tauqMlFjo5_3-f484mit5RcUJJlnxihubhZLuY_knlC84TQgj-LTinnZVJRwp5jTSqWZGlZnkSvQrgj-NAsfxmdsJLkpKrYafR3Ei-cXZlh1MbKLl5icR8bG09b02kPNv5jhjZewq8R7GCQuDKdHMBjNXWq7UD6-Lpfd9IO4TK-NT1gf_QB4sb5eGgBtcpZ_QiBjmcokdjZO30Hj3QvrYLX0YtGdgHePHzPop9fZrfTebL49vV6OlkkilfZkGhZkIyxjDBOallXSnNaa103SquMFhQqlgFryiati1IrXRdpwytJJZGSUpKnZ9Hnre96rHvQCk-HfyLW3vTS3wsnjThcsaYVK_dbcJ6mmDEafHww8A7DCYPoTVDQ4SHBjUHQkue8rGhFEf3wH3qHEWHcGyovOeM5TffUSnYgjG0c7qs2pmKSlZThRfICqeQItQK7CdJZaAy2D_iLIzy-GnqjjgrOnwhakN3QBteNg3E2HILZFlTeheCh2YVHidiMqNiPqJgLLDcjirL3T4PfiR5nEoF3WwC8Ubvl2Q2lLM_x5v4BaGPr9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1868525613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Longitudinal Study in Children with Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Time Course for the Second Implanted Ear and Bilateral Performance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Reeder, Ruth M ; Firszt, Jill B ; Cadieux, Jamie H ; Strube, Michael J</creator><creatorcontrib>Reeder, Ruth M ; Firszt, Jill B ; Cadieux, Jamie H ; Strube, Michael J</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Whether, and if so when, a second-ear cochlear implant should be provided to older, unilaterally implanted children is an ongoing clinical question. This study evaluated rate of speech recognition progress for the second implanted ear and with bilateral cochlear implants in older sequentially implanted children and evaluated localization abilities. Method: A prospective longitudinal study included 24 bilaterally implanted children (mean ear surgeries at 5.11 and 14.25 years). Test intervals were every 3-6 months through 24 months postbilateral. Test conditions were each ear and bilaterally for speech recognition and localization. Results: Overall, the rate of progress for the second implanted ear was gradual. Improvements in quiet continued through the second year of bilateral use. Improvements in noise were more modest and leveled off during the second year. On all measures, results from the second ear were poorer than the first. Bilateral scores were better than either ear alone for all measures except sentences in quiet and localization. Conclusions: Older sequentially implanted children with several years between surgeries may obtain speech understanding in the second implanted ear; however, performance may be limited and rate of progress gradual. Continued contralateral ear hearing aid use and reduced time between surgeries may enhance outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-4388</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0175</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28060992</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Adolescent ; Age ; Assistive Technology ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Children &amp; youth ; Cochlear Implantation - methods ; Cochlear Implants ; Data collection ; Deaf children ; Deafness ; Hearing ; Hearing Impairments ; Hearing Loss, Bilateral - rehabilitation ; Humans ; Improvement ; Intervals ; Linear Models ; Localization ; Longitudinal Studies ; Noise ; Patient outcomes ; Pediatrics ; Physiological aspects ; Prospective Studies ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Research Design ; Speech ; Speech Perception ; Studies ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2017-01, Vol.60 (1), p.276-287</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Jan 2017</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-da7042240250bab9cd51bddbfcdc4171e924e2f8f3b78dcdb73f59a1a0aa11063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-da7042240250bab9cd51bddbfcdc4171e924e2f8f3b78dcdb73f59a1a0aa11063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1126606$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28060992$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reeder, Ruth M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firszt, Jill B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadieux, Jamie H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strube, Michael J</creatorcontrib><title>A Longitudinal Study in Children with Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Time Course for the Second Implanted Ear and Bilateral Performance</title><title>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</title><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><description>Purpose: Whether, and if so when, a second-ear cochlear implant should be provided to older, unilaterally implanted children is an ongoing clinical question. This study evaluated rate of speech recognition progress for the second implanted ear and with bilateral cochlear implants in older sequentially implanted children and evaluated localization abilities. Method: A prospective longitudinal study included 24 bilaterally implanted children (mean ear surgeries at 5.11 and 14.25 years). Test intervals were every 3-6 months through 24 months postbilateral. Test conditions were each ear and bilaterally for speech recognition and localization. Results: Overall, the rate of progress for the second implanted ear was gradual. Improvements in quiet continued through the second year of bilateral use. Improvements in noise were more modest and leveled off during the second year. On all measures, results from the second ear were poorer than the first. Bilateral scores were better than either ear alone for all measures except sentences in quiet and localization. Conclusions: Older sequentially implanted children with several years between surgeries may obtain speech understanding in the second implanted ear; however, performance may be limited and rate of progress gradual. Continued contralateral ear hearing aid use and reduced time between surgeries may enhance outcomes.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Assistive Technology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Deaf children</subject><subject>Deafness</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Hearing Impairments</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Bilateral - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Improvement</subject><subject>Intervals</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1092-4388</issn><issn>1558-9102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt9u0zAUxiMEYmPwBoAiIU3cZNhOnD-7QOqqQjdVAtFxbTn2SeMpsYudgPYWPDKn6tauqMlFjo5_3-f484mit5RcUJJlnxihubhZLuY_knlC84TQgj-LTinnZVJRwp5jTSqWZGlZnkSvQrgj-NAsfxmdsJLkpKrYafR3Ei-cXZlh1MbKLl5icR8bG09b02kPNv5jhjZewq8R7GCQuDKdHMBjNXWq7UD6-Lpfd9IO4TK-NT1gf_QB4sb5eGgBtcpZ_QiBjmcokdjZO30Hj3QvrYLX0YtGdgHePHzPop9fZrfTebL49vV6OlkkilfZkGhZkIyxjDBOallXSnNaa103SquMFhQqlgFryiati1IrXRdpwytJJZGSUpKnZ9Hnre96rHvQCk-HfyLW3vTS3wsnjThcsaYVK_dbcJ6mmDEafHww8A7DCYPoTVDQ4SHBjUHQkue8rGhFEf3wH3qHEWHcGyovOeM5TffUSnYgjG0c7qs2pmKSlZThRfICqeQItQK7CdJZaAy2D_iLIzy-GnqjjgrOnwhakN3QBteNg3E2HILZFlTeheCh2YVHidiMqNiPqJgLLDcjirL3T4PfiR5nEoF3WwC8Ubvl2Q2lLM_x5v4BaGPr9g</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Reeder, Ruth M</creator><creator>Firszt, Jill B</creator><creator>Cadieux, Jamie H</creator><creator>Strube, Michael J</creator><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>A Longitudinal Study in Children with Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Time Course for the Second Implanted Ear and Bilateral Performance</title><author>Reeder, Ruth M ; Firszt, Jill B ; Cadieux, Jamie H ; Strube, Michael J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-da7042240250bab9cd51bddbfcdc4171e924e2f8f3b78dcdb73f59a1a0aa11063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Assistive Technology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Deaf children</topic><topic>Deafness</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Hearing Impairments</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Bilateral - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Improvement</topic><topic>Intervals</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reeder, Ruth M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firszt, Jill B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadieux, Jamie H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strube, Michael J</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reeder, Ruth M</au><au>Firszt, Jill B</au><au>Cadieux, Jamie H</au><au>Strube, Michael J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1126606</ericid><atitle>A Longitudinal Study in Children with Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Time Course for the Second Implanted Ear and Bilateral Performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>276</spage><epage>287</epage><pages>276-287</pages><issn>1092-4388</issn><eissn>1558-9102</eissn><abstract>Purpose: Whether, and if so when, a second-ear cochlear implant should be provided to older, unilaterally implanted children is an ongoing clinical question. This study evaluated rate of speech recognition progress for the second implanted ear and with bilateral cochlear implants in older sequentially implanted children and evaluated localization abilities. Method: A prospective longitudinal study included 24 bilaterally implanted children (mean ear surgeries at 5.11 and 14.25 years). Test intervals were every 3-6 months through 24 months postbilateral. Test conditions were each ear and bilaterally for speech recognition and localization. Results: Overall, the rate of progress for the second implanted ear was gradual. Improvements in quiet continued through the second year of bilateral use. Improvements in noise were more modest and leveled off during the second year. On all measures, results from the second ear were poorer than the first. Bilateral scores were better than either ear alone for all measures except sentences in quiet and localization. Conclusions: Older sequentially implanted children with several years between surgeries may obtain speech understanding in the second implanted ear; however, performance may be limited and rate of progress gradual. Continued contralateral ear hearing aid use and reduced time between surgeries may enhance outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</pub><pmid>28060992</pmid><doi>10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0175</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-4388
ispartof Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2017-01, Vol.60 (1), p.276-287
issn 1092-4388
1558-9102
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5533558
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acoustics
Adolescent
Age
Assistive Technology
Child
Child, Preschool
Children
Children & youth
Cochlear Implantation - methods
Cochlear Implants
Data collection
Deaf children
Deafness
Hearing
Hearing Impairments
Hearing Loss, Bilateral - rehabilitation
Humans
Improvement
Intervals
Linear Models
Localization
Longitudinal Studies
Noise
Patient outcomes
Pediatrics
Physiological aspects
Prospective Studies
Recognition (Psychology)
Research Design
Speech
Speech Perception
Studies
Surgery
Time Factors
Transplants & implants
Treatment Outcome
title A Longitudinal Study in Children with Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Time Course for the Second Implanted Ear and Bilateral Performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T17%3A52%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Longitudinal%20Study%20in%20Children%20with%20Sequential%20Bilateral%20Cochlear%20Implants:%20Time%20Course%20for%20the%20Second%20Implanted%20Ear%20and%20Bilateral%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20speech,%20language,%20and%20hearing%20research&rft.au=Reeder,%20Ruth%20M&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=276&rft.epage=287&rft.pages=276-287&rft.issn=1092-4388&rft.eissn=1558-9102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0175&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA481243857%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1868525613&rft_id=info:pmid/28060992&rft_galeid=A481243857&rft_ericid=EJ1126606&rfr_iscdi=true