Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest
We evaluated five competing hypotheses about what predicts romantic interest. Through a half‐block quasi‐experimental design, a large sample of young adults (i.e. responders; n = 335) viewed videos of opposite‐sex persons (i.e. targets) talking about themselves, and responders rated the targets'...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of personality 2017-01, Vol.31 (1), p.42-62 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 62 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 42 |
container_title | European journal of personality |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Olderbak, Sally G. Malter, Frederic Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril Jones, Daniel N. Figueredo, Aurelio José |
description | We evaluated five competing hypotheses about what predicts romantic interest. Through a half‐block quasi‐experimental design, a large sample of young adults (i.e. responders; n = 335) viewed videos of opposite‐sex persons (i.e. targets) talking about themselves, and responders rated the targets' traits and their romantic interest in the target. We tested whether similarity, dissimilarity or overall trait levels on mate value, physical attractiveness, life history strategy and the Big Five personality factors predicted romantic interest at zero acquaintance and whether sex acted as a moderator. We tested the responders' individual perception of the targets' traits, in addition to the targets' own self‐reported trait levels and a consensus rating of the targets made by the responders. We used polynomial regression with response surface analysis within multilevel modelling to test support for each of the hypotheses. Results suggest a large sex difference in trait perception; when women rated men, they agreed in their perception more often than when men rated women. However, as a predictor of romantic interest, there were no sex differences. Only the responders' perception of the targets' physical attractiveness predicted romantic interest; specifically, responders' who rated the targets' physical attractiveness as higher than themselves reported more romantic interest. Copyright © 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/per.2087 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5519305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2087446733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-978e0405f85bc5dcc4322e752b0eb446daf0b44df589c9a5a281b16f5d89b24d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1vFDEMhkcIRJeCxC9AkbhwmeJkJpOEA1JVtlCpglUpFy5RJuMpqXaTbZIp7Z0fTrbdlg8JTrbiJ-9ry66q5xT2KAB7vca4x0CKB9WMglI1KNk-rGYgFdQMBOxUT1I6BwDVdexxtcOkaLpWNrPqxyLi4Gx2_oychJXx2Vly5DNGTJmYTL5iDGTfXkzG-Wy8xTdkfukGLBkJI_mMV-SdG8fCl5dEnCen0bhMFhgtrrMLnvRTJh9D3tS2biGmzec7n6fVo9EsEz7bxt3qy-H89OBDffzp_dHB_nFt264TtRISoQU-St5bPljbNoyh4KwH7Nu2G8wIJQ4jl8oqww2TtKfdyAepetYOzW719lZ3PfUrHCz6HM1Sr6NbmXitg3H6z4p33_RZuNScU9UALwKvtgIxXEylc71yyeJyaTyGKWmqWEOhY0IU9OVf6HmYoi_j6c2mSruiaf5HUdnxhgsJ7JetjSGliON9yxT05gB0OYAb2YK--H3Ee_Bu4wWob4HvbonX_xTSi_nJjeBP_fm6yQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865357802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Olderbak, Sally G. ; Malter, Frederic ; Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril ; Jones, Daniel N. ; Figueredo, Aurelio José</creator><creatorcontrib>Olderbak, Sally G. ; Malter, Frederic ; Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril ; Jones, Daniel N. ; Figueredo, Aurelio José</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated five competing hypotheses about what predicts romantic interest. Through a half‐block quasi‐experimental design, a large sample of young adults (i.e. responders; n = 335) viewed videos of opposite‐sex persons (i.e. targets) talking about themselves, and responders rated the targets' traits and their romantic interest in the target. We tested whether similarity, dissimilarity or overall trait levels on mate value, physical attractiveness, life history strategy and the Big Five personality factors predicted romantic interest at zero acquaintance and whether sex acted as a moderator. We tested the responders' individual perception of the targets' traits, in addition to the targets' own self‐reported trait levels and a consensus rating of the targets made by the responders. We used polynomial regression with response surface analysis within multilevel modelling to test support for each of the hypotheses. Results suggest a large sex difference in trait perception; when women rated men, they agreed in their perception more often than when men rated women. However, as a predictor of romantic interest, there were no sex differences. Only the responders' perception of the targets' physical attractiveness predicted romantic interest; specifically, responders' who rated the targets' physical attractiveness as higher than themselves reported more romantic interest. Copyright © 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-2070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0984</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/per.2087</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28736483</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJPEEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</publisher><subject>Acquaintances ; Attraction ; Attractiveness ; Big Five personality factors ; Five factor model ; Gender differences ; Hypotheses ; Life history ; life history strategy ; mate value ; Modelling ; multilevel model ; Perception ; Personality ; Personality psychology ; Physical attractiveness ; polynomial regression ; Psychology ; Quasi-experimental methods ; response surface analysis ; Sex ; Sex differences ; social relations model ; Talking ; trait perception ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>European journal of personality, 2017-01, Vol.31 (1), p.42-62</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-978e0405f85bc5dcc4322e752b0eb446daf0b44df589c9a5a281b16f5d89b24d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-978e0405f85bc5dcc4322e752b0eb446daf0b44df589c9a5a281b16f5d89b24d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fper.2087$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fper.2087$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28736483$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olderbak, Sally G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malter, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Daniel N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueredo, Aurelio José</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest</title><title>European journal of personality</title><addtitle>Eur J Pers</addtitle><description>We evaluated five competing hypotheses about what predicts romantic interest. Through a half‐block quasi‐experimental design, a large sample of young adults (i.e. responders; n = 335) viewed videos of opposite‐sex persons (i.e. targets) talking about themselves, and responders rated the targets' traits and their romantic interest in the target. We tested whether similarity, dissimilarity or overall trait levels on mate value, physical attractiveness, life history strategy and the Big Five personality factors predicted romantic interest at zero acquaintance and whether sex acted as a moderator. We tested the responders' individual perception of the targets' traits, in addition to the targets' own self‐reported trait levels and a consensus rating of the targets made by the responders. We used polynomial regression with response surface analysis within multilevel modelling to test support for each of the hypotheses. Results suggest a large sex difference in trait perception; when women rated men, they agreed in their perception more often than when men rated women. However, as a predictor of romantic interest, there were no sex differences. Only the responders' perception of the targets' physical attractiveness predicted romantic interest; specifically, responders' who rated the targets' physical attractiveness as higher than themselves reported more romantic interest. Copyright © 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology</description><subject>Acquaintances</subject><subject>Attraction</subject><subject>Attractiveness</subject><subject>Big Five personality factors</subject><subject>Five factor model</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>life history strategy</subject><subject>mate value</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>multilevel model</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality psychology</subject><subject>Physical attractiveness</subject><subject>polynomial regression</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Quasi-experimental methods</subject><subject>response surface analysis</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>social relations model</subject><subject>Talking</subject><subject>trait perception</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>0890-2070</issn><issn>1099-0984</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1vFDEMhkcIRJeCxC9AkbhwmeJkJpOEA1JVtlCpglUpFy5RJuMpqXaTbZIp7Z0fTrbdlg8JTrbiJ-9ry66q5xT2KAB7vca4x0CKB9WMglI1KNk-rGYgFdQMBOxUT1I6BwDVdexxtcOkaLpWNrPqxyLi4Gx2_oychJXx2Vly5DNGTJmYTL5iDGTfXkzG-Wy8xTdkfukGLBkJI_mMV-SdG8fCl5dEnCen0bhMFhgtrrMLnvRTJh9D3tS2biGmzec7n6fVo9EsEz7bxt3qy-H89OBDffzp_dHB_nFt264TtRISoQU-St5bPljbNoyh4KwH7Nu2G8wIJQ4jl8oqww2TtKfdyAepetYOzW719lZ3PfUrHCz6HM1Sr6NbmXitg3H6z4p33_RZuNScU9UALwKvtgIxXEylc71yyeJyaTyGKWmqWEOhY0IU9OVf6HmYoi_j6c2mSruiaf5HUdnxhgsJ7JetjSGliON9yxT05gB0OYAb2YK--H3Ee_Bu4wWob4HvbonX_xTSi_nJjeBP_fm6yQ</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Olderbak, Sally G.</creator><creator>Malter, Frederic</creator><creator>Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril</creator><creator>Jones, Daniel N.</creator><creator>Figueredo, Aurelio José</creator><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest</title><author>Olderbak, Sally G. ; Malter, Frederic ; Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril ; Jones, Daniel N. ; Figueredo, Aurelio José</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-978e0405f85bc5dcc4322e752b0eb446daf0b44df589c9a5a281b16f5d89b24d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acquaintances</topic><topic>Attraction</topic><topic>Attractiveness</topic><topic>Big Five personality factors</topic><topic>Five factor model</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>life history strategy</topic><topic>mate value</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>multilevel model</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality psychology</topic><topic>Physical attractiveness</topic><topic>polynomial regression</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Quasi-experimental methods</topic><topic>response surface analysis</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>social relations model</topic><topic>Talking</topic><topic>trait perception</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olderbak, Sally G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malter, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Daniel N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueredo, Aurelio José</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of personality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olderbak, Sally G.</au><au>Malter, Frederic</au><au>Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril</au><au>Jones, Daniel N.</au><au>Figueredo, Aurelio José</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest</atitle><jtitle>European journal of personality</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Pers</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>42</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>42-62</pages><issn>0890-2070</issn><eissn>1099-0984</eissn><coden>EJPEEU</coden><abstract>We evaluated five competing hypotheses about what predicts romantic interest. Through a half‐block quasi‐experimental design, a large sample of young adults (i.e. responders; n = 335) viewed videos of opposite‐sex persons (i.e. targets) talking about themselves, and responders rated the targets' traits and their romantic interest in the target. We tested whether similarity, dissimilarity or overall trait levels on mate value, physical attractiveness, life history strategy and the Big Five personality factors predicted romantic interest at zero acquaintance and whether sex acted as a moderator. We tested the responders' individual perception of the targets' traits, in addition to the targets' own self‐reported trait levels and a consensus rating of the targets made by the responders. We used polynomial regression with response surface analysis within multilevel modelling to test support for each of the hypotheses. Results suggest a large sex difference in trait perception; when women rated men, they agreed in their perception more often than when men rated women. However, as a predictor of romantic interest, there were no sex differences. Only the responders' perception of the targets' physical attractiveness predicted romantic interest; specifically, responders' who rated the targets' physical attractiveness as higher than themselves reported more romantic interest. Copyright © 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</pub><pmid>28736483</pmid><doi>10.1002/per.2087</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-2070 |
ispartof | European journal of personality, 2017-01, Vol.31 (1), p.42-62 |
issn | 0890-2070 1099-0984 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5519305 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Acquaintances Attraction Attractiveness Big Five personality factors Five factor model Gender differences Hypotheses Life history life history strategy mate value Modelling multilevel model Perception Personality Personality psychology Physical attractiveness polynomial regression Psychology Quasi-experimental methods response surface analysis Sex Sex differences social relations model Talking trait perception Young adults |
title | Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T09%3A08%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20Romantic%20Interest%20at%20Zero%20Acquaintance:%20Evidence%20of%20Sex%20Differences%20in%20Trait%20Perception%20but%20Not%20in%20Predictors%20of%20Interest&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20personality&rft.au=Olderbak,%20Sally%20G.&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=42&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=42-62&rft.issn=0890-2070&rft.eissn=1099-0984&rft.coden=EJPEEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/per.2087&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2087446733%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865357802&rft_id=info:pmid/28736483&rfr_iscdi=true |