Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest

We evaluated five competing hypotheses about what predicts romantic interest. Through a half‐block quasi‐experimental design, a large sample of young adults (i.e. responders; n = 335) viewed videos of opposite‐sex persons (i.e. targets) talking about themselves, and responders rated the targets'...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of personality 2017-01, Vol.31 (1), p.42-62
Hauptverfasser: Olderbak, Sally G., Malter, Frederic, Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril, Jones, Daniel N., Figueredo, Aurelio José
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 62
container_issue 1
container_start_page 42
container_title European journal of personality
container_volume 31
creator Olderbak, Sally G.
Malter, Frederic
Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril
Jones, Daniel N.
Figueredo, Aurelio José
description We evaluated five competing hypotheses about what predicts romantic interest. Through a half‐block quasi‐experimental design, a large sample of young adults (i.e. responders; n = 335) viewed videos of opposite‐sex persons (i.e. targets) talking about themselves, and responders rated the targets' traits and their romantic interest in the target. We tested whether similarity, dissimilarity or overall trait levels on mate value, physical attractiveness, life history strategy and the Big Five personality factors predicted romantic interest at zero acquaintance and whether sex acted as a moderator. We tested the responders' individual perception of the targets' traits, in addition to the targets' own self‐reported trait levels and a consensus rating of the targets made by the responders. We used polynomial regression with response surface analysis within multilevel modelling to test support for each of the hypotheses. Results suggest a large sex difference in trait perception; when women rated men, they agreed in their perception more often than when men rated women. However, as a predictor of romantic interest, there were no sex differences. Only the responders' perception of the targets' physical attractiveness predicted romantic interest; specifically, responders' who rated the targets' physical attractiveness as higher than themselves reported more romantic interest. Copyright © 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology
doi_str_mv 10.1002/per.2087
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5519305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2087446733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-978e0405f85bc5dcc4322e752b0eb446daf0b44df589c9a5a281b16f5d89b24d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1vFDEMhkcIRJeCxC9AkbhwmeJkJpOEA1JVtlCpglUpFy5RJuMpqXaTbZIp7Z0fTrbdlg8JTrbiJ-9ry66q5xT2KAB7vca4x0CKB9WMglI1KNk-rGYgFdQMBOxUT1I6BwDVdexxtcOkaLpWNrPqxyLi4Gx2_oychJXx2Vly5DNGTJmYTL5iDGTfXkzG-Wy8xTdkfukGLBkJI_mMV-SdG8fCl5dEnCen0bhMFhgtrrMLnvRTJh9D3tS2biGmzec7n6fVo9EsEz7bxt3qy-H89OBDffzp_dHB_nFt264TtRISoQU-St5bPljbNoyh4KwH7Nu2G8wIJQ4jl8oqww2TtKfdyAepetYOzW719lZ3PfUrHCz6HM1Sr6NbmXitg3H6z4p33_RZuNScU9UALwKvtgIxXEylc71yyeJyaTyGKWmqWEOhY0IU9OVf6HmYoi_j6c2mSruiaf5HUdnxhgsJ7JetjSGliON9yxT05gB0OYAb2YK--H3Ee_Bu4wWob4HvbonX_xTSi_nJjeBP_fm6yQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865357802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Olderbak, Sally G. ; Malter, Frederic ; Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril ; Jones, Daniel N. ; Figueredo, Aurelio José</creator><creatorcontrib>Olderbak, Sally G. ; Malter, Frederic ; Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril ; Jones, Daniel N. ; Figueredo, Aurelio José</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated five competing hypotheses about what predicts romantic interest. Through a half‐block quasi‐experimental design, a large sample of young adults (i.e. responders; n = 335) viewed videos of opposite‐sex persons (i.e. targets) talking about themselves, and responders rated the targets' traits and their romantic interest in the target. We tested whether similarity, dissimilarity or overall trait levels on mate value, physical attractiveness, life history strategy and the Big Five personality factors predicted romantic interest at zero acquaintance and whether sex acted as a moderator. We tested the responders' individual perception of the targets' traits, in addition to the targets' own self‐reported trait levels and a consensus rating of the targets made by the responders. We used polynomial regression with response surface analysis within multilevel modelling to test support for each of the hypotheses. Results suggest a large sex difference in trait perception; when women rated men, they agreed in their perception more often than when men rated women. However, as a predictor of romantic interest, there were no sex differences. Only the responders' perception of the targets' physical attractiveness predicted romantic interest; specifically, responders' who rated the targets' physical attractiveness as higher than themselves reported more romantic interest. Copyright © 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-2070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0984</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/per.2087</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28736483</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJPEEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</publisher><subject>Acquaintances ; Attraction ; Attractiveness ; Big Five personality factors ; Five factor model ; Gender differences ; Hypotheses ; Life history ; life history strategy ; mate value ; Modelling ; multilevel model ; Perception ; Personality ; Personality psychology ; Physical attractiveness ; polynomial regression ; Psychology ; Quasi-experimental methods ; response surface analysis ; Sex ; Sex differences ; social relations model ; Talking ; trait perception ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>European journal of personality, 2017-01, Vol.31 (1), p.42-62</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-978e0405f85bc5dcc4322e752b0eb446daf0b44df589c9a5a281b16f5d89b24d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-978e0405f85bc5dcc4322e752b0eb446daf0b44df589c9a5a281b16f5d89b24d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fper.2087$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fper.2087$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28736483$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olderbak, Sally G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malter, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Daniel N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueredo, Aurelio José</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest</title><title>European journal of personality</title><addtitle>Eur J Pers</addtitle><description>We evaluated five competing hypotheses about what predicts romantic interest. Through a half‐block quasi‐experimental design, a large sample of young adults (i.e. responders; n = 335) viewed videos of opposite‐sex persons (i.e. targets) talking about themselves, and responders rated the targets' traits and their romantic interest in the target. We tested whether similarity, dissimilarity or overall trait levels on mate value, physical attractiveness, life history strategy and the Big Five personality factors predicted romantic interest at zero acquaintance and whether sex acted as a moderator. We tested the responders' individual perception of the targets' traits, in addition to the targets' own self‐reported trait levels and a consensus rating of the targets made by the responders. We used polynomial regression with response surface analysis within multilevel modelling to test support for each of the hypotheses. Results suggest a large sex difference in trait perception; when women rated men, they agreed in their perception more often than when men rated women. However, as a predictor of romantic interest, there were no sex differences. Only the responders' perception of the targets' physical attractiveness predicted romantic interest; specifically, responders' who rated the targets' physical attractiveness as higher than themselves reported more romantic interest. Copyright © 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology</description><subject>Acquaintances</subject><subject>Attraction</subject><subject>Attractiveness</subject><subject>Big Five personality factors</subject><subject>Five factor model</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>life history strategy</subject><subject>mate value</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>multilevel model</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality psychology</subject><subject>Physical attractiveness</subject><subject>polynomial regression</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Quasi-experimental methods</subject><subject>response surface analysis</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>social relations model</subject><subject>Talking</subject><subject>trait perception</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>0890-2070</issn><issn>1099-0984</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1vFDEMhkcIRJeCxC9AkbhwmeJkJpOEA1JVtlCpglUpFy5RJuMpqXaTbZIp7Z0fTrbdlg8JTrbiJ-9ry66q5xT2KAB7vca4x0CKB9WMglI1KNk-rGYgFdQMBOxUT1I6BwDVdexxtcOkaLpWNrPqxyLi4Gx2_oychJXx2Vly5DNGTJmYTL5iDGTfXkzG-Wy8xTdkfukGLBkJI_mMV-SdG8fCl5dEnCen0bhMFhgtrrMLnvRTJh9D3tS2biGmzec7n6fVo9EsEz7bxt3qy-H89OBDffzp_dHB_nFt264TtRISoQU-St5bPljbNoyh4KwH7Nu2G8wIJQ4jl8oqww2TtKfdyAepetYOzW719lZ3PfUrHCz6HM1Sr6NbmXitg3H6z4p33_RZuNScU9UALwKvtgIxXEylc71yyeJyaTyGKWmqWEOhY0IU9OVf6HmYoi_j6c2mSruiaf5HUdnxhgsJ7JetjSGliON9yxT05gB0OYAb2YK--H3Ee_Bu4wWob4HvbonX_xTSi_nJjeBP_fm6yQ</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Olderbak, Sally G.</creator><creator>Malter, Frederic</creator><creator>Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril</creator><creator>Jones, Daniel N.</creator><creator>Figueredo, Aurelio José</creator><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest</title><author>Olderbak, Sally G. ; Malter, Frederic ; Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril ; Jones, Daniel N. ; Figueredo, Aurelio José</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-978e0405f85bc5dcc4322e752b0eb446daf0b44df589c9a5a281b16f5d89b24d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acquaintances</topic><topic>Attraction</topic><topic>Attractiveness</topic><topic>Big Five personality factors</topic><topic>Five factor model</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>life history strategy</topic><topic>mate value</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>multilevel model</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality psychology</topic><topic>Physical attractiveness</topic><topic>polynomial regression</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Quasi-experimental methods</topic><topic>response surface analysis</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>social relations model</topic><topic>Talking</topic><topic>trait perception</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olderbak, Sally G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malter, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Daniel N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueredo, Aurelio José</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of personality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olderbak, Sally G.</au><au>Malter, Frederic</au><au>Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril</au><au>Jones, Daniel N.</au><au>Figueredo, Aurelio José</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest</atitle><jtitle>European journal of personality</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Pers</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>42</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>42-62</pages><issn>0890-2070</issn><eissn>1099-0984</eissn><coden>EJPEEU</coden><abstract>We evaluated five competing hypotheses about what predicts romantic interest. Through a half‐block quasi‐experimental design, a large sample of young adults (i.e. responders; n = 335) viewed videos of opposite‐sex persons (i.e. targets) talking about themselves, and responders rated the targets' traits and their romantic interest in the target. We tested whether similarity, dissimilarity or overall trait levels on mate value, physical attractiveness, life history strategy and the Big Five personality factors predicted romantic interest at zero acquaintance and whether sex acted as a moderator. We tested the responders' individual perception of the targets' traits, in addition to the targets' own self‐reported trait levels and a consensus rating of the targets made by the responders. We used polynomial regression with response surface analysis within multilevel modelling to test support for each of the hypotheses. Results suggest a large sex difference in trait perception; when women rated men, they agreed in their perception more often than when men rated women. However, as a predictor of romantic interest, there were no sex differences. Only the responders' perception of the targets' physical attractiveness predicted romantic interest; specifically, responders' who rated the targets' physical attractiveness as higher than themselves reported more romantic interest. Copyright © 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</pub><pmid>28736483</pmid><doi>10.1002/per.2087</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-2070
ispartof European journal of personality, 2017-01, Vol.31 (1), p.42-62
issn 0890-2070
1099-0984
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5519305
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; SAGE Complete
subjects Acquaintances
Attraction
Attractiveness
Big Five personality factors
Five factor model
Gender differences
Hypotheses
Life history
life history strategy
mate value
Modelling
multilevel model
Perception
Personality
Personality psychology
Physical attractiveness
polynomial regression
Psychology
Quasi-experimental methods
response surface analysis
Sex
Sex differences
social relations model
Talking
trait perception
Young adults
title Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T09%3A08%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20Romantic%20Interest%20at%20Zero%20Acquaintance:%20Evidence%20of%20Sex%20Differences%20in%20Trait%20Perception%20but%20Not%20in%20Predictors%20of%20Interest&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20personality&rft.au=Olderbak,%20Sally%20G.&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=42&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=42-62&rft.issn=0890-2070&rft.eissn=1099-0984&rft.coden=EJPEEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/per.2087&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2087446733%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865357802&rft_id=info:pmid/28736483&rfr_iscdi=true