Does prolonged storage of red blood cells cause harm?

Summary Red blood cells (RBCs) degrade progressively during the weeks of refrigerated storage. No universally accepted definition of ‘fresh’ or ‘old’ RBCs exists. While practices vary from country to country, preservative solutions permitting shelf life as long as 7 weeks have been licenced. Transfu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of haematology 2014-04, Vol.165 (1), p.3-16
Hauptverfasser: Flegel, Willy A., Natanson, Charles, Klein, Harvey G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title British journal of haematology
container_volume 165
creator Flegel, Willy A.
Natanson, Charles
Klein, Harvey G.
description Summary Red blood cells (RBCs) degrade progressively during the weeks of refrigerated storage. No universally accepted definition of ‘fresh’ or ‘old’ RBCs exists. While practices vary from country to country, preservative solutions permitting shelf life as long as 7 weeks have been licenced. Transfusion of stored RBCs, particularly those at the end of the approved shelf life, has been implicated in adverse clinical outcomes. The results of observational analyses, animal models and studies in volunteers have proved provocative, controversial and contradictory. A recently completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) in premature infants exemplifies the difficulties with moderately sized clinical studies. Several other RCTs are in progress. The effect of RBC storage may well vary according to the clinical setting. Resolution of the importance of the storage lesion may require large pragmatic clinical trials. In the meantime, institutions involved in blood collection and transfusion should explore strategies that assure blood availability, while limiting the use of the oldest RBCs currently approved by regulation.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bjh.12747
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5515544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>BJH12747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2037-77cf46a0ba6c5c67a7285e5b4a71a97d7b873d907c1b0627db840d4da0d54313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkNtOAjEQhhujEUQvfAHTF1iYnrbLjUbxgIbEG-6bnoAlhW5a0PD2rqBE52Zm8v_zJ_MhdE2gT9oamOWiT6jk8gR1CStFQQknp6gLALIgwKsOush5CUAYCHKOOpTzEgSjXSQeo8-4STHE9dw7nDcx6bnHcYZTu5oQo8PWh5Cx1dvs8UKn1d0lOpvpkP3VT--h6fPTdDQuJu8vr6P7SdFQYLKQ0s54qcHo0gpbSi1pJbwwXEuih9JJU0nmhiAtMVBS6UzFwXGnwQnOCOuh20NsszUr76xfb5IOqkn1SqedirpW_5V1vVDz-KGEIEJw3gbc_A04Xv7-3xoGB8NnHfzuqBNQ32BVC1btwaqHt_F-YF8eB2p8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does prolonged storage of red blood cells cause harm?</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Flegel, Willy A. ; Natanson, Charles ; Klein, Harvey G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Flegel, Willy A. ; Natanson, Charles ; Klein, Harvey G.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Red blood cells (RBCs) degrade progressively during the weeks of refrigerated storage. No universally accepted definition of ‘fresh’ or ‘old’ RBCs exists. While practices vary from country to country, preservative solutions permitting shelf life as long as 7 weeks have been licenced. Transfusion of stored RBCs, particularly those at the end of the approved shelf life, has been implicated in adverse clinical outcomes. The results of observational analyses, animal models and studies in volunteers have proved provocative, controversial and contradictory. A recently completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) in premature infants exemplifies the difficulties with moderately sized clinical studies. Several other RCTs are in progress. The effect of RBC storage may well vary according to the clinical setting. Resolution of the importance of the storage lesion may require large pragmatic clinical trials. In the meantime, institutions involved in blood collection and transfusion should explore strategies that assure blood availability, while limiting the use of the oldest RBCs currently approved by regulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1048</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12747</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24460532</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>adverse effects ; Animals ; Blood Preservation - adverse effects ; Blood Transfusion ; Erythrocytes - physiology ; Humans ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; red blood cells ; red cell units ; Research Design ; storage ; therapy ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>British journal of haematology, 2014-04, Vol.165 (1), p.3-16</ispartof><rights>Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbjh.12747$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbjh.12747$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24460532$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flegel, Willy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natanson, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Harvey G.</creatorcontrib><title>Does prolonged storage of red blood cells cause harm?</title><title>British journal of haematology</title><addtitle>Br J Haematol</addtitle><description>Summary Red blood cells (RBCs) degrade progressively during the weeks of refrigerated storage. No universally accepted definition of ‘fresh’ or ‘old’ RBCs exists. While practices vary from country to country, preservative solutions permitting shelf life as long as 7 weeks have been licenced. Transfusion of stored RBCs, particularly those at the end of the approved shelf life, has been implicated in adverse clinical outcomes. The results of observational analyses, animal models and studies in volunteers have proved provocative, controversial and contradictory. A recently completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) in premature infants exemplifies the difficulties with moderately sized clinical studies. Several other RCTs are in progress. The effect of RBC storage may well vary according to the clinical setting. Resolution of the importance of the storage lesion may require large pragmatic clinical trials. In the meantime, institutions involved in blood collection and transfusion should explore strategies that assure blood availability, while limiting the use of the oldest RBCs currently approved by regulation.</description><subject>adverse effects</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Blood Preservation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Transfusion</subject><subject>Erythrocytes - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>red blood cells</subject><subject>red cell units</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>storage</subject><subject>therapy</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0007-1048</issn><issn>1365-2141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkNtOAjEQhhujEUQvfAHTF1iYnrbLjUbxgIbEG-6bnoAlhW5a0PD2rqBE52Zm8v_zJ_MhdE2gT9oamOWiT6jk8gR1CStFQQknp6gLALIgwKsOush5CUAYCHKOOpTzEgSjXSQeo8-4STHE9dw7nDcx6bnHcYZTu5oQo8PWh5Cx1dvs8UKn1d0lOpvpkP3VT--h6fPTdDQuJu8vr6P7SdFQYLKQ0s54qcHo0gpbSi1pJbwwXEuih9JJU0nmhiAtMVBS6UzFwXGnwQnOCOuh20NsszUr76xfb5IOqkn1SqedirpW_5V1vVDz-KGEIEJw3gbc_A04Xv7-3xoGB8NnHfzuqBNQ32BVC1btwaqHt_F-YF8eB2p8</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Flegel, Willy A.</creator><creator>Natanson, Charles</creator><creator>Klein, Harvey G.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Does prolonged storage of red blood cells cause harm?</title><author>Flegel, Willy A. ; Natanson, Charles ; Klein, Harvey G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2037-77cf46a0ba6c5c67a7285e5b4a71a97d7b873d907c1b0627db840d4da0d54313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>adverse effects</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Blood Preservation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Transfusion</topic><topic>Erythrocytes - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>red blood cells</topic><topic>red cell units</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>storage</topic><topic>therapy</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flegel, Willy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natanson, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Harvey G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of haematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flegel, Willy A.</au><au>Natanson, Charles</au><au>Klein, Harvey G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does prolonged storage of red blood cells cause harm?</atitle><jtitle>British journal of haematology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Haematol</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>165</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>3-16</pages><issn>0007-1048</issn><eissn>1365-2141</eissn><abstract>Summary Red blood cells (RBCs) degrade progressively during the weeks of refrigerated storage. No universally accepted definition of ‘fresh’ or ‘old’ RBCs exists. While practices vary from country to country, preservative solutions permitting shelf life as long as 7 weeks have been licenced. Transfusion of stored RBCs, particularly those at the end of the approved shelf life, has been implicated in adverse clinical outcomes. The results of observational analyses, animal models and studies in volunteers have proved provocative, controversial and contradictory. A recently completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) in premature infants exemplifies the difficulties with moderately sized clinical studies. Several other RCTs are in progress. The effect of RBC storage may well vary according to the clinical setting. Resolution of the importance of the storage lesion may require large pragmatic clinical trials. In the meantime, institutions involved in blood collection and transfusion should explore strategies that assure blood availability, while limiting the use of the oldest RBCs currently approved by regulation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>24460532</pmid><doi>10.1111/bjh.12747</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1048
ispartof British journal of haematology, 2014-04, Vol.165 (1), p.3-16
issn 0007-1048
1365-2141
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5515544
source Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects adverse effects
Animals
Blood Preservation - adverse effects
Blood Transfusion
Erythrocytes - physiology
Humans
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
red blood cells
red cell units
Research Design
storage
therapy
Time Factors
title Does prolonged storage of red blood cells cause harm?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T08%3A39%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20prolonged%20storage%20of%20red%20blood%20cells%20cause%20harm?&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20haematology&rft.au=Flegel,%20Willy%20A.&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=165&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=3-16&rft.issn=0007-1048&rft.eissn=1365-2141&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjh.12747&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_pubme%3EBJH12747%3C/wiley_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/24460532&rfr_iscdi=true