Does prolonged storage of red blood cells cause harm?
Summary Red blood cells (RBCs) degrade progressively during the weeks of refrigerated storage. No universally accepted definition of ‘fresh’ or ‘old’ RBCs exists. While practices vary from country to country, preservative solutions permitting shelf life as long as 7 weeks have been licenced. Transfu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of haematology 2014-04, Vol.165 (1), p.3-16 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 16 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | British journal of haematology |
container_volume | 165 |
creator | Flegel, Willy A. Natanson, Charles Klein, Harvey G. |
description | Summary
Red blood cells (RBCs) degrade progressively during the weeks of refrigerated storage. No universally accepted definition of ‘fresh’ or ‘old’ RBCs exists. While practices vary from country to country, preservative solutions permitting shelf life as long as 7 weeks have been licenced. Transfusion of stored RBCs, particularly those at the end of the approved shelf life, has been implicated in adverse clinical outcomes. The results of observational analyses, animal models and studies in volunteers have proved provocative, controversial and contradictory. A recently completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) in premature infants exemplifies the difficulties with moderately sized clinical studies. Several other RCTs are in progress. The effect of RBC storage may well vary according to the clinical setting. Resolution of the importance of the storage lesion may require large pragmatic clinical trials. In the meantime, institutions involved in blood collection and transfusion should explore strategies that assure blood availability, while limiting the use of the oldest RBCs currently approved by regulation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bjh.12747 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5515544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>BJH12747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2037-77cf46a0ba6c5c67a7285e5b4a71a97d7b873d907c1b0627db840d4da0d54313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkNtOAjEQhhujEUQvfAHTF1iYnrbLjUbxgIbEG-6bnoAlhW5a0PD2rqBE52Zm8v_zJ_MhdE2gT9oamOWiT6jk8gR1CStFQQknp6gLALIgwKsOush5CUAYCHKOOpTzEgSjXSQeo8-4STHE9dw7nDcx6bnHcYZTu5oQo8PWh5Cx1dvs8UKn1d0lOpvpkP3VT--h6fPTdDQuJu8vr6P7SdFQYLKQ0s54qcHo0gpbSi1pJbwwXEuih9JJU0nmhiAtMVBS6UzFwXGnwQnOCOuh20NsszUr76xfb5IOqkn1SqedirpW_5V1vVDz-KGEIEJw3gbc_A04Xv7-3xoGB8NnHfzuqBNQ32BVC1btwaqHt_F-YF8eB2p8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does prolonged storage of red blood cells cause harm?</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Flegel, Willy A. ; Natanson, Charles ; Klein, Harvey G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Flegel, Willy A. ; Natanson, Charles ; Klein, Harvey G.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Red blood cells (RBCs) degrade progressively during the weeks of refrigerated storage. No universally accepted definition of ‘fresh’ or ‘old’ RBCs exists. While practices vary from country to country, preservative solutions permitting shelf life as long as 7 weeks have been licenced. Transfusion of stored RBCs, particularly those at the end of the approved shelf life, has been implicated in adverse clinical outcomes. The results of observational analyses, animal models and studies in volunteers have proved provocative, controversial and contradictory. A recently completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) in premature infants exemplifies the difficulties with moderately sized clinical studies. Several other RCTs are in progress. The effect of RBC storage may well vary according to the clinical setting. Resolution of the importance of the storage lesion may require large pragmatic clinical trials. In the meantime, institutions involved in blood collection and transfusion should explore strategies that assure blood availability, while limiting the use of the oldest RBCs currently approved by regulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1048</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12747</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24460532</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>adverse effects ; Animals ; Blood Preservation - adverse effects ; Blood Transfusion ; Erythrocytes - physiology ; Humans ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; red blood cells ; red cell units ; Research Design ; storage ; therapy ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>British journal of haematology, 2014-04, Vol.165 (1), p.3-16</ispartof><rights>Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbjh.12747$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbjh.12747$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24460532$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flegel, Willy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natanson, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Harvey G.</creatorcontrib><title>Does prolonged storage of red blood cells cause harm?</title><title>British journal of haematology</title><addtitle>Br J Haematol</addtitle><description>Summary
Red blood cells (RBCs) degrade progressively during the weeks of refrigerated storage. No universally accepted definition of ‘fresh’ or ‘old’ RBCs exists. While practices vary from country to country, preservative solutions permitting shelf life as long as 7 weeks have been licenced. Transfusion of stored RBCs, particularly those at the end of the approved shelf life, has been implicated in adverse clinical outcomes. The results of observational analyses, animal models and studies in volunteers have proved provocative, controversial and contradictory. A recently completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) in premature infants exemplifies the difficulties with moderately sized clinical studies. Several other RCTs are in progress. The effect of RBC storage may well vary according to the clinical setting. Resolution of the importance of the storage lesion may require large pragmatic clinical trials. In the meantime, institutions involved in blood collection and transfusion should explore strategies that assure blood availability, while limiting the use of the oldest RBCs currently approved by regulation.</description><subject>adverse effects</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Blood Preservation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Transfusion</subject><subject>Erythrocytes - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>red blood cells</subject><subject>red cell units</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>storage</subject><subject>therapy</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0007-1048</issn><issn>1365-2141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkNtOAjEQhhujEUQvfAHTF1iYnrbLjUbxgIbEG-6bnoAlhW5a0PD2rqBE52Zm8v_zJ_MhdE2gT9oamOWiT6jk8gR1CStFQQknp6gLALIgwKsOush5CUAYCHKOOpTzEgSjXSQeo8-4STHE9dw7nDcx6bnHcYZTu5oQo8PWh5Cx1dvs8UKn1d0lOpvpkP3VT--h6fPTdDQuJu8vr6P7SdFQYLKQ0s54qcHo0gpbSi1pJbwwXEuih9JJU0nmhiAtMVBS6UzFwXGnwQnOCOuh20NsszUr76xfb5IOqkn1SqedirpW_5V1vVDz-KGEIEJw3gbc_A04Xv7-3xoGB8NnHfzuqBNQ32BVC1btwaqHt_F-YF8eB2p8</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Flegel, Willy A.</creator><creator>Natanson, Charles</creator><creator>Klein, Harvey G.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Does prolonged storage of red blood cells cause harm?</title><author>Flegel, Willy A. ; Natanson, Charles ; Klein, Harvey G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2037-77cf46a0ba6c5c67a7285e5b4a71a97d7b873d907c1b0627db840d4da0d54313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>adverse effects</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Blood Preservation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Transfusion</topic><topic>Erythrocytes - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>red blood cells</topic><topic>red cell units</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>storage</topic><topic>therapy</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flegel, Willy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natanson, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Harvey G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of haematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flegel, Willy A.</au><au>Natanson, Charles</au><au>Klein, Harvey G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does prolonged storage of red blood cells cause harm?</atitle><jtitle>British journal of haematology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Haematol</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>165</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>3-16</pages><issn>0007-1048</issn><eissn>1365-2141</eissn><abstract>Summary
Red blood cells (RBCs) degrade progressively during the weeks of refrigerated storage. No universally accepted definition of ‘fresh’ or ‘old’ RBCs exists. While practices vary from country to country, preservative solutions permitting shelf life as long as 7 weeks have been licenced. Transfusion of stored RBCs, particularly those at the end of the approved shelf life, has been implicated in adverse clinical outcomes. The results of observational analyses, animal models and studies in volunteers have proved provocative, controversial and contradictory. A recently completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) in premature infants exemplifies the difficulties with moderately sized clinical studies. Several other RCTs are in progress. The effect of RBC storage may well vary according to the clinical setting. Resolution of the importance of the storage lesion may require large pragmatic clinical trials. In the meantime, institutions involved in blood collection and transfusion should explore strategies that assure blood availability, while limiting the use of the oldest RBCs currently approved by regulation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>24460532</pmid><doi>10.1111/bjh.12747</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1048 |
ispartof | British journal of haematology, 2014-04, Vol.165 (1), p.3-16 |
issn | 0007-1048 1365-2141 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5515544 |
source | Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | adverse effects Animals Blood Preservation - adverse effects Blood Transfusion Erythrocytes - physiology Humans Meta-Analysis as Topic Practice Guidelines as Topic Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic red blood cells red cell units Research Design storage therapy Time Factors |
title | Does prolonged storage of red blood cells cause harm? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T08%3A39%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20prolonged%20storage%20of%20red%20blood%20cells%20cause%20harm?&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20haematology&rft.au=Flegel,%20Willy%20A.&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=165&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=3-16&rft.issn=0007-1048&rft.eissn=1365-2141&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjh.12747&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_pubme%3EBJH12747%3C/wiley_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/24460532&rfr_iscdi=true |