Influence of Layer Thickness and Raster Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a Comparative Mechanical Study between PEEK and ABS

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is a rapidly growing 3D printing technology. However, printing materials are restricted to acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) or poly (lactic acid) (PLA) in most Fused deposition modeling (FDM) equipment. Here, we report on a new high-performance printing material,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materials 2015-09, Vol.8 (9), p.5834-5846
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Wenzheng, Geng, Peng, Li, Guiwei, Zhao, Di, Zhang, Haibo, Zhao, Ji
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5846
container_issue 9
container_start_page 5834
container_title Materials
container_volume 8
creator Wu, Wenzheng
Geng, Peng
Li, Guiwei
Zhao, Di
Zhang, Haibo
Zhao, Ji
description Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is a rapidly growing 3D printing technology. However, printing materials are restricted to acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) or poly (lactic acid) (PLA) in most Fused deposition modeling (FDM) equipment. Here, we report on a new high-performance printing material, polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK), which could surmount these shortcomings. This paper is devoted to studying the influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK. Samples with three different layer thicknesses (200, 300 and 400 μm) and raster angles (0°, 30° and 45°) were built using a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) 3D printing system and their tensile, compressive and bending strengths were tested. The optimal mechanical properties of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) samples were found at a layer thickness of 300 μm and a raster angle of 0°. To evaluate the printing performance of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) samples, a comparison was made between the mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) parts. The results suggest that the average tensile strengths of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) parts were 108% higher than those for acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and compressive strengths were 114% and bending strengths were 115%. However, the modulus of elasticity for both materials was similar. These results indicate that the mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) are superior to 3D-printed ABS.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ma8095271
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5512651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3835556491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-5a8d48573823e12f0bde3a9b583cda5dc9bd380eb0f78148bf09d99a4f62221a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks9u1DAQhy0EotXSAy-ALHGBQ8B_4sS-IG2XLVQsYkXLOZrYk25K4iy2U7QP0vclpWVpuTAXW_bnT57Rj5DnnL2R0rC3PWhmlCj5I3LIjSkybvL88b39ATmK8ZJNJSXXwjwlB0KXRipZHpLrU990I3qLdGjoCnYY6Pmmtd89xkjBO_oVYpoO5_6imxhP0wbpZ7Qb8K2Fjq7DsMWQWow3Avk-W4fWJ3R0vVx--i0Auhj6LQRI7dWDp2dpdDtaY_qJ6P_y8-OzZ-RJA13Eo7t1Rr6dLM8XH7PVlw-ni_kqs9IUKVOgXa5VKbWQyEXDaocSTK20tA6Us6Z2UjOsWVNqnuu6YcYZA3lTCCE4yBl5d-vdjnWPzqJPAbpqG9oewq4aoK0e3vh2U10MV5VSXBSKT4JXd4Iw_Bgxpqpvo8WuA4_DGCtuRKmlUHn5f7QsmcyFnGpGXv6DXg5j8NMkJkpwIzVXxUS9vqVsGGIM2Oz_zVl1E41qH42JfXG_0T35JwjyF-HqsxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1721938156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Layer Thickness and Raster Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a Comparative Mechanical Study between PEEK and ABS</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Wu, Wenzheng ; Geng, Peng ; Li, Guiwei ; Zhao, Di ; Zhang, Haibo ; Zhao, Ji</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Wenzheng ; Geng, Peng ; Li, Guiwei ; Zhao, Di ; Zhang, Haibo ; Zhao, Ji</creatorcontrib><description>Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is a rapidly growing 3D printing technology. However, printing materials are restricted to acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) or poly (lactic acid) (PLA) in most Fused deposition modeling (FDM) equipment. Here, we report on a new high-performance printing material, polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK), which could surmount these shortcomings. This paper is devoted to studying the influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK. Samples with three different layer thicknesses (200, 300 and 400 μm) and raster angles (0°, 30° and 45°) were built using a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) 3D printing system and their tensile, compressive and bending strengths were tested. The optimal mechanical properties of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) samples were found at a layer thickness of 300 μm and a raster angle of 0°. To evaluate the printing performance of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) samples, a comparison was made between the mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) parts. The results suggest that the average tensile strengths of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) parts were 108% higher than those for acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and compressive strengths were 114% and bending strengths were 115%. However, the modulus of elasticity for both materials was similar. These results indicate that the mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) are superior to 3D-printed ABS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ma8095271</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28793537</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>3-D printers ; 3D printing ; ABS resins ; Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene ; Bend strength ; Fused deposition modeling ; Manufacturing ; Mechanical properties ; Polyetheretherketones ; Printing ; Product development ; Raster</subject><ispartof>Materials, 2015-09, Vol.8 (9), p.5834-5846</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2015</rights><rights>2015 by the authors. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-5a8d48573823e12f0bde3a9b583cda5dc9bd380eb0f78148bf09d99a4f62221a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512651/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5512651/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28793537$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Wenzheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geng, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Haibo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ji</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Layer Thickness and Raster Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a Comparative Mechanical Study between PEEK and ABS</title><title>Materials</title><addtitle>Materials (Basel)</addtitle><description>Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is a rapidly growing 3D printing technology. However, printing materials are restricted to acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) or poly (lactic acid) (PLA) in most Fused deposition modeling (FDM) equipment. Here, we report on a new high-performance printing material, polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK), which could surmount these shortcomings. This paper is devoted to studying the influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK. Samples with three different layer thicknesses (200, 300 and 400 μm) and raster angles (0°, 30° and 45°) were built using a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) 3D printing system and their tensile, compressive and bending strengths were tested. The optimal mechanical properties of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) samples were found at a layer thickness of 300 μm and a raster angle of 0°. To evaluate the printing performance of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) samples, a comparison was made between the mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) parts. The results suggest that the average tensile strengths of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) parts were 108% higher than those for acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and compressive strengths were 114% and bending strengths were 115%. However, the modulus of elasticity for both materials was similar. These results indicate that the mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) are superior to 3D-printed ABS.</description><subject>3-D printers</subject><subject>3D printing</subject><subject>ABS resins</subject><subject>Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene</subject><subject>Bend strength</subject><subject>Fused deposition modeling</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Polyetheretherketones</subject><subject>Printing</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Raster</subject><issn>1996-1944</issn><issn>1996-1944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks9u1DAQhy0EotXSAy-ALHGBQ8B_4sS-IG2XLVQsYkXLOZrYk25K4iy2U7QP0vclpWVpuTAXW_bnT57Rj5DnnL2R0rC3PWhmlCj5I3LIjSkybvL88b39ATmK8ZJNJSXXwjwlB0KXRipZHpLrU990I3qLdGjoCnYY6Pmmtd89xkjBO_oVYpoO5_6imxhP0wbpZ7Qb8K2Fjq7DsMWQWow3Avk-W4fWJ3R0vVx--i0Auhj6LQRI7dWDp2dpdDtaY_qJ6P_y8-OzZ-RJA13Eo7t1Rr6dLM8XH7PVlw-ni_kqs9IUKVOgXa5VKbWQyEXDaocSTK20tA6Us6Z2UjOsWVNqnuu6YcYZA3lTCCE4yBl5d-vdjnWPzqJPAbpqG9oewq4aoK0e3vh2U10MV5VSXBSKT4JXd4Iw_Bgxpqpvo8WuA4_DGCtuRKmlUHn5f7QsmcyFnGpGXv6DXg5j8NMkJkpwIzVXxUS9vqVsGGIM2Oz_zVl1E41qH42JfXG_0T35JwjyF-HqsxQ</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Wu, Wenzheng</creator><creator>Geng, Peng</creator><creator>Li, Guiwei</creator><creator>Zhao, Di</creator><creator>Zhang, Haibo</creator><creator>Zhao, Ji</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Influence of Layer Thickness and Raster Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a Comparative Mechanical Study between PEEK and ABS</title><author>Wu, Wenzheng ; Geng, Peng ; Li, Guiwei ; Zhao, Di ; Zhang, Haibo ; Zhao, Ji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-5a8d48573823e12f0bde3a9b583cda5dc9bd380eb0f78148bf09d99a4f62221a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>3-D printers</topic><topic>3D printing</topic><topic>ABS resins</topic><topic>Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene</topic><topic>Bend strength</topic><topic>Fused deposition modeling</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Polyetheretherketones</topic><topic>Printing</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Raster</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Wenzheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geng, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Haibo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ji</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Wenzheng</au><au>Geng, Peng</au><au>Li, Guiwei</au><au>Zhao, Di</au><au>Zhang, Haibo</au><au>Zhao, Ji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Layer Thickness and Raster Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a Comparative Mechanical Study between PEEK and ABS</atitle><jtitle>Materials</jtitle><addtitle>Materials (Basel)</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>5834</spage><epage>5846</epage><pages>5834-5846</pages><issn>1996-1944</issn><eissn>1996-1944</eissn><abstract>Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is a rapidly growing 3D printing technology. However, printing materials are restricted to acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) or poly (lactic acid) (PLA) in most Fused deposition modeling (FDM) equipment. Here, we report on a new high-performance printing material, polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK), which could surmount these shortcomings. This paper is devoted to studying the influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK. Samples with three different layer thicknesses (200, 300 and 400 μm) and raster angles (0°, 30° and 45°) were built using a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) 3D printing system and their tensile, compressive and bending strengths were tested. The optimal mechanical properties of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) samples were found at a layer thickness of 300 μm and a raster angle of 0°. To evaluate the printing performance of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) samples, a comparison was made between the mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) parts. The results suggest that the average tensile strengths of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) parts were 108% higher than those for acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and compressive strengths were 114% and bending strengths were 115%. However, the modulus of elasticity for both materials was similar. These results indicate that the mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) are superior to 3D-printed ABS.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>28793537</pmid><doi>10.3390/ma8095271</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1996-1944
ispartof Materials, 2015-09, Vol.8 (9), p.5834-5846
issn 1996-1944
1996-1944
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5512651
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects 3-D printers
3D printing
ABS resins
Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene
Bend strength
Fused deposition modeling
Manufacturing
Mechanical properties
Polyetheretherketones
Printing
Product development
Raster
title Influence of Layer Thickness and Raster Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a Comparative Mechanical Study between PEEK and ABS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T07%3A45%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Layer%20Thickness%20and%20Raster%20Angle%20on%20the%20Mechanical%20Properties%20of%203D-Printed%20PEEK%20and%20a%20Comparative%20Mechanical%20Study%20between%20PEEK%20and%20ABS&rft.jtitle=Materials&rft.au=Wu,%20Wenzheng&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=5834&rft.epage=5846&rft.pages=5834-5846&rft.issn=1996-1944&rft.eissn=1996-1944&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ma8095271&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3835556491%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1721938156&rft_id=info:pmid/28793537&rfr_iscdi=true