Effective quality management practices in routine clinical next-generation sequencing

Molecular technologies have allowed laboratories to detect and establish the profiles of human cancers by identifying a variety of somatic variants. In order to improve personalized patient care, we have established a next-generation sequencing (NGS) test to screen for somatic variants in primary or...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2016-05, Vol.54 (5), p.761-771
Hauptverfasser: de Abreu, Francine B., Peterson, Jason D., Amos, Christopher I., Wells, Wendy A., Tsongalis, Gregory J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 771
container_issue 5
container_start_page 761
container_title Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
container_volume 54
creator de Abreu, Francine B.
Peterson, Jason D.
Amos, Christopher I.
Wells, Wendy A.
Tsongalis, Gregory J.
description Molecular technologies have allowed laboratories to detect and establish the profiles of human cancers by identifying a variety of somatic variants. In order to improve personalized patient care, we have established a next-generation sequencing (NGS) test to screen for somatic variants in primary or advanced cancers. In this study, we describe the laboratory quality management program for NGS testing, and also provide an overview of the somatic variants identified in over 1000 patient samples as well as their implications in clinical practice. Over the past one-and-a-half years, our laboratory received a total of 1028 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues, which consisted of non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs), colon adenocarcinomas, glioma/glioblastomas, melanomas, breast carcinomas, and other tumor types. During this time period, we implemented a series of quality control (QC) checks that included (1) pre-DNA extraction, (2) DNA quantification, (3) DNA quality, (4) library quantification, (5) post-emulsification PCR, and (6) post-sequencing metrics. At least 10 ng of genomic DNA (gDNA) were used to prepare barcoded libraries using the AmpliSeq CHPv2. Samples were multiplexed and sequenced on Ion Torrent 318 chips using the Ion PGM System. Variants were identified using the Variant Caller Plugin, and annotation and functional predictions were performed using the Golden Helix SVS. A total of 1005 samples passed QC1-3, and following additional library preparation QC checkpoints, 877 samples were sequenced. Samples were classified into two categories: wild-type (127) and positive for somatic variants (750). Somatic variants were classified into clinically actionable (60%) and non-actionable (40%). The use of NGS in routine clinical laboratory practice allowed for the detection of tumor profiles that are essential for the selection of targeted therapies and identification of applicable clinical trials, contributing to the improvement of personalized patient care in oncology.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/cclm-2015-1190
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5506542</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1783338523</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ad54daecbf6c4fe7fc56319fb9549101ffcded5b77032451d333dda6205164aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1PHDEMxaOqqFDaa4_VHHsZiCcfsyshJIRoQULiAucomzjToExmSTLQ_e-b7VIEB0625J-fn_wI-Qb0CASIY2PC2HYURAuwpB_IAXDWt5wx-Piv562UHeyTzznf04oJ3n8i-51c9B0DcUDuLpxDU_wjNg-zDr5smlFHPeCIsTTrpOvMYG58bNI0Fx-xMcFHb3RoIv4p7YARky5-ik3Ghxmj8XH4QvacDhm_PtdDcvfz4vb8sr2--XV1fnbdGs5ZabUV3Go0KycNd9g7IySDpVstBV8CBeeMRStWfU9ZxwVYxpi1WnZUgORas0NyutNdz6sRramekw5qnfyo00ZN2qu3k-h_q2F6VEJQKXhXBX48C6Spms9FjT4bDEFHnOasoF_UmwvRsYoe7VCTppwTupczQNU2C7XNQm2zUNss6sL31-Ze8P_Pr8DJDnjSoWCyOKR5Uxt1P80p1r-9oyy46CWwv74anIo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1783338523</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effective quality management practices in routine clinical next-generation sequencing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>de Abreu, Francine B. ; Peterson, Jason D. ; Amos, Christopher I. ; Wells, Wendy A. ; Tsongalis, Gregory J.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Abreu, Francine B. ; Peterson, Jason D. ; Amos, Christopher I. ; Wells, Wendy A. ; Tsongalis, Gregory J.</creatorcontrib><description>Molecular technologies have allowed laboratories to detect and establish the profiles of human cancers by identifying a variety of somatic variants. In order to improve personalized patient care, we have established a next-generation sequencing (NGS) test to screen for somatic variants in primary or advanced cancers. In this study, we describe the laboratory quality management program for NGS testing, and also provide an overview of the somatic variants identified in over 1000 patient samples as well as their implications in clinical practice. Over the past one-and-a-half years, our laboratory received a total of 1028 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues, which consisted of non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs), colon adenocarcinomas, glioma/glioblastomas, melanomas, breast carcinomas, and other tumor types. During this time period, we implemented a series of quality control (QC) checks that included (1) pre-DNA extraction, (2) DNA quantification, (3) DNA quality, (4) library quantification, (5) post-emulsification PCR, and (6) post-sequencing metrics. At least 10 ng of genomic DNA (gDNA) were used to prepare barcoded libraries using the AmpliSeq CHPv2. Samples were multiplexed and sequenced on Ion Torrent 318 chips using the Ion PGM System. Variants were identified using the Variant Caller Plugin, and annotation and functional predictions were performed using the Golden Helix SVS. A total of 1005 samples passed QC1-3, and following additional library preparation QC checkpoints, 877 samples were sequenced. Samples were classified into two categories: wild-type (127) and positive for somatic variants (750). Somatic variants were classified into clinically actionable (60%) and non-actionable (40%). The use of NGS in routine clinical laboratory practice allowed for the detection of tumor profiles that are essential for the selection of targeted therapies and identification of applicable clinical trials, contributing to the improvement of personalized patient care in oncology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1434-6621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-4331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2015-1190</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26872315</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Base Sequence ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards ; DNA, Neoplasm - genetics ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - standards ; Humans ; massively parallel sequencing ; Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Neoplasms - genetics ; next-generation sequencing ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; solid tumor ; somatic variant ; Tissue Fixation</subject><ispartof>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2016-05, Vol.54 (5), p.761-771</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ad54daecbf6c4fe7fc56319fb9549101ffcded5b77032451d333dda6205164aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ad54daecbf6c4fe7fc56319fb9549101ffcded5b77032451d333dda6205164aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2015-1190/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2015-1190/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,66725,68509</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26872315$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Abreu, Francine B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Jason D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amos, Christopher I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Wendy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsongalis, Gregory J.</creatorcontrib><title>Effective quality management practices in routine clinical next-generation sequencing</title><title>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</title><addtitle>Clin Chem Lab Med</addtitle><description>Molecular technologies have allowed laboratories to detect and establish the profiles of human cancers by identifying a variety of somatic variants. In order to improve personalized patient care, we have established a next-generation sequencing (NGS) test to screen for somatic variants in primary or advanced cancers. In this study, we describe the laboratory quality management program for NGS testing, and also provide an overview of the somatic variants identified in over 1000 patient samples as well as their implications in clinical practice. Over the past one-and-a-half years, our laboratory received a total of 1028 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues, which consisted of non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs), colon adenocarcinomas, glioma/glioblastomas, melanomas, breast carcinomas, and other tumor types. During this time period, we implemented a series of quality control (QC) checks that included (1) pre-DNA extraction, (2) DNA quantification, (3) DNA quality, (4) library quantification, (5) post-emulsification PCR, and (6) post-sequencing metrics. At least 10 ng of genomic DNA (gDNA) were used to prepare barcoded libraries using the AmpliSeq CHPv2. Samples were multiplexed and sequenced on Ion Torrent 318 chips using the Ion PGM System. Variants were identified using the Variant Caller Plugin, and annotation and functional predictions were performed using the Golden Helix SVS. A total of 1005 samples passed QC1-3, and following additional library preparation QC checkpoints, 877 samples were sequenced. Samples were classified into two categories: wild-type (127) and positive for somatic variants (750). Somatic variants were classified into clinically actionable (60%) and non-actionable (40%). The use of NGS in routine clinical laboratory practice allowed for the detection of tumor profiles that are essential for the selection of targeted therapies and identification of applicable clinical trials, contributing to the improvement of personalized patient care in oncology.</description><subject>Base Sequence</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - genetics</subject><subject>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>massively parallel sequencing</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>next-generation sequencing</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>solid tumor</subject><subject>somatic variant</subject><subject>Tissue Fixation</subject><issn>1434-6621</issn><issn>1437-4331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1PHDEMxaOqqFDaa4_VHHsZiCcfsyshJIRoQULiAucomzjToExmSTLQ_e-b7VIEB0625J-fn_wI-Qb0CASIY2PC2HYURAuwpB_IAXDWt5wx-Piv562UHeyTzznf04oJ3n8i-51c9B0DcUDuLpxDU_wjNg-zDr5smlFHPeCIsTTrpOvMYG58bNI0Fx-xMcFHb3RoIv4p7YARky5-ik3Ghxmj8XH4QvacDhm_PtdDcvfz4vb8sr2--XV1fnbdGs5ZabUV3Go0KycNd9g7IySDpVstBV8CBeeMRStWfU9ZxwVYxpi1WnZUgORas0NyutNdz6sRramekw5qnfyo00ZN2qu3k-h_q2F6VEJQKXhXBX48C6Spms9FjT4bDEFHnOasoF_UmwvRsYoe7VCTppwTupczQNU2C7XNQm2zUNss6sL31-Ze8P_Pr8DJDnjSoWCyOKR5Uxt1P80p1r-9oyy46CWwv74anIo</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>de Abreu, Francine B.</creator><creator>Peterson, Jason D.</creator><creator>Amos, Christopher I.</creator><creator>Wells, Wendy A.</creator><creator>Tsongalis, Gregory J.</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Effective quality management practices in routine clinical next-generation sequencing</title><author>de Abreu, Francine B. ; Peterson, Jason D. ; Amos, Christopher I. ; Wells, Wendy A. ; Tsongalis, Gregory J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ad54daecbf6c4fe7fc56319fb9549101ffcded5b77032451d333dda6205164aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Base Sequence</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - genetics</topic><topic>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>massively parallel sequencing</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>next-generation sequencing</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>solid tumor</topic><topic>somatic variant</topic><topic>Tissue Fixation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Abreu, Francine B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Jason D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amos, Christopher I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Wendy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsongalis, Gregory J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Abreu, Francine B.</au><au>Peterson, Jason D.</au><au>Amos, Christopher I.</au><au>Wells, Wendy A.</au><au>Tsongalis, Gregory J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effective quality management practices in routine clinical next-generation sequencing</atitle><jtitle>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Chem Lab Med</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>761</spage><epage>771</epage><pages>761-771</pages><issn>1434-6621</issn><eissn>1437-4331</eissn><abstract>Molecular technologies have allowed laboratories to detect and establish the profiles of human cancers by identifying a variety of somatic variants. In order to improve personalized patient care, we have established a next-generation sequencing (NGS) test to screen for somatic variants in primary or advanced cancers. In this study, we describe the laboratory quality management program for NGS testing, and also provide an overview of the somatic variants identified in over 1000 patient samples as well as their implications in clinical practice. Over the past one-and-a-half years, our laboratory received a total of 1028 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues, which consisted of non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs), colon adenocarcinomas, glioma/glioblastomas, melanomas, breast carcinomas, and other tumor types. During this time period, we implemented a series of quality control (QC) checks that included (1) pre-DNA extraction, (2) DNA quantification, (3) DNA quality, (4) library quantification, (5) post-emulsification PCR, and (6) post-sequencing metrics. At least 10 ng of genomic DNA (gDNA) were used to prepare barcoded libraries using the AmpliSeq CHPv2. Samples were multiplexed and sequenced on Ion Torrent 318 chips using the Ion PGM System. Variants were identified using the Variant Caller Plugin, and annotation and functional predictions were performed using the Golden Helix SVS. A total of 1005 samples passed QC1-3, and following additional library preparation QC checkpoints, 877 samples were sequenced. Samples were classified into two categories: wild-type (127) and positive for somatic variants (750). Somatic variants were classified into clinically actionable (60%) and non-actionable (40%). The use of NGS in routine clinical laboratory practice allowed for the detection of tumor profiles that are essential for the selection of targeted therapies and identification of applicable clinical trials, contributing to the improvement of personalized patient care in oncology.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><pmid>26872315</pmid><doi>10.1515/cclm-2015-1190</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1434-6621
ispartof Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2016-05, Vol.54 (5), p.761-771
issn 1434-6621
1437-4331
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5506542
source MEDLINE; De Gruyter journals
subjects Base Sequence
Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards
DNA, Neoplasm - genetics
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - standards
Humans
massively parallel sequencing
Neoplasms - diagnosis
Neoplasms - genetics
next-generation sequencing
Polymerase Chain Reaction
solid tumor
somatic variant
Tissue Fixation
title Effective quality management practices in routine clinical next-generation sequencing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T08%3A30%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effective%20quality%20management%20practices%20in%20routine%20clinical%20next-generation%20sequencing&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20chemistry%20and%20laboratory%20medicine&rft.au=de%20Abreu,%20Francine%20B.&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=761&rft.epage=771&rft.pages=761-771&rft.issn=1434-6621&rft.eissn=1437-4331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/cclm-2015-1190&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1783338523%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1783338523&rft_id=info:pmid/26872315&rfr_iscdi=true