Cryolipolysis for Reduction of Arm Fat: Safety and Efficacy of a Prototype CoolCup Applicator With Flat Contour
BACKGROUNDCryolipolysis of the arms has been shown to be an effective but somewhat time-consuming process. OBJECTIVEThe study evaluated safety and efficacy of a contoured cup cryolipolysis applicator for reduction of arm fat. The prototype was designed to maximize tissue contact with the cooling sur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dermatologic surgery 2017-07, Vol.43 (7), p.940-949 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 949 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 940 |
container_title | Dermatologic surgery |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Carruthers, Jean D Humphrey, Shannon Rivers, Jason K |
description | BACKGROUNDCryolipolysis of the arms has been shown to be an effective but somewhat time-consuming process.
OBJECTIVEThe study evaluated safety and efficacy of a contoured cup cryolipolysis applicator for reduction of arm fat. The prototype was designed to maximize tissue contact with the cooling surface to improve comfort, while reducing treatment time by 25 minutes.
MATERIALS AND METHODSBoth arms were treated using a prototype device that delivered treatment in 35 minutes at −11°C. Photographic and ultrasound documentation was captured at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Efficacy was assessed by photo review and measurement of fat reduction in ultrasound images. Immediately after 1, 4, and 12 weeks post-treatment, clinical assessments were performed to evaluate treatment areas and sensory alterations.
RESULTSThirty women were enrolled and completed treatments to both arms. Ultrasound measurements found mean fat layer reduction of 3.2 mm with an SD of 2.7 mm. Blinded independent photo review found 85.2% correct identification of baseline photographs by at least 2/3 of reviewers. There were no unanticipated adverse device effects. Four study subjects experienced numbness in the treatment area beyond the 12-week visit that subsequently resolved without intervention.
CONCLUSIONThese data suggest that the CoolCup prototype applicator provides rapid, safe, and effective arm treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001134 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5491235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1908432547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-3aa4499d7970b17f1a281afabac997be6aa2f43e2778a734a8ed70501c2b416b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFvFCEYhonR2Nr6D4zh6GUqMMwyeDDZjF01aaJxazySbxhwUXaYAmMz_740W5vqoVwgeZ_v-UhehF5RckaJFG8_bLdn5MGhtOZP0DFtGK-4YM3T8iZiVZGGsiP0IqVfhWGyJs_REWsbWbjVMQpdXIJ3U_BLcgnbEPE3M8w6uzDiYPE67vEG8ju8BWvygmEc8Lm1ToNebnPAX2PIIS-TwV0IvpsnvJ4mX4BcXD9c3uGNh1zCMYc5nqJnFnwyL-_uE_R9c37Zfaouvnz83K0vKs0bwasagHMpByEF6amwFFhLwUIPWkrRmxUAs7w2TIgWRM2hNYMgDaGa9Zyu-voEvT94p7nfm0GbMUfwaopuD3FRAZz6NxndTv0Mf1TDJWV1UwRv7gQxXM0mZbV3SRvvYTRhTopK0vKaNVwUlB9QHUNK0dj7NZSo265U6Ur931UZe_3wi_dDf8spQHsAroPPJqbffr42Ue0M-Lx73H0DGrih3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1908432547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cryolipolysis for Reduction of Arm Fat: Safety and Efficacy of a Prototype CoolCup Applicator With Flat Contour</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Carruthers, Jean D ; Humphrey, Shannon ; Rivers, Jason K</creator><creatorcontrib>Carruthers, Jean D ; Humphrey, Shannon ; Rivers, Jason K</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDCryolipolysis of the arms has been shown to be an effective but somewhat time-consuming process.
OBJECTIVEThe study evaluated safety and efficacy of a contoured cup cryolipolysis applicator for reduction of arm fat. The prototype was designed to maximize tissue contact with the cooling surface to improve comfort, while reducing treatment time by 25 minutes.
MATERIALS AND METHODSBoth arms were treated using a prototype device that delivered treatment in 35 minutes at −11°C. Photographic and ultrasound documentation was captured at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Efficacy was assessed by photo review and measurement of fat reduction in ultrasound images. Immediately after 1, 4, and 12 weeks post-treatment, clinical assessments were performed to evaluate treatment areas and sensory alterations.
RESULTSThirty women were enrolled and completed treatments to both arms. Ultrasound measurements found mean fat layer reduction of 3.2 mm with an SD of 2.7 mm. Blinded independent photo review found 85.2% correct identification of baseline photographs by at least 2/3 of reviewers. There were no unanticipated adverse device effects. Four study subjects experienced numbness in the treatment area beyond the 12-week visit that subsequently resolved without intervention.
CONCLUSIONThese data suggest that the CoolCup prototype applicator provides rapid, safe, and effective arm treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-0512</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4725</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001134</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28595246</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arm ; Cold Temperature ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Humans ; Lipectomy - adverse effects ; Lipectomy - instrumentation ; Lipectomy - methods ; Middle Aged ; Original ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Dermatologic surgery, 2017-07, Vol.43 (7), p.940-949</ispartof><rights>2017 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-3aa4499d7970b17f1a281afabac997be6aa2f43e2778a734a8ed70501c2b416b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-3aa4499d7970b17f1a281afabac997be6aa2f43e2778a734a8ed70501c2b416b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28595246$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carruthers, Jean D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivers, Jason K</creatorcontrib><title>Cryolipolysis for Reduction of Arm Fat: Safety and Efficacy of a Prototype CoolCup Applicator With Flat Contour</title><title>Dermatologic surgery</title><addtitle>Dermatol Surg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUNDCryolipolysis of the arms has been shown to be an effective but somewhat time-consuming process.
OBJECTIVEThe study evaluated safety and efficacy of a contoured cup cryolipolysis applicator for reduction of arm fat. The prototype was designed to maximize tissue contact with the cooling surface to improve comfort, while reducing treatment time by 25 minutes.
MATERIALS AND METHODSBoth arms were treated using a prototype device that delivered treatment in 35 minutes at −11°C. Photographic and ultrasound documentation was captured at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Efficacy was assessed by photo review and measurement of fat reduction in ultrasound images. Immediately after 1, 4, and 12 weeks post-treatment, clinical assessments were performed to evaluate treatment areas and sensory alterations.
RESULTSThirty women were enrolled and completed treatments to both arms. Ultrasound measurements found mean fat layer reduction of 3.2 mm with an SD of 2.7 mm. Blinded independent photo review found 85.2% correct identification of baseline photographs by at least 2/3 of reviewers. There were no unanticipated adverse device effects. Four study subjects experienced numbness in the treatment area beyond the 12-week visit that subsequently resolved without intervention.
CONCLUSIONThese data suggest that the CoolCup prototype applicator provides rapid, safe, and effective arm treatment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arm</subject><subject>Cold Temperature</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lipectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Lipectomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Lipectomy - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1076-0512</issn><issn>1524-4725</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFvFCEYhonR2Nr6D4zh6GUqMMwyeDDZjF01aaJxazySbxhwUXaYAmMz_740W5vqoVwgeZ_v-UhehF5RckaJFG8_bLdn5MGhtOZP0DFtGK-4YM3T8iZiVZGGsiP0IqVfhWGyJs_REWsbWbjVMQpdXIJ3U_BLcgnbEPE3M8w6uzDiYPE67vEG8ju8BWvygmEc8Lm1ToNebnPAX2PIIS-TwV0IvpsnvJ4mX4BcXD9c3uGNh1zCMYc5nqJnFnwyL-_uE_R9c37Zfaouvnz83K0vKs0bwasagHMpByEF6amwFFhLwUIPWkrRmxUAs7w2TIgWRM2hNYMgDaGa9Zyu-voEvT94p7nfm0GbMUfwaopuD3FRAZz6NxndTv0Mf1TDJWV1UwRv7gQxXM0mZbV3SRvvYTRhTopK0vKaNVwUlB9QHUNK0dj7NZSo265U6Ur931UZe_3wi_dDf8spQHsAroPPJqbffr42Ue0M-Lx73H0DGrih3g</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Carruthers, Jean D</creator><creator>Humphrey, Shannon</creator><creator>Rivers, Jason K</creator><general>by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Cryolipolysis for Reduction of Arm Fat: Safety and Efficacy of a Prototype CoolCup Applicator With Flat Contour</title><author>Carruthers, Jean D ; Humphrey, Shannon ; Rivers, Jason K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-3aa4499d7970b17f1a281afabac997be6aa2f43e2778a734a8ed70501c2b416b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arm</topic><topic>Cold Temperature</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lipectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Lipectomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Lipectomy - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carruthers, Jean D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivers, Jason K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Dermatologic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carruthers, Jean D</au><au>Humphrey, Shannon</au><au>Rivers, Jason K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cryolipolysis for Reduction of Arm Fat: Safety and Efficacy of a Prototype CoolCup Applicator With Flat Contour</atitle><jtitle>Dermatologic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Dermatol Surg</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>940</spage><epage>949</epage><pages>940-949</pages><issn>1076-0512</issn><eissn>1524-4725</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDCryolipolysis of the arms has been shown to be an effective but somewhat time-consuming process.
OBJECTIVEThe study evaluated safety and efficacy of a contoured cup cryolipolysis applicator for reduction of arm fat. The prototype was designed to maximize tissue contact with the cooling surface to improve comfort, while reducing treatment time by 25 minutes.
MATERIALS AND METHODSBoth arms were treated using a prototype device that delivered treatment in 35 minutes at −11°C. Photographic and ultrasound documentation was captured at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Efficacy was assessed by photo review and measurement of fat reduction in ultrasound images. Immediately after 1, 4, and 12 weeks post-treatment, clinical assessments were performed to evaluate treatment areas and sensory alterations.
RESULTSThirty women were enrolled and completed treatments to both arms. Ultrasound measurements found mean fat layer reduction of 3.2 mm with an SD of 2.7 mm. Blinded independent photo review found 85.2% correct identification of baseline photographs by at least 2/3 of reviewers. There were no unanticipated adverse device effects. Four study subjects experienced numbness in the treatment area beyond the 12-week visit that subsequently resolved without intervention.
CONCLUSIONThese data suggest that the CoolCup prototype applicator provides rapid, safe, and effective arm treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>28595246</pmid><doi>10.1097/DSS.0000000000001134</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1076-0512 |
ispartof | Dermatologic surgery, 2017-07, Vol.43 (7), p.940-949 |
issn | 1076-0512 1524-4725 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5491235 |
source | Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adult Arm Cold Temperature Equipment Design Female Humans Lipectomy - adverse effects Lipectomy - instrumentation Lipectomy - methods Middle Aged Original Prospective Studies Treatment Outcome |
title | Cryolipolysis for Reduction of Arm Fat: Safety and Efficacy of a Prototype CoolCup Applicator With Flat Contour |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T04%3A54%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cryolipolysis%20for%20Reduction%20of%20Arm%20Fat:%20Safety%20and%20Efficacy%20of%20a%20Prototype%20CoolCup%20Applicator%20With%20Flat%20Contour&rft.jtitle=Dermatologic%20surgery&rft.au=Carruthers,%20Jean%20D&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=940&rft.epage=949&rft.pages=940-949&rft.issn=1076-0512&rft.eissn=1524-4725&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001134&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1908432547%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1908432547&rft_id=info:pmid/28595246&rfr_iscdi=true |