Cryolipolysis for Reduction of Arm Fat: Safety and Efficacy of a Prototype CoolCup Applicator With Flat Contour

BACKGROUNDCryolipolysis of the arms has been shown to be an effective but somewhat time-consuming process. OBJECTIVEThe study evaluated safety and efficacy of a contoured cup cryolipolysis applicator for reduction of arm fat. The prototype was designed to maximize tissue contact with the cooling sur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dermatologic surgery 2017-07, Vol.43 (7), p.940-949
Hauptverfasser: Carruthers, Jean D, Humphrey, Shannon, Rivers, Jason K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 949
container_issue 7
container_start_page 940
container_title Dermatologic surgery
container_volume 43
creator Carruthers, Jean D
Humphrey, Shannon
Rivers, Jason K
description BACKGROUNDCryolipolysis of the arms has been shown to be an effective but somewhat time-consuming process. OBJECTIVEThe study evaluated safety and efficacy of a contoured cup cryolipolysis applicator for reduction of arm fat. The prototype was designed to maximize tissue contact with the cooling surface to improve comfort, while reducing treatment time by 25 minutes. MATERIALS AND METHODSBoth arms were treated using a prototype device that delivered treatment in 35 minutes at −11°C. Photographic and ultrasound documentation was captured at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Efficacy was assessed by photo review and measurement of fat reduction in ultrasound images. Immediately after 1, 4, and 12 weeks post-treatment, clinical assessments were performed to evaluate treatment areas and sensory alterations. RESULTSThirty women were enrolled and completed treatments to both arms. Ultrasound measurements found mean fat layer reduction of 3.2 mm with an SD of 2.7 mm. Blinded independent photo review found 85.2% correct identification of baseline photographs by at least 2/3 of reviewers. There were no unanticipated adverse device effects. Four study subjects experienced numbness in the treatment area beyond the 12-week visit that subsequently resolved without intervention. CONCLUSIONThese data suggest that the CoolCup prototype applicator provides rapid, safe, and effective arm treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001134
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5491235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1908432547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-3aa4499d7970b17f1a281afabac997be6aa2f43e2778a734a8ed70501c2b416b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFvFCEYhonR2Nr6D4zh6GUqMMwyeDDZjF01aaJxazySbxhwUXaYAmMz_740W5vqoVwgeZ_v-UhehF5RckaJFG8_bLdn5MGhtOZP0DFtGK-4YM3T8iZiVZGGsiP0IqVfhWGyJs_REWsbWbjVMQpdXIJ3U_BLcgnbEPE3M8w6uzDiYPE67vEG8ju8BWvygmEc8Lm1ToNebnPAX2PIIS-TwV0IvpsnvJ4mX4BcXD9c3uGNh1zCMYc5nqJnFnwyL-_uE_R9c37Zfaouvnz83K0vKs0bwasagHMpByEF6amwFFhLwUIPWkrRmxUAs7w2TIgWRM2hNYMgDaGa9Zyu-voEvT94p7nfm0GbMUfwaopuD3FRAZz6NxndTv0Mf1TDJWV1UwRv7gQxXM0mZbV3SRvvYTRhTopK0vKaNVwUlB9QHUNK0dj7NZSo265U6Ur931UZe_3wi_dDf8spQHsAroPPJqbffr42Ue0M-Lx73H0DGrih3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1908432547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cryolipolysis for Reduction of Arm Fat: Safety and Efficacy of a Prototype CoolCup Applicator With Flat Contour</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Carruthers, Jean D ; Humphrey, Shannon ; Rivers, Jason K</creator><creatorcontrib>Carruthers, Jean D ; Humphrey, Shannon ; Rivers, Jason K</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDCryolipolysis of the arms has been shown to be an effective but somewhat time-consuming process. OBJECTIVEThe study evaluated safety and efficacy of a contoured cup cryolipolysis applicator for reduction of arm fat. The prototype was designed to maximize tissue contact with the cooling surface to improve comfort, while reducing treatment time by 25 minutes. MATERIALS AND METHODSBoth arms were treated using a prototype device that delivered treatment in 35 minutes at −11°C. Photographic and ultrasound documentation was captured at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Efficacy was assessed by photo review and measurement of fat reduction in ultrasound images. Immediately after 1, 4, and 12 weeks post-treatment, clinical assessments were performed to evaluate treatment areas and sensory alterations. RESULTSThirty women were enrolled and completed treatments to both arms. Ultrasound measurements found mean fat layer reduction of 3.2 mm with an SD of 2.7 mm. Blinded independent photo review found 85.2% correct identification of baseline photographs by at least 2/3 of reviewers. There were no unanticipated adverse device effects. Four study subjects experienced numbness in the treatment area beyond the 12-week visit that subsequently resolved without intervention. CONCLUSIONThese data suggest that the CoolCup prototype applicator provides rapid, safe, and effective arm treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-0512</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4725</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001134</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28595246</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arm ; Cold Temperature ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Humans ; Lipectomy - adverse effects ; Lipectomy - instrumentation ; Lipectomy - methods ; Middle Aged ; Original ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Dermatologic surgery, 2017-07, Vol.43 (7), p.940-949</ispartof><rights>2017 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-3aa4499d7970b17f1a281afabac997be6aa2f43e2778a734a8ed70501c2b416b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-3aa4499d7970b17f1a281afabac997be6aa2f43e2778a734a8ed70501c2b416b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28595246$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carruthers, Jean D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivers, Jason K</creatorcontrib><title>Cryolipolysis for Reduction of Arm Fat: Safety and Efficacy of a Prototype CoolCup Applicator With Flat Contour</title><title>Dermatologic surgery</title><addtitle>Dermatol Surg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUNDCryolipolysis of the arms has been shown to be an effective but somewhat time-consuming process. OBJECTIVEThe study evaluated safety and efficacy of a contoured cup cryolipolysis applicator for reduction of arm fat. The prototype was designed to maximize tissue contact with the cooling surface to improve comfort, while reducing treatment time by 25 minutes. MATERIALS AND METHODSBoth arms were treated using a prototype device that delivered treatment in 35 minutes at −11°C. Photographic and ultrasound documentation was captured at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Efficacy was assessed by photo review and measurement of fat reduction in ultrasound images. Immediately after 1, 4, and 12 weeks post-treatment, clinical assessments were performed to evaluate treatment areas and sensory alterations. RESULTSThirty women were enrolled and completed treatments to both arms. Ultrasound measurements found mean fat layer reduction of 3.2 mm with an SD of 2.7 mm. Blinded independent photo review found 85.2% correct identification of baseline photographs by at least 2/3 of reviewers. There were no unanticipated adverse device effects. Four study subjects experienced numbness in the treatment area beyond the 12-week visit that subsequently resolved without intervention. CONCLUSIONThese data suggest that the CoolCup prototype applicator provides rapid, safe, and effective arm treatment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arm</subject><subject>Cold Temperature</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lipectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Lipectomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Lipectomy - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1076-0512</issn><issn>1524-4725</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFvFCEYhonR2Nr6D4zh6GUqMMwyeDDZjF01aaJxazySbxhwUXaYAmMz_740W5vqoVwgeZ_v-UhehF5RckaJFG8_bLdn5MGhtOZP0DFtGK-4YM3T8iZiVZGGsiP0IqVfhWGyJs_REWsbWbjVMQpdXIJ3U_BLcgnbEPE3M8w6uzDiYPE67vEG8ju8BWvygmEc8Lm1ToNebnPAX2PIIS-TwV0IvpsnvJ4mX4BcXD9c3uGNh1zCMYc5nqJnFnwyL-_uE_R9c37Zfaouvnz83K0vKs0bwasagHMpByEF6amwFFhLwUIPWkrRmxUAs7w2TIgWRM2hNYMgDaGa9Zyu-voEvT94p7nfm0GbMUfwaopuD3FRAZz6NxndTv0Mf1TDJWV1UwRv7gQxXM0mZbV3SRvvYTRhTopK0vKaNVwUlB9QHUNK0dj7NZSo265U6Ur931UZe_3wi_dDf8spQHsAroPPJqbffr42Ue0M-Lx73H0DGrih3g</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Carruthers, Jean D</creator><creator>Humphrey, Shannon</creator><creator>Rivers, Jason K</creator><general>by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Cryolipolysis for Reduction of Arm Fat: Safety and Efficacy of a Prototype CoolCup Applicator With Flat Contour</title><author>Carruthers, Jean D ; Humphrey, Shannon ; Rivers, Jason K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-3aa4499d7970b17f1a281afabac997be6aa2f43e2778a734a8ed70501c2b416b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arm</topic><topic>Cold Temperature</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lipectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Lipectomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Lipectomy - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carruthers, Jean D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivers, Jason K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Dermatologic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carruthers, Jean D</au><au>Humphrey, Shannon</au><au>Rivers, Jason K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cryolipolysis for Reduction of Arm Fat: Safety and Efficacy of a Prototype CoolCup Applicator With Flat Contour</atitle><jtitle>Dermatologic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Dermatol Surg</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>940</spage><epage>949</epage><pages>940-949</pages><issn>1076-0512</issn><eissn>1524-4725</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDCryolipolysis of the arms has been shown to be an effective but somewhat time-consuming process. OBJECTIVEThe study evaluated safety and efficacy of a contoured cup cryolipolysis applicator for reduction of arm fat. The prototype was designed to maximize tissue contact with the cooling surface to improve comfort, while reducing treatment time by 25 minutes. MATERIALS AND METHODSBoth arms were treated using a prototype device that delivered treatment in 35 minutes at −11°C. Photographic and ultrasound documentation was captured at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Efficacy was assessed by photo review and measurement of fat reduction in ultrasound images. Immediately after 1, 4, and 12 weeks post-treatment, clinical assessments were performed to evaluate treatment areas and sensory alterations. RESULTSThirty women were enrolled and completed treatments to both arms. Ultrasound measurements found mean fat layer reduction of 3.2 mm with an SD of 2.7 mm. Blinded independent photo review found 85.2% correct identification of baseline photographs by at least 2/3 of reviewers. There were no unanticipated adverse device effects. Four study subjects experienced numbness in the treatment area beyond the 12-week visit that subsequently resolved without intervention. CONCLUSIONThese data suggest that the CoolCup prototype applicator provides rapid, safe, and effective arm treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>28595246</pmid><doi>10.1097/DSS.0000000000001134</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-0512
ispartof Dermatologic surgery, 2017-07, Vol.43 (7), p.940-949
issn 1076-0512
1524-4725
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5491235
source Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Arm
Cold Temperature
Equipment Design
Female
Humans
Lipectomy - adverse effects
Lipectomy - instrumentation
Lipectomy - methods
Middle Aged
Original
Prospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
title Cryolipolysis for Reduction of Arm Fat: Safety and Efficacy of a Prototype CoolCup Applicator With Flat Contour
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T04%3A54%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cryolipolysis%20for%20Reduction%20of%20Arm%20Fat:%20Safety%20and%20Efficacy%20of%20a%20Prototype%20CoolCup%20Applicator%20With%20Flat%20Contour&rft.jtitle=Dermatologic%20surgery&rft.au=Carruthers,%20Jean%20D&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=940&rft.epage=949&rft.pages=940-949&rft.issn=1076-0512&rft.eissn=1524-4725&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001134&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1908432547%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1908432547&rft_id=info:pmid/28595246&rfr_iscdi=true