Direct oral anticoagulant considerations in solid organ transplantation: A review
For more than 60 years, warfarin was the only oral anticoagulation agent available for use in the United States. In many recent clinical trials, several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) demonstrated similar efficacy with an equal or superior safety profile, with some other notable benefits. The DO...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical transplantation 2017-01, Vol.31 (1), p.np-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | np |
container_title | Clinical transplantation |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Salerno, David M. Tsapepas, Demetra Papachristos, Apostolos Chang, Jae‐Hyung Martin, Spencer Hardy, Mark A. McKeen, Jaclyn |
description | For more than 60 years, warfarin was the only oral anticoagulation agent available for use in the United States. In many recent clinical trials, several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) demonstrated similar efficacy with an equal or superior safety profile, with some other notable benefits. The DOACs have lower inter‐ and intrapatient variability, much shorter half‐lives, and less known drug‐drug and drug‐food interactions as compared to warfarin. Despite these demonstrated benefits, the use of DOACs has not gained uniform acceptance because of lack of supportive data in special patient populations, including recipients of solid organ transplants maintained on immunosuppression. This review describes the properties of several novel DOACs including their pharmacology and mechanisms of action as they relate to use among solid organ transplant recipients. We have particularly focused on (i) dosing in patients with impaired renal and hepatic function; (ii) considerations for drug‐drug interactions with immunosuppressive medications; and (iii) management of the anticoagulated patients at the time of unplanned surgery. The risks and benefits of the use of DOACs in solid organ transplant recipients should be carefully evaluated prior to the introduction of these agents in this highly distinct patient population. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ctr.12873 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5490493</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1841794638</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5143-d13aeb8460afd1c7233e958dc16f807e927ecec2c0b86fc929e4c1a26e8c04653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLAzEUhYMotj4W_gGZpS6m5jWZxIUg9QkFUXQd0sydGplOajJV_PemD0UXgtnkcO_H4d57EDogeEDSO7FdGBAqS7aB-oQplWNM6CbqY4Vp0oL10E6ML6kqiCi2UY-WslCCkj66v3ABbJf5YJrMtJ2z3kzmTVKZ9W10FQTTuaQy12bRN65K6MS0WRdMG2cLcNk_zc6zAG8O3vfQVm2aCPvrfxc9XV0-Dm_y0d317fB8lNuCcJZXhBkYSy6wqStiS8oYqEJWloha4hIULcGCpRaPpaitogq4JYYKkBZzUbBddLbync3HU6gstGmkRs-Cm5rwob1x-nendc964t90wRXmiiWDo7VB8K9ziJ2eumihSTuBn0dN0o24UhLjf6CclIoLJhN6vEJt8DEGqL8nIlgv0tIpLb1MK7GHP1f4Jr_iScDJCnh3DXz87aSHjw8ry0_lh6CG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1841794638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct oral anticoagulant considerations in solid organ transplantation: A review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Salerno, David M. ; Tsapepas, Demetra ; Papachristos, Apostolos ; Chang, Jae‐Hyung ; Martin, Spencer ; Hardy, Mark A. ; McKeen, Jaclyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Salerno, David M. ; Tsapepas, Demetra ; Papachristos, Apostolos ; Chang, Jae‐Hyung ; Martin, Spencer ; Hardy, Mark A. ; McKeen, Jaclyn</creatorcontrib><description>For more than 60 years, warfarin was the only oral anticoagulation agent available for use in the United States. In many recent clinical trials, several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) demonstrated similar efficacy with an equal or superior safety profile, with some other notable benefits. The DOACs have lower inter‐ and intrapatient variability, much shorter half‐lives, and less known drug‐drug and drug‐food interactions as compared to warfarin. Despite these demonstrated benefits, the use of DOACs has not gained uniform acceptance because of lack of supportive data in special patient populations, including recipients of solid organ transplants maintained on immunosuppression. This review describes the properties of several novel DOACs including their pharmacology and mechanisms of action as they relate to use among solid organ transplant recipients. We have particularly focused on (i) dosing in patients with impaired renal and hepatic function; (ii) considerations for drug‐drug interactions with immunosuppressive medications; and (iii) management of the anticoagulated patients at the time of unplanned surgery. The risks and benefits of the use of DOACs in solid organ transplant recipients should be carefully evaluated prior to the introduction of these agents in this highly distinct patient population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0902-0063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12873</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27859621</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Anticoagulants - therapeutic use ; direct oral anticoagulants ; drug‐drug interactions ; Graft Rejection - drug therapy ; Humans ; Organ Transplantation - adverse effects ; renal dysfunction ; renal transplant ; safety ; transplantation</subject><ispartof>Clinical transplantation, 2017-01, Vol.31 (1), p.np-n/a</ispartof><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5143-d13aeb8460afd1c7233e958dc16f807e927ecec2c0b86fc929e4c1a26e8c04653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5143-d13aeb8460afd1c7233e958dc16f807e927ecec2c0b86fc929e4c1a26e8c04653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fctr.12873$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fctr.12873$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27859621$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salerno, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsapepas, Demetra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papachristos, Apostolos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Jae‐Hyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Spencer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKeen, Jaclyn</creatorcontrib><title>Direct oral anticoagulant considerations in solid organ transplantation: A review</title><title>Clinical transplantation</title><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><description>For more than 60 years, warfarin was the only oral anticoagulation agent available for use in the United States. In many recent clinical trials, several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) demonstrated similar efficacy with an equal or superior safety profile, with some other notable benefits. The DOACs have lower inter‐ and intrapatient variability, much shorter half‐lives, and less known drug‐drug and drug‐food interactions as compared to warfarin. Despite these demonstrated benefits, the use of DOACs has not gained uniform acceptance because of lack of supportive data in special patient populations, including recipients of solid organ transplants maintained on immunosuppression. This review describes the properties of several novel DOACs including their pharmacology and mechanisms of action as they relate to use among solid organ transplant recipients. We have particularly focused on (i) dosing in patients with impaired renal and hepatic function; (ii) considerations for drug‐drug interactions with immunosuppressive medications; and (iii) management of the anticoagulated patients at the time of unplanned surgery. The risks and benefits of the use of DOACs in solid organ transplant recipients should be carefully evaluated prior to the introduction of these agents in this highly distinct patient population.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>direct oral anticoagulants</subject><subject>drug‐drug interactions</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Organ Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>renal dysfunction</subject><subject>renal transplant</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>transplantation</subject><issn>0902-0063</issn><issn>1399-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLAzEUhYMotj4W_gGZpS6m5jWZxIUg9QkFUXQd0sydGplOajJV_PemD0UXgtnkcO_H4d57EDogeEDSO7FdGBAqS7aB-oQplWNM6CbqY4Vp0oL10E6ML6kqiCi2UY-WslCCkj66v3ABbJf5YJrMtJ2z3kzmTVKZ9W10FQTTuaQy12bRN65K6MS0WRdMG2cLcNk_zc6zAG8O3vfQVm2aCPvrfxc9XV0-Dm_y0d317fB8lNuCcJZXhBkYSy6wqStiS8oYqEJWloha4hIULcGCpRaPpaitogq4JYYKkBZzUbBddLbync3HU6gstGmkRs-Cm5rwob1x-nendc964t90wRXmiiWDo7VB8K9ziJ2eumihSTuBn0dN0o24UhLjf6CclIoLJhN6vEJt8DEGqL8nIlgv0tIpLb1MK7GHP1f4Jr_iScDJCnh3DXz87aSHjw8ry0_lh6CG</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Salerno, David M.</creator><creator>Tsapepas, Demetra</creator><creator>Papachristos, Apostolos</creator><creator>Chang, Jae‐Hyung</creator><creator>Martin, Spencer</creator><creator>Hardy, Mark A.</creator><creator>McKeen, Jaclyn</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Direct oral anticoagulant considerations in solid organ transplantation: A review</title><author>Salerno, David M. ; Tsapepas, Demetra ; Papachristos, Apostolos ; Chang, Jae‐Hyung ; Martin, Spencer ; Hardy, Mark A. ; McKeen, Jaclyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5143-d13aeb8460afd1c7233e958dc16f807e927ecec2c0b86fc929e4c1a26e8c04653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>direct oral anticoagulants</topic><topic>drug‐drug interactions</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Organ Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>renal dysfunction</topic><topic>renal transplant</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salerno, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsapepas, Demetra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papachristos, Apostolos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Jae‐Hyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Spencer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKeen, Jaclyn</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salerno, David M.</au><au>Tsapepas, Demetra</au><au>Papachristos, Apostolos</au><au>Chang, Jae‐Hyung</au><au>Martin, Spencer</au><au>Hardy, Mark A.</au><au>McKeen, Jaclyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct oral anticoagulant considerations in solid organ transplantation: A review</atitle><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>np</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>np-n/a</pages><issn>0902-0063</issn><eissn>1399-0012</eissn><abstract>For more than 60 years, warfarin was the only oral anticoagulation agent available for use in the United States. In many recent clinical trials, several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) demonstrated similar efficacy with an equal or superior safety profile, with some other notable benefits. The DOACs have lower inter‐ and intrapatient variability, much shorter half‐lives, and less known drug‐drug and drug‐food interactions as compared to warfarin. Despite these demonstrated benefits, the use of DOACs has not gained uniform acceptance because of lack of supportive data in special patient populations, including recipients of solid organ transplants maintained on immunosuppression. This review describes the properties of several novel DOACs including their pharmacology and mechanisms of action as they relate to use among solid organ transplant recipients. We have particularly focused on (i) dosing in patients with impaired renal and hepatic function; (ii) considerations for drug‐drug interactions with immunosuppressive medications; and (iii) management of the anticoagulated patients at the time of unplanned surgery. The risks and benefits of the use of DOACs in solid organ transplant recipients should be carefully evaluated prior to the introduction of these agents in this highly distinct patient population.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pmid>27859621</pmid><doi>10.1111/ctr.12873</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0902-0063 |
ispartof | Clinical transplantation, 2017-01, Vol.31 (1), p.np-n/a |
issn | 0902-0063 1399-0012 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5490493 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Administration, Oral Anticoagulants - therapeutic use direct oral anticoagulants drug‐drug interactions Graft Rejection - drug therapy Humans Organ Transplantation - adverse effects renal dysfunction renal transplant safety transplantation |
title | Direct oral anticoagulant considerations in solid organ transplantation: A review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T17%3A04%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20oral%20anticoagulant%20considerations%20in%20solid%20organ%20transplantation:%20A%20review&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20transplantation&rft.au=Salerno,%20David%20M.&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=np&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=np-n/a&rft.issn=0902-0063&rft.eissn=1399-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ctr.12873&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1841794638%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1841794638&rft_id=info:pmid/27859621&rfr_iscdi=true |