Practical approach to evaluating testicular status in infants and children
To review the differences between normal, retractile, ectopic, ascended, and undescended testes and to describe the optimal way to perform a testicular examination to distinguish one from the other, as well as to demonstrate that ultrasound imaging is not necessary and to clarify when to consider sp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian family physician 2017-06, Vol.63 (6), p.432-435 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 435 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 432 |
container_title | Canadian family physician |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Mau, Elke E Leonard, Michael P |
description | To review the differences between normal, retractile, ectopic, ascended, and undescended testes and to describe the optimal way to perform a testicular examination to distinguish one from the other, as well as to demonstrate that ultrasound imaging is not necessary and to clarify when to consider specialist referral.
This paper is based on selected findings from a MEDLINE search on undescended testes and orchiopexy referrals, and on our experience at the Urology Clinic at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario in Ottawa, including review of referrals to our clinic for undescended testes and the resultant findings of normal variants versus surgical cases. The MeSH headings used in our MEDLINE search included
and
.
An
is defined as the true absence of one testis (or both testes) from normal scrotal position. Ectopic and ascended testes will likewise be absent from the scrotum, the latter having been present at one point in development. Differentiating among testicular examination findings is important, as descended and retractile testes are managed conservatively, while prompt surgical intervention should be offered for ascended, ectopic, and undescended testes. Uncertainty surrounding the diagnosis of an undescended testis causes anxiety, might lead to unwarranted imaging, and might increase the wait list for specialty assessment. For this reason, avoidance of ultrasound in the evaluation of undescended testes was included in the recent Choosing Wisely Canada campaign. We seek to clarify the physical examination findings in the evaluation of possible undescended testes, the suggested referral parameters, and the subsequent management.
Undescended testes and their variants are common. As decision for referral is based on the primary care physician's physical examination findings, we clarify distinguishing between normal and abnormal findings on testicular examination to aid in appropriate referral for subspecialist evaluation. Consultation, if needed, should be sought at 6 months' corrected gestational age, or at detection if later than 6 months, without delay for ultrasound imaging, as surgical management is recommended for those patients with undescended, ectopic, or ascended testes. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5471079</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1910338369</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p224t-ed0fea8f4e6299add625fa32678855ea5ab4d95838dfb4ea85b47996e75603bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF1LwzAYhYMobk7_ggS88aaQ5qvJjSDDTwZ6oeBdedukW0eW1iQd-O_tcIoKL7wX5-FwzjlA07zIRSaoUIdoSghRGRPkbYJOYlwTQiVn-TGaUCVzwXQ-RY_PAerU1uAw9H3ooF7h1GG7BTdAav0SJxtHfXAQcEyQhohbP14DPkUM3uB61ToTrD9FRw24aM_2f4Zeb29e5vfZ4unuYX69yHpKecqsIY0F1XArqdZgjKSiAUZloZQQFgRU3GihmDJNxUdSVLzQWtpCSMKqms3Q1ZdvP1Qba2rrUwBX9qHdQPgoO2jLv4pvV-Wy25aCFzkp9GhwuTcI3fsw1is3baytc-BtN8Qy1zlhTDG5Qy_-oetuCH6sN1JUc1posqPOfyf6ifI9M_sEF-t7sg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1929427909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practical approach to evaluating testicular status in infants and children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mau, Elke E ; Leonard, Michael P</creator><creatorcontrib>Mau, Elke E ; Leonard, Michael P</creatorcontrib><description>To review the differences between normal, retractile, ectopic, ascended, and undescended testes and to describe the optimal way to perform a testicular examination to distinguish one from the other, as well as to demonstrate that ultrasound imaging is not necessary and to clarify when to consider specialist referral.
This paper is based on selected findings from a MEDLINE search on undescended testes and orchiopexy referrals, and on our experience at the Urology Clinic at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario in Ottawa, including review of referrals to our clinic for undescended testes and the resultant findings of normal variants versus surgical cases. The MeSH headings used in our MEDLINE search included
and
.
An
is defined as the true absence of one testis (or both testes) from normal scrotal position. Ectopic and ascended testes will likewise be absent from the scrotum, the latter having been present at one point in development. Differentiating among testicular examination findings is important, as descended and retractile testes are managed conservatively, while prompt surgical intervention should be offered for ascended, ectopic, and undescended testes. Uncertainty surrounding the diagnosis of an undescended testis causes anxiety, might lead to unwarranted imaging, and might increase the wait list for specialty assessment. For this reason, avoidance of ultrasound in the evaluation of undescended testes was included in the recent Choosing Wisely Canada campaign. We seek to clarify the physical examination findings in the evaluation of possible undescended testes, the suggested referral parameters, and the subsequent management.
Undescended testes and their variants are common. As decision for referral is based on the primary care physician's physical examination findings, we clarify distinguishing between normal and abnormal findings on testicular examination to aid in appropriate referral for subspecialist evaluation. Consultation, if needed, should be sought at 6 months' corrected gestational age, or at detection if later than 6 months, without delay for ultrasound imaging, as surgical management is recommended for those patients with undescended, ectopic, or ascended testes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-350X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1715-5258</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28615391</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: College of Family Physicians of Canada</publisher><subject>Babies ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children & youth ; Cryptorchidism - diagnosis ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Males ; Orchitis - diagnosis ; Physical Examination - methods ; Physical examinations ; Practice ; Primary Health Care ; Referral and Consultation ; Scrotum - diagnostic imaging ; Testis - abnormalities ; Testis - diagnostic imaging ; Ultrasonography ; Urogenital system</subject><ispartof>Canadian family physician, 2017-06, Vol.63 (6), p.432-435</ispartof><rights>Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.</rights><rights>Copyright College of Family Physicians of Canada Jun 2017</rights><rights>Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471079/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471079/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28615391$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mau, Elke E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonard, Michael P</creatorcontrib><title>Practical approach to evaluating testicular status in infants and children</title><title>Canadian family physician</title><addtitle>Can Fam Physician</addtitle><description>To review the differences between normal, retractile, ectopic, ascended, and undescended testes and to describe the optimal way to perform a testicular examination to distinguish one from the other, as well as to demonstrate that ultrasound imaging is not necessary and to clarify when to consider specialist referral.
This paper is based on selected findings from a MEDLINE search on undescended testes and orchiopexy referrals, and on our experience at the Urology Clinic at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario in Ottawa, including review of referrals to our clinic for undescended testes and the resultant findings of normal variants versus surgical cases. The MeSH headings used in our MEDLINE search included
and
.
An
is defined as the true absence of one testis (or both testes) from normal scrotal position. Ectopic and ascended testes will likewise be absent from the scrotum, the latter having been present at one point in development. Differentiating among testicular examination findings is important, as descended and retractile testes are managed conservatively, while prompt surgical intervention should be offered for ascended, ectopic, and undescended testes. Uncertainty surrounding the diagnosis of an undescended testis causes anxiety, might lead to unwarranted imaging, and might increase the wait list for specialty assessment. For this reason, avoidance of ultrasound in the evaluation of undescended testes was included in the recent Choosing Wisely Canada campaign. We seek to clarify the physical examination findings in the evaluation of possible undescended testes, the suggested referral parameters, and the subsequent management.
Undescended testes and their variants are common. As decision for referral is based on the primary care physician's physical examination findings, we clarify distinguishing between normal and abnormal findings on testicular examination to aid in appropriate referral for subspecialist evaluation. Consultation, if needed, should be sought at 6 months' corrected gestational age, or at detection if later than 6 months, without delay for ultrasound imaging, as surgical management is recommended for those patients with undescended, ectopic, or ascended testes.</description><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Cryptorchidism - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Orchitis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Physical Examination - methods</subject><subject>Physical examinations</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Scrotum - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Testis - abnormalities</subject><subject>Testis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><issn>0008-350X</issn><issn>1715-5258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkF1LwzAYhYMobk7_ggS88aaQ5qvJjSDDTwZ6oeBdedukW0eW1iQd-O_tcIoKL7wX5-FwzjlA07zIRSaoUIdoSghRGRPkbYJOYlwTQiVn-TGaUCVzwXQ-RY_PAerU1uAw9H3ooF7h1GG7BTdAav0SJxtHfXAQcEyQhohbP14DPkUM3uB61ToTrD9FRw24aM_2f4Zeb29e5vfZ4unuYX69yHpKecqsIY0F1XArqdZgjKSiAUZloZQQFgRU3GihmDJNxUdSVLzQWtpCSMKqms3Q1ZdvP1Qba2rrUwBX9qHdQPgoO2jLv4pvV-Wy25aCFzkp9GhwuTcI3fsw1is3baytc-BtN8Qy1zlhTDG5Qy_-oetuCH6sN1JUc1posqPOfyf6ifI9M_sEF-t7sg</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Mau, Elke E</creator><creator>Leonard, Michael P</creator><general>College of Family Physicians of Canada</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Practical approach to evaluating testicular status in infants and children</title><author>Mau, Elke E ; Leonard, Michael P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p224t-ed0fea8f4e6299add625fa32678855ea5ab4d95838dfb4ea85b47996e75603bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Cryptorchidism - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Orchitis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Physical Examination - methods</topic><topic>Physical examinations</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Scrotum - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Testis - abnormalities</topic><topic>Testis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mau, Elke E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonard, Michael P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian family physician</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mau, Elke E</au><au>Leonard, Michael P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practical approach to evaluating testicular status in infants and children</atitle><jtitle>Canadian family physician</jtitle><addtitle>Can Fam Physician</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>432</spage><epage>435</epage><pages>432-435</pages><issn>0008-350X</issn><eissn>1715-5258</eissn><abstract>To review the differences between normal, retractile, ectopic, ascended, and undescended testes and to describe the optimal way to perform a testicular examination to distinguish one from the other, as well as to demonstrate that ultrasound imaging is not necessary and to clarify when to consider specialist referral.
This paper is based on selected findings from a MEDLINE search on undescended testes and orchiopexy referrals, and on our experience at the Urology Clinic at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario in Ottawa, including review of referrals to our clinic for undescended testes and the resultant findings of normal variants versus surgical cases. The MeSH headings used in our MEDLINE search included
and
.
An
is defined as the true absence of one testis (or both testes) from normal scrotal position. Ectopic and ascended testes will likewise be absent from the scrotum, the latter having been present at one point in development. Differentiating among testicular examination findings is important, as descended and retractile testes are managed conservatively, while prompt surgical intervention should be offered for ascended, ectopic, and undescended testes. Uncertainty surrounding the diagnosis of an undescended testis causes anxiety, might lead to unwarranted imaging, and might increase the wait list for specialty assessment. For this reason, avoidance of ultrasound in the evaluation of undescended testes was included in the recent Choosing Wisely Canada campaign. We seek to clarify the physical examination findings in the evaluation of possible undescended testes, the suggested referral parameters, and the subsequent management.
Undescended testes and their variants are common. As decision for referral is based on the primary care physician's physical examination findings, we clarify distinguishing between normal and abnormal findings on testicular examination to aid in appropriate referral for subspecialist evaluation. Consultation, if needed, should be sought at 6 months' corrected gestational age, or at detection if later than 6 months, without delay for ultrasound imaging, as surgical management is recommended for those patients with undescended, ectopic, or ascended testes.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>College of Family Physicians of Canada</pub><pmid>28615391</pmid><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-350X |
ispartof | Canadian family physician, 2017-06, Vol.63 (6), p.432-435 |
issn | 0008-350X 1715-5258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5471079 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Babies Child Child, Preschool Children & youth Cryptorchidism - diagnosis Humans Infant Male Males Orchitis - diagnosis Physical Examination - methods Physical examinations Practice Primary Health Care Referral and Consultation Scrotum - diagnostic imaging Testis - abnormalities Testis - diagnostic imaging Ultrasonography Urogenital system |
title | Practical approach to evaluating testicular status in infants and children |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T16%3A50%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practical%20approach%20to%20evaluating%20testicular%20status%20in%20infants%20and%20children&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20family%20physician&rft.au=Mau,%20Elke%20E&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=432&rft.epage=435&rft.pages=432-435&rft.issn=0008-350X&rft.eissn=1715-5258&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1910338369%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1929427909&rft_id=info:pmid/28615391&rfr_iscdi=true |