Complications following endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric, esophageal, and colorectal cancer: a review of studies based on nationwide large-scale databases

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a relatively new procedure used for the treatment of early gastrointestinal cancers regardless of the lesion size and configuration, and it has gradually acquired popularity because of its minimally invasive nature. As compared to conventional endoscopic res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of translational medicine 2017-04, Vol.5 (8), p.189-189
Hauptverfasser: Odagiri, Hiroyuki, Yasunaga, Hideo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 189
container_issue 8
container_start_page 189
container_title Annals of translational medicine
container_volume 5
creator Odagiri, Hiroyuki
Yasunaga, Hideo
description Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a relatively new procedure used for the treatment of early gastrointestinal cancers regardless of the lesion size and configuration, and it has gradually acquired popularity because of its minimally invasive nature. As compared to conventional endoscopic resection, ESD is a more complex procedure and requires a higher level of technical skill. Therefore, it is associated with a higher complication rate. Many previous studies that investigated the complication rates following ESD analyzed data from a limited number of specialized centers, possibly leading to an underestimation of the complication rates. Further, the relationship between hospital volume and complication rates is poorly understood. In the present study, we searched the MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library databases for studies that have reported on ESD-related complications and the relationship between hospital volume and ESD-related complication rates in a nationwide setting. The complication rates (including perforation, peritonitis, and bleeding) were 3.5% for gastric ESD, 3.3% for esophageal ESD, and 4.6% for colorectal ESD. The studies reviewed showed that ESD-related complication rates were permissibly low, and that there was a linear association between a higher hospital volume and a lower frequency of complications following ESD.
doi_str_mv 10.21037/atm.2017.02.12
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5464939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1910340894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f3c5f9351acf9e8f2028ce86d15f43abefbcdb5ee48fc01d1553435af1f092913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhiMEolXpmRvykUOz9ec25oCEVnxJlbjA2Zo449TIiYMn2xV_iN-Jty1VOXlkP_OOR0_TvBZ8IwVXV5ewThvJxdWGy42Qz5pTqbhpTafs8yf1SXNO9JNzLqSwivOXzYnstmKruT5t_uzytKToYY15JhZySvkQ55HhPGTyeYme0b6f9j4TJDZEIvRHtqKFjUBrif6CIeXlBkaEdMFgHpjPKZcK1hYPs8fyjgEreBvxwHJgtO6HiMR6IBxYDZvv5h_igCxBGbElDwnZACscGXrVvAiQCM8fzrPmx6eP33df2utvn7_uPly3Xhu7tkF5E6wyAnyw2AXJZeex2w7CBK2gx9D7oTeIuguei3ptlFYGggjcSivUWfP-PnepO-PgcV4LJLeUOEH57TJE9__LHG_cmG-d0Vttla0Bbx8CSv61R1rdFMljSjBj3pMTtprTvLO6opf3qC-ZqGB4HCO4uxPsqmB3FOy4dELWjjdPf_fI_9Op_gKM7qev</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1910340894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Complications following endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric, esophageal, and colorectal cancer: a review of studies based on nationwide large-scale databases</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Odagiri, Hiroyuki ; Yasunaga, Hideo</creator><creatorcontrib>Odagiri, Hiroyuki ; Yasunaga, Hideo</creatorcontrib><description>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a relatively new procedure used for the treatment of early gastrointestinal cancers regardless of the lesion size and configuration, and it has gradually acquired popularity because of its minimally invasive nature. As compared to conventional endoscopic resection, ESD is a more complex procedure and requires a higher level of technical skill. Therefore, it is associated with a higher complication rate. Many previous studies that investigated the complication rates following ESD analyzed data from a limited number of specialized centers, possibly leading to an underestimation of the complication rates. Further, the relationship between hospital volume and complication rates is poorly understood. In the present study, we searched the MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library databases for studies that have reported on ESD-related complications and the relationship between hospital volume and ESD-related complication rates in a nationwide setting. The complication rates (including perforation, peritonitis, and bleeding) were 3.5% for gastric ESD, 3.3% for esophageal ESD, and 4.6% for colorectal ESD. The studies reviewed showed that ESD-related complication rates were permissibly low, and that there was a linear association between a higher hospital volume and a lower frequency of complications following ESD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2305-5839</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2305-5839</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.02.12</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28616404</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China: AME Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Review on Endoscopic Therapy</subject><ispartof>Annals of translational medicine, 2017-04, Vol.5 (8), p.189-189</ispartof><rights>2017 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. 2017 Annals of Translational Medicine.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f3c5f9351acf9e8f2028ce86d15f43abefbcdb5ee48fc01d1553435af1f092913</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464939/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464939/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28616404$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Odagiri, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasunaga, Hideo</creatorcontrib><title>Complications following endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric, esophageal, and colorectal cancer: a review of studies based on nationwide large-scale databases</title><title>Annals of translational medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Transl Med</addtitle><description>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a relatively new procedure used for the treatment of early gastrointestinal cancers regardless of the lesion size and configuration, and it has gradually acquired popularity because of its minimally invasive nature. As compared to conventional endoscopic resection, ESD is a more complex procedure and requires a higher level of technical skill. Therefore, it is associated with a higher complication rate. Many previous studies that investigated the complication rates following ESD analyzed data from a limited number of specialized centers, possibly leading to an underestimation of the complication rates. Further, the relationship between hospital volume and complication rates is poorly understood. In the present study, we searched the MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library databases for studies that have reported on ESD-related complications and the relationship between hospital volume and ESD-related complication rates in a nationwide setting. The complication rates (including perforation, peritonitis, and bleeding) were 3.5% for gastric ESD, 3.3% for esophageal ESD, and 4.6% for colorectal ESD. The studies reviewed showed that ESD-related complication rates were permissibly low, and that there was a linear association between a higher hospital volume and a lower frequency of complications following ESD.</description><subject>Review on Endoscopic Therapy</subject><issn>2305-5839</issn><issn>2305-5839</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhiMEolXpmRvykUOz9ec25oCEVnxJlbjA2Zo449TIiYMn2xV_iN-Jty1VOXlkP_OOR0_TvBZ8IwVXV5ewThvJxdWGy42Qz5pTqbhpTafs8yf1SXNO9JNzLqSwivOXzYnstmKruT5t_uzytKToYY15JhZySvkQ55HhPGTyeYme0b6f9j4TJDZEIvRHtqKFjUBrif6CIeXlBkaEdMFgHpjPKZcK1hYPs8fyjgEreBvxwHJgtO6HiMR6IBxYDZvv5h_igCxBGbElDwnZACscGXrVvAiQCM8fzrPmx6eP33df2utvn7_uPly3Xhu7tkF5E6wyAnyw2AXJZeex2w7CBK2gx9D7oTeIuguei3ptlFYGggjcSivUWfP-PnepO-PgcV4LJLeUOEH57TJE9__LHG_cmG-d0Vttla0Bbx8CSv61R1rdFMljSjBj3pMTtprTvLO6opf3qC-ZqGB4HCO4uxPsqmB3FOy4dELWjjdPf_fI_9Op_gKM7qev</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Odagiri, Hiroyuki</creator><creator>Yasunaga, Hideo</creator><general>AME Publishing Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Complications following endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric, esophageal, and colorectal cancer: a review of studies based on nationwide large-scale databases</title><author>Odagiri, Hiroyuki ; Yasunaga, Hideo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f3c5f9351acf9e8f2028ce86d15f43abefbcdb5ee48fc01d1553435af1f092913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Review on Endoscopic Therapy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Odagiri, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasunaga, Hideo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of translational medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Odagiri, Hiroyuki</au><au>Yasunaga, Hideo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Complications following endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric, esophageal, and colorectal cancer: a review of studies based on nationwide large-scale databases</atitle><jtitle>Annals of translational medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Transl Med</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>189-189</pages><issn>2305-5839</issn><eissn>2305-5839</eissn><abstract>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a relatively new procedure used for the treatment of early gastrointestinal cancers regardless of the lesion size and configuration, and it has gradually acquired popularity because of its minimally invasive nature. As compared to conventional endoscopic resection, ESD is a more complex procedure and requires a higher level of technical skill. Therefore, it is associated with a higher complication rate. Many previous studies that investigated the complication rates following ESD analyzed data from a limited number of specialized centers, possibly leading to an underestimation of the complication rates. Further, the relationship between hospital volume and complication rates is poorly understood. In the present study, we searched the MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library databases for studies that have reported on ESD-related complications and the relationship between hospital volume and ESD-related complication rates in a nationwide setting. The complication rates (including perforation, peritonitis, and bleeding) were 3.5% for gastric ESD, 3.3% for esophageal ESD, and 4.6% for colorectal ESD. The studies reviewed showed that ESD-related complication rates were permissibly low, and that there was a linear association between a higher hospital volume and a lower frequency of complications following ESD.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pub>AME Publishing Company</pub><pmid>28616404</pmid><doi>10.21037/atm.2017.02.12</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2305-5839
ispartof Annals of translational medicine, 2017-04, Vol.5 (8), p.189-189
issn 2305-5839
2305-5839
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5464939
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Review on Endoscopic Therapy
title Complications following endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric, esophageal, and colorectal cancer: a review of studies based on nationwide large-scale databases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A26%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Complications%20following%20endoscopic%20submucosal%20dissection%20for%20gastric,%20esophageal,%20and%20colorectal%20cancer:%20a%20review%20of%20studies%20based%20on%20nationwide%20large-scale%20databases&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20translational%20medicine&rft.au=Odagiri,%20Hiroyuki&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=189-189&rft.issn=2305-5839&rft.eissn=2305-5839&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/atm.2017.02.12&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1910340894%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1910340894&rft_id=info:pmid/28616404&rfr_iscdi=true