Moral transgressions corrupt neural representations of value
Crockett et al . used model-based fMRI to investigate the neural basis of decisions to profit from harming others vs. themselves. Most people preferred to harm themselves over others for profit. This moral preference was associated with diminished neural responses in value-sensitive brain regions to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature neuroscience 2017-06, Vol.20 (6), p.879-885 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 885 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 879 |
container_title | Nature neuroscience |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Crockett, Molly J Siegel, Jenifer Z Kurth-Nelson, Zeb Dayan, Peter Dolan, Raymond J |
description | Crockett
et al
. used model-based fMRI to investigate the neural basis of decisions to profit from harming others vs. themselves. Most people preferred to harm themselves over others for profit. This moral preference was associated with diminished neural responses in value-sensitive brain regions to profit gained from harming others.
Moral systems universally prohibit harming others for personal gain. However, we know little about how such principles guide moral behavior. Using a task that assesses the financial cost participants ascribe to harming others versus themselves, we probed the relationship between moral behavior and neural representations of profit and pain. Most participants displayed moral preferences, placing a higher cost on harming others than themselves. Moral preferences correlated with neural responses to profit, where participants with stronger moral preferences had lower dorsal striatal responses to profit gained from harming others. Lateral prefrontal cortex encoded profit gained from harming others, but not self, and tracked the blameworthiness of harmful choices. Moral decisions also modulated functional connectivity between lateral prefrontal cortex and the profit-sensitive region of dorsal striatum. The findings suggest moral behavior in our task is linked to a neural devaluation of reward realized by a prefrontal modulation of striatal value representations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/nn.4557 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5462090</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1917728350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-d01d9d7eac8570abf3f07ca22e4100ec9e4c1c811150ad228f8dce4578ac461c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF1LwzAYhYMobk7xH0jBC73pTNKkSUAGMvyCiTd6HbI0nR1dUpN24L83dXNMrxJ4Hs57OACcIzhGMOM31o4JpewADBEleYoYzg_jHwqW5pjmA3ASwhJCyCgXx2CAOaGCEDwEty_OqzppvbJh4U0IlbMh0c77rmkTa7qeetNEZGyr2h_symSt6s6cgqNS1cGcbd8ReH-4f5s-pbPXx-fp3SzVmWBtWkBUiIIZpTllUM3LrIRMK4wNQRAaLQzRSHOEEIWqwJiXvNCGUMaVJjnS2QhMNrlNN1-ZyGzsW8vGVyvlv6RTlfxLbPUhF24t4xYYChgDLrcB3n12JrRy6TpvY2eJBGIM84z21tXG0t6F4E25u4Cg7GeW1sp-5mhe7Bfaeb-7RuF6I4SI7ML4vYP_sr4BeM-HVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1917728350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moral transgressions corrupt neural representations of value</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature Journals Online</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Crockett, Molly J ; Siegel, Jenifer Z ; Kurth-Nelson, Zeb ; Dayan, Peter ; Dolan, Raymond J</creator><creatorcontrib>Crockett, Molly J ; Siegel, Jenifer Z ; Kurth-Nelson, Zeb ; Dayan, Peter ; Dolan, Raymond J</creatorcontrib><description>Crockett
et al
. used model-based fMRI to investigate the neural basis of decisions to profit from harming others vs. themselves. Most people preferred to harm themselves over others for profit. This moral preference was associated with diminished neural responses in value-sensitive brain regions to profit gained from harming others.
Moral systems universally prohibit harming others for personal gain. However, we know little about how such principles guide moral behavior. Using a task that assesses the financial cost participants ascribe to harming others versus themselves, we probed the relationship between moral behavior and neural representations of profit and pain. Most participants displayed moral preferences, placing a higher cost on harming others than themselves. Moral preferences correlated with neural responses to profit, where participants with stronger moral preferences had lower dorsal striatal responses to profit gained from harming others. Lateral prefrontal cortex encoded profit gained from harming others, but not self, and tracked the blameworthiness of harmful choices. Moral decisions also modulated functional connectivity between lateral prefrontal cortex and the profit-sensitive region of dorsal striatum. The findings suggest moral behavior in our task is linked to a neural devaluation of reward realized by a prefrontal modulation of striatal value representations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6256</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-1726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nn.4557</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28459442</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>59 ; 59/36 ; 631/378/2645/2648 ; 631/378/2649/1409 ; 631/477 ; Animal cognition ; Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biological Techniques ; Biomedicine ; Brain Mapping ; Caudate-putamen ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Coding ; Corpus Striatum - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Models, Neurological ; Morality ; Morals ; Neostriatum ; Neurobiology ; Neurosciences ; Pain ; Prefrontal cortex ; Prefrontal Cortex - physiology ; Reinforcement ; Representations ; Reward ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Nature neuroscience, 2017-06, Vol.20 (6), p.879-885</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature America, Inc. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jun 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-d01d9d7eac8570abf3f07ca22e4100ec9e4c1c811150ad228f8dce4578ac461c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-d01d9d7eac8570abf3f07ca22e4100ec9e4c1c811150ad228f8dce4578ac461c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3476-1839</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/nn.4557$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/nn.4557$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28459442$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crockett, Molly J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Jenifer Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurth-Nelson, Zeb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayan, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolan, Raymond J</creatorcontrib><title>Moral transgressions corrupt neural representations of value</title><title>Nature neuroscience</title><addtitle>Nat Neurosci</addtitle><addtitle>Nat Neurosci</addtitle><description>Crockett
et al
. used model-based fMRI to investigate the neural basis of decisions to profit from harming others vs. themselves. Most people preferred to harm themselves over others for profit. This moral preference was associated with diminished neural responses in value-sensitive brain regions to profit gained from harming others.
Moral systems universally prohibit harming others for personal gain. However, we know little about how such principles guide moral behavior. Using a task that assesses the financial cost participants ascribe to harming others versus themselves, we probed the relationship between moral behavior and neural representations of profit and pain. Most participants displayed moral preferences, placing a higher cost on harming others than themselves. Moral preferences correlated with neural responses to profit, where participants with stronger moral preferences had lower dorsal striatal responses to profit gained from harming others. Lateral prefrontal cortex encoded profit gained from harming others, but not self, and tracked the blameworthiness of harmful choices. Moral decisions also modulated functional connectivity between lateral prefrontal cortex and the profit-sensitive region of dorsal striatum. The findings suggest moral behavior in our task is linked to a neural devaluation of reward realized by a prefrontal modulation of striatal value representations.</description><subject>59</subject><subject>59/36</subject><subject>631/378/2645/2648</subject><subject>631/378/2649/1409</subject><subject>631/477</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biological Techniques</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Caudate-putamen</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Corpus Striatum - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Neostriatum</subject><subject>Neurobiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Prefrontal cortex</subject><subject>Prefrontal Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Representations</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1097-6256</issn><issn>1546-1726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkF1LwzAYhYMobk7xH0jBC73pTNKkSUAGMvyCiTd6HbI0nR1dUpN24L83dXNMrxJ4Hs57OACcIzhGMOM31o4JpewADBEleYoYzg_jHwqW5pjmA3ASwhJCyCgXx2CAOaGCEDwEty_OqzppvbJh4U0IlbMh0c77rmkTa7qeetNEZGyr2h_symSt6s6cgqNS1cGcbd8ReH-4f5s-pbPXx-fp3SzVmWBtWkBUiIIZpTllUM3LrIRMK4wNQRAaLQzRSHOEEIWqwJiXvNCGUMaVJjnS2QhMNrlNN1-ZyGzsW8vGVyvlv6RTlfxLbPUhF24t4xYYChgDLrcB3n12JrRy6TpvY2eJBGIM84z21tXG0t6F4E25u4Cg7GeW1sp-5mhe7Bfaeb-7RuF6I4SI7ML4vYP_sr4BeM-HVg</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Crockett, Molly J</creator><creator>Siegel, Jenifer Z</creator><creator>Kurth-Nelson, Zeb</creator><creator>Dayan, Peter</creator><creator>Dolan, Raymond J</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3476-1839</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Moral transgressions corrupt neural representations of value</title><author>Crockett, Molly J ; Siegel, Jenifer Z ; Kurth-Nelson, Zeb ; Dayan, Peter ; Dolan, Raymond J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-d01d9d7eac8570abf3f07ca22e4100ec9e4c1c811150ad228f8dce4578ac461c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>59</topic><topic>59/36</topic><topic>631/378/2645/2648</topic><topic>631/378/2649/1409</topic><topic>631/477</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biological Techniques</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Caudate-putamen</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Corpus Striatum - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Neostriatum</topic><topic>Neurobiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Prefrontal cortex</topic><topic>Prefrontal Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Representations</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crockett, Molly J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Jenifer Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurth-Nelson, Zeb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayan, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolan, Raymond J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Nature neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crockett, Molly J</au><au>Siegel, Jenifer Z</au><au>Kurth-Nelson, Zeb</au><au>Dayan, Peter</au><au>Dolan, Raymond J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moral transgressions corrupt neural representations of value</atitle><jtitle>Nature neuroscience</jtitle><stitle>Nat Neurosci</stitle><addtitle>Nat Neurosci</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>879</spage><epage>885</epage><pages>879-885</pages><issn>1097-6256</issn><eissn>1546-1726</eissn><abstract>Crockett
et al
. used model-based fMRI to investigate the neural basis of decisions to profit from harming others vs. themselves. Most people preferred to harm themselves over others for profit. This moral preference was associated with diminished neural responses in value-sensitive brain regions to profit gained from harming others.
Moral systems universally prohibit harming others for personal gain. However, we know little about how such principles guide moral behavior. Using a task that assesses the financial cost participants ascribe to harming others versus themselves, we probed the relationship between moral behavior and neural representations of profit and pain. Most participants displayed moral preferences, placing a higher cost on harming others than themselves. Moral preferences correlated with neural responses to profit, where participants with stronger moral preferences had lower dorsal striatal responses to profit gained from harming others. Lateral prefrontal cortex encoded profit gained from harming others, but not self, and tracked the blameworthiness of harmful choices. Moral decisions also modulated functional connectivity between lateral prefrontal cortex and the profit-sensitive region of dorsal striatum. The findings suggest moral behavior in our task is linked to a neural devaluation of reward realized by a prefrontal modulation of striatal value representations.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><pmid>28459442</pmid><doi>10.1038/nn.4557</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3476-1839</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1097-6256 |
ispartof | Nature neuroscience, 2017-06, Vol.20 (6), p.879-885 |
issn | 1097-6256 1546-1726 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5462090 |
source | MEDLINE; Nature Journals Online; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | 59 59/36 631/378/2645/2648 631/378/2649/1409 631/477 Animal cognition Animal Genetics and Genomics Behavioral Sciences Biological Techniques Biomedicine Brain Mapping Caudate-putamen Choice Behavior - physiology Coding Corpus Striatum - physiology Female Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Models, Neurological Morality Morals Neostriatum Neurobiology Neurosciences Pain Prefrontal cortex Prefrontal Cortex - physiology Reinforcement Representations Reward Young Adult |
title | Moral transgressions corrupt neural representations of value |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T18%3A01%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moral%20transgressions%20corrupt%20neural%20representations%20of%20value&rft.jtitle=Nature%20neuroscience&rft.au=Crockett,%20Molly%20J&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=879&rft.epage=885&rft.pages=879-885&rft.issn=1097-6256&rft.eissn=1546-1726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nn.4557&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1917728350%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1917728350&rft_id=info:pmid/28459442&rfr_iscdi=true |