Direct quantification of lipopeptide biosurfactants in biological samples via HPLC and UPLC-MS requires sample modification with an organic solvent
The rapid and accurate quantification of biosurfactants in biological samples is challenging. In contrast to the orcinol method for rhamnolipids, no simple biochemical method is available for the rapid quantification of lipopeptides. Various liquid chromatography (LC) methods are promising tools for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied microbiology and biotechnology 2017-06, Vol.101 (11), p.4747-4759 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4759 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 4747 |
container_title | Applied microbiology and biotechnology |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Biniarz, Piotr Łukaszewicz, Marcin |
description | The rapid and accurate quantification of biosurfactants in biological samples is challenging. In contrast to the orcinol method for rhamnolipids, no simple biochemical method is available for the rapid quantification of lipopeptides. Various liquid chromatography (LC) methods are promising tools for relatively fast and exact quantification of lipopeptides. Here, we report strategies for the quantification of the lipopeptides pseudofactin and surfactin in bacterial cultures using different high- (HPLC) and ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) systems. We tested three strategies for sample pretreatment prior to LC analysis. In direct analysis (DA), bacterial cultures were injected directly and analyzed via LC. As a modification, we diluted the samples with methanol and detected an increase in lipopeptide recovery in the presence of methanol. Therefore, we suggest this simple modification as a tool for increasing the accuracy of LC methods. We also tested freeze-drying followed by solvent extraction (FDSE) as an alternative for the analysis of “heavy” samples. In FDSE, the bacterial cultures were freeze-dried, and the resulting powder was extracted with different solvents. Then, the organic extracts were analyzed via LC. Here, we determined the influence of the extracting solvent on lipopeptide recovery. HPLC methods allowed us to quantify pseudofactin and surfactin with run times of 15 and 20 min per sample, respectively, whereas UPLC quantification was as fast as 4 and 5.5 min per sample, respectively. Our methods provide highly accurate measurements and high recovery levels for lipopeptides. At the same time, UPLC-MS provides the possibility to identify lipopeptides and their structural isoforms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00253-017-8272-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5442266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A551032981</galeid><sourcerecordid>A551032981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-66a081a3f36a119c5559f0ddab3c866b13626ffa3bc4d7f067fdb4870f12c7653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks9u1DAQxiMEoqXwAFyQJS5wSPE4tpNckKrlTystAlF6thzHTl0ldtZOFvY5eGG82qXtIhDywdbMb77xjL4sew74FDAu30SMCStyDGVekZLkmwfZMdCC5JgDfZgdpwTLS1ZXR9mTGG8wBlJx_jg7IlWiKIXj7Oc7G7Sa0GqWbrLGKjlZ75A3qLejH_U42Vajxvo4ByPVlKiIrNtGet8lvEdRDmOvI1pbic6_LBdIuhZdpUf-6RIFvZpTh7in0ODbuy7f7XSdaORDJ51VKPp-rd30NHtkZB_1s_19kl19eP9tcZ4vP3-8WJwtc8UpTDnnElcgC1NwCVArxlhtcNvKplBpzAYKTrgxsmgUbUuDeWnahlYlNkBUyVlxkr3d6Y5zM-hWpdZB9mIMdpBhI7y04jDj7LXo_FowSgnhPAm82gsEv5p1nMRgo9J9L532cxQEY0zrsi7Zf1GoaoAkS8uEvvwDvfFzcGkTAmoMlACryR3VyV4L64xPX1RbUXHGGOCC1BUk6vQvVDqtHqzyThub4gcFrw8KEjPpH1Mn5xjFxeXXQxZ2rAo-xqDN7eoAi61Bxc6gIvlQbA0qNqnmxf2d31b8dmQCyA6IKeU6He5N_0_VXxsb8TA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1901421592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct quantification of lipopeptide biosurfactants in biological samples via HPLC and UPLC-MS requires sample modification with an organic solvent</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Biniarz, Piotr ; Łukaszewicz, Marcin</creator><creatorcontrib>Biniarz, Piotr ; Łukaszewicz, Marcin</creatorcontrib><description>The rapid and accurate quantification of biosurfactants in biological samples is challenging. In contrast to the orcinol method for rhamnolipids, no simple biochemical method is available for the rapid quantification of lipopeptides. Various liquid chromatography (LC) methods are promising tools for relatively fast and exact quantification of lipopeptides. Here, we report strategies for the quantification of the lipopeptides pseudofactin and surfactin in bacterial cultures using different high- (HPLC) and ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) systems. We tested three strategies for sample pretreatment prior to LC analysis. In direct analysis (DA), bacterial cultures were injected directly and analyzed via LC. As a modification, we diluted the samples with methanol and detected an increase in lipopeptide recovery in the presence of methanol. Therefore, we suggest this simple modification as a tool for increasing the accuracy of LC methods. We also tested freeze-drying followed by solvent extraction (FDSE) as an alternative for the analysis of “heavy” samples. In FDSE, the bacterial cultures were freeze-dried, and the resulting powder was extracted with different solvents. Then, the organic extracts were analyzed via LC. Here, we determined the influence of the extracting solvent on lipopeptide recovery. HPLC methods allowed us to quantify pseudofactin and surfactin with run times of 15 and 20 min per sample, respectively, whereas UPLC quantification was as fast as 4 and 5.5 min per sample, respectively. Our methods provide highly accurate measurements and high recovery levels for lipopeptides. At the same time, UPLC-MS provides the possibility to identify lipopeptides and their structural isoforms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0175-7598</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00253-017-8272-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28432441</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biological properties ; Biological samples ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biosurfactants ; Biotechnology ; Chromatography ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods ; Extraction processes ; Freeze drying ; High performance liquid chromatography ; Isoforms ; Life Sciences ; Limit of Detection ; Lipopeptides ; Lipopeptides - analysis ; Lipopeptides - chemistry ; Liquid chromatography ; mass spectrometry ; Methanol ; Methanol - chemistry ; Methods and Protocols ; Microbial Genetics and Genomics ; Microbiology ; Organic Chemicals - chemistry ; Peptides, Cyclic - analysis ; Peptides, Cyclic - chemistry ; Powder ; Recovery ; Rhamnolipids ; Solvent extraction ; Solvents ; Surface active agents ; Surface-Active Agents - analysis ; Surface-Active Agents - chemistry ; Surfactants ; Surfactin ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods ; ultra-performance liquid chromatography</subject><ispartof>Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2017-06, Vol.101 (11), p.4747-4759</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-66a081a3f36a119c5559f0ddab3c866b13626ffa3bc4d7f067fdb4870f12c7653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-66a081a3f36a119c5559f0ddab3c866b13626ffa3bc4d7f067fdb4870f12c7653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00253-017-8272-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00253-017-8272-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,27911,27912,41475,42544,51306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28432441$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Biniarz, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Łukaszewicz, Marcin</creatorcontrib><title>Direct quantification of lipopeptide biosurfactants in biological samples via HPLC and UPLC-MS requires sample modification with an organic solvent</title><title>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</title><addtitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</addtitle><addtitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</addtitle><description>The rapid and accurate quantification of biosurfactants in biological samples is challenging. In contrast to the orcinol method for rhamnolipids, no simple biochemical method is available for the rapid quantification of lipopeptides. Various liquid chromatography (LC) methods are promising tools for relatively fast and exact quantification of lipopeptides. Here, we report strategies for the quantification of the lipopeptides pseudofactin and surfactin in bacterial cultures using different high- (HPLC) and ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) systems. We tested three strategies for sample pretreatment prior to LC analysis. In direct analysis (DA), bacterial cultures were injected directly and analyzed via LC. As a modification, we diluted the samples with methanol and detected an increase in lipopeptide recovery in the presence of methanol. Therefore, we suggest this simple modification as a tool for increasing the accuracy of LC methods. We also tested freeze-drying followed by solvent extraction (FDSE) as an alternative for the analysis of “heavy” samples. In FDSE, the bacterial cultures were freeze-dried, and the resulting powder was extracted with different solvents. Then, the organic extracts were analyzed via LC. Here, we determined the influence of the extracting solvent on lipopeptide recovery. HPLC methods allowed us to quantify pseudofactin and surfactin with run times of 15 and 20 min per sample, respectively, whereas UPLC quantification was as fast as 4 and 5.5 min per sample, respectively. Our methods provide highly accurate measurements and high recovery levels for lipopeptides. At the same time, UPLC-MS provides the possibility to identify lipopeptides and their structural isoforms.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biological properties</subject><subject>Biological samples</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biosurfactants</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Extraction processes</subject><subject>Freeze drying</subject><subject>High performance liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Isoforms</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Limit of Detection</subject><subject>Lipopeptides</subject><subject>Lipopeptides - analysis</subject><subject>Lipopeptides - chemistry</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Methanol</subject><subject>Methanol - chemistry</subject><subject>Methods and Protocols</subject><subject>Microbial Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Organic Chemicals - chemistry</subject><subject>Peptides, Cyclic - analysis</subject><subject>Peptides, Cyclic - chemistry</subject><subject>Powder</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Rhamnolipids</subject><subject>Solvent extraction</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Surface active agents</subject><subject>Surface-Active Agents - analysis</subject><subject>Surface-Active Agents - chemistry</subject><subject>Surfactants</subject><subject>Surfactin</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>ultra-performance liquid chromatography</subject><issn>0175-7598</issn><issn>1432-0614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks9u1DAQxiMEoqXwAFyQJS5wSPE4tpNckKrlTystAlF6thzHTl0ldtZOFvY5eGG82qXtIhDywdbMb77xjL4sew74FDAu30SMCStyDGVekZLkmwfZMdCC5JgDfZgdpwTLS1ZXR9mTGG8wBlJx_jg7IlWiKIXj7Oc7G7Sa0GqWbrLGKjlZ75A3qLejH_U42Vajxvo4ByPVlKiIrNtGet8lvEdRDmOvI1pbic6_LBdIuhZdpUf-6RIFvZpTh7in0ODbuy7f7XSdaORDJ51VKPp-rd30NHtkZB_1s_19kl19eP9tcZ4vP3-8WJwtc8UpTDnnElcgC1NwCVArxlhtcNvKplBpzAYKTrgxsmgUbUuDeWnahlYlNkBUyVlxkr3d6Y5zM-hWpdZB9mIMdpBhI7y04jDj7LXo_FowSgnhPAm82gsEv5p1nMRgo9J9L532cxQEY0zrsi7Zf1GoaoAkS8uEvvwDvfFzcGkTAmoMlACryR3VyV4L64xPX1RbUXHGGOCC1BUk6vQvVDqtHqzyThub4gcFrw8KEjPpH1Mn5xjFxeXXQxZ2rAo-xqDN7eoAi61Bxc6gIvlQbA0qNqnmxf2d31b8dmQCyA6IKeU6He5N_0_VXxsb8TA</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Biniarz, Piotr</creator><creator>Łukaszewicz, Marcin</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Direct quantification of lipopeptide biosurfactants in biological samples via HPLC and UPLC-MS requires sample modification with an organic solvent</title><author>Biniarz, Piotr ; Łukaszewicz, Marcin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-66a081a3f36a119c5559f0ddab3c866b13626ffa3bc4d7f067fdb4870f12c7653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biological properties</topic><topic>Biological samples</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biosurfactants</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Extraction processes</topic><topic>Freeze drying</topic><topic>High performance liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Isoforms</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Limit of Detection</topic><topic>Lipopeptides</topic><topic>Lipopeptides - analysis</topic><topic>Lipopeptides - chemistry</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Methanol</topic><topic>Methanol - chemistry</topic><topic>Methods and Protocols</topic><topic>Microbial Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Organic Chemicals - chemistry</topic><topic>Peptides, Cyclic - analysis</topic><topic>Peptides, Cyclic - chemistry</topic><topic>Powder</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Rhamnolipids</topic><topic>Solvent extraction</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Surface active agents</topic><topic>Surface-Active Agents - analysis</topic><topic>Surface-Active Agents - chemistry</topic><topic>Surfactants</topic><topic>Surfactin</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>ultra-performance liquid chromatography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Biniarz, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Łukaszewicz, Marcin</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Biniarz, Piotr</au><au>Łukaszewicz, Marcin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct quantification of lipopeptide biosurfactants in biological samples via HPLC and UPLC-MS requires sample modification with an organic solvent</atitle><jtitle>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</jtitle><stitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</stitle><addtitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>4747</spage><epage>4759</epage><pages>4747-4759</pages><issn>0175-7598</issn><eissn>1432-0614</eissn><abstract>The rapid and accurate quantification of biosurfactants in biological samples is challenging. In contrast to the orcinol method for rhamnolipids, no simple biochemical method is available for the rapid quantification of lipopeptides. Various liquid chromatography (LC) methods are promising tools for relatively fast and exact quantification of lipopeptides. Here, we report strategies for the quantification of the lipopeptides pseudofactin and surfactin in bacterial cultures using different high- (HPLC) and ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) systems. We tested three strategies for sample pretreatment prior to LC analysis. In direct analysis (DA), bacterial cultures were injected directly and analyzed via LC. As a modification, we diluted the samples with methanol and detected an increase in lipopeptide recovery in the presence of methanol. Therefore, we suggest this simple modification as a tool for increasing the accuracy of LC methods. We also tested freeze-drying followed by solvent extraction (FDSE) as an alternative for the analysis of “heavy” samples. In FDSE, the bacterial cultures were freeze-dried, and the resulting powder was extracted with different solvents. Then, the organic extracts were analyzed via LC. Here, we determined the influence of the extracting solvent on lipopeptide recovery. HPLC methods allowed us to quantify pseudofactin and surfactin with run times of 15 and 20 min per sample, respectively, whereas UPLC quantification was as fast as 4 and 5.5 min per sample, respectively. Our methods provide highly accurate measurements and high recovery levels for lipopeptides. At the same time, UPLC-MS provides the possibility to identify lipopeptides and their structural isoforms.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28432441</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00253-017-8272-y</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0175-7598 |
ispartof | Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2017-06, Vol.101 (11), p.4747-4759 |
issn | 0175-7598 1432-0614 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5442266 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Analysis Biological properties Biological samples Biomedical and Life Sciences Biosurfactants Biotechnology Chromatography Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods Extraction processes Freeze drying High performance liquid chromatography Isoforms Life Sciences Limit of Detection Lipopeptides Lipopeptides - analysis Lipopeptides - chemistry Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry Methanol Methanol - chemistry Methods and Protocols Microbial Genetics and Genomics Microbiology Organic Chemicals - chemistry Peptides, Cyclic - analysis Peptides, Cyclic - chemistry Powder Recovery Rhamnolipids Solvent extraction Solvents Surface active agents Surface-Active Agents - analysis Surface-Active Agents - chemistry Surfactants Surfactin Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods ultra-performance liquid chromatography |
title | Direct quantification of lipopeptide biosurfactants in biological samples via HPLC and UPLC-MS requires sample modification with an organic solvent |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T04%3A34%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20quantification%20of%20lipopeptide%20biosurfactants%20in%20biological%20samples%20via%20HPLC%20and%20UPLC-MS%20requires%20sample%20modification%20with%20an%20organic%20solvent&rft.jtitle=Applied%20microbiology%20and%20biotechnology&rft.au=Biniarz,%20Piotr&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4747&rft.epage=4759&rft.pages=4747-4759&rft.issn=0175-7598&rft.eissn=1432-0614&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00253-017-8272-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA551032981%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1901421592&rft_id=info:pmid/28432441&rft_galeid=A551032981&rfr_iscdi=true |