Resistance and resilience of root fungal communities to water limitation in a temperate agroecosystem

Understanding crop resilience to environmental stress is critical in predicting the consequences of global climate change for agricultural systems worldwide, but to date studies addressing crop resiliency have focused primarily on plant physiological and molecular responses. Arbuscular mycorrhizal f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology and evolution 2017-05, Vol.7 (10), p.3443-3454
Hauptverfasser: Furze, Jessie R., Martin, Adam R., Nasielski, Joshua, Thevathasan, Naresh V., Gordon, Andrew M., Isaac, Marney E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3454
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3443
container_title Ecology and evolution
container_volume 7
creator Furze, Jessie R.
Martin, Adam R.
Nasielski, Joshua
Thevathasan, Naresh V.
Gordon, Andrew M.
Isaac, Marney E.
description Understanding crop resilience to environmental stress is critical in predicting the consequences of global climate change for agricultural systems worldwide, but to date studies addressing crop resiliency have focused primarily on plant physiological and molecular responses. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form mutualisms with many crop species, and these relationships are key in mitigating the effects of abiotic stress in many agricultural systems. However, to date there is little research examining whether (1) fungal community structure in agroecosystems is resistant to changing environmental conditions, specifically water limitation and (2) resilience of fungal community structure is moderated by agricultural management systems, namely the integration of trees into cropping systems. Here, we address these uncertainties through a rainfall reduction field experiment that manipulated short‐term water availability in a soybean‐based (Glycine max L. Merr.) agroforest in Southern Ontario, Canada. We employed terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis to determine the molecular diversity of both general fungal and AMF communities in soybean roots under no stress, stress (rainfall shelters added), and poststress (rainfall shelters removed). We found that general fungal and AMF communities sampled from soybean roots were resistant to rainfall reduction in a monoculture, but not in an agroforest. While AMF communities were unchanged after stress removal, general fungal communities were significantly different poststress in the agroforest, indicating a capacity for resiliency. Our study indicates that generalist fungi and AMF are responsive to changes in environmental conditions and that agroecosystem management plays a key role in the resistance and resilience of fungal communities to water limitation. We employ a novel field‐based rainfall shelter design, coupled with contemporary molecular methods, to provide among the first evaluations of how climate change influences key plant‐microbial mutualisms in a temperate agroecosystem. Specifically, we use these techniques to evaluate both the resistance and resilience of AMF communities to environmental change, in soybean, one of the world's most important crops grown in both monoculture and agroforestry systems. Our results suggest that AMF community structure is not resistant to water limitations but general fungal communities are resilient to this type of environmental change.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ece3.2900
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5433968</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1949090669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-7d5d93c4df018e2508f4d1897b5e480d72218438cca0cf298c63dcb08df8abf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9rFDEUx4MottQe_Ack4MnDtm-SzExyEWRZf0BBED2HbPKypswka5Kx7H_frFtLPZhL8vI-fN6DLyGvO7jqANg1WuRXTAE8I-cMRL8ax14-f_I-I5el3EI7AzAB40tyxmTf9VLCOcFvWEKpJlqkJjqaWzkFPJbJ05xSpX6JOzNRm-Z5iaEGLLQmemcqZjqFOVRTQ4o0RGpoxXmPubWo2eWENpVDaX-vyAtvpoKXD_cF-fFx8339eXXz9dOX9YeblRWCw2p0vVPcCuehk8h6kF64Tqpx26OQ4EbGOim4tNaA9UxJO3BntyCdl2brOb8g70_e_bKd0VmMNZtJ73OYTT7oZIL-txPDT71Lv3UvOFeDbIK3D4Kcfi1Yqr5NS45tZ90poUDBMKhGvTtRNqdSMvrHCR3oYyj6GIo-htLYN09XeiT_RtCA6xNwFyY8_N-kN-sN_6O8B-2tmF0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1949090669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resistance and resilience of root fungal communities to water limitation in a temperate agroecosystem</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>TestCollectionTL3OpenAccess</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Furze, Jessie R. ; Martin, Adam R. ; Nasielski, Joshua ; Thevathasan, Naresh V. ; Gordon, Andrew M. ; Isaac, Marney E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Furze, Jessie R. ; Martin, Adam R. ; Nasielski, Joshua ; Thevathasan, Naresh V. ; Gordon, Andrew M. ; Isaac, Marney E.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding crop resilience to environmental stress is critical in predicting the consequences of global climate change for agricultural systems worldwide, but to date studies addressing crop resiliency have focused primarily on plant physiological and molecular responses. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form mutualisms with many crop species, and these relationships are key in mitigating the effects of abiotic stress in many agricultural systems. However, to date there is little research examining whether (1) fungal community structure in agroecosystems is resistant to changing environmental conditions, specifically water limitation and (2) resilience of fungal community structure is moderated by agricultural management systems, namely the integration of trees into cropping systems. Here, we address these uncertainties through a rainfall reduction field experiment that manipulated short‐term water availability in a soybean‐based (Glycine max L. Merr.) agroforest in Southern Ontario, Canada. We employed terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis to determine the molecular diversity of both general fungal and AMF communities in soybean roots under no stress, stress (rainfall shelters added), and poststress (rainfall shelters removed). We found that general fungal and AMF communities sampled from soybean roots were resistant to rainfall reduction in a monoculture, but not in an agroforest. While AMF communities were unchanged after stress removal, general fungal communities were significantly different poststress in the agroforest, indicating a capacity for resiliency. Our study indicates that generalist fungi and AMF are responsive to changes in environmental conditions and that agroecosystem management plays a key role in the resistance and resilience of fungal communities to water limitation. We employ a novel field‐based rainfall shelter design, coupled with contemporary molecular methods, to provide among the first evaluations of how climate change influences key plant‐microbial mutualisms in a temperate agroecosystem. Specifically, we use these techniques to evaluate both the resistance and resilience of AMF communities to environmental change, in soybean, one of the world's most important crops grown in both monoculture and agroforestry systems. Our results suggest that AMF community structure is not resistant to water limitations but general fungal communities are resilient to this type of environmental change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2900</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28515880</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; agroforestry ; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi ; Arbuscular mycorrhizas ; Climate change ; Communities ; Community structure ; Crop resilience ; Cropping systems ; Crops ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental management ; Environmental stress ; Fungi ; Gene polymorphism ; Glycine max ; Integration ; Management systems ; Monoculture ; Original Research ; Polymorphism ; Rainfall ; rainfall reduction ; Reduction ; Resilience ; Restriction fragment length polymorphism ; Roots ; Shelters ; Soybeans ; Stresses ; tree‐based intercropping ; T‐RFLP ; Water availability ; water limitation</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2017-05, Vol.7 (10), p.3443-3454</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-7d5d93c4df018e2508f4d1897b5e480d72218438cca0cf298c63dcb08df8abf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-7d5d93c4df018e2508f4d1897b5e480d72218438cca0cf298c63dcb08df8abf33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5975-833X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433968/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433968/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,866,887,1419,11569,27931,27932,45581,45582,46059,46483,53798,53800</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515880$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Furze, Jessie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Adam R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasielski, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thevathasan, Naresh V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isaac, Marney E.</creatorcontrib><title>Resistance and resilience of root fungal communities to water limitation in a temperate agroecosystem</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Understanding crop resilience to environmental stress is critical in predicting the consequences of global climate change for agricultural systems worldwide, but to date studies addressing crop resiliency have focused primarily on plant physiological and molecular responses. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form mutualisms with many crop species, and these relationships are key in mitigating the effects of abiotic stress in many agricultural systems. However, to date there is little research examining whether (1) fungal community structure in agroecosystems is resistant to changing environmental conditions, specifically water limitation and (2) resilience of fungal community structure is moderated by agricultural management systems, namely the integration of trees into cropping systems. Here, we address these uncertainties through a rainfall reduction field experiment that manipulated short‐term water availability in a soybean‐based (Glycine max L. Merr.) agroforest in Southern Ontario, Canada. We employed terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis to determine the molecular diversity of both general fungal and AMF communities in soybean roots under no stress, stress (rainfall shelters added), and poststress (rainfall shelters removed). We found that general fungal and AMF communities sampled from soybean roots were resistant to rainfall reduction in a monoculture, but not in an agroforest. While AMF communities were unchanged after stress removal, general fungal communities were significantly different poststress in the agroforest, indicating a capacity for resiliency. Our study indicates that generalist fungi and AMF are responsive to changes in environmental conditions and that agroecosystem management plays a key role in the resistance and resilience of fungal communities to water limitation. We employ a novel field‐based rainfall shelter design, coupled with contemporary molecular methods, to provide among the first evaluations of how climate change influences key plant‐microbial mutualisms in a temperate agroecosystem. Specifically, we use these techniques to evaluate both the resistance and resilience of AMF communities to environmental change, in soybean, one of the world's most important crops grown in both monoculture and agroforestry systems. Our results suggest that AMF community structure is not resistant to water limitations but general fungal communities are resilient to this type of environmental change.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>agroforestry</subject><subject>arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</subject><subject>Arbuscular mycorrhizas</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Crop resilience</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental stress</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Gene polymorphism</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>Integration</subject><subject>Management systems</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Polymorphism</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>rainfall reduction</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Restriction fragment length polymorphism</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Shelters</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><subject>tree‐based intercropping</subject><subject>T‐RFLP</subject><subject>Water availability</subject><subject>water limitation</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9rFDEUx4MottQe_Ack4MnDtm-SzExyEWRZf0BBED2HbPKypswka5Kx7H_frFtLPZhL8vI-fN6DLyGvO7jqANg1WuRXTAE8I-cMRL8ax14-f_I-I5el3EI7AzAB40tyxmTf9VLCOcFvWEKpJlqkJjqaWzkFPJbJ05xSpX6JOzNRm-Z5iaEGLLQmemcqZjqFOVRTQ4o0RGpoxXmPubWo2eWENpVDaX-vyAtvpoKXD_cF-fFx8339eXXz9dOX9YeblRWCw2p0vVPcCuehk8h6kF64Tqpx26OQ4EbGOim4tNaA9UxJO3BntyCdl2brOb8g70_e_bKd0VmMNZtJ73OYTT7oZIL-txPDT71Lv3UvOFeDbIK3D4Kcfi1Yqr5NS45tZ90poUDBMKhGvTtRNqdSMvrHCR3oYyj6GIo-htLYN09XeiT_RtCA6xNwFyY8_N-kN-sN_6O8B-2tmF0</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Furze, Jessie R.</creator><creator>Martin, Adam R.</creator><creator>Nasielski, Joshua</creator><creator>Thevathasan, Naresh V.</creator><creator>Gordon, Andrew M.</creator><creator>Isaac, Marney E.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5975-833X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>Resistance and resilience of root fungal communities to water limitation in a temperate agroecosystem</title><author>Furze, Jessie R. ; Martin, Adam R. ; Nasielski, Joshua ; Thevathasan, Naresh V. ; Gordon, Andrew M. ; Isaac, Marney E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-7d5d93c4df018e2508f4d1897b5e480d72218438cca0cf298c63dcb08df8abf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>agroforestry</topic><topic>arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</topic><topic>Arbuscular mycorrhizas</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Crop resilience</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental stress</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Gene polymorphism</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>Integration</topic><topic>Management systems</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Polymorphism</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>rainfall reduction</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Restriction fragment length polymorphism</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Shelters</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><topic>tree‐based intercropping</topic><topic>T‐RFLP</topic><topic>Water availability</topic><topic>water limitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Furze, Jessie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Adam R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasielski, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thevathasan, Naresh V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isaac, Marney E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Furze, Jessie R.</au><au>Martin, Adam R.</au><au>Nasielski, Joshua</au><au>Thevathasan, Naresh V.</au><au>Gordon, Andrew M.</au><au>Isaac, Marney E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resistance and resilience of root fungal communities to water limitation in a temperate agroecosystem</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3443</spage><epage>3454</epage><pages>3443-3454</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Understanding crop resilience to environmental stress is critical in predicting the consequences of global climate change for agricultural systems worldwide, but to date studies addressing crop resiliency have focused primarily on plant physiological and molecular responses. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form mutualisms with many crop species, and these relationships are key in mitigating the effects of abiotic stress in many agricultural systems. However, to date there is little research examining whether (1) fungal community structure in agroecosystems is resistant to changing environmental conditions, specifically water limitation and (2) resilience of fungal community structure is moderated by agricultural management systems, namely the integration of trees into cropping systems. Here, we address these uncertainties through a rainfall reduction field experiment that manipulated short‐term water availability in a soybean‐based (Glycine max L. Merr.) agroforest in Southern Ontario, Canada. We employed terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis to determine the molecular diversity of both general fungal and AMF communities in soybean roots under no stress, stress (rainfall shelters added), and poststress (rainfall shelters removed). We found that general fungal and AMF communities sampled from soybean roots were resistant to rainfall reduction in a monoculture, but not in an agroforest. While AMF communities were unchanged after stress removal, general fungal communities were significantly different poststress in the agroforest, indicating a capacity for resiliency. Our study indicates that generalist fungi and AMF are responsive to changes in environmental conditions and that agroecosystem management plays a key role in the resistance and resilience of fungal communities to water limitation. We employ a novel field‐based rainfall shelter design, coupled with contemporary molecular methods, to provide among the first evaluations of how climate change influences key plant‐microbial mutualisms in a temperate agroecosystem. Specifically, we use these techniques to evaluate both the resistance and resilience of AMF communities to environmental change, in soybean, one of the world's most important crops grown in both monoculture and agroforestry systems. Our results suggest that AMF community structure is not resistant to water limitations but general fungal communities are resilient to this type of environmental change.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>28515880</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.2900</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5975-833X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-7758
ispartof Ecology and evolution, 2017-05, Vol.7 (10), p.3443-3454
issn 2045-7758
2045-7758
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5433968
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; TestCollectionTL3OpenAccess; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central
subjects Agricultural management
agroforestry
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Arbuscular mycorrhizas
Climate change
Communities
Community structure
Crop resilience
Cropping systems
Crops
Environmental conditions
Environmental management
Environmental stress
Fungi
Gene polymorphism
Glycine max
Integration
Management systems
Monoculture
Original Research
Polymorphism
Rainfall
rainfall reduction
Reduction
Resilience
Restriction fragment length polymorphism
Roots
Shelters
Soybeans
Stresses
tree‐based intercropping
T‐RFLP
Water availability
water limitation
title Resistance and resilience of root fungal communities to water limitation in a temperate agroecosystem
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T17%3A05%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resistance%20and%20resilience%20of%20root%20fungal%20communities%20to%20water%20limitation%20in%20a%20temperate%20agroecosystem&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Furze,%20Jessie%20R.&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3443&rft.epage=3454&rft.pages=3443-3454&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.2900&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1949090669%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1949090669&rft_id=info:pmid/28515880&rfr_iscdi=true