Evaluation of surface roughness of enamel after various bonding and clean-up procedures on enamel bonded with three different bonding agents: An in-vitro study
The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the enamel surface roughness before bonding and after debonding, to find correlation between the adhesive remnant index and its effect on enamel surface roughness and to evaluate which clean-up method is most efficient to provide a smoother enamel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry 2017-05, Vol.9 (5), p.e608-e616 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e616 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e608 |
container_title | Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Goel, Amit Singh, Atul Gupta, Tarun Gambhir, Ramandeep-Singh |
description | The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the enamel surface roughness before bonding and after debonding, to find correlation between the adhesive remnant index and its effect on enamel surface roughness and to evaluate which clean-up method is most efficient to provide a smoother enamel surface.
135 premolars were divided into 3 groups containing 45 premolars in each group. Group I was bonded by using moisture insensitive primer, Group II by using conventional orthodontic adhesive and Group III by using self-etching primer. Each group was divided into 3 sub-groups on the basis of type of clean-up method applied i,e scaling followed by polishing, tungsten carbide bur and Sof-Lex disc. Enamel surface roughness was measured and compared before bonding and after clean-up.
Evaluation of pre bonding and post clean-up enamel surface roughness (Ra value) with the t test showed that Post clean-up Ra values were greater than Pre bonding Ra values in all the groups except in teeth bonded with self-etching primer cleaned with Sof-Lex disc. Reliability of ARI score taken at different time interval tested with Kruskal Wallis test suggested that all the readings were reliable.
No clean-up procedure was able to restore the enamel to its original smoothness. Self-etching primer and Sof-Lex disc clean-up method combination restored the enamel surface roughness (Ra value) closest to its pre-treatment value.
Enamel surface roughness, clean-up method, adhesive remnant index. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4317/jced.53237 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5429470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1899790535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2937-b9b63edf912791fd96e0035d3d333f4929fda301fbd891e9760ac56ad88cd3f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1OxCAUhYnRqFE3PoBhaUyqUNopuDAxxr_ExI2uCYXLDKYDI5QxPo2vKuO_bODCdw8n9yC0T8lxw2h38qTBHLesZt0a2qaCi6ptOF__c95Ceyk9kbI6ympON9FWzVtat6zdRm-XSzVkNbrgcbA45WiVBhxDns48pLS6BK_mMGBlR4h4qaILOeE-eOP8FCtvsB5A-Sov8CKGYidHKH3-u29FgsEvbpzhcRYBsHHWQgQ__qpMS5VO8bnHzldLN8aA05jN6y7asGpIsPe176DHq8uHi5vq7v769uL8rtK1YF3Vi37CwFhB605Qa8QECGGtYYYxZhtRC2sUI9T2hgsKopsQpduJMpxrwyxlO-jsU3eR-zkYXexENchFdHMVX2VQTv5_8W4mp2Ep26YWTUeKwOGXQAzPGdIo5y5pGAblocxLUi5EJ0gZekGPPlEdQ0oR7M83lMhVqHIVqvwItcAHf439oN8RsncQm6Hi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1899790535</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of surface roughness of enamel after various bonding and clean-up procedures on enamel bonded with three different bonding agents: An in-vitro study</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Goel, Amit ; Singh, Atul ; Gupta, Tarun ; Gambhir, Ramandeep-Singh</creator><creatorcontrib>Goel, Amit ; Singh, Atul ; Gupta, Tarun ; Gambhir, Ramandeep-Singh</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the enamel surface roughness before bonding and after debonding, to find correlation between the adhesive remnant index and its effect on enamel surface roughness and to evaluate which clean-up method is most efficient to provide a smoother enamel surface.
135 premolars were divided into 3 groups containing 45 premolars in each group. Group I was bonded by using moisture insensitive primer, Group II by using conventional orthodontic adhesive and Group III by using self-etching primer. Each group was divided into 3 sub-groups on the basis of type of clean-up method applied i,e scaling followed by polishing, tungsten carbide bur and Sof-Lex disc. Enamel surface roughness was measured and compared before bonding and after clean-up.
Evaluation of pre bonding and post clean-up enamel surface roughness (Ra value) with the t test showed that Post clean-up Ra values were greater than Pre bonding Ra values in all the groups except in teeth bonded with self-etching primer cleaned with Sof-Lex disc. Reliability of ARI score taken at different time interval tested with Kruskal Wallis test suggested that all the readings were reliable.
No clean-up procedure was able to restore the enamel to its original smoothness. Self-etching primer and Sof-Lex disc clean-up method combination restored the enamel surface roughness (Ra value) closest to its pre-treatment value.
Enamel surface roughness, clean-up method, adhesive remnant index.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1989-5488</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1989-5488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4317/jced.53237</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28512535</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Spain: Medicina Oral S.L</publisher><ispartof>Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2017-05, Vol.9 (5), p.e608-e616</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2017 Medicina Oral S.L. 2017</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2937-b9b63edf912791fd96e0035d3d333f4929fda301fbd891e9760ac56ad88cd3f13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429470/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429470/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28512535$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goel, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Atul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Tarun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gambhir, Ramandeep-Singh</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of surface roughness of enamel after various bonding and clean-up procedures on enamel bonded with three different bonding agents: An in-vitro study</title><title>Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry</title><addtitle>J Clin Exp Dent</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the enamel surface roughness before bonding and after debonding, to find correlation between the adhesive remnant index and its effect on enamel surface roughness and to evaluate which clean-up method is most efficient to provide a smoother enamel surface.
135 premolars were divided into 3 groups containing 45 premolars in each group. Group I was bonded by using moisture insensitive primer, Group II by using conventional orthodontic adhesive and Group III by using self-etching primer. Each group was divided into 3 sub-groups on the basis of type of clean-up method applied i,e scaling followed by polishing, tungsten carbide bur and Sof-Lex disc. Enamel surface roughness was measured and compared before bonding and after clean-up.
Evaluation of pre bonding and post clean-up enamel surface roughness (Ra value) with the t test showed that Post clean-up Ra values were greater than Pre bonding Ra values in all the groups except in teeth bonded with self-etching primer cleaned with Sof-Lex disc. Reliability of ARI score taken at different time interval tested with Kruskal Wallis test suggested that all the readings were reliable.
No clean-up procedure was able to restore the enamel to its original smoothness. Self-etching primer and Sof-Lex disc clean-up method combination restored the enamel surface roughness (Ra value) closest to its pre-treatment value.
Enamel surface roughness, clean-up method, adhesive remnant index.</description><issn>1989-5488</issn><issn>1989-5488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc1OxCAUhYnRqFE3PoBhaUyqUNopuDAxxr_ExI2uCYXLDKYDI5QxPo2vKuO_bODCdw8n9yC0T8lxw2h38qTBHLesZt0a2qaCi6ptOF__c95Ceyk9kbI6ympON9FWzVtat6zdRm-XSzVkNbrgcbA45WiVBhxDns48pLS6BK_mMGBlR4h4qaILOeE-eOP8FCtvsB5A-Sov8CKGYidHKH3-u29FgsEvbpzhcRYBsHHWQgQ__qpMS5VO8bnHzldLN8aA05jN6y7asGpIsPe176DHq8uHi5vq7v769uL8rtK1YF3Vi37CwFhB605Qa8QECGGtYYYxZhtRC2sUI9T2hgsKopsQpduJMpxrwyxlO-jsU3eR-zkYXexENchFdHMVX2VQTv5_8W4mp2Ep26YWTUeKwOGXQAzPGdIo5y5pGAblocxLUi5EJ0gZekGPPlEdQ0oR7M83lMhVqHIVqvwItcAHf439oN8RsncQm6Hi</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Goel, Amit</creator><creator>Singh, Atul</creator><creator>Gupta, Tarun</creator><creator>Gambhir, Ramandeep-Singh</creator><general>Medicina Oral S.L</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Evaluation of surface roughness of enamel after various bonding and clean-up procedures on enamel bonded with three different bonding agents: An in-vitro study</title><author>Goel, Amit ; Singh, Atul ; Gupta, Tarun ; Gambhir, Ramandeep-Singh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2937-b9b63edf912791fd96e0035d3d333f4929fda301fbd891e9760ac56ad88cd3f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goel, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Atul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Tarun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gambhir, Ramandeep-Singh</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goel, Amit</au><au>Singh, Atul</au><au>Gupta, Tarun</au><au>Gambhir, Ramandeep-Singh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of surface roughness of enamel after various bonding and clean-up procedures on enamel bonded with three different bonding agents: An in-vitro study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Exp Dent</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e608</spage><epage>e616</epage><pages>e608-e616</pages><issn>1989-5488</issn><eissn>1989-5488</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the enamel surface roughness before bonding and after debonding, to find correlation between the adhesive remnant index and its effect on enamel surface roughness and to evaluate which clean-up method is most efficient to provide a smoother enamel surface.
135 premolars were divided into 3 groups containing 45 premolars in each group. Group I was bonded by using moisture insensitive primer, Group II by using conventional orthodontic adhesive and Group III by using self-etching primer. Each group was divided into 3 sub-groups on the basis of type of clean-up method applied i,e scaling followed by polishing, tungsten carbide bur and Sof-Lex disc. Enamel surface roughness was measured and compared before bonding and after clean-up.
Evaluation of pre bonding and post clean-up enamel surface roughness (Ra value) with the t test showed that Post clean-up Ra values were greater than Pre bonding Ra values in all the groups except in teeth bonded with self-etching primer cleaned with Sof-Lex disc. Reliability of ARI score taken at different time interval tested with Kruskal Wallis test suggested that all the readings were reliable.
No clean-up procedure was able to restore the enamel to its original smoothness. Self-etching primer and Sof-Lex disc clean-up method combination restored the enamel surface roughness (Ra value) closest to its pre-treatment value.
Enamel surface roughness, clean-up method, adhesive remnant index.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pub>Medicina Oral S.L</pub><pmid>28512535</pmid><doi>10.4317/jced.53237</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1989-5488 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2017-05, Vol.9 (5), p.e608-e616 |
issn | 1989-5488 1989-5488 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5429470 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
title | Evaluation of surface roughness of enamel after various bonding and clean-up procedures on enamel bonded with three different bonding agents: An in-vitro study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A48%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20surface%20roughness%20of%20enamel%20after%20various%20bonding%20and%20clean-up%20procedures%20on%20enamel%20bonded%20with%20three%20different%20bonding%20agents:%20An%20in-vitro%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20dentistry&rft.au=Goel,%20Amit&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e608&rft.epage=e616&rft.pages=e608-e616&rft.issn=1989-5488&rft.eissn=1989-5488&rft_id=info:doi/10.4317/jced.53237&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1899790535%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1899790535&rft_id=info:pmid/28512535&rfr_iscdi=true |