Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study
Summary Background Pregnancy increases the risk of harmful effects from cholera for both mothers and their fetuses. A killed oral cholera vaccine, Shanchol (Shantha Biotechnics, Hydrabad, India), can protect against the disease for up to 5 years. However, cholera vaccination campaigns have often exc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet infectious diseases 2017-05, Vol.17 (5), p.538-544 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 544 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 538 |
container_title | The Lancet infectious diseases |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Ali, Mohammad, Dr Nelson, Allyson, MSPH Luquero, Francisco J, PhD Azman, Andrew S, PhD Debes, Amanda K, PhD M'bang'ombe, Maurice Mwesawina, MSc Seyama, Linly, MSc Kachale, Evans, MSc Zuze, Kingsley, BSc Malichi, Desire, Adv Dipl Zulu, Fatima, MSc Msyamboza, Kelias Phiri, PhD Kabuluzi, Storn, MPH Sack, David A, Prof |
description | Summary Background Pregnancy increases the risk of harmful effects from cholera for both mothers and their fetuses. A killed oral cholera vaccine, Shanchol (Shantha Biotechnics, Hydrabad, India), can protect against the disease for up to 5 years. However, cholera vaccination campaigns have often excluded pregnant women because of insufficient safety data for use during pregnancy. We did an observational cohort study to assess the safety of Shanchol during pregnancy. Methods This observational cohort study was done in two adjacent districts (Nsanje and Chikwawa) in Malawi. Individuals older than 1 year in Nsanje were offered oral cholera vaccine during a mass vaccination campaign between March 30 and April 30, 2015, but no vaccines were administered in Chikwawa. We enrolled women who were exposed to oral cholera vaccine during pregnancy in Nsanje district, and women who were pregnant in Chikwawa district (and thus not exposed to oral cholera vaccine) during the same period. The primary endpoint of our analysis was pregnancy loss (spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth), and the secondary endpoints were neonatal deaths and malformations. We evaluated these endpoints using log-binomial regression, adjusting for the imbalanced baseline characteristics between the groups. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02499172. Findings We recruited 900 women exposed to oral cholera vaccine and 899 women not exposed to the vaccine between June 16 and Oct 10, 2015, and analysed 835 in each group. 361 women exposed to the vaccine and 327 not exposed to the vaccine were recruited after their pregnancies had ended. The incidence of pregnancy loss was 27·54 (95% CI 18·41–41·23) per 1000 pregnancies among those exposed to the vaccine and 21·56 (13·65–34·04) per 1000 among those not exposed. The adjusted relative risk for pregnancy loss among those exposed to oral cholera vaccine was 1·24 (95% CI 0·64–2·43; p=0·52) compared with those not exposed to the vaccine. The neonatal mortality rate was 11·78 (95% CI 5·92–23·46) per 1000 livebirths for infants whose mothers were exposed to oral cholera vaccine versus 8·91 (4·02–19·77) per 1000 livebirths for infants whose mothers were not exposed to the vaccine (crude relative risk 1·32, 95% CI 0·46–3·84; p=0·60). Only three newborn babies had malformations, two in the vaccine exposure group and one in the no-exposure group, yielding a relative risk of 2·00 (95% CI 0·18–22·04; p=0·57), although this estimate is unr |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30523-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5406486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1473309916305230</els_id><sourcerecordid>1865518582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-f0e6387bf2736df091a39aa59b70505e5fe7bfe5ac51200140dfbd6dc06b1cbe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxSMEoqXwEUCWuGwPgXFiOwmHIlTxTyrisHC2HGfSdevYWzvZar89zqYU6IWT7Zk3P_v5ZdlLCm8oUPF2TVlV5iU0zYqK0xJ4UebwKDtOZZYzxqvHh_0iOcqexXgFQCsK7Gl2VNRUUF7BcTasVY_jnvieKHJtrMWO-KAs0RtvMSiyU1obh2S13ig3F0-JcWQb8NIpN5JbP6CbK9-UVbfmHVGO-DZi2KnReDeD_MaHkcRx6vbPsye9shFf3K0n2c9PH3-cf8kvvn_-ev7hItecw5j3gKKsq7YvqlJ0PTRUlY1SvGkr4MCR95iayJXmtEiuGHR924lOg2ipbrE8yc4W7nZqB-w0ujF5kttgBhX20isj_-04s5GXfic5A8FqkQCrO0DwNxPGUQ4marRWOfRTlLQWnNOa10WSvn4gvfJTSM5nVVNUNWOiTCq-qHTwMQbs7x9DQc6BykOgck5LptMhUAlp7tXfTu6nfieYBO8XAab_3BkMMmqDTmNnAupRdt7894qzBwRtjTNa2WvcY_zjRsZCwgKZGVQcCFD-AtNXxiA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1892784463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ali, Mohammad, Dr ; Nelson, Allyson, MSPH ; Luquero, Francisco J, PhD ; Azman, Andrew S, PhD ; Debes, Amanda K, PhD ; M'bang'ombe, Maurice Mwesawina, MSc ; Seyama, Linly, MSc ; Kachale, Evans, MSc ; Zuze, Kingsley, BSc ; Malichi, Desire, Adv Dipl ; Zulu, Fatima, MSc ; Msyamboza, Kelias Phiri, PhD ; Kabuluzi, Storn, MPH ; Sack, David A, Prof</creator><creatorcontrib>Ali, Mohammad, Dr ; Nelson, Allyson, MSPH ; Luquero, Francisco J, PhD ; Azman, Andrew S, PhD ; Debes, Amanda K, PhD ; M'bang'ombe, Maurice Mwesawina, MSc ; Seyama, Linly, MSc ; Kachale, Evans, MSc ; Zuze, Kingsley, BSc ; Malichi, Desire, Adv Dipl ; Zulu, Fatima, MSc ; Msyamboza, Kelias Phiri, PhD ; Kabuluzi, Storn, MPH ; Sack, David A, Prof</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Pregnancy increases the risk of harmful effects from cholera for both mothers and their fetuses. A killed oral cholera vaccine, Shanchol (Shantha Biotechnics, Hydrabad, India), can protect against the disease for up to 5 years. However, cholera vaccination campaigns have often excluded pregnant women because of insufficient safety data for use during pregnancy. We did an observational cohort study to assess the safety of Shanchol during pregnancy. Methods This observational cohort study was done in two adjacent districts (Nsanje and Chikwawa) in Malawi. Individuals older than 1 year in Nsanje were offered oral cholera vaccine during a mass vaccination campaign between March 30 and April 30, 2015, but no vaccines were administered in Chikwawa. We enrolled women who were exposed to oral cholera vaccine during pregnancy in Nsanje district, and women who were pregnant in Chikwawa district (and thus not exposed to oral cholera vaccine) during the same period. The primary endpoint of our analysis was pregnancy loss (spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth), and the secondary endpoints were neonatal deaths and malformations. We evaluated these endpoints using log-binomial regression, adjusting for the imbalanced baseline characteristics between the groups. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02499172. Findings We recruited 900 women exposed to oral cholera vaccine and 899 women not exposed to the vaccine between June 16 and Oct 10, 2015, and analysed 835 in each group. 361 women exposed to the vaccine and 327 not exposed to the vaccine were recruited after their pregnancies had ended. The incidence of pregnancy loss was 27·54 (95% CI 18·41–41·23) per 1000 pregnancies among those exposed to the vaccine and 21·56 (13·65–34·04) per 1000 among those not exposed. The adjusted relative risk for pregnancy loss among those exposed to oral cholera vaccine was 1·24 (95% CI 0·64–2·43; p=0·52) compared with those not exposed to the vaccine. The neonatal mortality rate was 11·78 (95% CI 5·92–23·46) per 1000 livebirths for infants whose mothers were exposed to oral cholera vaccine versus 8·91 (4·02–19·77) per 1000 livebirths for infants whose mothers were not exposed to the vaccine (crude relative risk 1·32, 95% CI 0·46–3·84; p=0·60). Only three newborn babies had malformations, two in the vaccine exposure group and one in the no-exposure group, yielding a relative risk of 2·00 (95% CI 0·18–22·04; p=0·57), although this estimate is unreliable because of the small number of outcomes. Interpretation Our study provides evidence that fetal exposure to oral cholera vaccine confers no significantly increased risk of pregnancy loss, neonatal mortality, or malformation. These data, along with findings from two retrospective studies, support use of oral cholera vaccine in pregnant women in cholera-affected regions. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-3099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-4457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30523-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28161570</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Babies ; Charities ; Cholera ; Cholera - complications ; Cholera - epidemiology ; Cholera - prevention & control ; Cholera Vaccines - administration & dosage ; Cohort analysis ; Exposure ; Fatalities ; Female ; Fetal Death ; Fetuses ; Health risk assessment ; Health risks ; Humans ; Immunization ; Incidence ; Infant mortality ; Infants ; Infectious Disease ; Infectious diseases ; Malawi - epidemiology ; Miscarriage ; Mortality ; Mothers ; Neonates ; Observational studies ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal exposure ; Public health ; Regression analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Safety ; Safety - standards ; Vaccines ; Vaccines, Inactivated - administration & dosage ; Waterborne diseases ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>The Lancet infectious diseases, 2017-05, Vol.17 (5), p.538-544</ispartof><rights>The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license</rights><rights>2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited May 1, 2017</rights><rights>2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-f0e6387bf2736df091a39aa59b70505e5fe7bfe5ac51200140dfbd6dc06b1cbe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-f0e6387bf2736df091a39aa59b70505e5fe7bfe5ac51200140dfbd6dc06b1cbe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473309916305230$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28161570$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ali, Mohammad, Dr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Allyson, MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luquero, Francisco J, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azman, Andrew S, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debes, Amanda K, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M'bang'ombe, Maurice Mwesawina, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seyama, Linly, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachale, Evans, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuze, Kingsley, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malichi, Desire, Adv Dipl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zulu, Fatima, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Msyamboza, Kelias Phiri, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabuluzi, Storn, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sack, David A, Prof</creatorcontrib><title>Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study</title><title>The Lancet infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Summary Background Pregnancy increases the risk of harmful effects from cholera for both mothers and their fetuses. A killed oral cholera vaccine, Shanchol (Shantha Biotechnics, Hydrabad, India), can protect against the disease for up to 5 years. However, cholera vaccination campaigns have often excluded pregnant women because of insufficient safety data for use during pregnancy. We did an observational cohort study to assess the safety of Shanchol during pregnancy. Methods This observational cohort study was done in two adjacent districts (Nsanje and Chikwawa) in Malawi. Individuals older than 1 year in Nsanje were offered oral cholera vaccine during a mass vaccination campaign between March 30 and April 30, 2015, but no vaccines were administered in Chikwawa. We enrolled women who were exposed to oral cholera vaccine during pregnancy in Nsanje district, and women who were pregnant in Chikwawa district (and thus not exposed to oral cholera vaccine) during the same period. The primary endpoint of our analysis was pregnancy loss (spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth), and the secondary endpoints were neonatal deaths and malformations. We evaluated these endpoints using log-binomial regression, adjusting for the imbalanced baseline characteristics between the groups. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02499172. Findings We recruited 900 women exposed to oral cholera vaccine and 899 women not exposed to the vaccine between June 16 and Oct 10, 2015, and analysed 835 in each group. 361 women exposed to the vaccine and 327 not exposed to the vaccine were recruited after their pregnancies had ended. The incidence of pregnancy loss was 27·54 (95% CI 18·41–41·23) per 1000 pregnancies among those exposed to the vaccine and 21·56 (13·65–34·04) per 1000 among those not exposed. The adjusted relative risk for pregnancy loss among those exposed to oral cholera vaccine was 1·24 (95% CI 0·64–2·43; p=0·52) compared with those not exposed to the vaccine. The neonatal mortality rate was 11·78 (95% CI 5·92–23·46) per 1000 livebirths for infants whose mothers were exposed to oral cholera vaccine versus 8·91 (4·02–19·77) per 1000 livebirths for infants whose mothers were not exposed to the vaccine (crude relative risk 1·32, 95% CI 0·46–3·84; p=0·60). Only three newborn babies had malformations, two in the vaccine exposure group and one in the no-exposure group, yielding a relative risk of 2·00 (95% CI 0·18–22·04; p=0·57), although this estimate is unreliable because of the small number of outcomes. Interpretation Our study provides evidence that fetal exposure to oral cholera vaccine confers no significantly increased risk of pregnancy loss, neonatal mortality, or malformation. These data, along with findings from two retrospective studies, support use of oral cholera vaccine in pregnant women in cholera-affected regions. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Charities</subject><subject>Cholera</subject><subject>Cholera - complications</subject><subject>Cholera - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cholera - prevention & control</subject><subject>Cholera Vaccines - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Death</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infant mortality</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Malawi - epidemiology</subject><subject>Miscarriage</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal exposure</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety - standards</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Vaccines, Inactivated - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Waterborne diseases</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1473-3099</issn><issn>1474-4457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxSMEoqXwEUCWuGwPgXFiOwmHIlTxTyrisHC2HGfSdevYWzvZar89zqYU6IWT7Zk3P_v5ZdlLCm8oUPF2TVlV5iU0zYqK0xJ4UebwKDtOZZYzxqvHh_0iOcqexXgFQCsK7Gl2VNRUUF7BcTasVY_jnvieKHJtrMWO-KAs0RtvMSiyU1obh2S13ig3F0-JcWQb8NIpN5JbP6CbK9-UVbfmHVGO-DZi2KnReDeD_MaHkcRx6vbPsye9shFf3K0n2c9PH3-cf8kvvn_-ev7hItecw5j3gKKsq7YvqlJ0PTRUlY1SvGkr4MCR95iayJXmtEiuGHR924lOg2ipbrE8yc4W7nZqB-w0ujF5kttgBhX20isj_-04s5GXfic5A8FqkQCrO0DwNxPGUQ4marRWOfRTlLQWnNOa10WSvn4gvfJTSM5nVVNUNWOiTCq-qHTwMQbs7x9DQc6BykOgck5LptMhUAlp7tXfTu6nfieYBO8XAab_3BkMMmqDTmNnAupRdt7894qzBwRtjTNa2WvcY_zjRsZCwgKZGVQcCFD-AtNXxiA</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Ali, Mohammad, Dr</creator><creator>Nelson, Allyson, MSPH</creator><creator>Luquero, Francisco J, PhD</creator><creator>Azman, Andrew S, PhD</creator><creator>Debes, Amanda K, PhD</creator><creator>M'bang'ombe, Maurice Mwesawina, MSc</creator><creator>Seyama, Linly, MSc</creator><creator>Kachale, Evans, MSc</creator><creator>Zuze, Kingsley, BSc</creator><creator>Malichi, Desire, Adv Dipl</creator><creator>Zulu, Fatima, MSc</creator><creator>Msyamboza, Kelias Phiri, PhD</creator><creator>Kabuluzi, Storn, MPH</creator><creator>Sack, David A, Prof</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study</title><author>Ali, Mohammad, Dr ; Nelson, Allyson, MSPH ; Luquero, Francisco J, PhD ; Azman, Andrew S, PhD ; Debes, Amanda K, PhD ; M'bang'ombe, Maurice Mwesawina, MSc ; Seyama, Linly, MSc ; Kachale, Evans, MSc ; Zuze, Kingsley, BSc ; Malichi, Desire, Adv Dipl ; Zulu, Fatima, MSc ; Msyamboza, Kelias Phiri, PhD ; Kabuluzi, Storn, MPH ; Sack, David A, Prof</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-f0e6387bf2736df091a39aa59b70505e5fe7bfe5ac51200140dfbd6dc06b1cbe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Charities</topic><topic>Cholera</topic><topic>Cholera - complications</topic><topic>Cholera - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cholera - prevention & control</topic><topic>Cholera Vaccines - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Death</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infant mortality</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Malawi - epidemiology</topic><topic>Miscarriage</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal exposure</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety - standards</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Vaccines, Inactivated - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Waterborne diseases</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ali, Mohammad, Dr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Allyson, MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luquero, Francisco J, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azman, Andrew S, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debes, Amanda K, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M'bang'ombe, Maurice Mwesawina, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seyama, Linly, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachale, Evans, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuze, Kingsley, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malichi, Desire, Adv Dipl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zulu, Fatima, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Msyamboza, Kelias Phiri, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabuluzi, Storn, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sack, David A, Prof</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ali, Mohammad, Dr</au><au>Nelson, Allyson, MSPH</au><au>Luquero, Francisco J, PhD</au><au>Azman, Andrew S, PhD</au><au>Debes, Amanda K, PhD</au><au>M'bang'ombe, Maurice Mwesawina, MSc</au><au>Seyama, Linly, MSc</au><au>Kachale, Evans, MSc</au><au>Zuze, Kingsley, BSc</au><au>Malichi, Desire, Adv Dipl</au><au>Zulu, Fatima, MSc</au><au>Msyamboza, Kelias Phiri, PhD</au><au>Kabuluzi, Storn, MPH</au><au>Sack, David A, Prof</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>538</spage><epage>544</epage><pages>538-544</pages><issn>1473-3099</issn><eissn>1474-4457</eissn><abstract>Summary Background Pregnancy increases the risk of harmful effects from cholera for both mothers and their fetuses. A killed oral cholera vaccine, Shanchol (Shantha Biotechnics, Hydrabad, India), can protect against the disease for up to 5 years. However, cholera vaccination campaigns have often excluded pregnant women because of insufficient safety data for use during pregnancy. We did an observational cohort study to assess the safety of Shanchol during pregnancy. Methods This observational cohort study was done in two adjacent districts (Nsanje and Chikwawa) in Malawi. Individuals older than 1 year in Nsanje were offered oral cholera vaccine during a mass vaccination campaign between March 30 and April 30, 2015, but no vaccines were administered in Chikwawa. We enrolled women who were exposed to oral cholera vaccine during pregnancy in Nsanje district, and women who were pregnant in Chikwawa district (and thus not exposed to oral cholera vaccine) during the same period. The primary endpoint of our analysis was pregnancy loss (spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth), and the secondary endpoints were neonatal deaths and malformations. We evaluated these endpoints using log-binomial regression, adjusting for the imbalanced baseline characteristics between the groups. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02499172. Findings We recruited 900 women exposed to oral cholera vaccine and 899 women not exposed to the vaccine between June 16 and Oct 10, 2015, and analysed 835 in each group. 361 women exposed to the vaccine and 327 not exposed to the vaccine were recruited after their pregnancies had ended. The incidence of pregnancy loss was 27·54 (95% CI 18·41–41·23) per 1000 pregnancies among those exposed to the vaccine and 21·56 (13·65–34·04) per 1000 among those not exposed. The adjusted relative risk for pregnancy loss among those exposed to oral cholera vaccine was 1·24 (95% CI 0·64–2·43; p=0·52) compared with those not exposed to the vaccine. The neonatal mortality rate was 11·78 (95% CI 5·92–23·46) per 1000 livebirths for infants whose mothers were exposed to oral cholera vaccine versus 8·91 (4·02–19·77) per 1000 livebirths for infants whose mothers were not exposed to the vaccine (crude relative risk 1·32, 95% CI 0·46–3·84; p=0·60). Only three newborn babies had malformations, two in the vaccine exposure group and one in the no-exposure group, yielding a relative risk of 2·00 (95% CI 0·18–22·04; p=0·57), although this estimate is unreliable because of the small number of outcomes. Interpretation Our study provides evidence that fetal exposure to oral cholera vaccine confers no significantly increased risk of pregnancy loss, neonatal mortality, or malformation. These data, along with findings from two retrospective studies, support use of oral cholera vaccine in pregnant women in cholera-affected regions. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28161570</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30523-0</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1473-3099 |
ispartof | The Lancet infectious diseases, 2017-05, Vol.17 (5), p.538-544 |
issn | 1473-3099 1474-4457 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5406486 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Administration, Oral Adult Babies Charities Cholera Cholera - complications Cholera - epidemiology Cholera - prevention & control Cholera Vaccines - administration & dosage Cohort analysis Exposure Fatalities Female Fetal Death Fetuses Health risk assessment Health risks Humans Immunization Incidence Infant mortality Infants Infectious Disease Infectious diseases Malawi - epidemiology Miscarriage Mortality Mothers Neonates Observational studies Pregnancy Prenatal exposure Public health Regression analysis Retrospective Studies Risk Safety Safety - standards Vaccines Vaccines, Inactivated - administration & dosage Waterborne diseases Womens health |
title | Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A57%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20of%20a%20killed%20oral%20cholera%20vaccine%20(Shanchol)%20in%20pregnant%20women%20in%20Malawi:%20an%20observational%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Ali,%20Mohammad,%20Dr&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=538&rft.epage=544&rft.pages=538-544&rft.issn=1473-3099&rft.eissn=1474-4457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30523-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1865518582%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1892784463&rft_id=info:pmid/28161570&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1473309916305230&rfr_iscdi=true |