Anxious anticipation and pain: the influence of instructed vs conditioned threat on pain
Negative emotions such as anxiety enhance pain perception. However, certain threat characteristics are discussed to have different or even divergent effects on pain (hypoalgesia vs hyperalgesia). In order to investigate the neurobiological basis of different threats, we compared the impact of condit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social cognitive and affective neuroscience 2017-04, Vol.12 (4), p.544-554 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 554 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 544 |
container_title | Social cognitive and affective neuroscience |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Reicherts, Philipp Wiemer, Julian Gerdes, Antje B M Schulz, Stefan M Pauli, Paul Wieser, Matthias J |
description | Negative emotions such as anxiety enhance pain perception. However, certain threat characteristics are discussed to have different or even divergent effects on pain (hypoalgesia vs hyperalgesia). In order to investigate the neurobiological basis of different threats, we compared the impact of conditioned threat (CT) vs instructed threat (IT) on pain using fMRI. In two groups, participants underwent either Pavlovian threat conditioning or an instructed threat procedure. Afterwards, in an identical test phase participants watched the same visual cues from the previous phase indicating potential threat or safety, and received painful thermal stimulation. In the test phase, pain ratings were increased in both groups under threat. Group comparisons show elevated responses in amygdala and hippocampus for pain under threat in the CT group, and higher activation of the mid-cingulate gyrus (MCC) in the IT group. Psychophysiological interaction analyses in CT demonstrated elevated connectivity of the amygdala and the insula for the comparison of pain under threat vs safety. In IT, the same comparison revealed elevated functional connectivity of the MCC and the insula. The results suggest a similar pain augmenting effect of CT and IT, which, however, seems to rely on different networks mediating the impact of threat on pain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/scan/nsw181 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5390728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1852782189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-d3b1767896d562468d282ec9263ef17fe412d1245deab10729fbede61805cc5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1LxDAQDaK46-rJu_QoSN18tE3qQVgWv2DBi4K3kCZTN9JN1yZd9d-bsrroaeYx770Z5iF0SvAlwSWbeq3c1PkPIsgeGhOelWmOaba_60kxQkfev2Gclxlmh2hEBcYCcz5GLzP3adveJ8oFq-1aBdu6CEyyVtZdJWEJiXV104PTkLR1BD50vQ5gko1PdOuMHSQRhmUHKiRRPkiP0UGtGg8nP3WCnm9vnub36eLx7mE-W6SaZVlIDasIL7goC5MXNCuEoYKCLmnBoCa8hoxQQ2iWG1AVwZyWdQUGCiJwrnWu2QRdb33XfbUCo8GFTjVy3dmV6r5kq6z8P3F2KV_bjcxZGe1ENDj_Meja9x58kCvrNTSNchAfI4nIKReUiDJSL7ZU3bXed1Dv1hAshyzkkIXcZhHZZ38v23F_n8--ATYYiIc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1852782189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anxious anticipation and pain: the influence of instructed vs conditioned threat on pain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Reicherts, Philipp ; Wiemer, Julian ; Gerdes, Antje B M ; Schulz, Stefan M ; Pauli, Paul ; Wieser, Matthias J</creator><creatorcontrib>Reicherts, Philipp ; Wiemer, Julian ; Gerdes, Antje B M ; Schulz, Stefan M ; Pauli, Paul ; Wieser, Matthias J</creatorcontrib><description>Negative emotions such as anxiety enhance pain perception. However, certain threat characteristics are discussed to have different or even divergent effects on pain (hypoalgesia vs hyperalgesia). In order to investigate the neurobiological basis of different threats, we compared the impact of conditioned threat (CT) vs instructed threat (IT) on pain using fMRI. In two groups, participants underwent either Pavlovian threat conditioning or an instructed threat procedure. Afterwards, in an identical test phase participants watched the same visual cues from the previous phase indicating potential threat or safety, and received painful thermal stimulation. In the test phase, pain ratings were increased in both groups under threat. Group comparisons show elevated responses in amygdala and hippocampus for pain under threat in the CT group, and higher activation of the mid-cingulate gyrus (MCC) in the IT group. Psychophysiological interaction analyses in CT demonstrated elevated connectivity of the amygdala and the insula for the comparison of pain under threat vs safety. In IT, the same comparison revealed elevated functional connectivity of the MCC and the insula. The results suggest a similar pain augmenting effect of CT and IT, which, however, seems to rely on different networks mediating the impact of threat on pain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-5016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-5024</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsw181</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28008077</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Amygdala - physiopathology ; Anxiety - physiopathology ; Arousal - physiology ; Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology ; Conditioning, Classical - physiology ; Cues ; Female ; Gyrus Cinguli - physiopathology ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Original ; Pain Perception - physiology ; Pain Threshold - physiology</subject><ispartof>Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2017-04, Vol.12 (4), p.544-554</ispartof><rights>The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>The Author(s) (2016). Published by Oxford University Press. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-d3b1767896d562468d282ec9263ef17fe412d1245deab10729fbede61805cc5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-d3b1767896d562468d282ec9263ef17fe412d1245deab10729fbede61805cc5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5390728/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5390728/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28008077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reicherts, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiemer, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerdes, Antje B M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Stefan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauli, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieser, Matthias J</creatorcontrib><title>Anxious anticipation and pain: the influence of instructed vs conditioned threat on pain</title><title>Social cognitive and affective neuroscience</title><addtitle>Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci</addtitle><description>Negative emotions such as anxiety enhance pain perception. However, certain threat characteristics are discussed to have different or even divergent effects on pain (hypoalgesia vs hyperalgesia). In order to investigate the neurobiological basis of different threats, we compared the impact of conditioned threat (CT) vs instructed threat (IT) on pain using fMRI. In two groups, participants underwent either Pavlovian threat conditioning or an instructed threat procedure. Afterwards, in an identical test phase participants watched the same visual cues from the previous phase indicating potential threat or safety, and received painful thermal stimulation. In the test phase, pain ratings were increased in both groups under threat. Group comparisons show elevated responses in amygdala and hippocampus for pain under threat in the CT group, and higher activation of the mid-cingulate gyrus (MCC) in the IT group. Psychophysiological interaction analyses in CT demonstrated elevated connectivity of the amygdala and the insula for the comparison of pain under threat vs safety. In IT, the same comparison revealed elevated functional connectivity of the MCC and the insula. The results suggest a similar pain augmenting effect of CT and IT, which, however, seems to rely on different networks mediating the impact of threat on pain.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amygdala - physiopathology</subject><subject>Anxiety - physiopathology</subject><subject>Arousal - physiology</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>Conditioning, Classical - physiology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gyrus Cinguli - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pain Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Pain Threshold - physiology</subject><issn>1749-5016</issn><issn>1749-5024</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1LxDAQDaK46-rJu_QoSN18tE3qQVgWv2DBi4K3kCZTN9JN1yZd9d-bsrroaeYx770Z5iF0SvAlwSWbeq3c1PkPIsgeGhOelWmOaba_60kxQkfev2Gclxlmh2hEBcYCcz5GLzP3adveJ8oFq-1aBdu6CEyyVtZdJWEJiXV104PTkLR1BD50vQ5gko1PdOuMHSQRhmUHKiRRPkiP0UGtGg8nP3WCnm9vnub36eLx7mE-W6SaZVlIDasIL7goC5MXNCuEoYKCLmnBoCa8hoxQQ2iWG1AVwZyWdQUGCiJwrnWu2QRdb33XfbUCo8GFTjVy3dmV6r5kq6z8P3F2KV_bjcxZGe1ENDj_Meja9x58kCvrNTSNchAfI4nIKReUiDJSL7ZU3bXed1Dv1hAshyzkkIXcZhHZZ38v23F_n8--ATYYiIc</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Reicherts, Philipp</creator><creator>Wiemer, Julian</creator><creator>Gerdes, Antje B M</creator><creator>Schulz, Stefan M</creator><creator>Pauli, Paul</creator><creator>Wieser, Matthias J</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Anxious anticipation and pain: the influence of instructed vs conditioned threat on pain</title><author>Reicherts, Philipp ; Wiemer, Julian ; Gerdes, Antje B M ; Schulz, Stefan M ; Pauli, Paul ; Wieser, Matthias J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-d3b1767896d562468d282ec9263ef17fe412d1245deab10729fbede61805cc5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amygdala - physiopathology</topic><topic>Anxiety - physiopathology</topic><topic>Arousal - physiology</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>Conditioning, Classical - physiology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gyrus Cinguli - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pain Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Pain Threshold - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reicherts, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiemer, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerdes, Antje B M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Stefan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauli, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieser, Matthias J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Social cognitive and affective neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reicherts, Philipp</au><au>Wiemer, Julian</au><au>Gerdes, Antje B M</au><au>Schulz, Stefan M</au><au>Pauli, Paul</au><au>Wieser, Matthias J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anxious anticipation and pain: the influence of instructed vs conditioned threat on pain</atitle><jtitle>Social cognitive and affective neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>544</spage><epage>554</epage><pages>544-554</pages><issn>1749-5016</issn><eissn>1749-5024</eissn><abstract>Negative emotions such as anxiety enhance pain perception. However, certain threat characteristics are discussed to have different or even divergent effects on pain (hypoalgesia vs hyperalgesia). In order to investigate the neurobiological basis of different threats, we compared the impact of conditioned threat (CT) vs instructed threat (IT) on pain using fMRI. In two groups, participants underwent either Pavlovian threat conditioning or an instructed threat procedure. Afterwards, in an identical test phase participants watched the same visual cues from the previous phase indicating potential threat or safety, and received painful thermal stimulation. In the test phase, pain ratings were increased in both groups under threat. Group comparisons show elevated responses in amygdala and hippocampus for pain under threat in the CT group, and higher activation of the mid-cingulate gyrus (MCC) in the IT group. Psychophysiological interaction analyses in CT demonstrated elevated connectivity of the amygdala and the insula for the comparison of pain under threat vs safety. In IT, the same comparison revealed elevated functional connectivity of the MCC and the insula. The results suggest a similar pain augmenting effect of CT and IT, which, however, seems to rely on different networks mediating the impact of threat on pain.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>28008077</pmid><doi>10.1093/scan/nsw181</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1749-5016 |
ispartof | Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2017-04, Vol.12 (4), p.544-554 |
issn | 1749-5016 1749-5024 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5390728 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Amygdala - physiopathology Anxiety - physiopathology Arousal - physiology Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology Conditioning, Classical - physiology Cues Female Gyrus Cinguli - physiopathology Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Original Pain Perception - physiology Pain Threshold - physiology |
title | Anxious anticipation and pain: the influence of instructed vs conditioned threat on pain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T20%3A08%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anxious%20anticipation%20and%20pain:%20the%20influence%20of%20instructed%20vs%20conditioned%20threat%20on%20pain&rft.jtitle=Social%20cognitive%20and%20affective%20neuroscience&rft.au=Reicherts,%20Philipp&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=544&rft.epage=554&rft.pages=544-554&rft.issn=1749-5016&rft.eissn=1749-5024&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/scan/nsw181&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1852782189%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1852782189&rft_id=info:pmid/28008077&rfr_iscdi=true |