Agricultural input credit in Sub-Saharan Africa: Telling myth from facts

Recent evidence shows that many Sub-Saharan African farmers use modern inputs, but there is limited information on how these inputs are financed. We use recent nationally representative data from four countries to explore input financing and the role of credit therein. A number of our results contra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food policy 2017-02, Vol.67, p.93-105
Hauptverfasser: Adjognon, Serge G., Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O., Reardon, Thomas A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105
container_issue
container_start_page 93
container_title Food policy
container_volume 67
creator Adjognon, Serge G.
Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O.
Reardon, Thomas A.
description Recent evidence shows that many Sub-Saharan African farmers use modern inputs, but there is limited information on how these inputs are financed. We use recent nationally representative data from four countries to explore input financing and the role of credit therein. A number of our results contradict “conventional wisdom” found in the literature. Our results consistently show that traditional credit use, formal or informal, is extremely low (across credit type, country, crop and farm size categories). Instead, farmers primarily finance modern input purchases with cash from nonfarm activities and crop sales. Tied output-labor arrangements (which have received little empirical treatment in the literature) appear to be the only form of credit relatively widely used for farming.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5384443</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306919216303815</els_id><sourcerecordid>1888956047</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c683t-3836c8522af9a5e50012e31f7046a38c9d3c2ac730b82c60469b958abc279cc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxS0EgoX2I7TKkUuC_yZ2D6AVagEJiQNwtpyJs-tVEm9tB4lvj9FuUTlxssb-zfObeQj9ILgimNQXm6r3vtv6oaK5rLCqMOEHaEFkw0pRi-YQLTDDdamIoifoNMYNxphijo_RCZWcMMrVAt0uV8HBPKQ5mKFw03ZOBQTbuZSL4nFuy0ezNsFMxbLPoPlVPNlhcNOqGF_TuuiDH4veQIrf0FFvhmi_788z9Pzn99P1bXn_cHN3vbwvoZYslUyyGqSg1PTKCCswJtQy0jeY14ZJUB0DaqBhuJUU6nyrWiWkaYE2CkCyM3S5093O7Wg7sFPKzvU2uNGEV-2N059fJrfWK_-iBZOcc5YFzvcCwf-dbUx6dBHyUGayfo6a5jVxwQn5GiVSSiWyySajYodC8DEG2384Ili_B6Y3eh-Yfg9MY6VzYLnv5__jfHT9SygDVzvA5qW-OBt0BGcnyBEFC0l33n3xxRsieamH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1888956047</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agricultural input credit in Sub-Saharan Africa: Telling myth from facts</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Adjognon, Serge G. ; Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O. ; Reardon, Thomas A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adjognon, Serge G. ; Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O. ; Reardon, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent evidence shows that many Sub-Saharan African farmers use modern inputs, but there is limited information on how these inputs are financed. We use recent nationally representative data from four countries to explore input financing and the role of credit therein. A number of our results contradict “conventional wisdom” found in the literature. Our results consistently show that traditional credit use, formal or informal, is extremely low (across credit type, country, crop and farm size categories). Instead, farmers primarily finance modern input purchases with cash from nonfarm activities and crop sales. Tied output-labor arrangements (which have received little empirical treatment in the literature) appear to be the only form of credit relatively widely used for farming.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-9192</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5657</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28413249</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Africa ; Credit ; Farm inputs ; farm size ; farmers ; funding ; Rural nonfarm employment ; sales ; Sub-Saharan Africa</subject><ispartof>Food policy, 2017-02, Vol.67, p.93-105</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c683t-3836c8522af9a5e50012e31f7046a38c9d3c2ac730b82c60469b958abc279cc83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c683t-3836c8522af9a5e50012e31f7046a38c9d3c2ac730b82c60469b958abc279cc83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919216303815$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28413249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adjognon, Serge G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reardon, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><title>Agricultural input credit in Sub-Saharan Africa: Telling myth from facts</title><title>Food policy</title><addtitle>Food Policy</addtitle><description>Recent evidence shows that many Sub-Saharan African farmers use modern inputs, but there is limited information on how these inputs are financed. We use recent nationally representative data from four countries to explore input financing and the role of credit therein. A number of our results contradict “conventional wisdom” found in the literature. Our results consistently show that traditional credit use, formal or informal, is extremely low (across credit type, country, crop and farm size categories). Instead, farmers primarily finance modern input purchases with cash from nonfarm activities and crop sales. Tied output-labor arrangements (which have received little empirical treatment in the literature) appear to be the only form of credit relatively widely used for farming.</description><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Credit</subject><subject>Farm inputs</subject><subject>farm size</subject><subject>farmers</subject><subject>funding</subject><subject>Rural nonfarm employment</subject><subject>sales</subject><subject>Sub-Saharan Africa</subject><issn>0306-9192</issn><issn>1873-5657</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxS0EgoX2I7TKkUuC_yZ2D6AVagEJiQNwtpyJs-tVEm9tB4lvj9FuUTlxssb-zfObeQj9ILgimNQXm6r3vtv6oaK5rLCqMOEHaEFkw0pRi-YQLTDDdamIoifoNMYNxphijo_RCZWcMMrVAt0uV8HBPKQ5mKFw03ZOBQTbuZSL4nFuy0ezNsFMxbLPoPlVPNlhcNOqGF_TuuiDH4veQIrf0FFvhmi_788z9Pzn99P1bXn_cHN3vbwvoZYslUyyGqSg1PTKCCswJtQy0jeY14ZJUB0DaqBhuJUU6nyrWiWkaYE2CkCyM3S5093O7Wg7sFPKzvU2uNGEV-2N059fJrfWK_-iBZOcc5YFzvcCwf-dbUx6dBHyUGayfo6a5jVxwQn5GiVSSiWyySajYodC8DEG2384Ili_B6Y3eh-Yfg9MY6VzYLnv5__jfHT9SygDVzvA5qW-OBt0BGcnyBEFC0l33n3xxRsieamH</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Adjognon, Serge G.</creator><creator>Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O.</creator><creator>Reardon, Thomas A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>IPC Science and Technology Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Agricultural input credit in Sub-Saharan Africa: Telling myth from facts</title><author>Adjognon, Serge G. ; Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O. ; Reardon, Thomas A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c683t-3836c8522af9a5e50012e31f7046a38c9d3c2ac730b82c60469b958abc279cc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Credit</topic><topic>Farm inputs</topic><topic>farm size</topic><topic>farmers</topic><topic>funding</topic><topic>Rural nonfarm employment</topic><topic>sales</topic><topic>Sub-Saharan Africa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adjognon, Serge G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reardon, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Food policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adjognon, Serge G.</au><au>Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O.</au><au>Reardon, Thomas A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agricultural input credit in Sub-Saharan Africa: Telling myth from facts</atitle><jtitle>Food policy</jtitle><addtitle>Food Policy</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>67</volume><spage>93</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>93-105</pages><issn>0306-9192</issn><eissn>1873-5657</eissn><abstract>Recent evidence shows that many Sub-Saharan African farmers use modern inputs, but there is limited information on how these inputs are financed. We use recent nationally representative data from four countries to explore input financing and the role of credit therein. A number of our results contradict “conventional wisdom” found in the literature. Our results consistently show that traditional credit use, formal or informal, is extremely low (across credit type, country, crop and farm size categories). Instead, farmers primarily finance modern input purchases with cash from nonfarm activities and crop sales. Tied output-labor arrangements (which have received little empirical treatment in the literature) appear to be the only form of credit relatively widely used for farming.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28413249</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.014</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-9192
ispartof Food policy, 2017-02, Vol.67, p.93-105
issn 0306-9192
1873-5657
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5384443
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Africa
Credit
Farm inputs
farm size
farmers
funding
Rural nonfarm employment
sales
Sub-Saharan Africa
title Agricultural input credit in Sub-Saharan Africa: Telling myth from facts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T20%3A17%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agricultural%20input%20credit%20in%20Sub-Saharan%20Africa:%20Telling%20myth%20from%20facts&rft.jtitle=Food%20policy&rft.au=Adjognon,%20Serge%20G.&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=67&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=93-105&rft.issn=0306-9192&rft.eissn=1873-5657&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1888956047%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1888956047&rft_id=info:pmid/28413249&rft_els_id=S0306919216303815&rfr_iscdi=true