Is increasing inorganic fertilizer use for maize production in SSA a profitable proposition? Evidence from Nigeria

Inorganic fertilizer use across Sub-Saharan Africa is generally considered to be low. Yet, the notion that fertilizer use is too low is predicated on the assumption that it is profitable to use rates higher than currently observed. There is, however, limited empirical evidence to support this. Using...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food policy 2017-02, Vol.67, p.41-51
Hauptverfasser: Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O., Omonona, Bolarin T., Sanou, Awa, Ogunleye, Wale O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 51
container_issue
container_start_page 41
container_title Food policy
container_volume 67
creator Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O.
Omonona, Bolarin T.
Sanou, Awa
Ogunleye, Wale O.
description Inorganic fertilizer use across Sub-Saharan Africa is generally considered to be low. Yet, the notion that fertilizer use is too low is predicated on the assumption that it is profitable to use rates higher than currently observed. There is, however, limited empirical evidence to support this. Using a nationally representative panel dataset, this paper empirically estimates the profitability of fertilizer use for maize production in Nigeria. We find that fertilizer use in Nigeria is not as low as conventional wisdom suggests. Low marginal physical product and high transportation costs significantly reduce the profitability of fertilizer use. Apart from reduced transportation costs, other constraints such as soil quality, timely access to the product, and availability of complementary inputs such as improved seeds, irrigation and credit, as well as good management practices are also necessary for sustained agricultural productivity improvements.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5384440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306919216303785</els_id><sourcerecordid>2000454298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631t-3fba63c59eab92d99a2151c8e6137beee86dfd9ed0a88fa950d1b2768a34c88a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhEUA-ckmwnThrX6iqqpRKFRwKZ8uxJ8uskjjYyUrw9DjdpYJTL7bH8_0z9vyEvOWs5Iw3H_ZlF4KfQl-KHJZMl4zzZ2TD1bYqZCO3z8mGVawpNNfijLxKac8YE6xmL8mZUDWvRC03JN4miqOLYBOOu3wMcWdHdLSDOGOPvyHSJQHtQqSDzSGdYvCLmzGMmab395fUrncdzrbtH9JTSLjmL-j1AT2MLstjGOgX3EFE-5q86Gyf4M1pPyffP11_u_pc3H29ub26vCtcU_G5qLrWNpWTGmyrhdfaCi65U9DwatsCgGp85zV4ZpXqrJbM81ZsG2Wr2qm8npOPx7rT0g7gHYxztL2ZIg42_jLBovk_M-IPswsHIytV1zXLBd6fCsTwc4E0mwGTg763I4QlGZEHWstaaPUkypVSWjaZz6g8oi6GlCJ0jy_izKzWmr05WWtWaw3TJlubde_-_c6j6q-XGbg4ApCHekCIJjlcp-8xgpuND_hEiz9x77sT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1888956004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is increasing inorganic fertilizer use for maize production in SSA a profitable proposition? Evidence from Nigeria</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O. ; Omonona, Bolarin T. ; Sanou, Awa ; Ogunleye, Wale O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O. ; Omonona, Bolarin T. ; Sanou, Awa ; Ogunleye, Wale O.</creatorcontrib><description>Inorganic fertilizer use across Sub-Saharan Africa is generally considered to be low. Yet, the notion that fertilizer use is too low is predicated on the assumption that it is profitable to use rates higher than currently observed. There is, however, limited empirical evidence to support this. Using a nationally representative panel dataset, this paper empirically estimates the profitability of fertilizer use for maize production in Nigeria. We find that fertilizer use in Nigeria is not as low as conventional wisdom suggests. Low marginal physical product and high transportation costs significantly reduce the profitability of fertilizer use. Apart from reduced transportation costs, other constraints such as soil quality, timely access to the product, and availability of complementary inputs such as improved seeds, irrigation and credit, as well as good management practices are also necessary for sustained agricultural productivity improvements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-9192</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5657</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28413245</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>agricultural productivity ; credit ; crop production ; data collection ; fertilizer application ; irrigation ; mineral fertilizers ; Nigeria ; profitability ; seeds ; soil quality ; transportation</subject><ispartof>Food policy, 2017-02, Vol.67, p.41-51</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631t-3fba63c59eab92d99a2151c8e6137beee86dfd9ed0a88fa950d1b2768a34c88a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631t-3fba63c59eab92d99a2151c8e6137beee86dfd9ed0a88fa950d1b2768a34c88a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28413245$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omonona, Bolarin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanou, Awa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogunleye, Wale O.</creatorcontrib><title>Is increasing inorganic fertilizer use for maize production in SSA a profitable proposition? Evidence from Nigeria</title><title>Food policy</title><addtitle>Food Policy</addtitle><description>Inorganic fertilizer use across Sub-Saharan Africa is generally considered to be low. Yet, the notion that fertilizer use is too low is predicated on the assumption that it is profitable to use rates higher than currently observed. There is, however, limited empirical evidence to support this. Using a nationally representative panel dataset, this paper empirically estimates the profitability of fertilizer use for maize production in Nigeria. We find that fertilizer use in Nigeria is not as low as conventional wisdom suggests. Low marginal physical product and high transportation costs significantly reduce the profitability of fertilizer use. Apart from reduced transportation costs, other constraints such as soil quality, timely access to the product, and availability of complementary inputs such as improved seeds, irrigation and credit, as well as good management practices are also necessary for sustained agricultural productivity improvements.</description><subject>agricultural productivity</subject><subject>credit</subject><subject>crop production</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>fertilizer application</subject><subject>irrigation</subject><subject>mineral fertilizers</subject><subject>Nigeria</subject><subject>profitability</subject><subject>seeds</subject><subject>soil quality</subject><subject>transportation</subject><issn>0306-9192</issn><issn>1873-5657</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhEUA-ckmwnThrX6iqqpRKFRwKZ8uxJ8uskjjYyUrw9DjdpYJTL7bH8_0z9vyEvOWs5Iw3H_ZlF4KfQl-KHJZMl4zzZ2TD1bYqZCO3z8mGVawpNNfijLxKac8YE6xmL8mZUDWvRC03JN4miqOLYBOOu3wMcWdHdLSDOGOPvyHSJQHtQqSDzSGdYvCLmzGMmab395fUrncdzrbtH9JTSLjmL-j1AT2MLstjGOgX3EFE-5q86Gyf4M1pPyffP11_u_pc3H29ub26vCtcU_G5qLrWNpWTGmyrhdfaCi65U9DwatsCgGp85zV4ZpXqrJbM81ZsG2Wr2qm8npOPx7rT0g7gHYxztL2ZIg42_jLBovk_M-IPswsHIytV1zXLBd6fCsTwc4E0mwGTg763I4QlGZEHWstaaPUkypVSWjaZz6g8oi6GlCJ0jy_izKzWmr05WWtWaw3TJlubde_-_c6j6q-XGbg4ApCHekCIJjlcp-8xgpuND_hEiz9x77sT</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O.</creator><creator>Omonona, Bolarin T.</creator><creator>Sanou, Awa</creator><creator>Ogunleye, Wale O.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>IPC Science and Technology Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Is increasing inorganic fertilizer use for maize production in SSA a profitable proposition? Evidence from Nigeria</title><author>Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O. ; Omonona, Bolarin T. ; Sanou, Awa ; Ogunleye, Wale O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c631t-3fba63c59eab92d99a2151c8e6137beee86dfd9ed0a88fa950d1b2768a34c88a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>agricultural productivity</topic><topic>credit</topic><topic>crop production</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>fertilizer application</topic><topic>irrigation</topic><topic>mineral fertilizers</topic><topic>Nigeria</topic><topic>profitability</topic><topic>seeds</topic><topic>soil quality</topic><topic>transportation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omonona, Bolarin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanou, Awa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogunleye, Wale O.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Food policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O.</au><au>Omonona, Bolarin T.</au><au>Sanou, Awa</au><au>Ogunleye, Wale O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is increasing inorganic fertilizer use for maize production in SSA a profitable proposition? Evidence from Nigeria</atitle><jtitle>Food policy</jtitle><addtitle>Food Policy</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>67</volume><spage>41</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>41-51</pages><issn>0306-9192</issn><eissn>1873-5657</eissn><abstract>Inorganic fertilizer use across Sub-Saharan Africa is generally considered to be low. Yet, the notion that fertilizer use is too low is predicated on the assumption that it is profitable to use rates higher than currently observed. There is, however, limited empirical evidence to support this. Using a nationally representative panel dataset, this paper empirically estimates the profitability of fertilizer use for maize production in Nigeria. We find that fertilizer use in Nigeria is not as low as conventional wisdom suggests. Low marginal physical product and high transportation costs significantly reduce the profitability of fertilizer use. Apart from reduced transportation costs, other constraints such as soil quality, timely access to the product, and availability of complementary inputs such as improved seeds, irrigation and credit, as well as good management practices are also necessary for sustained agricultural productivity improvements.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28413245</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.011</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-9192
ispartof Food policy, 2017-02, Vol.67, p.41-51
issn 0306-9192
1873-5657
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5384440
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects agricultural productivity
credit
crop production
data collection
fertilizer application
irrigation
mineral fertilizers
Nigeria
profitability
seeds
soil quality
transportation
title Is increasing inorganic fertilizer use for maize production in SSA a profitable proposition? Evidence from Nigeria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T11%3A49%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20increasing%20inorganic%20fertilizer%20use%20for%20maize%20production%20in%20SSA%20a%20profitable%20proposition?%20Evidence%20from%20Nigeria&rft.jtitle=Food%20policy&rft.au=Liverpool-Tasie,%20Lenis%20Saweda%20O.&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=67&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=41-51&rft.issn=0306-9192&rft.eissn=1873-5657&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2000454298%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1888956004&rft_id=info:pmid/28413245&rft_els_id=S0306919216303785&rfr_iscdi=true