Biomonitoring in the Era of the Exposome

The term "exposome" was coined in 2005 to underscore the importance of the environment to human health and to bring research efforts in line with those on the human genome. The ability to characterize environmental exposures through biomonitoring is key to exposome research efforts. Our ob...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental health perspectives 2017-04, Vol.125 (4), p.502-510
Hauptverfasser: Dennis, Kristine K, Marder, Elizabeth, Balshaw, David M, Cui, Yuxia, Lynes, Michael A, Patti, Gary J, Rappaport, Stephen M, Shaughnessy, Daniel T, Vrijheid, Martine, Barr, Dana Boyd
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 510
container_issue 4
container_start_page 502
container_title Environmental health perspectives
container_volume 125
creator Dennis, Kristine K
Marder, Elizabeth
Balshaw, David M
Cui, Yuxia
Lynes, Michael A
Patti, Gary J
Rappaport, Stephen M
Shaughnessy, Daniel T
Vrijheid, Martine
Barr, Dana Boyd
description The term "exposome" was coined in 2005 to underscore the importance of the environment to human health and to bring research efforts in line with those on the human genome. The ability to characterize environmental exposures through biomonitoring is key to exposome research efforts. Our objectives were to describe why traditional and nontraditional (exposomic) biomonitoring are both critical in studies aiming to capture the exposome and to make recommendations on how to transition exposure research toward exposomic approaches. We describe the biomonitoring needs of exposome research and approaches and recommendations that will help fill the gaps in the current science. Traditional and exposomic biomonitoring approaches have key advantages and disadvantages for assessing exposure. Exposomic approaches differ from traditional biomonitoring methods in that they can include all exposures of potential health significance, whether from endogenous or exogenous sources. Issues of sample availability and quality, identification of unknown analytes, capture of nonpersistent chemicals, integration of methods, and statistical assessment of increasingly complex data sets remain challenges that must continue to be addressed. To understand the complexity of exposures faced throughout the lifespan, both traditional and nontraditional biomonitoring methods should be used. Through hybrid approaches and the integration of emerging techniques, biomonitoring strategies can be maximized in research to define the exposome.
doi_str_mv 10.1289/EHP474
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5381997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A493275188</galeid><sourcerecordid>A493275188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-f5e5d4725db540c4ced48358741c5b8676d7b0d659d1ed1b38c62b57a5c368253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ltrHCEUAGApDc02bX9CWSiU5mFSr6O-FNKwaQKBlN5exVFn1jCjW3VK-u9r2TTJwj4UHxT9zvGgB4BXCJ4gLOT71cVnyukTsECM4UZKTJ-CBYQSNS1v2SF4nvMNhBCJtn0GDjEngsGWL8C7jz5OMfgSkw_D0odlWbvlKull7LfL203McXIvwEGvx-xe3s1H4Pv56tvZRXN1_eny7PSqMUyK0vTMMUs5ZrZjFBpqnKWCMMEpMqwTtRjLO2hbJi1yFnVEmBZ3jGtmSCswI0fgwzbvZu4mZ40LJelRbZKfdPqtovZq9yT4tRriL8WIQFLymuDNXYIUf84uF3UT5xRqzQoJgSVGksAHNejRKR_6WJOZyWejTqkkmLOKq2r2qMEFV2-OwfW-bu_4kz2-Dusmb_YGHO8EVFPcbRn0nLO6_Prl_-31j1379pFdOz2WdY7jXHwMeS80KeacXH__0giqv52ltp1V4evH_3LP_rUS-QNLfMJO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1882921930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomonitoring in the Era of the Exposome</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Dennis, Kristine K ; Marder, Elizabeth ; Balshaw, David M ; Cui, Yuxia ; Lynes, Michael A ; Patti, Gary J ; Rappaport, Stephen M ; Shaughnessy, Daniel T ; Vrijheid, Martine ; Barr, Dana Boyd</creator><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Kristine K ; Marder, Elizabeth ; Balshaw, David M ; Cui, Yuxia ; Lynes, Michael A ; Patti, Gary J ; Rappaport, Stephen M ; Shaughnessy, Daniel T ; Vrijheid, Martine ; Barr, Dana Boyd</creatorcontrib><description>The term "exposome" was coined in 2005 to underscore the importance of the environment to human health and to bring research efforts in line with those on the human genome. The ability to characterize environmental exposures through biomonitoring is key to exposome research efforts. Our objectives were to describe why traditional and nontraditional (exposomic) biomonitoring are both critical in studies aiming to capture the exposome and to make recommendations on how to transition exposure research toward exposomic approaches. We describe the biomonitoring needs of exposome research and approaches and recommendations that will help fill the gaps in the current science. Traditional and exposomic biomonitoring approaches have key advantages and disadvantages for assessing exposure. Exposomic approaches differ from traditional biomonitoring methods in that they can include all exposures of potential health significance, whether from endogenous or exogenous sources. Issues of sample availability and quality, identification of unknown analytes, capture of nonpersistent chemicals, integration of methods, and statistical assessment of increasingly complex data sets remain challenges that must continue to be addressed. To understand the complexity of exposures faced throughout the lifespan, both traditional and nontraditional biomonitoring methods should be used. Through hybrid approaches and the integration of emerging techniques, biomonitoring strategies can be maximized in research to define the exposome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-9924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1289/EHP474</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27385067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Arsenic ; Biological monitoring ; Biomonitoring ; Chemicals ; Complexity ; Disease control ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental Exposure ; Environmental Health ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Environmental toxicology ; Epidemiology ; Exposure ; Gene expression ; Genome, Human ; Genomes ; Genomics ; Health risks ; Health sciences ; Health surveillance ; Human performance ; Humans ; Identification methods ; Integration ; Life span ; Mass spectrometry ; Medical laboratories ; Metabolism ; Metabolites ; Nominations ; Nutrition research ; Pesticides ; Public health ; Scientific imaging ; Statistical methods ; Studies ; Surveillance ; Trends ; Urine</subject><ispartof>Environmental health perspectives, 2017-04, Vol.125 (4), p.502-510</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright National Institute of Environmental Apr 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-f5e5d4725db540c4ced48358741c5b8676d7b0d659d1ed1b38c62b57a5c368253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-f5e5d4725db540c4ced48358741c5b8676d7b0d659d1ed1b38c62b57a5c368253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381997/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5381997/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27385067$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Kristine K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marder, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balshaw, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Yuxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynes, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patti, Gary J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rappaport, Stephen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaughnessy, Daniel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrijheid, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barr, Dana Boyd</creatorcontrib><title>Biomonitoring in the Era of the Exposome</title><title>Environmental health perspectives</title><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><description>The term "exposome" was coined in 2005 to underscore the importance of the environment to human health and to bring research efforts in line with those on the human genome. The ability to characterize environmental exposures through biomonitoring is key to exposome research efforts. Our objectives were to describe why traditional and nontraditional (exposomic) biomonitoring are both critical in studies aiming to capture the exposome and to make recommendations on how to transition exposure research toward exposomic approaches. We describe the biomonitoring needs of exposome research and approaches and recommendations that will help fill the gaps in the current science. Traditional and exposomic biomonitoring approaches have key advantages and disadvantages for assessing exposure. Exposomic approaches differ from traditional biomonitoring methods in that they can include all exposures of potential health significance, whether from endogenous or exogenous sources. Issues of sample availability and quality, identification of unknown analytes, capture of nonpersistent chemicals, integration of methods, and statistical assessment of increasingly complex data sets remain challenges that must continue to be addressed. To understand the complexity of exposures faced throughout the lifespan, both traditional and nontraditional biomonitoring methods should be used. Through hybrid approaches and the integration of emerging techniques, biomonitoring strategies can be maximized in research to define the exposome.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Arsenic</subject><subject>Biological monitoring</subject><subject>Biomonitoring</subject><subject>Chemicals</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Environmental toxicology</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Genome, Human</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Health surveillance</subject><subject>Human performance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Integration</subject><subject>Life span</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Medical laboratories</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Nominations</subject><subject>Nutrition research</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Scientific imaging</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>0091-6765</issn><issn>1552-9924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ltrHCEUAGApDc02bX9CWSiU5mFSr6O-FNKwaQKBlN5exVFn1jCjW3VK-u9r2TTJwj4UHxT9zvGgB4BXCJ4gLOT71cVnyukTsECM4UZKTJ-CBYQSNS1v2SF4nvMNhBCJtn0GDjEngsGWL8C7jz5OMfgSkw_D0odlWbvlKull7LfL203McXIvwEGvx-xe3s1H4Pv56tvZRXN1_eny7PSqMUyK0vTMMUs5ZrZjFBpqnKWCMMEpMqwTtRjLO2hbJi1yFnVEmBZ3jGtmSCswI0fgwzbvZu4mZ40LJelRbZKfdPqtovZq9yT4tRriL8WIQFLymuDNXYIUf84uF3UT5xRqzQoJgSVGksAHNejRKR_6WJOZyWejTqkkmLOKq2r2qMEFV2-OwfW-bu_4kz2-Dusmb_YGHO8EVFPcbRn0nLO6_Prl_-31j1379pFdOz2WdY7jXHwMeS80KeacXH__0giqv52ltp1V4evH_3LP_rUS-QNLfMJO</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Dennis, Kristine K</creator><creator>Marder, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Balshaw, David M</creator><creator>Cui, Yuxia</creator><creator>Lynes, Michael A</creator><creator>Patti, Gary J</creator><creator>Rappaport, Stephen M</creator><creator>Shaughnessy, Daniel T</creator><creator>Vrijheid, Martine</creator><creator>Barr, Dana Boyd</creator><general>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Biomonitoring in the Era of the Exposome</title><author>Dennis, Kristine K ; Marder, Elizabeth ; Balshaw, David M ; Cui, Yuxia ; Lynes, Michael A ; Patti, Gary J ; Rappaport, Stephen M ; Shaughnessy, Daniel T ; Vrijheid, Martine ; Barr, Dana Boyd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-f5e5d4725db540c4ced48358741c5b8676d7b0d659d1ed1b38c62b57a5c368253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Arsenic</topic><topic>Biological monitoring</topic><topic>Biomonitoring</topic><topic>Chemicals</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Environmental toxicology</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Genome, Human</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Health surveillance</topic><topic>Human performance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Integration</topic><topic>Life span</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Medical laboratories</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Nominations</topic><topic>Nutrition research</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Scientific imaging</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Kristine K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marder, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balshaw, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Yuxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynes, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patti, Gary J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rappaport, Stephen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaughnessy, Daniel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrijheid, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barr, Dana Boyd</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dennis, Kristine K</au><au>Marder, Elizabeth</au><au>Balshaw, David M</au><au>Cui, Yuxia</au><au>Lynes, Michael A</au><au>Patti, Gary J</au><au>Rappaport, Stephen M</au><au>Shaughnessy, Daniel T</au><au>Vrijheid, Martine</au><au>Barr, Dana Boyd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomonitoring in the Era of the Exposome</atitle><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>502</spage><epage>510</epage><pages>502-510</pages><issn>0091-6765</issn><eissn>1552-9924</eissn><abstract>The term "exposome" was coined in 2005 to underscore the importance of the environment to human health and to bring research efforts in line with those on the human genome. The ability to characterize environmental exposures through biomonitoring is key to exposome research efforts. Our objectives were to describe why traditional and nontraditional (exposomic) biomonitoring are both critical in studies aiming to capture the exposome and to make recommendations on how to transition exposure research toward exposomic approaches. We describe the biomonitoring needs of exposome research and approaches and recommendations that will help fill the gaps in the current science. Traditional and exposomic biomonitoring approaches have key advantages and disadvantages for assessing exposure. Exposomic approaches differ from traditional biomonitoring methods in that they can include all exposures of potential health significance, whether from endogenous or exogenous sources. Issues of sample availability and quality, identification of unknown analytes, capture of nonpersistent chemicals, integration of methods, and statistical assessment of increasingly complex data sets remain challenges that must continue to be addressed. To understand the complexity of exposures faced throughout the lifespan, both traditional and nontraditional biomonitoring methods should be used. Through hybrid approaches and the integration of emerging techniques, biomonitoring strategies can be maximized in research to define the exposome.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</pub><pmid>27385067</pmid><doi>10.1289/EHP474</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-6765
ispartof Environmental health perspectives, 2017-04, Vol.125 (4), p.502-510
issn 0091-6765
1552-9924
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5381997
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Analytical chemistry
Arsenic
Biological monitoring
Biomonitoring
Chemicals
Complexity
Disease control
Environmental conditions
Environmental Exposure
Environmental Health
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Environmental toxicology
Epidemiology
Exposure
Gene expression
Genome, Human
Genomes
Genomics
Health risks
Health sciences
Health surveillance
Human performance
Humans
Identification methods
Integration
Life span
Mass spectrometry
Medical laboratories
Metabolism
Metabolites
Nominations
Nutrition research
Pesticides
Public health
Scientific imaging
Statistical methods
Studies
Surveillance
Trends
Urine
title Biomonitoring in the Era of the Exposome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A44%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomonitoring%20in%20the%20Era%20of%20the%20Exposome&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20health%20perspectives&rft.au=Dennis,%20Kristine%20K&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=502&rft.epage=510&rft.pages=502-510&rft.issn=0091-6765&rft.eissn=1552-9924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1289/EHP474&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA493275188%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1882921930&rft_id=info:pmid/27385067&rft_galeid=A493275188&rfr_iscdi=true