A Feasibility Study to Assess Vibration and Sound From Zygapophyseal Joints During Motion Before and After Spinal Manipulation
Abstract Objective This feasibility study used novel accelerometry (vibration) and microphone (sound) methods to assess crepitus originating from the lumbar spine before and after side-posture spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Methods This study included 5 healthy and 5 low back pain (LBP) particip...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 2017-03, Vol.40 (3), p.187-200 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 200 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 187 |
container_title | Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD Budavich, Matthew, DC Bora, Preetam, MSME Ross, Kim, DC, PhD |
description | Abstract Objective This feasibility study used novel accelerometry (vibration) and microphone (sound) methods to assess crepitus originating from the lumbar spine before and after side-posture spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Methods This study included 5 healthy and 5 low back pain (LBP) participants. Nine accelerometers and 1 specialized directional microphone were applied to the lumbar region, allowing assessment of crepitus. Each participant underwent full lumbar ranges of motion (ROM), bilateral lumbar SMT, and repeated full ROM. After full ROMs the participants received side-posture lumbar SMT on both sides by a licensed doctor of chiropractic. Accelerometer and microphone recordings were made during all pre- and post-SMT ROMs. Primary outcome was a descriptive report of crepitus prevalence (average number of crepitus events/participant). Participants were also divided into 3 age groups for comparisons (18-25, 26-45, and 46-65 years). Results Overall, crepitus prevalence decreased pre–post SMT (average pre = 1.4 crepitus/participant vs post = 0.9). Prevalence progressively increased from the youngest to oldest age groups (pre-SMT = 0.0, 1.67, and 2.0, respectively; and post-SMT = 0.5, 0.83, and 1.5). Prevalence was higher in LBP participants compared with healthy (pre-SMT–LBP = 2.0, vs pre-SMT–healthy = 0.8; post-SMT–LBP = 1.0 vs post-SMT–healthy = 0.8), even though healthy participants were older than LBP participants (40.8 years vs 27.8 years); accounting for age: pre-SMT–LBP = 2.0 vs pre-SMT–healthy = 0.0; post-SMT–LBP = 1.0 vs post-SMT–healthy = 0.3. Conclusions Our findings indicated that a larger study is feasible. Other findings included that crepitus prevalence increased with age, was higher in participants with LBP than in healthy participants, and overall decreased after SMT. This study indicated that crepitus assessment using accelerometers has the potential of being an outcome measure or biomarker for assessing spinal joint (facet/zygapophyseal joint) function during movement and the effects of LBP treatments (eg, SMT) on zygapophyseal joint function. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.01.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5380484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0161475416302408</els_id><sourcerecordid>1875404313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-beccc01db2a60355d6205bce5c3574bbf6e850675143371c4f15f56f57f7c8a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk9v1DAQxSMEokvhC3BAPnJJGMdxkkqo0raw_FErDgscuFiOM9l6SexgO5Vy4bPj7JYKOHCxD37vzXh-kyTPKWQUaPlqn-2HMWQ50CoDmgGwB8mKcpanJa_Lh8kqimhaVLw4SZ54vweAM3ZWP05O8jova8irVfJzTTYovW50r8NMtmFqZxIsWXuP3pOvunEyaGuINC3Z2imeG2cH8m3eydGON7NH2ZOPVpvgyZvJabMj1_bguMDOOjwY111AR7ajNlF8LY0ep_4Q-zR51Mne47O7-zT5snn7-fJ9evXp3YfL9VWqOIWQNqiUAto2uSyBcd6WOfBGIVeMV0XTdCXWHMqK04Kxiqqio7zjZcerrlK1ZOw0OT_mjlMzYKvQBCd7MTo9SDcLK7X4-8XoG7Gzt4KzGoq6iAEv7wKc_TGhD2LQXmHfS4N28oLWccxQMLrUyo9S5az3Drv7MhTEAk7sxQJOLOAEUBHBRdOLPxu8t_wmFQWvjwKMY7rV6IRXGo3CVjtUQbRW_z___B-76rXRSvbfcUa_t5OLbOI_hM8FiO2yOsvm0JJBXkDNfgH_r8FN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1875404313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Feasibility Study to Assess Vibration and Sound From Zygapophyseal Joints During Motion Before and After Spinal Manipulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD ; Budavich, Matthew, DC ; Bora, Preetam, MSME ; Ross, Kim, DC, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD ; Budavich, Matthew, DC ; Bora, Preetam, MSME ; Ross, Kim, DC, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective This feasibility study used novel accelerometry (vibration) and microphone (sound) methods to assess crepitus originating from the lumbar spine before and after side-posture spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Methods This study included 5 healthy and 5 low back pain (LBP) participants. Nine accelerometers and 1 specialized directional microphone were applied to the lumbar region, allowing assessment of crepitus. Each participant underwent full lumbar ranges of motion (ROM), bilateral lumbar SMT, and repeated full ROM. After full ROMs the participants received side-posture lumbar SMT on both sides by a licensed doctor of chiropractic. Accelerometer and microphone recordings were made during all pre- and post-SMT ROMs. Primary outcome was a descriptive report of crepitus prevalence (average number of crepitus events/participant). Participants were also divided into 3 age groups for comparisons (18-25, 26-45, and 46-65 years). Results Overall, crepitus prevalence decreased pre–post SMT (average pre = 1.4 crepitus/participant vs post = 0.9). Prevalence progressively increased from the youngest to oldest age groups (pre-SMT = 0.0, 1.67, and 2.0, respectively; and post-SMT = 0.5, 0.83, and 1.5). Prevalence was higher in LBP participants compared with healthy (pre-SMT–LBP = 2.0, vs pre-SMT–healthy = 0.8; post-SMT–LBP = 1.0 vs post-SMT–healthy = 0.8), even though healthy participants were older than LBP participants (40.8 years vs 27.8 years); accounting for age: pre-SMT–LBP = 2.0 vs pre-SMT–healthy = 0.0; post-SMT–LBP = 1.0 vs post-SMT–healthy = 0.3. Conclusions Our findings indicated that a larger study is feasible. Other findings included that crepitus prevalence increased with age, was higher in participants with LBP than in healthy participants, and overall decreased after SMT. This study indicated that crepitus assessment using accelerometers has the potential of being an outcome measure or biomarker for assessing spinal joint (facet/zygapophyseal joint) function during movement and the effects of LBP treatments (eg, SMT) on zygapophyseal joint function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-4754</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.01.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28268027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accelerometry ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Auscultation - instrumentation ; Facet Joint ; Feasibility Studies ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Low Back Pain - physiopathology ; Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology ; Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology ; Manipulation, Spinal - methods ; Middle Aged ; Movement - physiology ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Sound ; Spinal Manipulation ; Vibration ; Young Adult ; Zygapophyseal Joint ; Zygapophyseal Joint - physiology ; Zygapophyseal Joint - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2017-03, Vol.40 (3), p.187-200</ispartof><rights>2017</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-beccc01db2a60355d6205bce5c3574bbf6e850675143371c4f15f56f57f7c8a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-beccc01db2a60355d6205bce5c3574bbf6e850675143371c4f15f56f57f7c8a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.01.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28268027$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budavich, Matthew, DC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bora, Preetam, MSME</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Kim, DC, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>A Feasibility Study to Assess Vibration and Sound From Zygapophyseal Joints During Motion Before and After Spinal Manipulation</title><title>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</title><addtitle>J Manipulative Physiol Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective This feasibility study used novel accelerometry (vibration) and microphone (sound) methods to assess crepitus originating from the lumbar spine before and after side-posture spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Methods This study included 5 healthy and 5 low back pain (LBP) participants. Nine accelerometers and 1 specialized directional microphone were applied to the lumbar region, allowing assessment of crepitus. Each participant underwent full lumbar ranges of motion (ROM), bilateral lumbar SMT, and repeated full ROM. After full ROMs the participants received side-posture lumbar SMT on both sides by a licensed doctor of chiropractic. Accelerometer and microphone recordings were made during all pre- and post-SMT ROMs. Primary outcome was a descriptive report of crepitus prevalence (average number of crepitus events/participant). Participants were also divided into 3 age groups for comparisons (18-25, 26-45, and 46-65 years). Results Overall, crepitus prevalence decreased pre–post SMT (average pre = 1.4 crepitus/participant vs post = 0.9). Prevalence progressively increased from the youngest to oldest age groups (pre-SMT = 0.0, 1.67, and 2.0, respectively; and post-SMT = 0.5, 0.83, and 1.5). Prevalence was higher in LBP participants compared with healthy (pre-SMT–LBP = 2.0, vs pre-SMT–healthy = 0.8; post-SMT–LBP = 1.0 vs post-SMT–healthy = 0.8), even though healthy participants were older than LBP participants (40.8 years vs 27.8 years); accounting for age: pre-SMT–LBP = 2.0 vs pre-SMT–healthy = 0.0; post-SMT–LBP = 1.0 vs post-SMT–healthy = 0.3. Conclusions Our findings indicated that a larger study is feasible. Other findings included that crepitus prevalence increased with age, was higher in participants with LBP than in healthy participants, and overall decreased after SMT. This study indicated that crepitus assessment using accelerometers has the potential of being an outcome measure or biomarker for assessing spinal joint (facet/zygapophyseal joint) function during movement and the effects of LBP treatments (eg, SMT) on zygapophyseal joint function.</description><subject>Accelerometry</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Auscultation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Facet Joint</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology</subject><subject>Manipulation, Spinal - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Spinal Manipulation</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Zygapophyseal Joint</subject><subject>Zygapophyseal Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Zygapophyseal Joint - physiopathology</subject><issn>0161-4754</issn><issn>1532-6586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk9v1DAQxSMEokvhC3BAPnJJGMdxkkqo0raw_FErDgscuFiOM9l6SexgO5Vy4bPj7JYKOHCxD37vzXh-kyTPKWQUaPlqn-2HMWQ50CoDmgGwB8mKcpanJa_Lh8kqimhaVLw4SZ54vweAM3ZWP05O8jova8irVfJzTTYovW50r8NMtmFqZxIsWXuP3pOvunEyaGuINC3Z2imeG2cH8m3eydGON7NH2ZOPVpvgyZvJabMj1_bguMDOOjwY111AR7ajNlF8LY0ep_4Q-zR51Mne47O7-zT5snn7-fJ9evXp3YfL9VWqOIWQNqiUAto2uSyBcd6WOfBGIVeMV0XTdCXWHMqK04Kxiqqio7zjZcerrlK1ZOw0OT_mjlMzYKvQBCd7MTo9SDcLK7X4-8XoG7Gzt4KzGoq6iAEv7wKc_TGhD2LQXmHfS4N28oLWccxQMLrUyo9S5az3Drv7MhTEAk7sxQJOLOAEUBHBRdOLPxu8t_wmFQWvjwKMY7rV6IRXGo3CVjtUQbRW_z___B-76rXRSvbfcUa_t5OLbOI_hM8FiO2yOsvm0JJBXkDNfgH_r8FN</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD</creator><creator>Budavich, Matthew, DC</creator><creator>Bora, Preetam, MSME</creator><creator>Ross, Kim, DC, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>A Feasibility Study to Assess Vibration and Sound From Zygapophyseal Joints During Motion Before and After Spinal Manipulation</title><author>Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD ; Budavich, Matthew, DC ; Bora, Preetam, MSME ; Ross, Kim, DC, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-beccc01db2a60355d6205bce5c3574bbf6e850675143371c4f15f56f57f7c8a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accelerometry</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Auscultation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Facet Joint</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology</topic><topic>Manipulation, Spinal - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Spinal Manipulation</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Zygapophyseal Joint</topic><topic>Zygapophyseal Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Zygapophyseal Joint - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budavich, Matthew, DC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bora, Preetam, MSME</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Kim, DC, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD</au><au>Budavich, Matthew, DC</au><au>Bora, Preetam, MSME</au><au>Ross, Kim, DC, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Feasibility Study to Assess Vibration and Sound From Zygapophyseal Joints During Motion Before and After Spinal Manipulation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>J Manipulative Physiol Ther</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>187-200</pages><issn>0161-4754</issn><eissn>1532-6586</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective This feasibility study used novel accelerometry (vibration) and microphone (sound) methods to assess crepitus originating from the lumbar spine before and after side-posture spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Methods This study included 5 healthy and 5 low back pain (LBP) participants. Nine accelerometers and 1 specialized directional microphone were applied to the lumbar region, allowing assessment of crepitus. Each participant underwent full lumbar ranges of motion (ROM), bilateral lumbar SMT, and repeated full ROM. After full ROMs the participants received side-posture lumbar SMT on both sides by a licensed doctor of chiropractic. Accelerometer and microphone recordings were made during all pre- and post-SMT ROMs. Primary outcome was a descriptive report of crepitus prevalence (average number of crepitus events/participant). Participants were also divided into 3 age groups for comparisons (18-25, 26-45, and 46-65 years). Results Overall, crepitus prevalence decreased pre–post SMT (average pre = 1.4 crepitus/participant vs post = 0.9). Prevalence progressively increased from the youngest to oldest age groups (pre-SMT = 0.0, 1.67, and 2.0, respectively; and post-SMT = 0.5, 0.83, and 1.5). Prevalence was higher in LBP participants compared with healthy (pre-SMT–LBP = 2.0, vs pre-SMT–healthy = 0.8; post-SMT–LBP = 1.0 vs post-SMT–healthy = 0.8), even though healthy participants were older than LBP participants (40.8 years vs 27.8 years); accounting for age: pre-SMT–LBP = 2.0 vs pre-SMT–healthy = 0.0; post-SMT–LBP = 1.0 vs post-SMT–healthy = 0.3. Conclusions Our findings indicated that a larger study is feasible. Other findings included that crepitus prevalence increased with age, was higher in participants with LBP than in healthy participants, and overall decreased after SMT. This study indicated that crepitus assessment using accelerometers has the potential of being an outcome measure or biomarker for assessing spinal joint (facet/zygapophyseal joint) function during movement and the effects of LBP treatments (eg, SMT) on zygapophyseal joint function.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28268027</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.01.003</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-4754 |
ispartof | Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2017-03, Vol.40 (3), p.187-200 |
issn | 0161-4754 1532-6586 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5380484 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Accelerometry Adolescent Adult Aged Auscultation - instrumentation Facet Joint Feasibility Studies Healthy Volunteers Humans Low Back Pain - physiopathology Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology Manipulation, Spinal - methods Middle Aged Movement - physiology Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Range of Motion, Articular Sound Spinal Manipulation Vibration Young Adult Zygapophyseal Joint Zygapophyseal Joint - physiology Zygapophyseal Joint - physiopathology |
title | A Feasibility Study to Assess Vibration and Sound From Zygapophyseal Joints During Motion Before and After Spinal Manipulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T00%3A39%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Feasibility%20Study%20to%20Assess%20Vibration%20and%20Sound%20From%20Zygapophyseal%20Joints%20During%20Motion%20Before%20and%20After%20Spinal%20Manipulation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20manipulative%20and%20physiological%20therapeutics&rft.au=Cramer,%20Gregory%20D.,%20DC,%20PhD&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=187-200&rft.issn=0161-4754&rft.eissn=1532-6586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.01.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1875404313%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1875404313&rft_id=info:pmid/28268027&rft_els_id=S0161475416302408&rfr_iscdi=true |