A Feasibility Study to Assess Vibration and Sound From Zygapophyseal Joints During Motion Before and After Spinal Manipulation

Abstract Objective This feasibility study used novel accelerometry (vibration) and microphone (sound) methods to assess crepitus originating from the lumbar spine before and after side-posture spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Methods This study included 5 healthy and 5 low back pain (LBP) particip...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 2017-03, Vol.40 (3), p.187-200
Hauptverfasser: Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD, Budavich, Matthew, DC, Bora, Preetam, MSME, Ross, Kim, DC, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 200
container_issue 3
container_start_page 187
container_title Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics
container_volume 40
creator Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD
Budavich, Matthew, DC
Bora, Preetam, MSME
Ross, Kim, DC, PhD
description Abstract Objective This feasibility study used novel accelerometry (vibration) and microphone (sound) methods to assess crepitus originating from the lumbar spine before and after side-posture spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Methods This study included 5 healthy and 5 low back pain (LBP) participants. Nine accelerometers and 1 specialized directional microphone were applied to the lumbar region, allowing assessment of crepitus. Each participant underwent full lumbar ranges of motion (ROM), bilateral lumbar SMT, and repeated full ROM. After full ROMs the participants received side-posture lumbar SMT on both sides by a licensed doctor of chiropractic. Accelerometer and microphone recordings were made during all pre- and post-SMT ROMs. Primary outcome was a descriptive report of crepitus prevalence (average number of crepitus events/participant). Participants were also divided into 3 age groups for comparisons (18-25, 26-45, and 46-65 years). Results Overall, crepitus prevalence decreased pre–post SMT (average pre = 1.4 crepitus/participant vs post = 0.9). Prevalence progressively increased from the youngest to oldest age groups (pre-SMT = 0.0, 1.67, and 2.0, respectively; and post-SMT = 0.5, 0.83, and 1.5). Prevalence was higher in LBP participants compared with healthy (pre-SMT–LBP = 2.0, vs pre-SMT–healthy = 0.8; post-SMT–LBP = 1.0 vs post-SMT–healthy = 0.8), even though healthy participants were older than LBP participants (40.8 years vs 27.8 years); accounting for age: pre-SMT–LBP = 2.0 vs pre-SMT–healthy = 0.0; post-SMT–LBP = 1.0 vs post-SMT–healthy = 0.3. Conclusions Our findings indicated that a larger study is feasible. Other findings included that crepitus prevalence increased with age, was higher in participants with LBP than in healthy participants, and overall decreased after SMT. This study indicated that crepitus assessment using accelerometers has the potential of being an outcome measure or biomarker for assessing spinal joint (facet/zygapophyseal joint) function during movement and the effects of LBP treatments (eg, SMT) on zygapophyseal joint function.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.01.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5380484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0161475416302408</els_id><sourcerecordid>1875404313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-beccc01db2a60355d6205bce5c3574bbf6e850675143371c4f15f56f57f7c8a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk9v1DAQxSMEokvhC3BAPnJJGMdxkkqo0raw_FErDgscuFiOM9l6SexgO5Vy4bPj7JYKOHCxD37vzXh-kyTPKWQUaPlqn-2HMWQ50CoDmgGwB8mKcpanJa_Lh8kqimhaVLw4SZ54vweAM3ZWP05O8jova8irVfJzTTYovW50r8NMtmFqZxIsWXuP3pOvunEyaGuINC3Z2imeG2cH8m3eydGON7NH2ZOPVpvgyZvJabMj1_bguMDOOjwY111AR7ajNlF8LY0ep_4Q-zR51Mne47O7-zT5snn7-fJ9evXp3YfL9VWqOIWQNqiUAto2uSyBcd6WOfBGIVeMV0XTdCXWHMqK04Kxiqqio7zjZcerrlK1ZOw0OT_mjlMzYKvQBCd7MTo9SDcLK7X4-8XoG7Gzt4KzGoq6iAEv7wKc_TGhD2LQXmHfS4N28oLWccxQMLrUyo9S5az3Drv7MhTEAk7sxQJOLOAEUBHBRdOLPxu8t_wmFQWvjwKMY7rV6IRXGo3CVjtUQbRW_z___B-76rXRSvbfcUa_t5OLbOI_hM8FiO2yOsvm0JJBXkDNfgH_r8FN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1875404313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Feasibility Study to Assess Vibration and Sound From Zygapophyseal Joints During Motion Before and After Spinal Manipulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD ; Budavich, Matthew, DC ; Bora, Preetam, MSME ; Ross, Kim, DC, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD ; Budavich, Matthew, DC ; Bora, Preetam, MSME ; Ross, Kim, DC, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective This feasibility study used novel accelerometry (vibration) and microphone (sound) methods to assess crepitus originating from the lumbar spine before and after side-posture spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Methods This study included 5 healthy and 5 low back pain (LBP) participants. Nine accelerometers and 1 specialized directional microphone were applied to the lumbar region, allowing assessment of crepitus. Each participant underwent full lumbar ranges of motion (ROM), bilateral lumbar SMT, and repeated full ROM. After full ROMs the participants received side-posture lumbar SMT on both sides by a licensed doctor of chiropractic. Accelerometer and microphone recordings were made during all pre- and post-SMT ROMs. Primary outcome was a descriptive report of crepitus prevalence (average number of crepitus events/participant). Participants were also divided into 3 age groups for comparisons (18-25, 26-45, and 46-65 years). Results Overall, crepitus prevalence decreased pre–post SMT (average pre = 1.4 crepitus/participant vs post = 0.9). Prevalence progressively increased from the youngest to oldest age groups (pre-SMT = 0.0, 1.67, and 2.0, respectively; and post-SMT = 0.5, 0.83, and 1.5). Prevalence was higher in LBP participants compared with healthy (pre-SMT–LBP = 2.0, vs pre-SMT–healthy = 0.8; post-SMT–LBP = 1.0 vs post-SMT–healthy = 0.8), even though healthy participants were older than LBP participants (40.8 years vs 27.8 years); accounting for age: pre-SMT–LBP = 2.0 vs pre-SMT–healthy = 0.0; post-SMT–LBP = 1.0 vs post-SMT–healthy = 0.3. Conclusions Our findings indicated that a larger study is feasible. Other findings included that crepitus prevalence increased with age, was higher in participants with LBP than in healthy participants, and overall decreased after SMT. This study indicated that crepitus assessment using accelerometers has the potential of being an outcome measure or biomarker for assessing spinal joint (facet/zygapophyseal joint) function during movement and the effects of LBP treatments (eg, SMT) on zygapophyseal joint function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-4754</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.01.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28268027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accelerometry ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Auscultation - instrumentation ; Facet Joint ; Feasibility Studies ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Low Back Pain - physiopathology ; Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology ; Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology ; Manipulation, Spinal - methods ; Middle Aged ; Movement - physiology ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Sound ; Spinal Manipulation ; Vibration ; Young Adult ; Zygapophyseal Joint ; Zygapophyseal Joint - physiology ; Zygapophyseal Joint - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2017-03, Vol.40 (3), p.187-200</ispartof><rights>2017</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-beccc01db2a60355d6205bce5c3574bbf6e850675143371c4f15f56f57f7c8a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-beccc01db2a60355d6205bce5c3574bbf6e850675143371c4f15f56f57f7c8a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.01.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28268027$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budavich, Matthew, DC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bora, Preetam, MSME</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Kim, DC, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>A Feasibility Study to Assess Vibration and Sound From Zygapophyseal Joints During Motion Before and After Spinal Manipulation</title><title>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</title><addtitle>J Manipulative Physiol Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective This feasibility study used novel accelerometry (vibration) and microphone (sound) methods to assess crepitus originating from the lumbar spine before and after side-posture spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Methods This study included 5 healthy and 5 low back pain (LBP) participants. Nine accelerometers and 1 specialized directional microphone were applied to the lumbar region, allowing assessment of crepitus. Each participant underwent full lumbar ranges of motion (ROM), bilateral lumbar SMT, and repeated full ROM. After full ROMs the participants received side-posture lumbar SMT on both sides by a licensed doctor of chiropractic. Accelerometer and microphone recordings were made during all pre- and post-SMT ROMs. Primary outcome was a descriptive report of crepitus prevalence (average number of crepitus events/participant). Participants were also divided into 3 age groups for comparisons (18-25, 26-45, and 46-65 years). Results Overall, crepitus prevalence decreased pre–post SMT (average pre = 1.4 crepitus/participant vs post = 0.9). Prevalence progressively increased from the youngest to oldest age groups (pre-SMT = 0.0, 1.67, and 2.0, respectively; and post-SMT = 0.5, 0.83, and 1.5). Prevalence was higher in LBP participants compared with healthy (pre-SMT–LBP = 2.0, vs pre-SMT–healthy = 0.8; post-SMT–LBP = 1.0 vs post-SMT–healthy = 0.8), even though healthy participants were older than LBP participants (40.8 years vs 27.8 years); accounting for age: pre-SMT–LBP = 2.0 vs pre-SMT–healthy = 0.0; post-SMT–LBP = 1.0 vs post-SMT–healthy = 0.3. Conclusions Our findings indicated that a larger study is feasible. Other findings included that crepitus prevalence increased with age, was higher in participants with LBP than in healthy participants, and overall decreased after SMT. This study indicated that crepitus assessment using accelerometers has the potential of being an outcome measure or biomarker for assessing spinal joint (facet/zygapophyseal joint) function during movement and the effects of LBP treatments (eg, SMT) on zygapophyseal joint function.</description><subject>Accelerometry</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Auscultation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Facet Joint</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology</subject><subject>Manipulation, Spinal - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Spinal Manipulation</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Zygapophyseal Joint</subject><subject>Zygapophyseal Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Zygapophyseal Joint - physiopathology</subject><issn>0161-4754</issn><issn>1532-6586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk9v1DAQxSMEokvhC3BAPnJJGMdxkkqo0raw_FErDgscuFiOM9l6SexgO5Vy4bPj7JYKOHCxD37vzXh-kyTPKWQUaPlqn-2HMWQ50CoDmgGwB8mKcpanJa_Lh8kqimhaVLw4SZ54vweAM3ZWP05O8jova8irVfJzTTYovW50r8NMtmFqZxIsWXuP3pOvunEyaGuINC3Z2imeG2cH8m3eydGON7NH2ZOPVpvgyZvJabMj1_bguMDOOjwY111AR7ajNlF8LY0ep_4Q-zR51Mne47O7-zT5snn7-fJ9evXp3YfL9VWqOIWQNqiUAto2uSyBcd6WOfBGIVeMV0XTdCXWHMqK04Kxiqqio7zjZcerrlK1ZOw0OT_mjlMzYKvQBCd7MTo9SDcLK7X4-8XoG7Gzt4KzGoq6iAEv7wKc_TGhD2LQXmHfS4N28oLWccxQMLrUyo9S5az3Drv7MhTEAk7sxQJOLOAEUBHBRdOLPxu8t_wmFQWvjwKMY7rV6IRXGo3CVjtUQbRW_z___B-76rXRSvbfcUa_t5OLbOI_hM8FiO2yOsvm0JJBXkDNfgH_r8FN</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD</creator><creator>Budavich, Matthew, DC</creator><creator>Bora, Preetam, MSME</creator><creator>Ross, Kim, DC, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>A Feasibility Study to Assess Vibration and Sound From Zygapophyseal Joints During Motion Before and After Spinal Manipulation</title><author>Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD ; Budavich, Matthew, DC ; Bora, Preetam, MSME ; Ross, Kim, DC, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-beccc01db2a60355d6205bce5c3574bbf6e850675143371c4f15f56f57f7c8a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accelerometry</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Auscultation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Facet Joint</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology</topic><topic>Manipulation, Spinal - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Spinal Manipulation</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Zygapophyseal Joint</topic><topic>Zygapophyseal Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Zygapophyseal Joint - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budavich, Matthew, DC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bora, Preetam, MSME</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Kim, DC, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cramer, Gregory D., DC, PhD</au><au>Budavich, Matthew, DC</au><au>Bora, Preetam, MSME</au><au>Ross, Kim, DC, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Feasibility Study to Assess Vibration and Sound From Zygapophyseal Joints During Motion Before and After Spinal Manipulation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>J Manipulative Physiol Ther</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>187-200</pages><issn>0161-4754</issn><eissn>1532-6586</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective This feasibility study used novel accelerometry (vibration) and microphone (sound) methods to assess crepitus originating from the lumbar spine before and after side-posture spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Methods This study included 5 healthy and 5 low back pain (LBP) participants. Nine accelerometers and 1 specialized directional microphone were applied to the lumbar region, allowing assessment of crepitus. Each participant underwent full lumbar ranges of motion (ROM), bilateral lumbar SMT, and repeated full ROM. After full ROMs the participants received side-posture lumbar SMT on both sides by a licensed doctor of chiropractic. Accelerometer and microphone recordings were made during all pre- and post-SMT ROMs. Primary outcome was a descriptive report of crepitus prevalence (average number of crepitus events/participant). Participants were also divided into 3 age groups for comparisons (18-25, 26-45, and 46-65 years). Results Overall, crepitus prevalence decreased pre–post SMT (average pre = 1.4 crepitus/participant vs post = 0.9). Prevalence progressively increased from the youngest to oldest age groups (pre-SMT = 0.0, 1.67, and 2.0, respectively; and post-SMT = 0.5, 0.83, and 1.5). Prevalence was higher in LBP participants compared with healthy (pre-SMT–LBP = 2.0, vs pre-SMT–healthy = 0.8; post-SMT–LBP = 1.0 vs post-SMT–healthy = 0.8), even though healthy participants were older than LBP participants (40.8 years vs 27.8 years); accounting for age: pre-SMT–LBP = 2.0 vs pre-SMT–healthy = 0.0; post-SMT–LBP = 1.0 vs post-SMT–healthy = 0.3. Conclusions Our findings indicated that a larger study is feasible. Other findings included that crepitus prevalence increased with age, was higher in participants with LBP than in healthy participants, and overall decreased after SMT. This study indicated that crepitus assessment using accelerometers has the potential of being an outcome measure or biomarker for assessing spinal joint (facet/zygapophyseal joint) function during movement and the effects of LBP treatments (eg, SMT) on zygapophyseal joint function.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28268027</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.01.003</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-4754
ispartof Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2017-03, Vol.40 (3), p.187-200
issn 0161-4754
1532-6586
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5380484
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Accelerometry
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Auscultation - instrumentation
Facet Joint
Feasibility Studies
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Low Back Pain - physiopathology
Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology
Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology
Manipulation, Spinal - methods
Middle Aged
Movement - physiology
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Range of Motion, Articular
Sound
Spinal Manipulation
Vibration
Young Adult
Zygapophyseal Joint
Zygapophyseal Joint - physiology
Zygapophyseal Joint - physiopathology
title A Feasibility Study to Assess Vibration and Sound From Zygapophyseal Joints During Motion Before and After Spinal Manipulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T00%3A39%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Feasibility%20Study%20to%20Assess%20Vibration%20and%20Sound%20From%20Zygapophyseal%20Joints%20During%20Motion%20Before%20and%20After%20Spinal%20Manipulation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20manipulative%20and%20physiological%20therapeutics&rft.au=Cramer,%20Gregory%20D.,%20DC,%20PhD&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=187-200&rft.issn=0161-4754&rft.eissn=1532-6586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.01.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1875404313%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1875404313&rft_id=info:pmid/28268027&rft_els_id=S0161475416302408&rfr_iscdi=true