Meals Enhancing Nutrition After Discharge: Findings from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Background After older adults experience episodes of poor health or are hospitalized, they may not return to premorbid or prehospitalization eating behaviors. Furthermore, poor nutrition increases hospital readmission risk, but evidence-based interventions addressing these risks are limited...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 2017-04, Vol.117 (4), p.599-608
Hauptverfasser: Buys, David R., PhD, MSPH, Campbell, Anthony D., MSW, MA, Godfryd, Alice, Flood, Kellie, MD, Kitchin, Elizabeth, PhD, RD, Kilgore, Meredith L., PhD, RN, Allocca, Sally, MDiv, Locher, Julie L., PhD, MSPH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 608
container_issue 4
container_start_page 599
container_title Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
container_volume 117
creator Buys, David R., PhD, MSPH
Campbell, Anthony D., MSW, MA
Godfryd, Alice
Flood, Kellie, MD
Kitchin, Elizabeth, PhD, RD
Kilgore, Meredith L., PhD, RN
Allocca, Sally, MDiv
Locher, Julie L., PhD, MSPH
description Abstract Background After older adults experience episodes of poor health or are hospitalized, they may not return to premorbid or prehospitalization eating behaviors. Furthermore, poor nutrition increases hospital readmission risk, but evidence-based interventions addressing these risks are limited. Objective This pilot study’s objective was to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial assessing a post-discharge home-delivered meal program’s impact on older adults’ nutritional intake and hospital readmissions and to assess patient acceptability and satisfaction with the program. The aims of the study were to evaluate successful recruitment, randomization, and retention of at least 80% of the 24 participants sought; to compare the outcomes of hospital readmission and total daily caloric intake between participants in the intervention and control groups; and to assess patient acceptability and satisfaction with the program. Design This study used a two-arm randomized controlled trial design, and baseline data were collected at enrollment; three 24-hour food recalls were collected during the intervention period; and health services utilization and intervention satisfaction was evaluated 45 days post-discharge. Participants/setting Twenty-four patients from the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital’s Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Unit were enrolled from May 2014 to June 2015. They were 65 years or older; at risk for malnutrition; cognitively intact; able to communicate; discharged to a place where the patient or family was responsible for preparing meals; and diagnosed with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia. Final analysis included 21 participants. Intervention The intervention group received 10 days of home-delivered meals and nutrition education; the control group received usual care and nutrition education. Main outcome measures The main outcome was intervention feasibility, measured by recruitment and retention goals. Hospital readmissions, caloric intake, and satisfaction with the intervention were also evaluated. Statistical analyses performed Univariate and bivariate parametric statistics were used to evaluate differences between groups. Goals for success were identified to assess feasibility of conducting a full-scale study and outcomes were measured against the goals. Results Of the randomized participants, 87.5% were retained for final data colle
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jand.2016.11.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5368006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S221226721631396X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1856869160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-7df01ab569dc4342b9105abb0cb76680ef15d6553be530743f726f12d99915423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUstu1DAUtRCIVkN_gAXKks0EP2InQahSNbSAVB6CIrFBlmPfzDh47GInldqv6bfwZTiaMgIW4I2vdM85uveci9BjgkuCiXg2lIPypqS5LgkpMeb30CGlhC6paPD9fV3TA3SU0oDzE5ixBj9EB7TBggvGD9HXt6BcKk79Rnlt_bp4N43Rjjb44qQfIRYvbdIbFdfwvDiz3mRIKvoYtoUqPlgXxuJjHiNs7Q2YYhX8GINzYH7cXkSr3CP0oM_ycHT3L9Dns9OL1evl-ftXb1Yn50vNKzYua9NjojouWqMrVtGuJZirrsO6q0XeBnrCjeCcdcAZrivW11T0hJq2bQmvKFug453u5dRtwWjIcygnL6Pdqngtg7Lyz463G7kOV5KzLI9FFnh6JxDD9wnSKLd5b3BOeQhTkjS7R6uGYfJfKGm4aERLstkLRHdQHUNKEfr9RATLOUU5yDlFOacoCZE5xUx68vsue8qvzDLgxQ4A2dErC1EmbcFrMDaCHqUJ9t_6x3_RtbPeauW-wTWkIUzR56wkkYlKLD_NdzSfERGMsFZ8YT8Bf4PDLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1856869160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meals Enhancing Nutrition After Discharge: Findings from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Buys, David R., PhD, MSPH ; Campbell, Anthony D., MSW, MA ; Godfryd, Alice ; Flood, Kellie, MD ; Kitchin, Elizabeth, PhD, RD ; Kilgore, Meredith L., PhD, RN ; Allocca, Sally, MDiv ; Locher, Julie L., PhD, MSPH</creator><creatorcontrib>Buys, David R., PhD, MSPH ; Campbell, Anthony D., MSW, MA ; Godfryd, Alice ; Flood, Kellie, MD ; Kitchin, Elizabeth, PhD, RD ; Kilgore, Meredith L., PhD, RN ; Allocca, Sally, MDiv ; Locher, Julie L., PhD, MSPH</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background After older adults experience episodes of poor health or are hospitalized, they may not return to premorbid or prehospitalization eating behaviors. Furthermore, poor nutrition increases hospital readmission risk, but evidence-based interventions addressing these risks are limited. Objective This pilot study’s objective was to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial assessing a post-discharge home-delivered meal program’s impact on older adults’ nutritional intake and hospital readmissions and to assess patient acceptability and satisfaction with the program. The aims of the study were to evaluate successful recruitment, randomization, and retention of at least 80% of the 24 participants sought; to compare the outcomes of hospital readmission and total daily caloric intake between participants in the intervention and control groups; and to assess patient acceptability and satisfaction with the program. Design This study used a two-arm randomized controlled trial design, and baseline data were collected at enrollment; three 24-hour food recalls were collected during the intervention period; and health services utilization and intervention satisfaction was evaluated 45 days post-discharge. Participants/setting Twenty-four patients from the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital’s Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Unit were enrolled from May 2014 to June 2015. They were 65 years or older; at risk for malnutrition; cognitively intact; able to communicate; discharged to a place where the patient or family was responsible for preparing meals; and diagnosed with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia. Final analysis included 21 participants. Intervention The intervention group received 10 days of home-delivered meals and nutrition education; the control group received usual care and nutrition education. Main outcome measures The main outcome was intervention feasibility, measured by recruitment and retention goals. Hospital readmissions, caloric intake, and satisfaction with the intervention were also evaluated. Statistical analyses performed Univariate and bivariate parametric statistics were used to evaluate differences between groups. Goals for success were identified to assess feasibility of conducting a full-scale study and outcomes were measured against the goals. Results Of the randomized participants, 87.5% were retained for final data collection, indicating that this intervention study is feasible. There were no significant differences between groups for hospital readmissions; however, caloric intake during the intervention period was greater for intervention vs control participants (1,595 vs 1,235; P =0.03). Participants were overwhelmingly satisfied (82% to 100% satisfied or very satisfied) with staff performance, meal quality, and delivery processes. Conclusions Conducting a randomized controlled trial to assess outcomes of providing home-delivered meals to older adults after hospital discharge in partnership with a small nonprofit organization is feasible and warrants future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2212-2672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2212-2680</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.11.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28065635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Body Mass Index ; data collection ; diet recall ; eating habits ; elderly ; Energy Intake ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; health services ; heart failure ; Home Care Services ; Home- and community-based services ; Home-delivered meals ; hospitals ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; malnutrition ; Malnutrition - prevention &amp; control ; Meals ; myocardial infarction ; nonprofit corporations ; nutrition education ; Nutritional risk ; Nutritional Status ; Older adult nutrition ; Patient Discharge ; Patient Readmission ; Patient Satisfaction ; patients ; Pilot Projects ; pneumonia ; randomized clinical trials ; risk ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2017-04, Vol.117 (4), p.599-608</ispartof><rights>Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics</rights><rights>2017 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-7df01ab569dc4342b9105abb0cb76680ef15d6553be530743f726f12d99915423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-7df01ab569dc4342b9105abb0cb76680ef15d6553be530743f726f12d99915423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28065635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buys, David R., PhD, MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Anthony D., MSW, MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godfryd, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flood, Kellie, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitchin, Elizabeth, PhD, RD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgore, Meredith L., PhD, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allocca, Sally, MDiv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Locher, Julie L., PhD, MSPH</creatorcontrib><title>Meals Enhancing Nutrition After Discharge: Findings from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics</title><addtitle>J Acad Nutr Diet</addtitle><description>Abstract Background After older adults experience episodes of poor health or are hospitalized, they may not return to premorbid or prehospitalization eating behaviors. Furthermore, poor nutrition increases hospital readmission risk, but evidence-based interventions addressing these risks are limited. Objective This pilot study’s objective was to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial assessing a post-discharge home-delivered meal program’s impact on older adults’ nutritional intake and hospital readmissions and to assess patient acceptability and satisfaction with the program. The aims of the study were to evaluate successful recruitment, randomization, and retention of at least 80% of the 24 participants sought; to compare the outcomes of hospital readmission and total daily caloric intake between participants in the intervention and control groups; and to assess patient acceptability and satisfaction with the program. Design This study used a two-arm randomized controlled trial design, and baseline data were collected at enrollment; three 24-hour food recalls were collected during the intervention period; and health services utilization and intervention satisfaction was evaluated 45 days post-discharge. Participants/setting Twenty-four patients from the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital’s Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Unit were enrolled from May 2014 to June 2015. They were 65 years or older; at risk for malnutrition; cognitively intact; able to communicate; discharged to a place where the patient or family was responsible for preparing meals; and diagnosed with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia. Final analysis included 21 participants. Intervention The intervention group received 10 days of home-delivered meals and nutrition education; the control group received usual care and nutrition education. Main outcome measures The main outcome was intervention feasibility, measured by recruitment and retention goals. Hospital readmissions, caloric intake, and satisfaction with the intervention were also evaluated. Statistical analyses performed Univariate and bivariate parametric statistics were used to evaluate differences between groups. Goals for success were identified to assess feasibility of conducting a full-scale study and outcomes were measured against the goals. Results Of the randomized participants, 87.5% were retained for final data collection, indicating that this intervention study is feasible. There were no significant differences between groups for hospital readmissions; however, caloric intake during the intervention period was greater for intervention vs control participants (1,595 vs 1,235; P =0.03). Participants were overwhelmingly satisfied (82% to 100% satisfied or very satisfied) with staff performance, meal quality, and delivery processes. Conclusions Conducting a randomized controlled trial to assess outcomes of providing home-delivered meals to older adults after hospital discharge in partnership with a small nonprofit organization is feasible and warrants future research.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>diet recall</subject><subject>eating habits</subject><subject>elderly</subject><subject>Energy Intake</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>health services</subject><subject>heart failure</subject><subject>Home Care Services</subject><subject>Home- and community-based services</subject><subject>Home-delivered meals</subject><subject>hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>malnutrition</subject><subject>Malnutrition - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Meals</subject><subject>myocardial infarction</subject><subject>nonprofit corporations</subject><subject>nutrition education</subject><subject>Nutritional risk</subject><subject>Nutritional Status</subject><subject>Older adult nutrition</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Patient Readmission</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>patients</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>pneumonia</subject><subject>randomized clinical trials</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>2212-2672</issn><issn>2212-2680</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUstu1DAUtRCIVkN_gAXKks0EP2InQahSNbSAVB6CIrFBlmPfzDh47GInldqv6bfwZTiaMgIW4I2vdM85uveci9BjgkuCiXg2lIPypqS5LgkpMeb30CGlhC6paPD9fV3TA3SU0oDzE5ixBj9EB7TBggvGD9HXt6BcKk79Rnlt_bp4N43Rjjb44qQfIRYvbdIbFdfwvDiz3mRIKvoYtoUqPlgXxuJjHiNs7Q2YYhX8GINzYH7cXkSr3CP0oM_ycHT3L9Dns9OL1evl-ftXb1Yn50vNKzYua9NjojouWqMrVtGuJZirrsO6q0XeBnrCjeCcdcAZrivW11T0hJq2bQmvKFug453u5dRtwWjIcygnL6Pdqngtg7Lyz463G7kOV5KzLI9FFnh6JxDD9wnSKLd5b3BOeQhTkjS7R6uGYfJfKGm4aERLstkLRHdQHUNKEfr9RATLOUU5yDlFOacoCZE5xUx68vsue8qvzDLgxQ4A2dErC1EmbcFrMDaCHqUJ9t_6x3_RtbPeauW-wTWkIUzR56wkkYlKLD_NdzSfERGMsFZ8YT8Bf4PDLA</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Buys, David R., PhD, MSPH</creator><creator>Campbell, Anthony D., MSW, MA</creator><creator>Godfryd, Alice</creator><creator>Flood, Kellie, MD</creator><creator>Kitchin, Elizabeth, PhD, RD</creator><creator>Kilgore, Meredith L., PhD, RN</creator><creator>Allocca, Sally, MDiv</creator><creator>Locher, Julie L., PhD, MSPH</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Meals Enhancing Nutrition After Discharge: Findings from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Buys, David R., PhD, MSPH ; Campbell, Anthony D., MSW, MA ; Godfryd, Alice ; Flood, Kellie, MD ; Kitchin, Elizabeth, PhD, RD ; Kilgore, Meredith L., PhD, RN ; Allocca, Sally, MDiv ; Locher, Julie L., PhD, MSPH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-7df01ab569dc4342b9105abb0cb76680ef15d6553be530743f726f12d99915423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>diet recall</topic><topic>eating habits</topic><topic>elderly</topic><topic>Energy Intake</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>health services</topic><topic>heart failure</topic><topic>Home Care Services</topic><topic>Home- and community-based services</topic><topic>Home-delivered meals</topic><topic>hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>malnutrition</topic><topic>Malnutrition - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Meals</topic><topic>myocardial infarction</topic><topic>nonprofit corporations</topic><topic>nutrition education</topic><topic>Nutritional risk</topic><topic>Nutritional Status</topic><topic>Older adult nutrition</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Patient Readmission</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>patients</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>pneumonia</topic><topic>randomized clinical trials</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buys, David R., PhD, MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Anthony D., MSW, MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godfryd, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flood, Kellie, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitchin, Elizabeth, PhD, RD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgore, Meredith L., PhD, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allocca, Sally, MDiv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Locher, Julie L., PhD, MSPH</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buys, David R., PhD, MSPH</au><au>Campbell, Anthony D., MSW, MA</au><au>Godfryd, Alice</au><au>Flood, Kellie, MD</au><au>Kitchin, Elizabeth, PhD, RD</au><au>Kilgore, Meredith L., PhD, RN</au><au>Allocca, Sally, MDiv</au><au>Locher, Julie L., PhD, MSPH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meals Enhancing Nutrition After Discharge: Findings from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics</jtitle><addtitle>J Acad Nutr Diet</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>608</epage><pages>599-608</pages><issn>2212-2672</issn><eissn>2212-2680</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background After older adults experience episodes of poor health or are hospitalized, they may not return to premorbid or prehospitalization eating behaviors. Furthermore, poor nutrition increases hospital readmission risk, but evidence-based interventions addressing these risks are limited. Objective This pilot study’s objective was to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial assessing a post-discharge home-delivered meal program’s impact on older adults’ nutritional intake and hospital readmissions and to assess patient acceptability and satisfaction with the program. The aims of the study were to evaluate successful recruitment, randomization, and retention of at least 80% of the 24 participants sought; to compare the outcomes of hospital readmission and total daily caloric intake between participants in the intervention and control groups; and to assess patient acceptability and satisfaction with the program. Design This study used a two-arm randomized controlled trial design, and baseline data were collected at enrollment; three 24-hour food recalls were collected during the intervention period; and health services utilization and intervention satisfaction was evaluated 45 days post-discharge. Participants/setting Twenty-four patients from the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital’s Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Unit were enrolled from May 2014 to June 2015. They were 65 years or older; at risk for malnutrition; cognitively intact; able to communicate; discharged to a place where the patient or family was responsible for preparing meals; and diagnosed with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia. Final analysis included 21 participants. Intervention The intervention group received 10 days of home-delivered meals and nutrition education; the control group received usual care and nutrition education. Main outcome measures The main outcome was intervention feasibility, measured by recruitment and retention goals. Hospital readmissions, caloric intake, and satisfaction with the intervention were also evaluated. Statistical analyses performed Univariate and bivariate parametric statistics were used to evaluate differences between groups. Goals for success were identified to assess feasibility of conducting a full-scale study and outcomes were measured against the goals. Results Of the randomized participants, 87.5% were retained for final data collection, indicating that this intervention study is feasible. There were no significant differences between groups for hospital readmissions; however, caloric intake during the intervention period was greater for intervention vs control participants (1,595 vs 1,235; P =0.03). Participants were overwhelmingly satisfied (82% to 100% satisfied or very satisfied) with staff performance, meal quality, and delivery processes. Conclusions Conducting a randomized controlled trial to assess outcomes of providing home-delivered meals to older adults after hospital discharge in partnership with a small nonprofit organization is feasible and warrants future research.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28065635</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jand.2016.11.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2212-2672
ispartof Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2017-04, Vol.117 (4), p.599-608
issn 2212-2672
2212-2680
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5368006
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Body Mass Index
data collection
diet recall
eating habits
elderly
Energy Intake
Feasibility Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
health services
heart failure
Home Care Services
Home- and community-based services
Home-delivered meals
hospitals
Humans
Internal Medicine
Male
malnutrition
Malnutrition - prevention & control
Meals
myocardial infarction
nonprofit corporations
nutrition education
Nutritional risk
Nutritional Status
Older adult nutrition
Patient Discharge
Patient Readmission
Patient Satisfaction
patients
Pilot Projects
pneumonia
randomized clinical trials
risk
Treatment Outcome
title Meals Enhancing Nutrition After Discharge: Findings from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T21%3A46%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meals%20Enhancing%20Nutrition%20After%20Discharge:%20Findings%20from%20a%20Pilot%20Randomized%20Controlled%C2%A0Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Academy%20of%20Nutrition%20and%20Dietetics&rft.au=Buys,%20David%20R.,%20PhD,%20MSPH&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=608&rft.pages=599-608&rft.issn=2212-2672&rft.eissn=2212-2680&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jand.2016.11.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1856869160%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1856869160&rft_id=info:pmid/28065635&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S221226721631396X&rfr_iscdi=true