Proteobacteria explain significant functional variability in the human gut microbiome

While human gut microbiomes vary significantly in taxonomic composition, biological pathway abundance is surprisingly invariable across hosts. We hypothesized that healthy microbiomes appear functionally redundant due to factors that obscure differences in gene abundance between individuals. To acco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microbiome 2017-03, Vol.5 (1), p.36-36, Article 36
Hauptverfasser: Bradley, Patrick H, Pollard, Katherine S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 36
container_issue 1
container_start_page 36
container_title Microbiome
container_volume 5
creator Bradley, Patrick H
Pollard, Katherine S
description While human gut microbiomes vary significantly in taxonomic composition, biological pathway abundance is surprisingly invariable across hosts. We hypothesized that healthy microbiomes appear functionally redundant due to factors that obscure differences in gene abundance between individuals. To account for these biases, we developed a powerful test of gene variability called CCoDA, which is applicable to shotgun metagenomes from any environment and can integrate data from multiple studies. Our analysis of healthy human fecal metagenomes from three separate cohorts revealed thousands of genes whose abundance differs significantly and consistently between people, including glycolytic enzymes, lipopolysaccharide biosynthetic genes, and secretion systems. Even housekeeping pathways contain a mix of variable and invariable genes, though most highly conserved genes are significantly invariable. Variable genes tend to be associated with Proteobacteria, as opposed to taxa used to define enterotypes or the dominant phyla Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. These results establish limits on functional redundancy and predict specific genes and taxa that may explain physiological differences between gut microbiomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s40168-017-0244-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5363007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1880466248</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-532628fdb435dc652a90b7090e6446c7284aef448fb3ed0f107ca08f87ea9f5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFvFSEQx4mxsU3bD9CL2cSLl60DzLLsxcQ0ak2a6KE9E5aF92h24QlsY_vppb7aVLkMyfzmH5gfIWcUzimV4kNGoEK2QPsWGGL78IocMcChZYLK1y_uh-Q051uoZ6DYo3xDDpnkHDqQR-TmR4rFxlGbYpPXjf21m7UPTfab4J03OpTGrcEUH4OemztdodHPvtw3lSpb22zXRYdms5Zm8SbF0cfFnpADp-dsT5_qMbn58vn64rK9-v7128Wnq9bgwEvbcSaYdNOIvJuM6JgeYOxhACsQhemZRG0donQjtxM4Cr3RIJ3srR5cN_Fj8nGfu1vHxU7GhpL0rHbJLzrdq6i9-rcT_FZt4p3quOAAfQ14_xSQ4s_V5qIWn42dZx1sXLOiUgIKwVBW9N1_6G1cU13KHwq5RNp3laJ7qq4i52Td82MoqEdvau9NVW_q0Zt6qDNvX_7ieeKvJf4bbU2VTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1884384175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proteobacteria explain significant functional variability in the human gut microbiome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Bradley, Patrick H ; Pollard, Katherine S</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Patrick H ; Pollard, Katherine S</creatorcontrib><description>While human gut microbiomes vary significantly in taxonomic composition, biological pathway abundance is surprisingly invariable across hosts. We hypothesized that healthy microbiomes appear functionally redundant due to factors that obscure differences in gene abundance between individuals. To account for these biases, we developed a powerful test of gene variability called CCoDA, which is applicable to shotgun metagenomes from any environment and can integrate data from multiple studies. Our analysis of healthy human fecal metagenomes from three separate cohorts revealed thousands of genes whose abundance differs significantly and consistently between people, including glycolytic enzymes, lipopolysaccharide biosynthetic genes, and secretion systems. Even housekeeping pathways contain a mix of variable and invariable genes, though most highly conserved genes are significantly invariable. Variable genes tend to be associated with Proteobacteria, as opposed to taxa used to define enterotypes or the dominant phyla Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. These results establish limits on functional redundancy and predict specific genes and taxa that may explain physiological differences between gut microbiomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-2618</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-2618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40168-017-0244-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28330508</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Bacteroidetes - genetics ; Binomial distribution ; Biodiversity ; Bioinformatics ; Digestive system ; Enzymes ; Feces - microbiology ; Firmicutes - genetics ; Gastrointestinal Microbiome - genetics ; Gene expression ; Genetic Variation - genetics ; Genomes ; Genomics ; Glycolysis ; Humans ; Intestinal microflora ; Lipopolysaccharides ; Metabolism ; Metagenome - genetics ; Methods ; Microbiota ; Models, Theoretical ; Proteobacteria - genetics ; Secretion ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Microbiome, 2017-03, Vol.5 (1), p.36-36, Article 36</ispartof><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-532628fdb435dc652a90b7090e6446c7284aef448fb3ed0f107ca08f87ea9f5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-532628fdb435dc652a90b7090e6446c7284aef448fb3ed0f107ca08f87ea9f5d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5363007/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5363007/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,862,883,27911,27912,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28330508$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Patrick H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollard, Katherine S</creatorcontrib><title>Proteobacteria explain significant functional variability in the human gut microbiome</title><title>Microbiome</title><addtitle>Microbiome</addtitle><description>While human gut microbiomes vary significantly in taxonomic composition, biological pathway abundance is surprisingly invariable across hosts. We hypothesized that healthy microbiomes appear functionally redundant due to factors that obscure differences in gene abundance between individuals. To account for these biases, we developed a powerful test of gene variability called CCoDA, which is applicable to shotgun metagenomes from any environment and can integrate data from multiple studies. Our analysis of healthy human fecal metagenomes from three separate cohorts revealed thousands of genes whose abundance differs significantly and consistently between people, including glycolytic enzymes, lipopolysaccharide biosynthetic genes, and secretion systems. Even housekeeping pathways contain a mix of variable and invariable genes, though most highly conserved genes are significantly invariable. Variable genes tend to be associated with Proteobacteria, as opposed to taxa used to define enterotypes or the dominant phyla Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. These results establish limits on functional redundancy and predict specific genes and taxa that may explain physiological differences between gut microbiomes.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Bacteroidetes - genetics</subject><subject>Binomial distribution</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Firmicutes - genetics</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Microbiome - genetics</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Genetic Variation - genetics</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Glycolysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestinal microflora</subject><subject>Lipopolysaccharides</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Metagenome - genetics</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Proteobacteria - genetics</subject><subject>Secretion</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>2049-2618</issn><issn>2049-2618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFvFSEQx4mxsU3bD9CL2cSLl60DzLLsxcQ0ak2a6KE9E5aF92h24QlsY_vppb7aVLkMyfzmH5gfIWcUzimV4kNGoEK2QPsWGGL78IocMcChZYLK1y_uh-Q051uoZ6DYo3xDDpnkHDqQR-TmR4rFxlGbYpPXjf21m7UPTfab4J03OpTGrcEUH4OemztdodHPvtw3lSpb22zXRYdms5Zm8SbF0cfFnpADp-dsT5_qMbn58vn64rK9-v7128Wnq9bgwEvbcSaYdNOIvJuM6JgeYOxhACsQhemZRG0donQjtxM4Cr3RIJ3srR5cN_Fj8nGfu1vHxU7GhpL0rHbJLzrdq6i9-rcT_FZt4p3quOAAfQ14_xSQ4s_V5qIWn42dZx1sXLOiUgIKwVBW9N1_6G1cU13KHwq5RNp3laJ7qq4i52Td82MoqEdvau9NVW_q0Zt6qDNvX_7ieeKvJf4bbU2VTg</recordid><startdate>20170323</startdate><enddate>20170323</enddate><creator>Bradley, Patrick H</creator><creator>Pollard, Katherine S</creator><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170323</creationdate><title>Proteobacteria explain significant functional variability in the human gut microbiome</title><author>Bradley, Patrick H ; Pollard, Katherine S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-532628fdb435dc652a90b7090e6446c7284aef448fb3ed0f107ca08f87ea9f5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Bacteroidetes - genetics</topic><topic>Binomial distribution</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Firmicutes - genetics</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Microbiome - genetics</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Genetic Variation - genetics</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Glycolysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestinal microflora</topic><topic>Lipopolysaccharides</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Metagenome - genetics</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Proteobacteria - genetics</topic><topic>Secretion</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Patrick H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollard, Katherine S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Microbiome</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradley, Patrick H</au><au>Pollard, Katherine S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proteobacteria explain significant functional variability in the human gut microbiome</atitle><jtitle>Microbiome</jtitle><addtitle>Microbiome</addtitle><date>2017-03-23</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>36-36</pages><artnum>36</artnum><issn>2049-2618</issn><eissn>2049-2618</eissn><abstract>While human gut microbiomes vary significantly in taxonomic composition, biological pathway abundance is surprisingly invariable across hosts. We hypothesized that healthy microbiomes appear functionally redundant due to factors that obscure differences in gene abundance between individuals. To account for these biases, we developed a powerful test of gene variability called CCoDA, which is applicable to shotgun metagenomes from any environment and can integrate data from multiple studies. Our analysis of healthy human fecal metagenomes from three separate cohorts revealed thousands of genes whose abundance differs significantly and consistently between people, including glycolytic enzymes, lipopolysaccharide biosynthetic genes, and secretion systems. Even housekeeping pathways contain a mix of variable and invariable genes, though most highly conserved genes are significantly invariable. Variable genes tend to be associated with Proteobacteria, as opposed to taxa used to define enterotypes or the dominant phyla Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. These results establish limits on functional redundancy and predict specific genes and taxa that may explain physiological differences between gut microbiomes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central</pub><pmid>28330508</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40168-017-0244-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-2618
ispartof Microbiome, 2017-03, Vol.5 (1), p.36-36, Article 36
issn 2049-2618
2049-2618
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5363007
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Abundance
Bacteroidetes - genetics
Binomial distribution
Biodiversity
Bioinformatics
Digestive system
Enzymes
Feces - microbiology
Firmicutes - genetics
Gastrointestinal Microbiome - genetics
Gene expression
Genetic Variation - genetics
Genomes
Genomics
Glycolysis
Humans
Intestinal microflora
Lipopolysaccharides
Metabolism
Metagenome - genetics
Methods
Microbiota
Models, Theoretical
Proteobacteria - genetics
Secretion
Studies
title Proteobacteria explain significant functional variability in the human gut microbiome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T13%3A42%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proteobacteria%20explain%20significant%20functional%20variability%20in%20the%20human%20gut%20microbiome&rft.jtitle=Microbiome&rft.au=Bradley,%20Patrick%20H&rft.date=2017-03-23&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=36-36&rft.artnum=36&rft.issn=2049-2618&rft.eissn=2049-2618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40168-017-0244-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1880466248%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884384175&rft_id=info:pmid/28330508&rfr_iscdi=true