Successful Stepwise Development of Patient Research Partnership: 14 Years’ Experience of Actions and Consequences in Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT)

There is increasing interest in making patient participation an integral component of medical research. However, practical guidance on optimizing this engagement in healthcare is scarce. Since 2002, patient involvement has been one of the key features of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2017-04, Vol.10 (2), p.141-152
Hauptverfasser: de Wit, Maarten, Kirwan, John R., Tugwell, Peter, Beaton, Dorcas, Boers, Maarten, Brooks, Peter, Collins, Sarah, Conaghan, Philip G., D’Agostino, Maria-Antonietta, Hofstetter, Cathie, Hughes, Rod, Leong, Amye, Lyddiatt, Ann, March, Lyn, May, James, Montie, Pamela, Richards, Pamela, Simon, Lee S., Singh, Jasvinder A., Strand, Vibeke, Voshaar, Marieke, Bingham, Clifton O., Gossec, Laure
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 152
container_issue 2
container_start_page 141
container_title The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
container_volume 10
creator de Wit, Maarten
Kirwan, John R.
Tugwell, Peter
Beaton, Dorcas
Boers, Maarten
Brooks, Peter
Collins, Sarah
Conaghan, Philip G.
D’Agostino, Maria-Antonietta
Hofstetter, Cathie
Hughes, Rod
Leong, Amye
Lyddiatt, Ann
March, Lyn
May, James
Montie, Pamela
Richards, Pamela
Simon, Lee S.
Singh, Jasvinder A.
Strand, Vibeke
Voshaar, Marieke
Bingham, Clifton O.
Gossec, Laure
description There is increasing interest in making patient participation an integral component of medical research. However, practical guidance on optimizing this engagement in healthcare is scarce. Since 2002, patient involvement has been one of the key features of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) international consensus effort. Based on a review of cumulative data from qualitative studies and internal surveys among OMERACT participants, we explored the potential benefits and challenges of involving patient research partners in conferences and working group activities. We supplemented our review with personal experiences and reflections regarding patient participation in the OMERACT process. We found that between 2002 and 2016, 67 patients have attended OMERACT conferences, of whom 28 had sustained involvement; many other patients contributed to OMERACT working groups. Their participation provided face validity to the OMERACT process and expanded the research agenda. Essential facilitators have been the financial commitment to guarantee sustainable involvement of patients at these conferences, procedures for recruitment, selection and support, and dedicated time allocated in the program for patient issues. Current challenges include the representativeness of the patient panel, risk of pseudo-professionalization, and disparity in patients’ and researchers’ perception of involvement. In conclusion, OMERACT has embedded long-term patient involvement in the consensus-building process on the measurement of core health outcomes. This integrative process continues to evolve iteratively. We believe that the practical points raised here can improve participatory research implementation.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40271-016-0198-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5362656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1924818046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-936895cb84089f5bd918b355cd5e21aec41c6fbdb35f4e0939fbf0ae05551d063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UsFu1DAQtRCIloUP4IIscWkPATuxHYcD0mpZKNJWi7blwMlynMluqiQOdrJtb_wGR36NL8FRyqpU4mDN6M2bN57RQ-glJW8oIelbz0ic0ohQEV4mI_YIHVOayogKQR8fcp4coWfeXxEiQkE8RUdxmhLGpDhGvy4GY8D7cqjxRQ_ddeUBf4A91LZroO2xLfEX3VdjugEP2pldAFzfgvO7qnuHKcPfAux___iJlzcduMA1MPbNTV_Z1mPdFngREvg-jCWPqxavh97YBvA5aD-4CdvsYGh0b2u7vcUn6_PlZr64PH2OnpS69vDiLs7Q14_Ly8VZtFp_-ryYryLDU9JHWSJkxk0uGZFZyfMiozJPODcFh5hqMIwaUeZFwEoGJEuyMi-JBsI5pwURyQy9n3S7IW-gMGFjp2vVuarR7lZZXal_K221U1u7VzwRseCjwOkksHvQdjZfqREjicxYLMieBu7J3TBnw1V8r5rKG6hr3YIdvKIyCbKpCHGGXj-gXtnBteEUimYxk1QSNg6nE8s4672D8vADStRoFjWZRQWzqNEsioWeV_c3PnT8dUcgxBPBh1K7BXdv9H9V_wA0dcx4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1924818046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Successful Stepwise Development of Patient Research Partnership: 14 Years’ Experience of Actions and Consequences in Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>de Wit, Maarten ; Kirwan, John R. ; Tugwell, Peter ; Beaton, Dorcas ; Boers, Maarten ; Brooks, Peter ; Collins, Sarah ; Conaghan, Philip G. ; D’Agostino, Maria-Antonietta ; Hofstetter, Cathie ; Hughes, Rod ; Leong, Amye ; Lyddiatt, Ann ; March, Lyn ; May, James ; Montie, Pamela ; Richards, Pamela ; Simon, Lee S. ; Singh, Jasvinder A. ; Strand, Vibeke ; Voshaar, Marieke ; Bingham, Clifton O. ; Gossec, Laure</creator><creatorcontrib>de Wit, Maarten ; Kirwan, John R. ; Tugwell, Peter ; Beaton, Dorcas ; Boers, Maarten ; Brooks, Peter ; Collins, Sarah ; Conaghan, Philip G. ; D’Agostino, Maria-Antonietta ; Hofstetter, Cathie ; Hughes, Rod ; Leong, Amye ; Lyddiatt, Ann ; March, Lyn ; May, James ; Montie, Pamela ; Richards, Pamela ; Simon, Lee S. ; Singh, Jasvinder A. ; Strand, Vibeke ; Voshaar, Marieke ; Bingham, Clifton O. ; Gossec, Laure</creatorcontrib><description>There is increasing interest in making patient participation an integral component of medical research. However, practical guidance on optimizing this engagement in healthcare is scarce. Since 2002, patient involvement has been one of the key features of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) international consensus effort. Based on a review of cumulative data from qualitative studies and internal surveys among OMERACT participants, we explored the potential benefits and challenges of involving patient research partners in conferences and working group activities. We supplemented our review with personal experiences and reflections regarding patient participation in the OMERACT process. We found that between 2002 and 2016, 67 patients have attended OMERACT conferences, of whom 28 had sustained involvement; many other patients contributed to OMERACT working groups. Their participation provided face validity to the OMERACT process and expanded the research agenda. Essential facilitators have been the financial commitment to guarantee sustainable involvement of patients at these conferences, procedures for recruitment, selection and support, and dedicated time allocated in the program for patient issues. Current challenges include the representativeness of the patient panel, risk of pseudo-professionalization, and disparity in patients’ and researchers’ perception of involvement. In conclusion, OMERACT has embedded long-term patient involvement in the consensus-building process on the measurement of core health outcomes. This integrative process continues to evolve iteratively. We believe that the practical points raised here can improve participatory research implementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1178-1653</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1178-1661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40271-016-0198-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27704486</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Biomedical Research - methods ; Biomedical Research - trends ; Collaboration ; Forecasting ; Health Administration ; Health Economics ; Humans ; Initiatives ; Interprofessional Relations ; Life Sciences ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Participation ; Patient Participation ; Patients ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes ; Practical Application ; Professional-Patient Relations ; Public Health ; Qualitative Research ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life Research ; Researchers ; Rheumatic diseases ; Rheumatic Diseases - physiopathology ; Rheumatic Diseases - therapy ; Rheumatoid arthritis ; Rheumatology ; Severity of Illness Index ; Working groups</subject><ispartof>The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2017-04, Vol.10 (2), p.141-152</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media Apr 2017</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-936895cb84089f5bd918b355cd5e21aec41c6fbdb35f4e0939fbf0ae05551d063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-936895cb84089f5bd918b355cd5e21aec41c6fbdb35f4e0939fbf0ae05551d063</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8428-6354</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40271-016-0198-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-016-0198-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27704486$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03894260$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Wit, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirwan, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tugwell, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaton, Dorcas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boers, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conaghan, Philip G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Agostino, Maria-Antonietta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofstetter, Cathie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Rod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leong, Amye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyddiatt, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>March, Lyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montie, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Lee S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Jasvinder A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strand, Vibeke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voshaar, Marieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingham, Clifton O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gossec, Laure</creatorcontrib><title>Successful Stepwise Development of Patient Research Partnership: 14 Years’ Experience of Actions and Consequences in Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT)</title><title>The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research</title><addtitle>Patient</addtitle><addtitle>Patient</addtitle><description>There is increasing interest in making patient participation an integral component of medical research. However, practical guidance on optimizing this engagement in healthcare is scarce. Since 2002, patient involvement has been one of the key features of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) international consensus effort. Based on a review of cumulative data from qualitative studies and internal surveys among OMERACT participants, we explored the potential benefits and challenges of involving patient research partners in conferences and working group activities. We supplemented our review with personal experiences and reflections regarding patient participation in the OMERACT process. We found that between 2002 and 2016, 67 patients have attended OMERACT conferences, of whom 28 had sustained involvement; many other patients contributed to OMERACT working groups. Their participation provided face validity to the OMERACT process and expanded the research agenda. Essential facilitators have been the financial commitment to guarantee sustainable involvement of patients at these conferences, procedures for recruitment, selection and support, and dedicated time allocated in the program for patient issues. Current challenges include the representativeness of the patient panel, risk of pseudo-professionalization, and disparity in patients’ and researchers’ perception of involvement. In conclusion, OMERACT has embedded long-term patient involvement in the consensus-building process on the measurement of core health outcomes. This integrative process continues to evolve iteratively. We believe that the practical points raised here can improve participatory research implementation.</description><subject>Biomedical Research - methods</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - trends</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Health Administration</subject><subject>Health Economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Initiatives</subject><subject>Interprofessional Relations</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</subject><subject>Practical Application</subject><subject>Professional-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Rheumatic diseases</subject><subject>Rheumatic Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Rheumatic Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Working groups</subject><issn>1178-1653</issn><issn>1178-1661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UsFu1DAQtRCIloUP4IIscWkPATuxHYcD0mpZKNJWi7blwMlynMluqiQOdrJtb_wGR36NL8FRyqpU4mDN6M2bN57RQ-glJW8oIelbz0ic0ohQEV4mI_YIHVOayogKQR8fcp4coWfeXxEiQkE8RUdxmhLGpDhGvy4GY8D7cqjxRQ_ddeUBf4A91LZroO2xLfEX3VdjugEP2pldAFzfgvO7qnuHKcPfAux___iJlzcduMA1MPbNTV_Z1mPdFngREvg-jCWPqxavh97YBvA5aD-4CdvsYGh0b2u7vcUn6_PlZr64PH2OnpS69vDiLs7Q14_Ly8VZtFp_-ryYryLDU9JHWSJkxk0uGZFZyfMiozJPODcFh5hqMIwaUeZFwEoGJEuyMi-JBsI5pwURyQy9n3S7IW-gMGFjp2vVuarR7lZZXal_K221U1u7VzwRseCjwOkksHvQdjZfqREjicxYLMieBu7J3TBnw1V8r5rKG6hr3YIdvKIyCbKpCHGGXj-gXtnBteEUimYxk1QSNg6nE8s4672D8vADStRoFjWZRQWzqNEsioWeV_c3PnT8dUcgxBPBh1K7BXdv9H9V_wA0dcx4</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>de Wit, Maarten</creator><creator>Kirwan, John R.</creator><creator>Tugwell, Peter</creator><creator>Beaton, Dorcas</creator><creator>Boers, Maarten</creator><creator>Brooks, Peter</creator><creator>Collins, Sarah</creator><creator>Conaghan, Philip G.</creator><creator>D’Agostino, Maria-Antonietta</creator><creator>Hofstetter, Cathie</creator><creator>Hughes, Rod</creator><creator>Leong, Amye</creator><creator>Lyddiatt, Ann</creator><creator>March, Lyn</creator><creator>May, James</creator><creator>Montie, Pamela</creator><creator>Richards, Pamela</creator><creator>Simon, Lee S.</creator><creator>Singh, Jasvinder A.</creator><creator>Strand, Vibeke</creator><creator>Voshaar, Marieke</creator><creator>Bingham, Clifton O.</creator><creator>Gossec, Laure</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8428-6354</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Successful Stepwise Development of Patient Research Partnership: 14 Years’ Experience of Actions and Consequences in Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT)</title><author>de Wit, Maarten ; Kirwan, John R. ; Tugwell, Peter ; Beaton, Dorcas ; Boers, Maarten ; Brooks, Peter ; Collins, Sarah ; Conaghan, Philip G. ; D’Agostino, Maria-Antonietta ; Hofstetter, Cathie ; Hughes, Rod ; Leong, Amye ; Lyddiatt, Ann ; March, Lyn ; May, James ; Montie, Pamela ; Richards, Pamela ; Simon, Lee S. ; Singh, Jasvinder A. ; Strand, Vibeke ; Voshaar, Marieke ; Bingham, Clifton O. ; Gossec, Laure</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-936895cb84089f5bd918b355cd5e21aec41c6fbdb35f4e0939fbf0ae05551d063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Research - methods</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - trends</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Health Administration</topic><topic>Health Economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Initiatives</topic><topic>Interprofessional Relations</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</topic><topic>Practical Application</topic><topic>Professional-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Rheumatic diseases</topic><topic>Rheumatic Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Rheumatic Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Rheumatoid arthritis</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Working groups</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Wit, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirwan, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tugwell, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaton, Dorcas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boers, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conaghan, Philip G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Agostino, Maria-Antonietta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofstetter, Cathie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Rod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leong, Amye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyddiatt, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>March, Lyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montie, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Lee S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Jasvinder A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strand, Vibeke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voshaar, Marieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingham, Clifton O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gossec, Laure</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Wit, Maarten</au><au>Kirwan, John R.</au><au>Tugwell, Peter</au><au>Beaton, Dorcas</au><au>Boers, Maarten</au><au>Brooks, Peter</au><au>Collins, Sarah</au><au>Conaghan, Philip G.</au><au>D’Agostino, Maria-Antonietta</au><au>Hofstetter, Cathie</au><au>Hughes, Rod</au><au>Leong, Amye</au><au>Lyddiatt, Ann</au><au>March, Lyn</au><au>May, James</au><au>Montie, Pamela</au><au>Richards, Pamela</au><au>Simon, Lee S.</au><au>Singh, Jasvinder A.</au><au>Strand, Vibeke</au><au>Voshaar, Marieke</au><au>Bingham, Clifton O.</au><au>Gossec, Laure</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Successful Stepwise Development of Patient Research Partnership: 14 Years’ Experience of Actions and Consequences in Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT)</atitle><jtitle>The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research</jtitle><stitle>Patient</stitle><addtitle>Patient</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>141-152</pages><issn>1178-1653</issn><eissn>1178-1661</eissn><abstract>There is increasing interest in making patient participation an integral component of medical research. However, practical guidance on optimizing this engagement in healthcare is scarce. Since 2002, patient involvement has been one of the key features of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) international consensus effort. Based on a review of cumulative data from qualitative studies and internal surveys among OMERACT participants, we explored the potential benefits and challenges of involving patient research partners in conferences and working group activities. We supplemented our review with personal experiences and reflections regarding patient participation in the OMERACT process. We found that between 2002 and 2016, 67 patients have attended OMERACT conferences, of whom 28 had sustained involvement; many other patients contributed to OMERACT working groups. Their participation provided face validity to the OMERACT process and expanded the research agenda. Essential facilitators have been the financial commitment to guarantee sustainable involvement of patients at these conferences, procedures for recruitment, selection and support, and dedicated time allocated in the program for patient issues. Current challenges include the representativeness of the patient panel, risk of pseudo-professionalization, and disparity in patients’ and researchers’ perception of involvement. In conclusion, OMERACT has embedded long-term patient involvement in the consensus-building process on the measurement of core health outcomes. This integrative process continues to evolve iteratively. We believe that the practical points raised here can improve participatory research implementation.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>27704486</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40271-016-0198-4</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8428-6354</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1178-1653
ispartof The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2017-04, Vol.10 (2), p.141-152
issn 1178-1653
1178-1661
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5362656
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Biomedical Research - methods
Biomedical Research - trends
Collaboration
Forecasting
Health Administration
Health Economics
Humans
Initiatives
Interprofessional Relations
Life Sciences
Medical research
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Participation
Patient Participation
Patients
Pharmaceutical industry
Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes
Practical Application
Professional-Patient Relations
Public Health
Qualitative Research
Quality of life
Quality of Life Research
Researchers
Rheumatic diseases
Rheumatic Diseases - physiopathology
Rheumatic Diseases - therapy
Rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology
Severity of Illness Index
Working groups
title Successful Stepwise Development of Patient Research Partnership: 14 Years’ Experience of Actions and Consequences in Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T00%3A10%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Successful%20Stepwise%20Development%20of%20Patient%20Research%20Partnership:%2014%20Years%E2%80%99%20Experience%20of%20Actions%20and%20Consequences%20in%20Outcome%20Measures%20in%20Rheumatology%20(OMERACT)&rft.jtitle=The%20Patient%20-%20Patient-Centered%20Outcomes%20Research&rft.au=de%20Wit,%20Maarten&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=141-152&rft.issn=1178-1653&rft.eissn=1178-1661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40271-016-0198-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1924818046%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1924818046&rft_id=info:pmid/27704486&rfr_iscdi=true