Extent of Lymphadenectomy Is Associated With Improved Overall Survival After Esophagectomy With or Without Induction Therapy

Background National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend sampling 15 or more lymph nodes during esophagectomy. The proportion of patients meeting this guideline is unknown, as is its influence on overall survival (OS). Methods Univariate analysis and logistic regression were perf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of thoracic surgery 2017-02, Vol.103 (2), p.406-415
Hauptverfasser: Samson, Pamela, MD, MPHS, Puri, Varun, MD, MSci, Broderick, Stephen, MD, Patterson, G. Alexander, MD, Meyers, Bryan, MD, MPH, Crabtree, Traves, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 415
container_issue 2
container_start_page 406
container_title The Annals of thoracic surgery
container_volume 103
creator Samson, Pamela, MD, MPHS
Puri, Varun, MD, MSci
Broderick, Stephen, MD
Patterson, G. Alexander, MD
Meyers, Bryan, MD, MPH
Crabtree, Traves, MD
description Background National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend sampling 15 or more lymph nodes during esophagectomy. The proportion of patients meeting this guideline is unknown, as is its influence on overall survival (OS). Methods Univariate analysis and logistic regression were performed to identify variables associated with sampling 15 or more lymph nodes among patients undergoing esophagectomy in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). The NCCN guideline was evaluated in Cox proportional hazards modeling, along with alternative lymph node thresholds. Positive to examined node (PEN) ratios were calculated, and OS was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results From 2006 to 2012, only 6,961 of 18,777 (37.1%) patients undergoing esophagectomy had sampling of 15 or more lymph nodes. Variables associated with sampling 15 or more lymph nodes included income greater than or equal to $38,000, procedure performed in an academic facility, and increasing clinical T and N stages. Induction therapy was associated with a decreased likelihood of 15 or more lymph nodes being sampled. The largest decrease in mortality hazard in patients undergoing upfront esophagectomy was detected when 25 lymph nodes or more were sampled (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67–0.89; p < 0.001), whereas for patients undergoing induction therapy, sampling of 10 or 15 or more lymph nodes was associated with optimal survival benefit (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.74–0.90; p < 0.001). PEN ratios of 0 to 0.10 were associated with maximum survival benefit among all patients undergoing esophagectomy. For patients with a PEN ratio of 0, increases in OS were detected with higher lymph node sampling (85.3 months for sampling of 20 or more lymph nodes versus 52.0 months for sampling 1–9 lymph nodes; p < 0.001). Conclusions For patients undergoing upfront esophagectomy, there may be an increased survival benefit for examining 20 to 25 lymph nodes, which is higher than current recommendations. However, only a minority of patients are meeting current guidelines.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5362278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0003497516310670</els_id><sourcerecordid>1853357525</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-df76eeafd79f1c5699e4f1e4e145714c6487faecef49c212beba9a28aae414083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUstu1DAUjRCIDoVfQF6ySbAdO49NpaEaYKSRumgRS8vj3DQekjjYTtQs-Be-pV9WpzOUx4qVdX3POfdxbhQhghOCSfb-kEjfGCuVG21Cw0-CiwQT_CxaEc5pnFFePo9WGOM0ZmXOz6JXzh1CSEP6ZXRGC0xZxopV9GNz56H3yNRoN3dDIyvoQXnTzWjr0No5o7T0UKGv2jdo2w3WTCG6msDKtkXXo530JFu0rj1YtHEmSNyeBB4pxj6-ZvRo21ej8tr09z9vmsAf5tfRi1q2Dt6c3vPoy8fNzeXneHf1aXu53sWKp8zHVZ1nALKu8rImimdlCawmwIAwnhOmwiR5LUFBzUpFCd3DXpaSFlICIwwX6Xl0cdQdxn0HlQoTh_bFYHUn7SyM1OLvTK8bcWsmwdOM0nwReHcSsOb7CM6LTjsFbSt7MKMTpOBpynNOeYAWR6iyxjkL9VMZgsXinjiI3-6JxT2BCxHcC9S3f7b5RPxlVwB8OAIgLGvSYIVTGnoFlbZh6aIy-n-qXPwjolrdayXbbzCDO5jR9sEMQYSjAovr5YqWIyJZSnCW4_QB-4nLUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1853357525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extent of Lymphadenectomy Is Associated With Improved Overall Survival After Esophagectomy With or Without Induction Therapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Samson, Pamela, MD, MPHS ; Puri, Varun, MD, MSci ; Broderick, Stephen, MD ; Patterson, G. Alexander, MD ; Meyers, Bryan, MD, MPH ; Crabtree, Traves, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Samson, Pamela, MD, MPHS ; Puri, Varun, MD, MSci ; Broderick, Stephen, MD ; Patterson, G. Alexander, MD ; Meyers, Bryan, MD, MPH ; Crabtree, Traves, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend sampling 15 or more lymph nodes during esophagectomy. The proportion of patients meeting this guideline is unknown, as is its influence on overall survival (OS). Methods Univariate analysis and logistic regression were performed to identify variables associated with sampling 15 or more lymph nodes among patients undergoing esophagectomy in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). The NCCN guideline was evaluated in Cox proportional hazards modeling, along with alternative lymph node thresholds. Positive to examined node (PEN) ratios were calculated, and OS was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results From 2006 to 2012, only 6,961 of 18,777 (37.1%) patients undergoing esophagectomy had sampling of 15 or more lymph nodes. Variables associated with sampling 15 or more lymph nodes included income greater than or equal to $38,000, procedure performed in an academic facility, and increasing clinical T and N stages. Induction therapy was associated with a decreased likelihood of 15 or more lymph nodes being sampled. The largest decrease in mortality hazard in patients undergoing upfront esophagectomy was detected when 25 lymph nodes or more were sampled (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67–0.89; p &lt; 0.001), whereas for patients undergoing induction therapy, sampling of 10 or 15 or more lymph nodes was associated with optimal survival benefit (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.74–0.90; p &lt; 0.001). PEN ratios of 0 to 0.10 were associated with maximum survival benefit among all patients undergoing esophagectomy. For patients with a PEN ratio of 0, increases in OS were detected with higher lymph node sampling (85.3 months for sampling of 20 or more lymph nodes versus 52.0 months for sampling 1–9 lymph nodes; p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions For patients undergoing upfront esophagectomy, there may be an increased survival benefit for examining 20 to 25 lymph nodes, which is higher than current recommendations. However, only a minority of patients are meeting current guidelines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4975</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28024648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Cardiothoracic Surgery ; Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality ; Esophageal Neoplasms - secondary ; Esophageal Neoplasms - therapy ; Esophagectomy - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Induction Chemotherapy ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Lymph Node Excision - methods ; Lymph Nodes - surgery ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Survival Rate - trends ; Time Factors ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2017-02, Vol.103 (2), p.406-415</ispartof><rights>The Society of Thoracic Surgeons</rights><rights>2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-df76eeafd79f1c5699e4f1e4e145714c6487faecef49c212beba9a28aae414083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-df76eeafd79f1c5699e4f1e4e145714c6487faecef49c212beba9a28aae414083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28024648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Samson, Pamela, MD, MPHS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puri, Varun, MD, MSci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broderick, Stephen, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, G. Alexander, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyers, Bryan, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crabtree, Traves, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Extent of Lymphadenectomy Is Associated With Improved Overall Survival After Esophagectomy With or Without Induction Therapy</title><title>The Annals of thoracic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><description>Background National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend sampling 15 or more lymph nodes during esophagectomy. The proportion of patients meeting this guideline is unknown, as is its influence on overall survival (OS). Methods Univariate analysis and logistic regression were performed to identify variables associated with sampling 15 or more lymph nodes among patients undergoing esophagectomy in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). The NCCN guideline was evaluated in Cox proportional hazards modeling, along with alternative lymph node thresholds. Positive to examined node (PEN) ratios were calculated, and OS was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results From 2006 to 2012, only 6,961 of 18,777 (37.1%) patients undergoing esophagectomy had sampling of 15 or more lymph nodes. Variables associated with sampling 15 or more lymph nodes included income greater than or equal to $38,000, procedure performed in an academic facility, and increasing clinical T and N stages. Induction therapy was associated with a decreased likelihood of 15 or more lymph nodes being sampled. The largest decrease in mortality hazard in patients undergoing upfront esophagectomy was detected when 25 lymph nodes or more were sampled (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67–0.89; p &lt; 0.001), whereas for patients undergoing induction therapy, sampling of 10 or 15 or more lymph nodes was associated with optimal survival benefit (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.74–0.90; p &lt; 0.001). PEN ratios of 0 to 0.10 were associated with maximum survival benefit among all patients undergoing esophagectomy. For patients with a PEN ratio of 0, increases in OS were detected with higher lymph node sampling (85.3 months for sampling of 20 or more lymph nodes versus 52.0 months for sampling 1–9 lymph nodes; p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions For patients undergoing upfront esophagectomy, there may be an increased survival benefit for examining 20 to 25 lymph nodes, which is higher than current recommendations. However, only a minority of patients are meeting current guidelines.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cardiothoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Induction Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - methods</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - surgery</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival Rate - trends</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0003-4975</issn><issn>1552-6259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUstu1DAUjRCIDoVfQF6ySbAdO49NpaEaYKSRumgRS8vj3DQekjjYTtQs-Be-pV9WpzOUx4qVdX3POfdxbhQhghOCSfb-kEjfGCuVG21Cw0-CiwQT_CxaEc5pnFFePo9WGOM0ZmXOz6JXzh1CSEP6ZXRGC0xZxopV9GNz56H3yNRoN3dDIyvoQXnTzWjr0No5o7T0UKGv2jdo2w3WTCG6msDKtkXXo530JFu0rj1YtHEmSNyeBB4pxj6-ZvRo21ej8tr09z9vmsAf5tfRi1q2Dt6c3vPoy8fNzeXneHf1aXu53sWKp8zHVZ1nALKu8rImimdlCawmwIAwnhOmwiR5LUFBzUpFCd3DXpaSFlICIwwX6Xl0cdQdxn0HlQoTh_bFYHUn7SyM1OLvTK8bcWsmwdOM0nwReHcSsOb7CM6LTjsFbSt7MKMTpOBpynNOeYAWR6iyxjkL9VMZgsXinjiI3-6JxT2BCxHcC9S3f7b5RPxlVwB8OAIgLGvSYIVTGnoFlbZh6aIy-n-qXPwjolrdayXbbzCDO5jR9sEMQYSjAovr5YqWIyJZSnCW4_QB-4nLUw</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Samson, Pamela, MD, MPHS</creator><creator>Puri, Varun, MD, MSci</creator><creator>Broderick, Stephen, MD</creator><creator>Patterson, G. Alexander, MD</creator><creator>Meyers, Bryan, MD, MPH</creator><creator>Crabtree, Traves, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Extent of Lymphadenectomy Is Associated With Improved Overall Survival After Esophagectomy With or Without Induction Therapy</title><author>Samson, Pamela, MD, MPHS ; Puri, Varun, MD, MSci ; Broderick, Stephen, MD ; Patterson, G. Alexander, MD ; Meyers, Bryan, MD, MPH ; Crabtree, Traves, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-df76eeafd79f1c5699e4f1e4e145714c6487faecef49c212beba9a28aae414083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cardiothoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Induction Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - methods</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - surgery</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival Rate - trends</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Samson, Pamela, MD, MPHS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puri, Varun, MD, MSci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broderick, Stephen, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, G. Alexander, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyers, Bryan, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crabtree, Traves, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Samson, Pamela, MD, MPHS</au><au>Puri, Varun, MD, MSci</au><au>Broderick, Stephen, MD</au><au>Patterson, G. Alexander, MD</au><au>Meyers, Bryan, MD, MPH</au><au>Crabtree, Traves, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extent of Lymphadenectomy Is Associated With Improved Overall Survival After Esophagectomy With or Without Induction Therapy</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>406</spage><epage>415</epage><pages>406-415</pages><issn>0003-4975</issn><eissn>1552-6259</eissn><abstract>Background National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend sampling 15 or more lymph nodes during esophagectomy. The proportion of patients meeting this guideline is unknown, as is its influence on overall survival (OS). Methods Univariate analysis and logistic regression were performed to identify variables associated with sampling 15 or more lymph nodes among patients undergoing esophagectomy in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). The NCCN guideline was evaluated in Cox proportional hazards modeling, along with alternative lymph node thresholds. Positive to examined node (PEN) ratios were calculated, and OS was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results From 2006 to 2012, only 6,961 of 18,777 (37.1%) patients undergoing esophagectomy had sampling of 15 or more lymph nodes. Variables associated with sampling 15 or more lymph nodes included income greater than or equal to $38,000, procedure performed in an academic facility, and increasing clinical T and N stages. Induction therapy was associated with a decreased likelihood of 15 or more lymph nodes being sampled. The largest decrease in mortality hazard in patients undergoing upfront esophagectomy was detected when 25 lymph nodes or more were sampled (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67–0.89; p &lt; 0.001), whereas for patients undergoing induction therapy, sampling of 10 or 15 or more lymph nodes was associated with optimal survival benefit (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.74–0.90; p &lt; 0.001). PEN ratios of 0 to 0.10 were associated with maximum survival benefit among all patients undergoing esophagectomy. For patients with a PEN ratio of 0, increases in OS were detected with higher lymph node sampling (85.3 months for sampling of 20 or more lymph nodes versus 52.0 months for sampling 1–9 lymph nodes; p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions For patients undergoing upfront esophagectomy, there may be an increased survival benefit for examining 20 to 25 lymph nodes, which is higher than current recommendations. However, only a minority of patients are meeting current guidelines.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28024648</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.010</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4975
ispartof The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2017-02, Vol.103 (2), p.406-415
issn 0003-4975
1552-6259
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5362278
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use
Cardiothoracic Surgery
Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality
Esophageal Neoplasms - secondary
Esophageal Neoplasms - therapy
Esophagectomy - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Induction Chemotherapy
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Lymph Node Excision - methods
Lymph Nodes - surgery
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Survival Rate - trends
Time Factors
United States - epidemiology
title Extent of Lymphadenectomy Is Associated With Improved Overall Survival After Esophagectomy With or Without Induction Therapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T09%3A53%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extent%20of%20Lymphadenectomy%20Is%20Associated%20With%20Improved%20Overall%20Survival%20After%20Esophagectomy%20With%20or%20Without%20Induction%C2%A0Therapy&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20thoracic%20surgery&rft.au=Samson,%20Pamela,%20MD,%20MPHS&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=406&rft.epage=415&rft.pages=406-415&rft.issn=0003-4975&rft.eissn=1552-6259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1853357525%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1853357525&rft_id=info:pmid/28024648&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0003497516310670&rfr_iscdi=true