Rapid Evidence Review of Bariatric Surgery in Super Obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2)
Background Despite accumulating evidence of the important health benefits of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients in general, bariatric surgery outcomes are less clear in higher-risk, high-priority populations of patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m 2 . To help the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2017-04, Vol.32 (Suppl 1), p.56-64 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 64 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | 56 |
container_title | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Peterson, Kim Anderson, Johanna Boundy, Erin Ferguson, Lauren Erickson, Katherine |
description | Background
Despite accumulating evidence of the important health benefits of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients in general, bariatric surgery outcomes are less clear in higher-risk, high-priority populations of patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m
2
. To help the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research & Development Service (HSR&D) develop a research agenda, we conducted a rapid evidence review to better understand bariatric surgery outcomes in adults with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m
2
.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE
®
, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov through June 2016. We included trials and observational studies. We used pre-specified criteria to select studies, abstract data, and rate internal validity and strength of the evidence (PROSPERO registration number CRD42015025348). All decisions were completed by one reviewer and checked by another.
Results
Among 1892 citations, we included 23 studies in this rapid review. Compared with usual care, one large retrospective VA study provided limited evidence that bariatric surgery can lead to increased mortality in the first year, but decreased mortality long-term among super obese veterans. Studies that compared different bariatric surgical approaches suggested some differences in weight loss and complications. Laparoscopic gastric bypass generally resulted in greater short-term proportion of excess weight loss than did other procedures. Duodenal switch led to greater long-term weight loss than did gastric bypass, but with more complications.
Conclusions
The published literature that separates the super obese is insufficient for determining the precise balance of benefits and harms of bariatric surgery in this high-risk subgroup. Future studies should evaluate a more complete set of key outcomes with longer follow-up in larger samples of more broadly representative adults. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11606-016-3950-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5359153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1875405543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-c5a59ed8ce163d6ca1e04e123b0c4f970cf90ab4771be776536d8f34cc738cd13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9uEzEQxi0EoiHwAFyQJS7lsK3Hf9beCxKtSlupVaUAZ8vrnQ0uyW6wd4Ny49oH4cX6JHWU0gISl5mR5jefZ_wR8hrYATCmDxNAycqCQVmISrFCPSETUFwVICv9lEyYMbIwWsg98iKla8ZAcG6ekz1uuAbJywmZzdwqNPRkHRrsPNIZrgP-oH1Lj1wMbojB009jnGPc0NDlcoWRXtWYwrCh-0eX57c_b25vfuWoGP02P1zydy_Js9YtEr66z1Py5ePJ5-Oz4uLq9Pz4w0XhlSiHHJ2qsDEeoRRN6R0gkwhc1MzLttLMtxVztdQaatS6zEONaYX0XgvjGxBT8n6nuxrrJTYeuyG6hV3FsHRxY3sX7N-dLny1835tlVAVKJEF9u8FYv99xDTYZUgeFwvXYT8mC0YryZSSW_TtP-h1P8Yun2f59luNMVBlCnaUj31KEduHZYDZrWN255jNjtmtY3mVKXnz5xUPE78tygDfASm3umzE49P_V70D_iSiRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2001388819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid Evidence Review of Bariatric Surgery in Super Obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Peterson, Kim ; Anderson, Johanna ; Boundy, Erin ; Ferguson, Lauren ; Erickson, Katherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Kim ; Anderson, Johanna ; Boundy, Erin ; Ferguson, Lauren ; Erickson, Katherine</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Despite accumulating evidence of the important health benefits of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients in general, bariatric surgery outcomes are less clear in higher-risk, high-priority populations of patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m
2
. To help the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research & Development Service (HSR&D) develop a research agenda, we conducted a rapid evidence review to better understand bariatric surgery outcomes in adults with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m
2
.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE
®
, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov through June 2016. We included trials and observational studies. We used pre-specified criteria to select studies, abstract data, and rate internal validity and strength of the evidence (PROSPERO registration number CRD42015025348). All decisions were completed by one reviewer and checked by another.
Results
Among 1892 citations, we included 23 studies in this rapid review. Compared with usual care, one large retrospective VA study provided limited evidence that bariatric surgery can lead to increased mortality in the first year, but decreased mortality long-term among super obese veterans. Studies that compared different bariatric surgical approaches suggested some differences in weight loss and complications. Laparoscopic gastric bypass generally resulted in greater short-term proportion of excess weight loss than did other procedures. Duodenal switch led to greater long-term weight loss than did gastric bypass, but with more complications.
Conclusions
The published literature that separates the super obese is insufficient for determining the precise balance of benefits and harms of bariatric surgery in this high-risk subgroup. Future studies should evaluate a more complete set of key outcomes with longer follow-up in larger samples of more broadly representative adults.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3950-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28271426</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adults ; Bariatric Surgery - methods ; Bias ; Body mass ; Body Mass Index ; Body weight loss ; Clinical trials ; Complications ; Evidence-Based Medicine - methods ; Gastric bypass ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Government agencies ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Laparoscopy ; Literature reviews ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mortality ; Obesity ; Obesity, Morbid - physiopathology ; Obesity, Morbid - surgery ; Patients ; R&D ; Research & development ; Review Paper ; Risk groups ; Studies ; Subgroups ; Surgery ; Weight loss</subject><ispartof>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2017-04, Vol.32 (Suppl 1), p.56-64</ispartof><rights>Society of General Internal Medicine 2016</rights><rights>Journal of General Internal Medicine is a copyright of Springer, (2016). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-c5a59ed8ce163d6ca1e04e123b0c4f970cf90ab4771be776536d8f34cc738cd13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-c5a59ed8ce163d6ca1e04e123b0c4f970cf90ab4771be776536d8f34cc738cd13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359153/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5359153/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28271426$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boundy, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Katherine</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid Evidence Review of Bariatric Surgery in Super Obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2)</title><title>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</title><addtitle>J GEN INTERN MED</addtitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><description>Background
Despite accumulating evidence of the important health benefits of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients in general, bariatric surgery outcomes are less clear in higher-risk, high-priority populations of patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m
2
. To help the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research & Development Service (HSR&D) develop a research agenda, we conducted a rapid evidence review to better understand bariatric surgery outcomes in adults with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m
2
.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE
®
, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov through June 2016. We included trials and observational studies. We used pre-specified criteria to select studies, abstract data, and rate internal validity and strength of the evidence (PROSPERO registration number CRD42015025348). All decisions were completed by one reviewer and checked by another.
Results
Among 1892 citations, we included 23 studies in this rapid review. Compared with usual care, one large retrospective VA study provided limited evidence that bariatric surgery can lead to increased mortality in the first year, but decreased mortality long-term among super obese veterans. Studies that compared different bariatric surgical approaches suggested some differences in weight loss and complications. Laparoscopic gastric bypass generally resulted in greater short-term proportion of excess weight loss than did other procedures. Duodenal switch led to greater long-term weight loss than did gastric bypass, but with more complications.
Conclusions
The published literature that separates the super obese is insufficient for determining the precise balance of benefits and harms of bariatric surgery in this high-risk subgroup. Future studies should evaluate a more complete set of key outcomes with longer follow-up in larger samples of more broadly representative adults.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Bariatric Surgery - methods</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Body weight loss</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - methods</subject><subject>Gastric bypass</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - physiopathology</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Review Paper</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Weight loss</subject><issn>0884-8734</issn><issn>1525-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9uEzEQxi0EoiHwAFyQJS7lsK3Hf9beCxKtSlupVaUAZ8vrnQ0uyW6wd4Ny49oH4cX6JHWU0gISl5mR5jefZ_wR8hrYATCmDxNAycqCQVmISrFCPSETUFwVICv9lEyYMbIwWsg98iKla8ZAcG6ekz1uuAbJywmZzdwqNPRkHRrsPNIZrgP-oH1Lj1wMbojB009jnGPc0NDlcoWRXtWYwrCh-0eX57c_b25vfuWoGP02P1zydy_Js9YtEr66z1Py5ePJ5-Oz4uLq9Pz4w0XhlSiHHJ2qsDEeoRRN6R0gkwhc1MzLttLMtxVztdQaatS6zEONaYX0XgvjGxBT8n6nuxrrJTYeuyG6hV3FsHRxY3sX7N-dLny1835tlVAVKJEF9u8FYv99xDTYZUgeFwvXYT8mC0YryZSSW_TtP-h1P8Yun2f59luNMVBlCnaUj31KEduHZYDZrWN255jNjtmtY3mVKXnz5xUPE78tygDfASm3umzE49P_V70D_iSiRA</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Peterson, Kim</creator><creator>Anderson, Johanna</creator><creator>Boundy, Erin</creator><creator>Ferguson, Lauren</creator><creator>Erickson, Katherine</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Rapid Evidence Review of Bariatric Surgery in Super Obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2)</title><author>Peterson, Kim ; Anderson, Johanna ; Boundy, Erin ; Ferguson, Lauren ; Erickson, Katherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-c5a59ed8ce163d6ca1e04e123b0c4f970cf90ab4771be776536d8f34cc738cd13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Bariatric Surgery - methods</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Body weight loss</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - methods</topic><topic>Gastric bypass</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - physiopathology</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Review Paper</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Weight loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boundy, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Katherine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peterson, Kim</au><au>Anderson, Johanna</au><au>Boundy, Erin</au><au>Ferguson, Lauren</au><au>Erickson, Katherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid Evidence Review of Bariatric Surgery in Super Obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle><stitle>J GEN INTERN MED</stitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>56</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>56-64</pages><issn>0884-8734</issn><eissn>1525-1497</eissn><abstract>Background
Despite accumulating evidence of the important health benefits of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients in general, bariatric surgery outcomes are less clear in higher-risk, high-priority populations of patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m
2
. To help the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research & Development Service (HSR&D) develop a research agenda, we conducted a rapid evidence review to better understand bariatric surgery outcomes in adults with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m
2
.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE
®
, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov through June 2016. We included trials and observational studies. We used pre-specified criteria to select studies, abstract data, and rate internal validity and strength of the evidence (PROSPERO registration number CRD42015025348). All decisions were completed by one reviewer and checked by another.
Results
Among 1892 citations, we included 23 studies in this rapid review. Compared with usual care, one large retrospective VA study provided limited evidence that bariatric surgery can lead to increased mortality in the first year, but decreased mortality long-term among super obese veterans. Studies that compared different bariatric surgical approaches suggested some differences in weight loss and complications. Laparoscopic gastric bypass generally resulted in greater short-term proportion of excess weight loss than did other procedures. Duodenal switch led to greater long-term weight loss than did gastric bypass, but with more complications.
Conclusions
The published literature that separates the super obese is insufficient for determining the precise balance of benefits and harms of bariatric surgery in this high-risk subgroup. Future studies should evaluate a more complete set of key outcomes with longer follow-up in larger samples of more broadly representative adults.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>28271426</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11606-016-3950-5</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0884-8734 |
ispartof | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2017-04, Vol.32 (Suppl 1), p.56-64 |
issn | 0884-8734 1525-1497 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5359153 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adults Bariatric Surgery - methods Bias Body mass Body Mass Index Body weight loss Clinical trials Complications Evidence-Based Medicine - methods Gastric bypass Gastrointestinal surgery Government agencies Humans Internal Medicine Laparoscopy Literature reviews Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mortality Obesity Obesity, Morbid - physiopathology Obesity, Morbid - surgery Patients R&D Research & development Review Paper Risk groups Studies Subgroups Surgery Weight loss |
title | Rapid Evidence Review of Bariatric Surgery in Super Obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T03%3A53%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20Evidence%20Review%20of%20Bariatric%20Surgery%20in%20Super%20Obesity%20(BMI%E2%80%89%E2%89%A5%E2%80%8950%20kg/m2)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20general%20internal%20medicine%20:%20JGIM&rft.au=Peterson,%20Kim&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=56-64&rft.issn=0884-8734&rft.eissn=1525-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11606-016-3950-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1875405543%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2001388819&rft_id=info:pmid/28271426&rfr_iscdi=true |