Renal xenotransplantation: experimental progress and clinical prospects

There are >100,000 patients waiting for kidney transplants in the United States and a vast need worldwide. Xenotransplantation, in the form of the transplantation of kidneys from genetically engineered pigs, offers the possibility of overcoming the chronic shortage of deceased and living human do...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kidney international 2017-04, Vol.91 (4), p.790-796
Hauptverfasser: Wijkstrom, Martin, Iwase, Hayato, Paris, Wayne, Hara, Hidetaka, Ezzelarab, Mohamed, Cooper, David K.C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 796
container_issue 4
container_start_page 790
container_title Kidney international
container_volume 91
creator Wijkstrom, Martin
Iwase, Hayato
Paris, Wayne
Hara, Hidetaka
Ezzelarab, Mohamed
Cooper, David K.C.
description There are >100,000 patients waiting for kidney transplants in the United States and a vast need worldwide. Xenotransplantation, in the form of the transplantation of kidneys from genetically engineered pigs, offers the possibility of overcoming the chronic shortage of deceased and living human donors. These genetic manipulations can take the form of (i) knockout of pig genes that are responsible for the expression of antigens against which the primate (human or nonhuman primate) has natural “preformed” antibodies that bind and initiate complement-mediated destruction or (ii) the insertion of human transgenes that provide protection against the human complement, coagulation, or inflammatory responses. Between 1989 and 2015, pig kidney graft survival in nonhuman primates increased from 23 days to almost 10 months. There appear to be no clinically significant physiological incompatibilities in renal function between pigs and primates. The organ-source pigs will be housed in a biosecure environment, and thus the risk of transferring an exogenous potentially pathogenic microorganism will be less than that after allotransplantation. Although the risk associated with porcine endogenous retroviruses is considered small, techniques are now available whereby they could potentially be excluded from the pig. The US Food and Drug Administration suggests that xenotransplantation should be restricted to “patients with serious or life-threatening diseases for whom adequately safe and effective alternative therapies are not available.” These might include those with (i) a high degree of allosensitization to human leukocyte antigens or (ii) rapid recurrence of primary disease in previous allografts. The potential psychosocial, regulatory, and legal aspects of clinical xenotransplantation are briefly discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.kint.2016.08.035
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5357451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0085253816305695</els_id><sourcerecordid>1846025610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-e35790f849375bb0c14bfffb9374197863814d4e2297b7c74b76ccd3db3e01973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1P3DAQtSqqsmz7BzigHLkk9WecIISEENBKSEgVnC3HmSxesk6wsyv4953VLoheerJn5s2bN_MIOWa0YJSVP5fFsw9TwfFf0KqgQn0hM6a4yJlW6oDMKK1UzpWoDslRSkuKcS3oN3LIdc2kpnxGbv9AsH32CmGYog1p7G2Y7OSHcJbB6wjRrwATfTbGYREhpcyGNnO9D97tsmkEN6Xv5Gtn-wQ_9u-cPN5cP1z9yu_ub39fXd7lTio15SCUrmlXyVpo1TTUMdl0XddgKFmtq1JUTLYSOK91o52WjS6da0XbCKAIEHNyseMd180KWofiou3NiDptfDOD9ebfSvBPZjFsjMLJUjEkON0TxOFlDWkyK58c9Lg3DOtkWCVLylXJKEL5DupwyxSh-xjDqNk6YJZm64DZOmBoZdABbDr5LPCj5f3kCDjfAQDPtPEQTXIegoPWR7ykaQf_P_6_nbiZjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1846025610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Renal xenotransplantation: experimental progress and clinical prospects</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wijkstrom, Martin ; Iwase, Hayato ; Paris, Wayne ; Hara, Hidetaka ; Ezzelarab, Mohamed ; Cooper, David K.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wijkstrom, Martin ; Iwase, Hayato ; Paris, Wayne ; Hara, Hidetaka ; Ezzelarab, Mohamed ; Cooper, David K.C.</creatorcontrib><description>There are &gt;100,000 patients waiting for kidney transplants in the United States and a vast need worldwide. Xenotransplantation, in the form of the transplantation of kidneys from genetically engineered pigs, offers the possibility of overcoming the chronic shortage of deceased and living human donors. These genetic manipulations can take the form of (i) knockout of pig genes that are responsible for the expression of antigens against which the primate (human or nonhuman primate) has natural “preformed” antibodies that bind and initiate complement-mediated destruction or (ii) the insertion of human transgenes that provide protection against the human complement, coagulation, or inflammatory responses. Between 1989 and 2015, pig kidney graft survival in nonhuman primates increased from 23 days to almost 10 months. There appear to be no clinically significant physiological incompatibilities in renal function between pigs and primates. The organ-source pigs will be housed in a biosecure environment, and thus the risk of transferring an exogenous potentially pathogenic microorganism will be less than that after allotransplantation. Although the risk associated with porcine endogenous retroviruses is considered small, techniques are now available whereby they could potentially be excluded from the pig. The US Food and Drug Administration suggests that xenotransplantation should be restricted to “patients with serious or life-threatening diseases for whom adequately safe and effective alternative therapies are not available.” These might include those with (i) a high degree of allosensitization to human leukocyte antigens or (ii) rapid recurrence of primary disease in previous allografts. The potential psychosocial, regulatory, and legal aspects of clinical xenotransplantation are briefly discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0085-2538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.08.035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27914702</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>allosensitization ; Animals ; Animals, Genetically Modified ; clinical trial ; genetically engineered xenotransplantation ; Genotype ; Graft Rejection - genetics ; Graft Rejection - immunology ; Graft Rejection - prevention &amp; control ; Graft Survival ; Heterografts ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use ; kidney ; Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects ; Kidney Transplantation - history ; Kidney Transplantation - methods ; Phenotype ; pig ; Risk Factors ; Species Specificity ; Sus scrofa - genetics ; Sus scrofa - immunology ; Tissue Donors - supply &amp; distribution ; Transplantation Tolerance ; Transplantation, Heterologous - adverse effects ; Transplantation, Heterologous - history ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Kidney international, 2017-04, Vol.91 (4), p.790-796</ispartof><rights>2016 International Society of Nephrology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-e35790f849375bb0c14bfffb9374197863814d4e2297b7c74b76ccd3db3e01973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-e35790f849375bb0c14bfffb9374197863814d4e2297b7c74b76ccd3db3e01973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27914702$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wijkstrom, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwase, Hayato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paris, Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hara, Hidetaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezzelarab, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, David K.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Renal xenotransplantation: experimental progress and clinical prospects</title><title>Kidney international</title><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><description>There are &gt;100,000 patients waiting for kidney transplants in the United States and a vast need worldwide. Xenotransplantation, in the form of the transplantation of kidneys from genetically engineered pigs, offers the possibility of overcoming the chronic shortage of deceased and living human donors. These genetic manipulations can take the form of (i) knockout of pig genes that are responsible for the expression of antigens against which the primate (human or nonhuman primate) has natural “preformed” antibodies that bind and initiate complement-mediated destruction or (ii) the insertion of human transgenes that provide protection against the human complement, coagulation, or inflammatory responses. Between 1989 and 2015, pig kidney graft survival in nonhuman primates increased from 23 days to almost 10 months. There appear to be no clinically significant physiological incompatibilities in renal function between pigs and primates. The organ-source pigs will be housed in a biosecure environment, and thus the risk of transferring an exogenous potentially pathogenic microorganism will be less than that after allotransplantation. Although the risk associated with porcine endogenous retroviruses is considered small, techniques are now available whereby they could potentially be excluded from the pig. The US Food and Drug Administration suggests that xenotransplantation should be restricted to “patients with serious or life-threatening diseases for whom adequately safe and effective alternative therapies are not available.” These might include those with (i) a high degree of allosensitization to human leukocyte antigens or (ii) rapid recurrence of primary disease in previous allografts. The potential psychosocial, regulatory, and legal aspects of clinical xenotransplantation are briefly discussed.</description><subject>allosensitization</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Genetically Modified</subject><subject>clinical trial</subject><subject>genetically engineered xenotransplantation</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - genetics</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - immunology</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Heterografts</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>History, 21st Century</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>kidney</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - history</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>pig</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Sus scrofa - genetics</subject><subject>Sus scrofa - immunology</subject><subject>Tissue Donors - supply &amp; distribution</subject><subject>Transplantation Tolerance</subject><subject>Transplantation, Heterologous - adverse effects</subject><subject>Transplantation, Heterologous - history</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0085-2538</issn><issn>1523-1755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1P3DAQtSqqsmz7BzigHLkk9WecIISEENBKSEgVnC3HmSxesk6wsyv4953VLoheerJn5s2bN_MIOWa0YJSVP5fFsw9TwfFf0KqgQn0hM6a4yJlW6oDMKK1UzpWoDslRSkuKcS3oN3LIdc2kpnxGbv9AsH32CmGYog1p7G2Y7OSHcJbB6wjRrwATfTbGYREhpcyGNnO9D97tsmkEN6Xv5Gtn-wQ_9u-cPN5cP1z9yu_ub39fXd7lTio15SCUrmlXyVpo1TTUMdl0XddgKFmtq1JUTLYSOK91o52WjS6da0XbCKAIEHNyseMd180KWofiou3NiDptfDOD9ebfSvBPZjFsjMLJUjEkON0TxOFlDWkyK58c9Lg3DOtkWCVLylXJKEL5DupwyxSh-xjDqNk6YJZm64DZOmBoZdABbDr5LPCj5f3kCDjfAQDPtPEQTXIegoPWR7ykaQf_P_6_nbiZjg</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Wijkstrom, Martin</creator><creator>Iwase, Hayato</creator><creator>Paris, Wayne</creator><creator>Hara, Hidetaka</creator><creator>Ezzelarab, Mohamed</creator><creator>Cooper, David K.C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Renal xenotransplantation: experimental progress and clinical prospects</title><author>Wijkstrom, Martin ; Iwase, Hayato ; Paris, Wayne ; Hara, Hidetaka ; Ezzelarab, Mohamed ; Cooper, David K.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-e35790f849375bb0c14bfffb9374197863814d4e2297b7c74b76ccd3db3e01973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>allosensitization</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Genetically Modified</topic><topic>clinical trial</topic><topic>genetically engineered xenotransplantation</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - genetics</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - immunology</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Heterografts</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>History, 21st Century</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>kidney</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - history</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>pig</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Sus scrofa - genetics</topic><topic>Sus scrofa - immunology</topic><topic>Tissue Donors - supply &amp; distribution</topic><topic>Transplantation Tolerance</topic><topic>Transplantation, Heterologous - adverse effects</topic><topic>Transplantation, Heterologous - history</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wijkstrom, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwase, Hayato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paris, Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hara, Hidetaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezzelarab, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, David K.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wijkstrom, Martin</au><au>Iwase, Hayato</au><au>Paris, Wayne</au><au>Hara, Hidetaka</au><au>Ezzelarab, Mohamed</au><au>Cooper, David K.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Renal xenotransplantation: experimental progress and clinical prospects</atitle><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>790</spage><epage>796</epage><pages>790-796</pages><issn>0085-2538</issn><eissn>1523-1755</eissn><abstract>There are &gt;100,000 patients waiting for kidney transplants in the United States and a vast need worldwide. Xenotransplantation, in the form of the transplantation of kidneys from genetically engineered pigs, offers the possibility of overcoming the chronic shortage of deceased and living human donors. These genetic manipulations can take the form of (i) knockout of pig genes that are responsible for the expression of antigens against which the primate (human or nonhuman primate) has natural “preformed” antibodies that bind and initiate complement-mediated destruction or (ii) the insertion of human transgenes that provide protection against the human complement, coagulation, or inflammatory responses. Between 1989 and 2015, pig kidney graft survival in nonhuman primates increased from 23 days to almost 10 months. There appear to be no clinically significant physiological incompatibilities in renal function between pigs and primates. The organ-source pigs will be housed in a biosecure environment, and thus the risk of transferring an exogenous potentially pathogenic microorganism will be less than that after allotransplantation. Although the risk associated with porcine endogenous retroviruses is considered small, techniques are now available whereby they could potentially be excluded from the pig. The US Food and Drug Administration suggests that xenotransplantation should be restricted to “patients with serious or life-threatening diseases for whom adequately safe and effective alternative therapies are not available.” These might include those with (i) a high degree of allosensitization to human leukocyte antigens or (ii) rapid recurrence of primary disease in previous allografts. The potential psychosocial, regulatory, and legal aspects of clinical xenotransplantation are briefly discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27914702</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.kint.2016.08.035</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0085-2538
ispartof Kidney international, 2017-04, Vol.91 (4), p.790-796
issn 0085-2538
1523-1755
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5357451
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects allosensitization
Animals
Animals, Genetically Modified
clinical trial
genetically engineered xenotransplantation
Genotype
Graft Rejection - genetics
Graft Rejection - immunology
Graft Rejection - prevention & control
Graft Survival
Heterografts
History, 20th Century
History, 21st Century
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use
kidney
Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects
Kidney Transplantation - history
Kidney Transplantation - methods
Phenotype
pig
Risk Factors
Species Specificity
Sus scrofa - genetics
Sus scrofa - immunology
Tissue Donors - supply & distribution
Transplantation Tolerance
Transplantation, Heterologous - adverse effects
Transplantation, Heterologous - history
Treatment Outcome
title Renal xenotransplantation: experimental progress and clinical prospects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A35%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Renal%20xenotransplantation:%20experimental%20progress%20and%20clinical%20prospects&rft.jtitle=Kidney%20international&rft.au=Wijkstrom,%20Martin&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=790&rft.epage=796&rft.pages=790-796&rft.issn=0085-2538&rft.eissn=1523-1755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.kint.2016.08.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1846025610%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1846025610&rft_id=info:pmid/27914702&rft_els_id=S0085253816305695&rfr_iscdi=true