Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension

Upright head and neck position has been frequently applied as baseline for diagnosis of neck problems. However, the variance of the position after cervical motions has never been demonstrated. Thus, it is unclear if the baseline position varies evenly across the cervical joints. The purpose was to a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2017-03, Vol.18 (1), p.102-102, Article 102
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Xu, Lindstroem, René, Carstens, Niels Peter Bak, Graven-Nielsen, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102
container_issue 1
container_start_page 102
container_title BMC musculoskeletal disorders
container_volume 18
creator Wang, Xu
Lindstroem, René
Carstens, Niels Peter Bak
Graven-Nielsen, Thomas
description Upright head and neck position has been frequently applied as baseline for diagnosis of neck problems. However, the variance of the position after cervical motions has never been demonstrated. Thus, it is unclear if the baseline position varies evenly across the cervical joints. The purpose was to assess reposition errors of upright cervical spine. Cervical reposition errors were measured in twenty healthy subjects (6 females) using video-fluoroscopy. Two flexion movements were performed with a 20 s interval, the same was repeated for extension, with an interval of 5 min between flexion and extension movements. Cervical joint positions were assessed with anatomical landmarks and external markers in a Matlab program. Reposition errors were extracted in degrees (initial position minus reposition) as constant errors (CEs) and absolute errors (AEs). Twelve of twenty-eight CEs (7 joints times 4 repositions) exceeded the minimal detectable change (MDC), while all AEs exceeded the MDC. Averaged AEs across the cervical joints were larger after 5 min' intervals compared to 20 s intervals (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12891-017-1454-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5347814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1877525920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-f876630a67ac991393226e2160a7fcbbbfe6fd4ca5910e10c9ea4f7d1e52380e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAWxQlmwCHtuJ7Q0SqspDqsQG1pbjjCEoTYqdVqVfT6o-VFYzo3vnzugQcg30DkDl9xGY0pBSkCmITKTrEzIEISFlQorTo35ALmL8pr1RcX1OBkwxpXKgQzIZY1hWztZJnFcNJgHnbay6qm0SDKENMbG-w5C4vc3XuNqotikTXHXYxH66JGfe1hGvdnVEPp4m7-OXdPr2_Dp-nKaOa92lXsk859Tm0jqtgWvOWI4Mcmqld0VReMx9KZzNNFAE6jRa4WUJmDGuKPIRedjmzhfFDEuHTRdsbeahmtnwa1pbmf9KU32Zz3ZpMi6kAtEH3O4CQvuzwNiZWRUd1rVtsF1EA0rKjGWa0d4KW6sLbYwB_eEMULPBb7b4TU_VbPCbdb9zc_zfYWPPm_8BAamC9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877525920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><creator>Wang, Xu ; Lindstroem, René ; Carstens, Niels Peter Bak ; Graven-Nielsen, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xu ; Lindstroem, René ; Carstens, Niels Peter Bak ; Graven-Nielsen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Upright head and neck position has been frequently applied as baseline for diagnosis of neck problems. However, the variance of the position after cervical motions has never been demonstrated. Thus, it is unclear if the baseline position varies evenly across the cervical joints. The purpose was to assess reposition errors of upright cervical spine. Cervical reposition errors were measured in twenty healthy subjects (6 females) using video-fluoroscopy. Two flexion movements were performed with a 20 s interval, the same was repeated for extension, with an interval of 5 min between flexion and extension movements. Cervical joint positions were assessed with anatomical landmarks and external markers in a Matlab program. Reposition errors were extracted in degrees (initial position minus reposition) as constant errors (CEs) and absolute errors (AEs). Twelve of twenty-eight CEs (7 joints times 4 repositions) exceeded the minimal detectable change (MDC), while all AEs exceeded the MDC. Averaged AEs across the cervical joints were larger after 5 min' intervals compared to 20 s intervals (p &lt; 0.05). This is the first study to demonstrate single joint reposition errors of the cervical spine. The cervical spine returns to the upright positions with a 2° average absolute difference after cervical flexion and extension movements in healthy adults.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2474</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1454-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28288610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Cervical Vertebrae - physiology ; Female ; Fluoroscopy ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Joints - diagnostic imaging ; Joints - physiology ; Male ; Movement - physiology ; Neck - anatomy &amp; histology ; Neck - diagnostic imaging ; Neck - physiology ; Patient Positioning - adverse effects ; Posture - physiology ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Time Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017-03, Vol.18 (1), p.102-102, Article 102</ispartof><rights>The Author(s). 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-f876630a67ac991393226e2160a7fcbbbfe6fd4ca5910e10c9ea4f7d1e52380e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-f876630a67ac991393226e2160a7fcbbbfe6fd4ca5910e10c9ea4f7d1e52380e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5347814/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5347814/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindstroem, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carstens, Niels Peter Bak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graven-Nielsen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension</title><title>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</title><addtitle>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</addtitle><description>Upright head and neck position has been frequently applied as baseline for diagnosis of neck problems. However, the variance of the position after cervical motions has never been demonstrated. Thus, it is unclear if the baseline position varies evenly across the cervical joints. The purpose was to assess reposition errors of upright cervical spine. Cervical reposition errors were measured in twenty healthy subjects (6 females) using video-fluoroscopy. Two flexion movements were performed with a 20 s interval, the same was repeated for extension, with an interval of 5 min between flexion and extension movements. Cervical joint positions were assessed with anatomical landmarks and external markers in a Matlab program. Reposition errors were extracted in degrees (initial position minus reposition) as constant errors (CEs) and absolute errors (AEs). Twelve of twenty-eight CEs (7 joints times 4 repositions) exceeded the minimal detectable change (MDC), while all AEs exceeded the MDC. Averaged AEs across the cervical joints were larger after 5 min' intervals compared to 20 s intervals (p &lt; 0.05). This is the first study to demonstrate single joint reposition errors of the cervical spine. The cervical spine returns to the upright positions with a 2° average absolute difference after cervical flexion and extension movements in healthy adults.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joints - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Joints - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Neck - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Neck - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neck - physiology</subject><subject>Patient Positioning - adverse effects</subject><subject>Posture - physiology</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1471-2474</issn><issn>1471-2474</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAWxQlmwCHtuJ7Q0SqspDqsQG1pbjjCEoTYqdVqVfT6o-VFYzo3vnzugQcg30DkDl9xGY0pBSkCmITKTrEzIEISFlQorTo35ALmL8pr1RcX1OBkwxpXKgQzIZY1hWztZJnFcNJgHnbay6qm0SDKENMbG-w5C4vc3XuNqotikTXHXYxH66JGfe1hGvdnVEPp4m7-OXdPr2_Dp-nKaOa92lXsk859Tm0jqtgWvOWI4Mcmqld0VReMx9KZzNNFAE6jRa4WUJmDGuKPIRedjmzhfFDEuHTRdsbeahmtnwa1pbmf9KU32Zz3ZpMi6kAtEH3O4CQvuzwNiZWRUd1rVtsF1EA0rKjGWa0d4KW6sLbYwB_eEMULPBb7b4TU_VbPCbdb9zc_zfYWPPm_8BAamC9A</recordid><startdate>20170313</startdate><enddate>20170313</enddate><creator>Wang, Xu</creator><creator>Lindstroem, René</creator><creator>Carstens, Niels Peter Bak</creator><creator>Graven-Nielsen, Thomas</creator><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170313</creationdate><title>Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension</title><author>Wang, Xu ; Lindstroem, René ; Carstens, Niels Peter Bak ; Graven-Nielsen, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-f876630a67ac991393226e2160a7fcbbbfe6fd4ca5910e10c9ea4f7d1e52380e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joints - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Joints - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Neck - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Neck - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neck - physiology</topic><topic>Patient Positioning - adverse effects</topic><topic>Posture - physiology</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindstroem, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carstens, Niels Peter Bak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graven-Nielsen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Xu</au><au>Lindstroem, René</au><au>Carstens, Niels Peter Bak</au><au>Graven-Nielsen, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension</atitle><jtitle>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</addtitle><date>2017-03-13</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>102</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>102-102</pages><artnum>102</artnum><issn>1471-2474</issn><eissn>1471-2474</eissn><abstract>Upright head and neck position has been frequently applied as baseline for diagnosis of neck problems. However, the variance of the position after cervical motions has never been demonstrated. Thus, it is unclear if the baseline position varies evenly across the cervical joints. The purpose was to assess reposition errors of upright cervical spine. Cervical reposition errors were measured in twenty healthy subjects (6 females) using video-fluoroscopy. Two flexion movements were performed with a 20 s interval, the same was repeated for extension, with an interval of 5 min between flexion and extension movements. Cervical joint positions were assessed with anatomical landmarks and external markers in a Matlab program. Reposition errors were extracted in degrees (initial position minus reposition) as constant errors (CEs) and absolute errors (AEs). Twelve of twenty-eight CEs (7 joints times 4 repositions) exceeded the minimal detectable change (MDC), while all AEs exceeded the MDC. Averaged AEs across the cervical joints were larger after 5 min' intervals compared to 20 s intervals (p &lt; 0.05). This is the first study to demonstrate single joint reposition errors of the cervical spine. The cervical spine returns to the upright positions with a 2° average absolute difference after cervical flexion and extension movements in healthy adults.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central</pub><pmid>28288610</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12891-017-1454-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2474
ispartof BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017-03, Vol.18 (1), p.102-102, Article 102
issn 1471-2474
1471-2474
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5347814
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
subjects Adult
Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Cervical Vertebrae - physiology
Female
Fluoroscopy
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Joints - diagnostic imaging
Joints - physiology
Male
Movement - physiology
Neck - anatomy & histology
Neck - diagnostic imaging
Neck - physiology
Patient Positioning - adverse effects
Posture - physiology
Range of Motion, Articular
Time Factors
Young Adult
title Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T19%3A20%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cervical%20spine%20reposition%20errors%20after%20cervical%20flexion%20and%20extension&rft.jtitle=BMC%20musculoskeletal%20disorders&rft.au=Wang,%20Xu&rft.date=2017-03-13&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=102-102&rft.artnum=102&rft.issn=1471-2474&rft.eissn=1471-2474&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12891-017-1454-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1877525920%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877525920&rft_id=info:pmid/28288610&rfr_iscdi=true