Robust sampling of decision information during perceptual choice

Humans move their eyes to gather information about the visual world. However, saccadic sampling has largely been explored in paradigms that involve searching for a lone target in a cluttered array or natural scene. Here, we investigated the policy that humans use to overtly sample information in a p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2017-03, Vol.114 (10), p.2771-2776
Hauptverfasser: Vandormael, Hildward, Castañón, Santiago Herce, Balaguer, Jan, Li, Vickie, Summerfield, Christopher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2776
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2771
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS
container_volume 114
creator Vandormael, Hildward
Castañón, Santiago Herce
Balaguer, Jan
Li, Vickie
Summerfield, Christopher
description Humans move their eyes to gather information about the visual world. However, saccadic sampling has largely been explored in paradigms that involve searching for a lone target in a cluttered array or natural scene. Here, we investigated the policy that humans use to overtly sample information in a perceptual decision task that required information from across multiple spatial locations to be combined. Participants viewed a spatial array of numbers and judged whether the average was greater or smaller than a reference value. Participants preferentially sampled items that were less diagnostic of the correct answer (“inlying” elements; that is, elements closer to the reference value). This preference to sample inlying items was linked to decisions, enhancing the tendency to give more weight to inlying elements in the final choice (“robust averaging”). These findings contrast with a large body of evidence indicating that gaze is directed preferentially to deviant information during natural scene viewing and visual search, and suggest that humans may sample information “robustly” with their eyes during perceptual decision-making.
doi_str_mv 10.1073/pnas.1613950114
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5347592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26480104</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26480104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-19342ee9016adfa7f21889db1646cb29b288c3b893fa56dd4e962997ef665a003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1v1TAQxC1ERR8PzpxAkXrhknbXdhzvBYEqvqRKlRCcLcdxWj8lcbATJP77JnqlBU62ND-Pd3YYe4VwjlCLi2m0-RwVCqoAUT5hOwTCUkmCp2wHwOtSSy5P2fOcDwBAlYZn7JRrzkWFtGPvv8VmyXOR7TD1YbwpYle03oUc4liEsYtpsPN2b5e0yZNPzk_zYvvC3cbg_At20tk--5f35579-PTx--WX8ur689fLD1elq4DmEklI7j0BKtt2tu44ak1tg0oq13BquNZONJpEZyvVttKT4kS175SqLIDYs3dH32lpBt86P87J9mZKYbDpt4k2mH-VMdyam_jLVELWFfHV4O29QYo_F59nM4TsfN_b0cclG9Q1kFZcbn-d_Yce4pLGNd5KaSRFsK58zy6OlEsx5-S7h2EQzNaO2doxj-2sL978neGB_1PHCrw-Aoc8x_SoK6kBQYo7qbWVSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1881969061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robust sampling of decision information during perceptual choice</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Vandormael, Hildward ; Castañón, Santiago Herce ; Balaguer, Jan ; Li, Vickie ; Summerfield, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Vandormael, Hildward ; Castañón, Santiago Herce ; Balaguer, Jan ; Li, Vickie ; Summerfield, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>Humans move their eyes to gather information about the visual world. However, saccadic sampling has largely been explored in paradigms that involve searching for a lone target in a cluttered array or natural scene. Here, we investigated the policy that humans use to overtly sample information in a perceptual decision task that required information from across multiple spatial locations to be combined. Participants viewed a spatial array of numbers and judged whether the average was greater or smaller than a reference value. Participants preferentially sampled items that were less diagnostic of the correct answer (“inlying” elements; that is, elements closer to the reference value). This preference to sample inlying items was linked to decisions, enhancing the tendency to give more weight to inlying elements in the final choice (“robust averaging”). These findings contrast with a large body of evidence indicating that gaze is directed preferentially to deviant information during natural scene viewing and visual search, and suggest that humans may sample information “robustly” with their eyes during perceptual decision-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1613950114</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28223519</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Biological Sciences ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Decision making ; Decision Making - physiology ; Eye movements ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Female ; Human subjects ; Humans ; Information processing ; Judgment ; Learning ; Male ; Sensory perception ; Social Sciences ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2017-03, Vol.114 (10), p.2771-2776</ispartof><rights>Volumes 1–89 and 106–114, copyright as a collective work only; author(s) retains copyright to individual articles</rights><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Mar 7, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-19342ee9016adfa7f21889db1646cb29b288c3b893fa56dd4e962997ef665a003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-19342ee9016adfa7f21889db1646cb29b288c3b893fa56dd4e962997ef665a003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26480104$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26480104$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28223519$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vandormael, Hildward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castañón, Santiago Herce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balaguer, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Vickie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summerfield, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Robust sampling of decision information during perceptual choice</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>Humans move their eyes to gather information about the visual world. However, saccadic sampling has largely been explored in paradigms that involve searching for a lone target in a cluttered array or natural scene. Here, we investigated the policy that humans use to overtly sample information in a perceptual decision task that required information from across multiple spatial locations to be combined. Participants viewed a spatial array of numbers and judged whether the average was greater or smaller than a reference value. Participants preferentially sampled items that were less diagnostic of the correct answer (“inlying” elements; that is, elements closer to the reference value). This preference to sample inlying items was linked to decisions, enhancing the tendency to give more weight to inlying elements in the final choice (“robust averaging”). These findings contrast with a large body of evidence indicating that gaze is directed preferentially to deviant information during natural scene viewing and visual search, and suggest that humans may sample information “robustly” with their eyes during perceptual decision-making.</description><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision Making - physiology</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human subjects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1v1TAQxC1ERR8PzpxAkXrhknbXdhzvBYEqvqRKlRCcLcdxWj8lcbATJP77JnqlBU62ND-Pd3YYe4VwjlCLi2m0-RwVCqoAUT5hOwTCUkmCp2wHwOtSSy5P2fOcDwBAlYZn7JRrzkWFtGPvv8VmyXOR7TD1YbwpYle03oUc4liEsYtpsPN2b5e0yZNPzk_zYvvC3cbg_At20tk--5f35579-PTx--WX8ur689fLD1elq4DmEklI7j0BKtt2tu44ak1tg0oq13BquNZONJpEZyvVttKT4kS175SqLIDYs3dH32lpBt86P87J9mZKYbDpt4k2mH-VMdyam_jLVELWFfHV4O29QYo_F59nM4TsfN_b0cclG9Q1kFZcbn-d_Yce4pLGNd5KaSRFsK58zy6OlEsx5-S7h2EQzNaO2doxj-2sL978neGB_1PHCrw-Aoc8x_SoK6kBQYo7qbWVSg</recordid><startdate>20170307</startdate><enddate>20170307</enddate><creator>Vandormael, Hildward</creator><creator>Castañón, Santiago Herce</creator><creator>Balaguer, Jan</creator><creator>Li, Vickie</creator><creator>Summerfield, Christopher</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170307</creationdate><title>Robust sampling of decision information during perceptual choice</title><author>Vandormael, Hildward ; Castañón, Santiago Herce ; Balaguer, Jan ; Li, Vickie ; Summerfield, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-19342ee9016adfa7f21889db1646cb29b288c3b893fa56dd4e962997ef665a003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision Making - physiology</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human subjects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vandormael, Hildward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castañón, Santiago Herce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balaguer, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Vickie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summerfield, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vandormael, Hildward</au><au>Castañón, Santiago Herce</au><au>Balaguer, Jan</au><au>Li, Vickie</au><au>Summerfield, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robust sampling of decision information during perceptual choice</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2017-03-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2771</spage><epage>2776</epage><pages>2771-2776</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Humans move their eyes to gather information about the visual world. However, saccadic sampling has largely been explored in paradigms that involve searching for a lone target in a cluttered array or natural scene. Here, we investigated the policy that humans use to overtly sample information in a perceptual decision task that required information from across multiple spatial locations to be combined. Participants viewed a spatial array of numbers and judged whether the average was greater or smaller than a reference value. Participants preferentially sampled items that were less diagnostic of the correct answer (“inlying” elements; that is, elements closer to the reference value). This preference to sample inlying items was linked to decisions, enhancing the tendency to give more weight to inlying elements in the final choice (“robust averaging”). These findings contrast with a large body of evidence indicating that gaze is directed preferentially to deviant information during natural scene viewing and visual search, and suggest that humans may sample information “robustly” with their eyes during perceptual decision-making.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>28223519</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.1613950114</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-8424
ispartof Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2017-03, Vol.114 (10), p.2771-2776
issn 0027-8424
1091-6490
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5347592
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Biological Sciences
Choice Behavior - physiology
Decision making
Decision Making - physiology
Eye movements
Eye Movements - physiology
Female
Human subjects
Humans
Information processing
Judgment
Learning
Male
Sensory perception
Social Sciences
Visual Perception - physiology
title Robust sampling of decision information during perceptual choice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A33%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robust%20sampling%20of%20decision%20information%20during%20perceptual%20choice&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Vandormael,%20Hildward&rft.date=2017-03-07&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2771&rft.epage=2776&rft.pages=2771-2776&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.1613950114&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26480104%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1881969061&rft_id=info:pmid/28223519&rft_jstor_id=26480104&rfr_iscdi=true