Robust sampling of decision information during perceptual choice
Humans move their eyes to gather information about the visual world. However, saccadic sampling has largely been explored in paradigms that involve searching for a lone target in a cluttered array or natural scene. Here, we investigated the policy that humans use to overtly sample information in a p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2017-03, Vol.114 (10), p.2771-2776 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2776 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2771 |
container_title | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS |
container_volume | 114 |
creator | Vandormael, Hildward Castañón, Santiago Herce Balaguer, Jan Li, Vickie Summerfield, Christopher |
description | Humans move their eyes to gather information about the visual world. However, saccadic sampling has largely been explored in paradigms that involve searching for a lone target in a cluttered array or natural scene. Here, we investigated the policy that humans use to overtly sample information in a perceptual decision task that required information from across multiple spatial locations to be combined. Participants viewed a spatial array of numbers and judged whether the average was greater or smaller than a reference value. Participants preferentially sampled items that were less diagnostic of the correct answer (“inlying” elements; that is, elements closer to the reference value). This preference to sample inlying items was linked to decisions, enhancing the tendency to give more weight to inlying elements in the final choice (“robust averaging”). These findings contrast with a large body of evidence indicating that gaze is directed preferentially to deviant information during natural scene viewing and visual search, and suggest that humans may sample information “robustly” with their eyes during perceptual decision-making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1073/pnas.1613950114 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5347592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26480104</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26480104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-19342ee9016adfa7f21889db1646cb29b288c3b893fa56dd4e962997ef665a003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1v1TAQxC1ERR8PzpxAkXrhknbXdhzvBYEqvqRKlRCcLcdxWj8lcbATJP77JnqlBU62ND-Pd3YYe4VwjlCLi2m0-RwVCqoAUT5hOwTCUkmCp2wHwOtSSy5P2fOcDwBAlYZn7JRrzkWFtGPvv8VmyXOR7TD1YbwpYle03oUc4liEsYtpsPN2b5e0yZNPzk_zYvvC3cbg_At20tk--5f35579-PTx--WX8ur689fLD1elq4DmEklI7j0BKtt2tu44ak1tg0oq13BquNZONJpEZyvVttKT4kS175SqLIDYs3dH32lpBt86P87J9mZKYbDpt4k2mH-VMdyam_jLVELWFfHV4O29QYo_F59nM4TsfN_b0cclG9Q1kFZcbn-d_Yce4pLGNd5KaSRFsK58zy6OlEsx5-S7h2EQzNaO2doxj-2sL978neGB_1PHCrw-Aoc8x_SoK6kBQYo7qbWVSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1881969061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robust sampling of decision information during perceptual choice</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Vandormael, Hildward ; Castañón, Santiago Herce ; Balaguer, Jan ; Li, Vickie ; Summerfield, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Vandormael, Hildward ; Castañón, Santiago Herce ; Balaguer, Jan ; Li, Vickie ; Summerfield, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>Humans move their eyes to gather information about the visual world. However, saccadic sampling has largely been explored in paradigms that involve searching for a lone target in a cluttered array or natural scene. Here, we investigated the policy that humans use to overtly sample information in a perceptual decision task that required information from across multiple spatial locations to be combined. Participants viewed a spatial array of numbers and judged whether the average was greater or smaller than a reference value. Participants preferentially sampled items that were less diagnostic of the correct answer (“inlying” elements; that is, elements closer to the reference value). This preference to sample inlying items was linked to decisions, enhancing the tendency to give more weight to inlying elements in the final choice (“robust averaging”). These findings contrast with a large body of evidence indicating that gaze is directed preferentially to deviant information during natural scene viewing and visual search, and suggest that humans may sample information “robustly” with their eyes during perceptual decision-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1613950114</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28223519</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Biological Sciences ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Decision making ; Decision Making - physiology ; Eye movements ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Female ; Human subjects ; Humans ; Information processing ; Judgment ; Learning ; Male ; Sensory perception ; Social Sciences ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2017-03, Vol.114 (10), p.2771-2776</ispartof><rights>Volumes 1–89 and 106–114, copyright as a collective work only; author(s) retains copyright to individual articles</rights><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Mar 7, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-19342ee9016adfa7f21889db1646cb29b288c3b893fa56dd4e962997ef665a003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-19342ee9016adfa7f21889db1646cb29b288c3b893fa56dd4e962997ef665a003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26480104$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26480104$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28223519$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vandormael, Hildward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castañón, Santiago Herce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balaguer, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Vickie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summerfield, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Robust sampling of decision information during perceptual choice</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>Humans move their eyes to gather information about the visual world. However, saccadic sampling has largely been explored in paradigms that involve searching for a lone target in a cluttered array or natural scene. Here, we investigated the policy that humans use to overtly sample information in a perceptual decision task that required information from across multiple spatial locations to be combined. Participants viewed a spatial array of numbers and judged whether the average was greater or smaller than a reference value. Participants preferentially sampled items that were less diagnostic of the correct answer (“inlying” elements; that is, elements closer to the reference value). This preference to sample inlying items was linked to decisions, enhancing the tendency to give more weight to inlying elements in the final choice (“robust averaging”). These findings contrast with a large body of evidence indicating that gaze is directed preferentially to deviant information during natural scene viewing and visual search, and suggest that humans may sample information “robustly” with their eyes during perceptual decision-making.</description><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision Making - physiology</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human subjects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1v1TAQxC1ERR8PzpxAkXrhknbXdhzvBYEqvqRKlRCcLcdxWj8lcbATJP77JnqlBU62ND-Pd3YYe4VwjlCLi2m0-RwVCqoAUT5hOwTCUkmCp2wHwOtSSy5P2fOcDwBAlYZn7JRrzkWFtGPvv8VmyXOR7TD1YbwpYle03oUc4liEsYtpsPN2b5e0yZNPzk_zYvvC3cbg_At20tk--5f35579-PTx--WX8ur689fLD1elq4DmEklI7j0BKtt2tu44ak1tg0oq13BquNZONJpEZyvVttKT4kS175SqLIDYs3dH32lpBt86P87J9mZKYbDpt4k2mH-VMdyam_jLVELWFfHV4O29QYo_F59nM4TsfN_b0cclG9Q1kFZcbn-d_Yce4pLGNd5KaSRFsK58zy6OlEsx5-S7h2EQzNaO2doxj-2sL978neGB_1PHCrw-Aoc8x_SoK6kBQYo7qbWVSg</recordid><startdate>20170307</startdate><enddate>20170307</enddate><creator>Vandormael, Hildward</creator><creator>Castañón, Santiago Herce</creator><creator>Balaguer, Jan</creator><creator>Li, Vickie</creator><creator>Summerfield, Christopher</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170307</creationdate><title>Robust sampling of decision information during perceptual choice</title><author>Vandormael, Hildward ; Castañón, Santiago Herce ; Balaguer, Jan ; Li, Vickie ; Summerfield, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-19342ee9016adfa7f21889db1646cb29b288c3b893fa56dd4e962997ef665a003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision Making - physiology</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human subjects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vandormael, Hildward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castañón, Santiago Herce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balaguer, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Vickie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summerfield, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vandormael, Hildward</au><au>Castañón, Santiago Herce</au><au>Balaguer, Jan</au><au>Li, Vickie</au><au>Summerfield, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robust sampling of decision information during perceptual choice</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2017-03-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2771</spage><epage>2776</epage><pages>2771-2776</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Humans move their eyes to gather information about the visual world. However, saccadic sampling has largely been explored in paradigms that involve searching for a lone target in a cluttered array or natural scene. Here, we investigated the policy that humans use to overtly sample information in a perceptual decision task that required information from across multiple spatial locations to be combined. Participants viewed a spatial array of numbers and judged whether the average was greater or smaller than a reference value. Participants preferentially sampled items that were less diagnostic of the correct answer (“inlying” elements; that is, elements closer to the reference value). This preference to sample inlying items was linked to decisions, enhancing the tendency to give more weight to inlying elements in the final choice (“robust averaging”). These findings contrast with a large body of evidence indicating that gaze is directed preferentially to deviant information during natural scene viewing and visual search, and suggest that humans may sample information “robustly” with their eyes during perceptual decision-making.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>28223519</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.1613950114</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0027-8424 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2017-03, Vol.114 (10), p.2771-2776 |
issn | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5347592 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Biological Sciences Choice Behavior - physiology Decision making Decision Making - physiology Eye movements Eye Movements - physiology Female Human subjects Humans Information processing Judgment Learning Male Sensory perception Social Sciences Visual Perception - physiology |
title | Robust sampling of decision information during perceptual choice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A33%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robust%20sampling%20of%20decision%20information%20during%20perceptual%20choice&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Vandormael,%20Hildward&rft.date=2017-03-07&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2771&rft.epage=2776&rft.pages=2771-2776&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.1613950114&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26480104%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1881969061&rft_id=info:pmid/28223519&rft_jstor_id=26480104&rfr_iscdi=true |