The Conditional Process Model of Mindfulness and Emotion Regulation: An Empirical Test
Abstract Background The conditional process model (CPM) of mindfulness and emotion regulation posits that specific mediators and moderators link these constructs to mental health outcomes. The current study empirically examined the central tenets of the CPM, which posit that nonreactivity moderates...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of affective disorders 2017-04, Vol.212, p.93-100 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 100 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 93 |
| container_title | Journal of affective disorders |
| container_volume | 212 |
| creator | Curtiss, Joshua Klemanski, David H Andrews, Leigh Ito, Masaya Hofmann, Stefan G |
| description | Abstract Background The conditional process model (CPM) of mindfulness and emotion regulation posits that specific mediators and moderators link these constructs to mental health outcomes. The current study empirically examined the central tenets of the CPM, which posit that nonreactivity moderates the indirect effect of observation on symptoms of emotional disorders through cognitive emotion regulation strategies. Methods A clinical sample (n=1667) of individuals from Japan completed a battery of self-report instruments. Several path analyses were conducted to determine whether cognitive emotion regulation strategies mediate the relationship between observation and symptoms of individual emotional disorders, and to determine whether nonreactivity moderated these indirect effects. Results Results provided support the CPM. Specifically, nonreactivity moderated the indirect effect of observation on symptoms through reappraisal, but it did not moderate the indirect effect of observation on symptoms through suppression. Limitations Causal interpretations are limited, and cultural considerations must be acknowledged given the Japanese sample Conclusions These results underscore the potential importance of nonreactivity and emotion regulation as targets for interventions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.027 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5340204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0165032716315555</els_id><sourcerecordid>1865543063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-5e4eacf99189c8cfa234df8e4f11489f6eb5f5f5b35406df8aa803e144a69713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1vFDEMjRCIbgs_gAuaI5cZ8jkfIFWqVi0gtWoFK65RNnHaDNlkSWYq9d-T0ZYKOJAcYtnPL7afEXpDcEMwad-PzahMQzHpGkwaTLtnaEVEx2oqSPccrQpG1JjR7ggd5zxijNuhwy_REe0LTAi6Qt83d1CtYzBucjEoX92kqCHn6ioa8FW01ZULxs4-LE4VTHW-iwu0-gq3s1eL-aE6C8W9d8npwrCBPL1CL6zyGV4_vidoc3G-WX-uL68_fVmfXdZadHSqBXBQ2g4D6Qfda6so48b2wC0hvB9sC1thy90ywXFbIkr1mAHhXJVOCDtBpwfa_bzdgdEQpqS83Ce3U-lBRuXk35Hg7uRtvJeCcUwxLwTvHglS_DmXwuXOZQ3eqwBxzpL0rRCc4ZYVKDlAdYo5J7BP3xAsFznkKIsccpFDYiKLHCXn7Z_1PWX8nn8BfDwAoAzp3kGSWTsIGoxLoCdpovsv_ek_2dq7sIjwAx4gj3FORdLShcxUYvlt2YdlHUjLiCiH_QJu4bC0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865543063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Conditional Process Model of Mindfulness and Emotion Regulation: An Empirical Test</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Curtiss, Joshua ; Klemanski, David H ; Andrews, Leigh ; Ito, Masaya ; Hofmann, Stefan G</creator><creatorcontrib>Curtiss, Joshua ; Klemanski, David H ; Andrews, Leigh ; Ito, Masaya ; Hofmann, Stefan G</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The conditional process model (CPM) of mindfulness and emotion regulation posits that specific mediators and moderators link these constructs to mental health outcomes. The current study empirically examined the central tenets of the CPM, which posit that nonreactivity moderates the indirect effect of observation on symptoms of emotional disorders through cognitive emotion regulation strategies. Methods A clinical sample (n=1667) of individuals from Japan completed a battery of self-report instruments. Several path analyses were conducted to determine whether cognitive emotion regulation strategies mediate the relationship between observation and symptoms of individual emotional disorders, and to determine whether nonreactivity moderated these indirect effects. Results Results provided support the CPM. Specifically, nonreactivity moderated the indirect effect of observation on symptoms through reappraisal, but it did not moderate the indirect effect of observation on symptoms through suppression. Limitations Causal interpretations are limited, and cultural considerations must be acknowledged given the Japanese sample Conclusions These results underscore the potential importance of nonreactivity and emotion regulation as targets for interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28157552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anxiety ; Conditional process model ; Depression ; Emotion regulation ; Emotions ; Female ; Humans ; Japan ; Male ; Mediators ; Mindfulness ; Moderators ; Mood Disorders - psychology ; Mood Disorders - therapy ; Psychiatry ; Self Report</subject><ispartof>Journal of affective disorders, 2017-04, Vol.212, p.93-100</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-5e4eacf99189c8cfa234df8e4f11489f6eb5f5f5b35406df8aa803e144a69713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-5e4eacf99189c8cfa234df8e4f11489f6eb5f5f5b35406df8aa803e144a69713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28157552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Curtiss, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klemanski, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Leigh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Masaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Stefan G</creatorcontrib><title>The Conditional Process Model of Mindfulness and Emotion Regulation: An Empirical Test</title><title>Journal of affective disorders</title><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The conditional process model (CPM) of mindfulness and emotion regulation posits that specific mediators and moderators link these constructs to mental health outcomes. The current study empirically examined the central tenets of the CPM, which posit that nonreactivity moderates the indirect effect of observation on symptoms of emotional disorders through cognitive emotion regulation strategies. Methods A clinical sample (n=1667) of individuals from Japan completed a battery of self-report instruments. Several path analyses were conducted to determine whether cognitive emotion regulation strategies mediate the relationship between observation and symptoms of individual emotional disorders, and to determine whether nonreactivity moderated these indirect effects. Results Results provided support the CPM. Specifically, nonreactivity moderated the indirect effect of observation on symptoms through reappraisal, but it did not moderate the indirect effect of observation on symptoms through suppression. Limitations Causal interpretations are limited, and cultural considerations must be acknowledged given the Japanese sample Conclusions These results underscore the potential importance of nonreactivity and emotion regulation as targets for interventions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Conditional process model</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Emotion regulation</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mediators</subject><subject>Mindfulness</subject><subject>Moderators</subject><subject>Mood Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Mood Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><issn>0165-0327</issn><issn>1573-2517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1vFDEMjRCIbgs_gAuaI5cZ8jkfIFWqVi0gtWoFK65RNnHaDNlkSWYq9d-T0ZYKOJAcYtnPL7afEXpDcEMwad-PzahMQzHpGkwaTLtnaEVEx2oqSPccrQpG1JjR7ggd5zxijNuhwy_REe0LTAi6Qt83d1CtYzBucjEoX92kqCHn6ioa8FW01ZULxs4-LE4VTHW-iwu0-gq3s1eL-aE6C8W9d8npwrCBPL1CL6zyGV4_vidoc3G-WX-uL68_fVmfXdZadHSqBXBQ2g4D6Qfda6so48b2wC0hvB9sC1thy90ywXFbIkr1mAHhXJVOCDtBpwfa_bzdgdEQpqS83Ce3U-lBRuXk35Hg7uRtvJeCcUwxLwTvHglS_DmXwuXOZQ3eqwBxzpL0rRCc4ZYVKDlAdYo5J7BP3xAsFznkKIsccpFDYiKLHCXn7Z_1PWX8nn8BfDwAoAzp3kGSWTsIGoxLoCdpovsv_ek_2dq7sIjwAx4gj3FORdLShcxUYvlt2YdlHUjLiCiH_QJu4bC0</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Curtiss, Joshua</creator><creator>Klemanski, David H</creator><creator>Andrews, Leigh</creator><creator>Ito, Masaya</creator><creator>Hofmann, Stefan G</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>The Conditional Process Model of Mindfulness and Emotion Regulation: An Empirical Test</title><author>Curtiss, Joshua ; Klemanski, David H ; Andrews, Leigh ; Ito, Masaya ; Hofmann, Stefan G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-5e4eacf99189c8cfa234df8e4f11489f6eb5f5f5b35406df8aa803e144a69713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Conditional process model</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Emotion regulation</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mediators</topic><topic>Mindfulness</topic><topic>Moderators</topic><topic>Mood Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Mood Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Curtiss, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klemanski, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Leigh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Masaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Stefan G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Curtiss, Joshua</au><au>Klemanski, David H</au><au>Andrews, Leigh</au><au>Ito, Masaya</au><au>Hofmann, Stefan G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Conditional Process Model of Mindfulness and Emotion Regulation: An Empirical Test</atitle><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>212</volume><spage>93</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>93-100</pages><issn>0165-0327</issn><eissn>1573-2517</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The conditional process model (CPM) of mindfulness and emotion regulation posits that specific mediators and moderators link these constructs to mental health outcomes. The current study empirically examined the central tenets of the CPM, which posit that nonreactivity moderates the indirect effect of observation on symptoms of emotional disorders through cognitive emotion regulation strategies. Methods A clinical sample (n=1667) of individuals from Japan completed a battery of self-report instruments. Several path analyses were conducted to determine whether cognitive emotion regulation strategies mediate the relationship between observation and symptoms of individual emotional disorders, and to determine whether nonreactivity moderated these indirect effects. Results Results provided support the CPM. Specifically, nonreactivity moderated the indirect effect of observation on symptoms through reappraisal, but it did not moderate the indirect effect of observation on symptoms through suppression. Limitations Causal interpretations are limited, and cultural considerations must be acknowledged given the Japanese sample Conclusions These results underscore the potential importance of nonreactivity and emotion regulation as targets for interventions.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28157552</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.027</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0165-0327 |
| ispartof | Journal of affective disorders, 2017-04, Vol.212, p.93-100 |
| issn | 0165-0327 1573-2517 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5340204 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adult Anxiety Conditional process model Depression Emotion regulation Emotions Female Humans Japan Male Mediators Mindfulness Moderators Mood Disorders - psychology Mood Disorders - therapy Psychiatry Self Report |
| title | The Conditional Process Model of Mindfulness and Emotion Regulation: An Empirical Test |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T00%3A16%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Conditional%20Process%20Model%20of%20Mindfulness%20and%20Emotion%20Regulation:%20An%20Empirical%20Test&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20affective%20disorders&rft.au=Curtiss,%20Joshua&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=212&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=93-100&rft.issn=0165-0327&rft.eissn=1573-2517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1865543063%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865543063&rft_id=info:pmid/28157552&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0165032716315555&rfr_iscdi=true |