Differences in Ureolytic Bacterial Composition between the Rumen Digesta and Rumen Wall Based on ureC Gene Classification

Ureolytic bacteria are key organisms in the rumen producing urease enzymes to catalyze the breakdown of urea to ammonia for the synthesis of microbial protein. However, little is known about the diversity and distribution of rumen ureolytic microorganisms. The urease gene ( ) has been the target gen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in microbiology 2017-03, Vol.8, p.385-385
Hauptverfasser: Jin, Di, Zhao, Shengguo, Zheng, Nan, Bu, Dengpan, Beckers, Yves, Denman, Stuart E, McSweeney, Christopher S, Wang, Jiaqi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 385
container_issue
container_start_page 385
container_title Frontiers in microbiology
container_volume 8
creator Jin, Di
Zhao, Shengguo
Zheng, Nan
Bu, Dengpan
Beckers, Yves
Denman, Stuart E
McSweeney, Christopher S
Wang, Jiaqi
description Ureolytic bacteria are key organisms in the rumen producing urease enzymes to catalyze the breakdown of urea to ammonia for the synthesis of microbial protein. However, little is known about the diversity and distribution of rumen ureolytic microorganisms. The urease gene ( ) has been the target gene of choice for analysis of the urea-degrading microorganisms in various environments. In this study, we investigated the predominant genes of the ureolytic bacteria in the rumen of dairy cows using high-throughput sequencing. Six dairy cows with rumen fistulas were assigned to a two-period cross-over trial. A control group ( = 3) were fed a total mixed ration without urea and the treatment group ( = 3) were fed rations plus 180 g urea per cow per day at three separate times. Rumen bacterial samples from liquid and solid digesta and rumen wall fractions were collected for gene amplification and sequencing using Miseq. The wall-adherent bacteria (WAB) had a distinct ureolytic bacterial profile compared to the solid-adherent bacteria (SAB) and liquid-associated bacteria (LAB) but more than 55% of the sequences did not affiliate with any known taxonomically assigned urease genes. Diversity analysis of the genes showed that the Shannon and Chao1 indices for the rumen WAB was lower than those observed for the SAB and LAB ( < 0.01). The most abundant genes were affiliated with Methylococcaceae, Clostridiaceae, Paenibacillaceae, Helicobacteraceae, and Methylophilaceae families. Compared with the rumen LAB and SAB, relative abundance of the OTUs affiliated with and genera were significantly higher ( < 0.05) in the WAB. Supplementation with urea did not alter the composition of the detected ureolytic bacteria. This study has identified significant populations of ureolytic WAB representing genera that have not been recognized or studied previously in the rumen. The taxonomic classification of rumen genes in the dairy cow indicates that the majority of ureolytic bacteria are yet to be identified. This survey has expanded our knowledge of gene information relating to the rumen ureolytic microbial community, and provides a basis for obtaining regulatory targets of ureolytic bacteria to moderate urea hydrolysis in the rumen.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00385
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5339240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1880086718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-2fb31e155c62c44a017c0f7fe47006115822cc6296caa79a5ae677c78f7cb5863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc9vFCEUx4nR2Kbt3ZPh6GVXfswAczHRqVaTJk1Mm3ojDPvYYhhYYabN_veyP2wqh8cL732-8Pgi9I6SJeeq--hGb4clI1QuCeGqfYVOqRDNghP26_WL_ARdlPKb1NUQVuNbdMIUZ4LI7hRtL71zkCFaKNhHfJchhe3kLf5i7ATZm4D7NG5S8ZNPEQ8wPQFEPD0A_jmPNbv0ayiTwSaujif3JoSKF1jhSswZenwFEXAfTCneeWt2UufojTOhwMVxP0N3377e9t8X1zdXP_rP1wvbEjEtmBs4Bdq2VjDbNKaOa4mTDhpJiKC0VYzZWuuENUZ2pjUgpLRSOWmHVgl-hj4ddDfzMMLKQpyyCXqT_WjyVifj9f-V6B_0Oj3qlvOONaQK8INA8LAGnfLg9SPbg_t8DmttrB5AMyZUDZQ0qlIfjtfm9GeuP6RHXyyEYCKkuWiqFCFKSLprJYdWm1MpGdzz4yjRO6v13mq9s1rvra7I-5dDPQP_jOV_AYpipto</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880086718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in Ureolytic Bacterial Composition between the Rumen Digesta and Rumen Wall Based on ureC Gene Classification</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Jin, Di ; Zhao, Shengguo ; Zheng, Nan ; Bu, Dengpan ; Beckers, Yves ; Denman, Stuart E ; McSweeney, Christopher S ; Wang, Jiaqi</creator><creatorcontrib>Jin, Di ; Zhao, Shengguo ; Zheng, Nan ; Bu, Dengpan ; Beckers, Yves ; Denman, Stuart E ; McSweeney, Christopher S ; Wang, Jiaqi</creatorcontrib><description>Ureolytic bacteria are key organisms in the rumen producing urease enzymes to catalyze the breakdown of urea to ammonia for the synthesis of microbial protein. However, little is known about the diversity and distribution of rumen ureolytic microorganisms. The urease gene ( ) has been the target gene of choice for analysis of the urea-degrading microorganisms in various environments. In this study, we investigated the predominant genes of the ureolytic bacteria in the rumen of dairy cows using high-throughput sequencing. Six dairy cows with rumen fistulas were assigned to a two-period cross-over trial. A control group ( = 3) were fed a total mixed ration without urea and the treatment group ( = 3) were fed rations plus 180 g urea per cow per day at three separate times. Rumen bacterial samples from liquid and solid digesta and rumen wall fractions were collected for gene amplification and sequencing using Miseq. The wall-adherent bacteria (WAB) had a distinct ureolytic bacterial profile compared to the solid-adherent bacteria (SAB) and liquid-associated bacteria (LAB) but more than 55% of the sequences did not affiliate with any known taxonomically assigned urease genes. Diversity analysis of the genes showed that the Shannon and Chao1 indices for the rumen WAB was lower than those observed for the SAB and LAB ( &lt; 0.01). The most abundant genes were affiliated with Methylococcaceae, Clostridiaceae, Paenibacillaceae, Helicobacteraceae, and Methylophilaceae families. Compared with the rumen LAB and SAB, relative abundance of the OTUs affiliated with and genera were significantly higher ( &lt; 0.05) in the WAB. Supplementation with urea did not alter the composition of the detected ureolytic bacteria. This study has identified significant populations of ureolytic WAB representing genera that have not been recognized or studied previously in the rumen. The taxonomic classification of rumen genes in the dairy cow indicates that the majority of ureolytic bacteria are yet to be identified. This survey has expanded our knowledge of gene information relating to the rumen ureolytic microbial community, and provides a basis for obtaining regulatory targets of ureolytic bacteria to moderate urea hydrolysis in the rumen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-302X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-302X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00385</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28326079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Research Foundation</publisher><subject>Animal production &amp; animal husbandry ; Clostridiaceae ; Difference ; Helicobacteraceae ; Life sciences ; Marinobacter ; Methylococcaceae ; Methylophilaceae ; Microbiology ; Oxalobacteraceae ; Paenibacillaceae ; Productions animales &amp; zootechnie ; Rumen digesta ; Rumen wall ; Sciences du vivant ; UreC gene ; Ureolytic bacteria</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in microbiology, 2017-03, Vol.8, p.385-385</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Jin, Zhao, Zheng, Bu, Beckers, Denman, McSweeney and Wang. 2017 Jin, Zhao, Zheng, Bu, Beckers, Denman, McSweeney and Wang</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-2fb31e155c62c44a017c0f7fe47006115822cc6296caa79a5ae677c78f7cb5863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-2fb31e155c62c44a017c0f7fe47006115822cc6296caa79a5ae677c78f7cb5863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5339240/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5339240/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jin, Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Shengguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bu, Dengpan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckers, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denman, Stuart E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McSweeney, Christopher S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jiaqi</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in Ureolytic Bacterial Composition between the Rumen Digesta and Rumen Wall Based on ureC Gene Classification</title><title>Frontiers in microbiology</title><addtitle>Front Microbiol</addtitle><description>Ureolytic bacteria are key organisms in the rumen producing urease enzymes to catalyze the breakdown of urea to ammonia for the synthesis of microbial protein. However, little is known about the diversity and distribution of rumen ureolytic microorganisms. The urease gene ( ) has been the target gene of choice for analysis of the urea-degrading microorganisms in various environments. In this study, we investigated the predominant genes of the ureolytic bacteria in the rumen of dairy cows using high-throughput sequencing. Six dairy cows with rumen fistulas were assigned to a two-period cross-over trial. A control group ( = 3) were fed a total mixed ration without urea and the treatment group ( = 3) were fed rations plus 180 g urea per cow per day at three separate times. Rumen bacterial samples from liquid and solid digesta and rumen wall fractions were collected for gene amplification and sequencing using Miseq. The wall-adherent bacteria (WAB) had a distinct ureolytic bacterial profile compared to the solid-adherent bacteria (SAB) and liquid-associated bacteria (LAB) but more than 55% of the sequences did not affiliate with any known taxonomically assigned urease genes. Diversity analysis of the genes showed that the Shannon and Chao1 indices for the rumen WAB was lower than those observed for the SAB and LAB ( &lt; 0.01). The most abundant genes were affiliated with Methylococcaceae, Clostridiaceae, Paenibacillaceae, Helicobacteraceae, and Methylophilaceae families. Compared with the rumen LAB and SAB, relative abundance of the OTUs affiliated with and genera were significantly higher ( &lt; 0.05) in the WAB. Supplementation with urea did not alter the composition of the detected ureolytic bacteria. This study has identified significant populations of ureolytic WAB representing genera that have not been recognized or studied previously in the rumen. The taxonomic classification of rumen genes in the dairy cow indicates that the majority of ureolytic bacteria are yet to be identified. This survey has expanded our knowledge of gene information relating to the rumen ureolytic microbial community, and provides a basis for obtaining regulatory targets of ureolytic bacteria to moderate urea hydrolysis in the rumen.</description><subject>Animal production &amp; animal husbandry</subject><subject>Clostridiaceae</subject><subject>Difference</subject><subject>Helicobacteraceae</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Marinobacter</subject><subject>Methylococcaceae</subject><subject>Methylophilaceae</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Oxalobacteraceae</subject><subject>Paenibacillaceae</subject><subject>Productions animales &amp; zootechnie</subject><subject>Rumen digesta</subject><subject>Rumen wall</subject><subject>Sciences du vivant</subject><subject>UreC gene</subject><subject>Ureolytic bacteria</subject><issn>1664-302X</issn><issn>1664-302X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc9vFCEUx4nR2Kbt3ZPh6GVXfswAczHRqVaTJk1Mm3ojDPvYYhhYYabN_veyP2wqh8cL732-8Pgi9I6SJeeq--hGb4clI1QuCeGqfYVOqRDNghP26_WL_ARdlPKb1NUQVuNbdMIUZ4LI7hRtL71zkCFaKNhHfJchhe3kLf5i7ATZm4D7NG5S8ZNPEQ8wPQFEPD0A_jmPNbv0ayiTwSaujif3JoSKF1jhSswZenwFEXAfTCneeWt2UufojTOhwMVxP0N3377e9t8X1zdXP_rP1wvbEjEtmBs4Bdq2VjDbNKaOa4mTDhpJiKC0VYzZWuuENUZ2pjUgpLRSOWmHVgl-hj4ddDfzMMLKQpyyCXqT_WjyVifj9f-V6B_0Oj3qlvOONaQK8INA8LAGnfLg9SPbg_t8DmttrB5AMyZUDZQ0qlIfjtfm9GeuP6RHXyyEYCKkuWiqFCFKSLprJYdWm1MpGdzz4yjRO6v13mq9s1rvra7I-5dDPQP_jOV_AYpipto</recordid><startdate>20170307</startdate><enddate>20170307</enddate><creator>Jin, Di</creator><creator>Zhao, Shengguo</creator><creator>Zheng, Nan</creator><creator>Bu, Dengpan</creator><creator>Beckers, Yves</creator><creator>Denman, Stuart E</creator><creator>McSweeney, Christopher S</creator><creator>Wang, Jiaqi</creator><general>Frontiers Research Foundation</general><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>Q33</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170307</creationdate><title>Differences in Ureolytic Bacterial Composition between the Rumen Digesta and Rumen Wall Based on ureC Gene Classification</title><author>Jin, Di ; Zhao, Shengguo ; Zheng, Nan ; Bu, Dengpan ; Beckers, Yves ; Denman, Stuart E ; McSweeney, Christopher S ; Wang, Jiaqi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-2fb31e155c62c44a017c0f7fe47006115822cc6296caa79a5ae677c78f7cb5863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal production &amp; animal husbandry</topic><topic>Clostridiaceae</topic><topic>Difference</topic><topic>Helicobacteraceae</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Marinobacter</topic><topic>Methylococcaceae</topic><topic>Methylophilaceae</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Oxalobacteraceae</topic><topic>Paenibacillaceae</topic><topic>Productions animales &amp; zootechnie</topic><topic>Rumen digesta</topic><topic>Rumen wall</topic><topic>Sciences du vivant</topic><topic>UreC gene</topic><topic>Ureolytic bacteria</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jin, Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Shengguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bu, Dengpan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckers, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denman, Stuart E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McSweeney, Christopher S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jiaqi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Université de Liège - Open Repository and Bibliography (ORBI)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jin, Di</au><au>Zhao, Shengguo</au><au>Zheng, Nan</au><au>Bu, Dengpan</au><au>Beckers, Yves</au><au>Denman, Stuart E</au><au>McSweeney, Christopher S</au><au>Wang, Jiaqi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in Ureolytic Bacterial Composition between the Rumen Digesta and Rumen Wall Based on ureC Gene Classification</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Microbiol</addtitle><date>2017-03-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>8</volume><spage>385</spage><epage>385</epage><pages>385-385</pages><issn>1664-302X</issn><eissn>1664-302X</eissn><abstract>Ureolytic bacteria are key organisms in the rumen producing urease enzymes to catalyze the breakdown of urea to ammonia for the synthesis of microbial protein. However, little is known about the diversity and distribution of rumen ureolytic microorganisms. The urease gene ( ) has been the target gene of choice for analysis of the urea-degrading microorganisms in various environments. In this study, we investigated the predominant genes of the ureolytic bacteria in the rumen of dairy cows using high-throughput sequencing. Six dairy cows with rumen fistulas were assigned to a two-period cross-over trial. A control group ( = 3) were fed a total mixed ration without urea and the treatment group ( = 3) were fed rations plus 180 g urea per cow per day at three separate times. Rumen bacterial samples from liquid and solid digesta and rumen wall fractions were collected for gene amplification and sequencing using Miseq. The wall-adherent bacteria (WAB) had a distinct ureolytic bacterial profile compared to the solid-adherent bacteria (SAB) and liquid-associated bacteria (LAB) but more than 55% of the sequences did not affiliate with any known taxonomically assigned urease genes. Diversity analysis of the genes showed that the Shannon and Chao1 indices for the rumen WAB was lower than those observed for the SAB and LAB ( &lt; 0.01). The most abundant genes were affiliated with Methylococcaceae, Clostridiaceae, Paenibacillaceae, Helicobacteraceae, and Methylophilaceae families. Compared with the rumen LAB and SAB, relative abundance of the OTUs affiliated with and genera were significantly higher ( &lt; 0.05) in the WAB. Supplementation with urea did not alter the composition of the detected ureolytic bacteria. This study has identified significant populations of ureolytic WAB representing genera that have not been recognized or studied previously in the rumen. The taxonomic classification of rumen genes in the dairy cow indicates that the majority of ureolytic bacteria are yet to be identified. This survey has expanded our knowledge of gene information relating to the rumen ureolytic microbial community, and provides a basis for obtaining regulatory targets of ureolytic bacteria to moderate urea hydrolysis in the rumen.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Research Foundation</pub><pmid>28326079</pmid><doi>10.3389/fmicb.2017.00385</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-302X
ispartof Frontiers in microbiology, 2017-03, Vol.8, p.385-385
issn 1664-302X
1664-302X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5339240
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Animal production & animal husbandry
Clostridiaceae
Difference
Helicobacteraceae
Life sciences
Marinobacter
Methylococcaceae
Methylophilaceae
Microbiology
Oxalobacteraceae
Paenibacillaceae
Productions animales & zootechnie
Rumen digesta
Rumen wall
Sciences du vivant
UreC gene
Ureolytic bacteria
title Differences in Ureolytic Bacterial Composition between the Rumen Digesta and Rumen Wall Based on ureC Gene Classification
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A24%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20Ureolytic%20Bacterial%20Composition%20between%20the%20Rumen%20Digesta%20and%20Rumen%20Wall%20Based%20on%20ureC%20Gene%20Classification&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20microbiology&rft.au=Jin,%20Di&rft.date=2017-03-07&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=385&rft.pages=385-385&rft.issn=1664-302X&rft.eissn=1664-302X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00385&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1880086718%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880086718&rft_id=info:pmid/28326079&rfr_iscdi=true