Best time to assess complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a post-hoc analysis of randomised controlled phase 3 trial
Summary Background Guidelines for anal cancer recommend assessment of response at 6–12 weeks after starting treatment. Using data from the ACT II trial, we determined the optimum timepoint to assess clinical tumour response after chemoradiotherapy. Methods The previously reported ACT II trial was a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The lancet oncology 2017-03, Vol.18 (3), p.347-356 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 356 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 347 |
container_title | The lancet oncology |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Glynne-Jones, Robert, Dr Sebag-Montefiore, David, Prof Meadows, Helen M, MSc Cunningham, David, Prof Begum, Rubina, BSc Adab, Fawzi, FRCR Benstead, Kim, MD Harte, Robert J, MD Stewart, Jill, FRCR Beare, Sandy, PhD Hackshaw, Allan, Prof Kadalayil, Latha, PhD |
description | Summary Background Guidelines for anal cancer recommend assessment of response at 6–12 weeks after starting treatment. Using data from the ACT II trial, we determined the optimum timepoint to assess clinical tumour response after chemoradiotherapy. Methods The previously reported ACT II trial was a phase 3 randomised trial of patients of any age with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, squamous cell carcinoma of the anus without metastatic disease from 59 centres in the UK. We randomly assigned patients (by minimisation) to receive either intravenous mitomycin (one dose of 12 mg/m2 on day 1) or intravenous cisplatin (one dose of 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29), with intravenous fluorouracil (one dose of 1000 mg/m2 per day on days 1–4 and 29–32) and radiotherapy (50·4 Gy in 28 daily fractions); and also did a second randomisation after initial therapy to maintenance chemotherapy (fluorouracil and cisplatin) or no maintenance chemotherapy. The primary outcome was complete clinical response (the absence of primary and nodal tumour by clinical examination), in addition to overall survival and progression-free survival from time of randomisation. In this post-hoc analysis, we analysed complete clinical response at three timepoints: 11 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 1), 18 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 2), and 26 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 3) as well as the overall and progression-free survival estimates of patients with complete clinical response or without complete clinical response at each assessment. We analysed both the overall trial population and a subgroup of patients who had attended each of the three assessments by modified intention-to-treat. This study is registered at controlled-trials.com , ISRCTN 26715889. Findings We enrolled 940 patients from June 4, 2001, until Dec 16, 2008. Complete clinical response was achieved in 492 (52%) of 940 patients at assessment 1 (11 weeks), 665 (71%) of patients at assessment 2 (18 weeks), and 730 (78%) of patients at assessment 3 (26 weeks). 691 patients attended all three assessments and in this subgroup, complete clinical response was reported in 441 (64%) patients at assessment 1, 556 (80%) at assessment 2, and 590 (85%) at assessments 3. 151 (72%) of the 209 patients who had not had a complete clinical response at assessment 1 had a complete clinical response by assessment 3. In the overall trial population of 940 patients, 5 year over |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30071-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5337624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1470204517300712</els_id><sourcerecordid>4318824041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c611t-7cf69e40e2cb9389d23b4c3e968783bca331b02d1cfca5784d84a197f303b1473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks9u1DAQxiMEoqXwCCBLXLaHgP8ldji0KqsWVqrEgXK2HGfCujhxansr7WvxhDi7bYEe4BQr85tvZj59RfGa4HcEk_r9V8IFLinm1YKIY4axICV9Uhzm37ysuJRPd-89clC8iPEaYyIIrp4XB1RS3NCmPix-foSYULIDoOSRjhFiRMYPk4MEyDg7WqMdChAnP0ZAuk8QkFnD4IPurE9rCHraIjuieLPRg9_kdnAOGR2MHf2gke9RppAec2lxtrxCq9XxB6TR5GMq197kinbbaONMBj12frARurzFmIJ3Lj-ntc6zGUrBaveyeNZrF-HV3feo-HZxfrX8XF5--bRanl2WpiYklcL0dQMcAzVtw2TTUdZyw6CppZCsNZox0mLaEdMbXQnJO8k1aUTPMGuzc-yoONnrTpt2gM5AXkc7NQU76LBVXlv1d2W0a_Xd36qKMVFTngUWdwLB32yyzyofNpujR8g-KSJFHsuxrDL69hF67Tch-xIV5ZWgXBLR_IvKWpzzmnOaqWpPmeBjDNA_rEywmrOjdtlRczAUEWqXHTX3vfnz3oeu-7Bk4HQPQHb91kJQ0VgYDXQ2gEmq8_a_I04eKdwn7AdsIf6-RkWq8F5k1iBip0DZLxD26kw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1874446442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Best time to assess complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a post-hoc analysis of randomised controlled phase 3 trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Glynne-Jones, Robert, Dr ; Sebag-Montefiore, David, Prof ; Meadows, Helen M, MSc ; Cunningham, David, Prof ; Begum, Rubina, BSc ; Adab, Fawzi, FRCR ; Benstead, Kim, MD ; Harte, Robert J, MD ; Stewart, Jill, FRCR ; Beare, Sandy, PhD ; Hackshaw, Allan, Prof ; Kadalayil, Latha, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Glynne-Jones, Robert, Dr ; Sebag-Montefiore, David, Prof ; Meadows, Helen M, MSc ; Cunningham, David, Prof ; Begum, Rubina, BSc ; Adab, Fawzi, FRCR ; Benstead, Kim, MD ; Harte, Robert J, MD ; Stewart, Jill, FRCR ; Beare, Sandy, PhD ; Hackshaw, Allan, Prof ; Kadalayil, Latha, PhD ; ACT II study group</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Guidelines for anal cancer recommend assessment of response at 6–12 weeks after starting treatment. Using data from the ACT II trial, we determined the optimum timepoint to assess clinical tumour response after chemoradiotherapy. Methods The previously reported ACT II trial was a phase 3 randomised trial of patients of any age with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, squamous cell carcinoma of the anus without metastatic disease from 59 centres in the UK. We randomly assigned patients (by minimisation) to receive either intravenous mitomycin (one dose of 12 mg/m2 on day 1) or intravenous cisplatin (one dose of 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29), with intravenous fluorouracil (one dose of 1000 mg/m2 per day on days 1–4 and 29–32) and radiotherapy (50·4 Gy in 28 daily fractions); and also did a second randomisation after initial therapy to maintenance chemotherapy (fluorouracil and cisplatin) or no maintenance chemotherapy. The primary outcome was complete clinical response (the absence of primary and nodal tumour by clinical examination), in addition to overall survival and progression-free survival from time of randomisation. In this post-hoc analysis, we analysed complete clinical response at three timepoints: 11 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 1), 18 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 2), and 26 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 3) as well as the overall and progression-free survival estimates of patients with complete clinical response or without complete clinical response at each assessment. We analysed both the overall trial population and a subgroup of patients who had attended each of the three assessments by modified intention-to-treat. This study is registered at controlled-trials.com , ISRCTN 26715889. Findings We enrolled 940 patients from June 4, 2001, until Dec 16, 2008. Complete clinical response was achieved in 492 (52%) of 940 patients at assessment 1 (11 weeks), 665 (71%) of patients at assessment 2 (18 weeks), and 730 (78%) of patients at assessment 3 (26 weeks). 691 patients attended all three assessments and in this subgroup, complete clinical response was reported in 441 (64%) patients at assessment 1, 556 (80%) at assessment 2, and 590 (85%) at assessments 3. 151 (72%) of the 209 patients who had not had a complete clinical response at assessment 1 had a complete clinical response by assessment 3. In the overall trial population of 940 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3 was 83% (95% CI 79–86), 84% (81–87), and 87% (84–89), respectively and was 72% (66–78), 59% (49–67), and 46% (37–55) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3, respectively. In the subgroup of 691 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3 was 85% (81–88), 86% (82–88), and 87% (84–90), respectively, and was 75% (68–80), 61% (50–70), and 48% (36–58) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3, respectively. Similarly, progression-free survival in both the overall trial population and the subgroup was longer in patients who had a complete clinical response, compared with patients who did not have a complete clinical response, at all three assessments. Interpretation Many patients who do not have a complete clinical response when assessed at 11 weeks after commencing chemoradiotherapy do in fact respond by 26 weeks, and the earlier assessment could lead to some patients having unnecessary surgery. Our data suggests that the optimum time for assessment of complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus is 26 weeks from starting chemoradiotherapy. We suggest that guidelines should be revised to indicate that later assessment is acceptable. Funding Cancer Research UK.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-2045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-5488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30071-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28209296</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>5-Fluorouracil ; Aged ; Anal cancer ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Anus ; Anus Neoplasms - pathology ; Anus Neoplasms - therapy ; Biopsy ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Chemotherapy ; Cisplatin ; Cisplatin - administration & dosage ; Clinical trials ; Colorectal cancer ; Disease ; Dose Fractionation, Radiation ; Female ; Fluorouracil - administration & dosage ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Intravenous administration ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Medical research ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Mitomycin ; Mitomycin - administration & dosage ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy ; Neoplasm Staging ; Patients ; Prognosis ; Radiation therapy ; Remission Induction ; Squamous cell carcinoma ; Studies ; Surgery ; Survival Rate ; Time Factors ; Toxicity ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>The lancet oncology, 2017-03, Vol.18 (3), p.347-356</ispartof><rights>The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license</rights><rights>2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 01, 2017</rights><rights>2017. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (theLicense”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c611t-7cf69e40e2cb9389d23b4c3e968783bca331b02d1cfca5784d84a197f303b1473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c611t-7cf69e40e2cb9389d23b4c3e968783bca331b02d1cfca5784d84a197f303b1473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470204517300712$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209296$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glynne-Jones, Robert, Dr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sebag-Montefiore, David, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meadows, Helen M, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, David, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Begum, Rubina, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adab, Fawzi, FRCR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benstead, Kim, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harte, Robert J, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Jill, FRCR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beare, Sandy, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackshaw, Allan, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadalayil, Latha, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ACT II study group</creatorcontrib><title>Best time to assess complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a post-hoc analysis of randomised controlled phase 3 trial</title><title>The lancet oncology</title><addtitle>Lancet Oncol</addtitle><description>Summary Background Guidelines for anal cancer recommend assessment of response at 6–12 weeks after starting treatment. Using data from the ACT II trial, we determined the optimum timepoint to assess clinical tumour response after chemoradiotherapy. Methods The previously reported ACT II trial was a phase 3 randomised trial of patients of any age with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, squamous cell carcinoma of the anus without metastatic disease from 59 centres in the UK. We randomly assigned patients (by minimisation) to receive either intravenous mitomycin (one dose of 12 mg/m2 on day 1) or intravenous cisplatin (one dose of 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29), with intravenous fluorouracil (one dose of 1000 mg/m2 per day on days 1–4 and 29–32) and radiotherapy (50·4 Gy in 28 daily fractions); and also did a second randomisation after initial therapy to maintenance chemotherapy (fluorouracil and cisplatin) or no maintenance chemotherapy. The primary outcome was complete clinical response (the absence of primary and nodal tumour by clinical examination), in addition to overall survival and progression-free survival from time of randomisation. In this post-hoc analysis, we analysed complete clinical response at three timepoints: 11 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 1), 18 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 2), and 26 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 3) as well as the overall and progression-free survival estimates of patients with complete clinical response or without complete clinical response at each assessment. We analysed both the overall trial population and a subgroup of patients who had attended each of the three assessments by modified intention-to-treat. This study is registered at controlled-trials.com , ISRCTN 26715889. Findings We enrolled 940 patients from June 4, 2001, until Dec 16, 2008. Complete clinical response was achieved in 492 (52%) of 940 patients at assessment 1 (11 weeks), 665 (71%) of patients at assessment 2 (18 weeks), and 730 (78%) of patients at assessment 3 (26 weeks). 691 patients attended all three assessments and in this subgroup, complete clinical response was reported in 441 (64%) patients at assessment 1, 556 (80%) at assessment 2, and 590 (85%) at assessments 3. 151 (72%) of the 209 patients who had not had a complete clinical response at assessment 1 had a complete clinical response by assessment 3. In the overall trial population of 940 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3 was 83% (95% CI 79–86), 84% (81–87), and 87% (84–89), respectively and was 72% (66–78), 59% (49–67), and 46% (37–55) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3, respectively. In the subgroup of 691 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3 was 85% (81–88), 86% (82–88), and 87% (84–90), respectively, and was 75% (68–80), 61% (50–70), and 48% (36–58) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3, respectively. Similarly, progression-free survival in both the overall trial population and the subgroup was longer in patients who had a complete clinical response, compared with patients who did not have a complete clinical response, at all three assessments. Interpretation Many patients who do not have a complete clinical response when assessed at 11 weeks after commencing chemoradiotherapy do in fact respond by 26 weeks, and the earlier assessment could lead to some patients having unnecessary surgery. Our data suggests that the optimum time for assessment of complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus is 26 weeks from starting chemoradiotherapy. We suggest that guidelines should be revised to indicate that later assessment is acceptable. Funding Cancer Research UK.</description><subject>5-Fluorouracil</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anal cancer</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anus</subject><subject>Anus Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Anus Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Cisplatin</subject><subject>Cisplatin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorouracil - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mitomycin</subject><subject>Mitomycin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Squamous cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1470-2045</issn><issn>1474-5488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks9u1DAQxiMEoqXwCCBLXLaHgP8ldji0KqsWVqrEgXK2HGfCujhxansr7WvxhDi7bYEe4BQr85tvZj59RfGa4HcEk_r9V8IFLinm1YKIY4axICV9Uhzm37ysuJRPd-89clC8iPEaYyIIrp4XB1RS3NCmPix-foSYULIDoOSRjhFiRMYPk4MEyDg7WqMdChAnP0ZAuk8QkFnD4IPurE9rCHraIjuieLPRg9_kdnAOGR2MHf2gke9RppAec2lxtrxCq9XxB6TR5GMq197kinbbaONMBj12frARurzFmIJ3Lj-ntc6zGUrBaveyeNZrF-HV3feo-HZxfrX8XF5--bRanl2WpiYklcL0dQMcAzVtw2TTUdZyw6CppZCsNZox0mLaEdMbXQnJO8k1aUTPMGuzc-yoONnrTpt2gM5AXkc7NQU76LBVXlv1d2W0a_Xd36qKMVFTngUWdwLB32yyzyofNpujR8g-KSJFHsuxrDL69hF67Tch-xIV5ZWgXBLR_IvKWpzzmnOaqWpPmeBjDNA_rEywmrOjdtlRczAUEWqXHTX3vfnz3oeu-7Bk4HQPQHb91kJQ0VgYDXQ2gEmq8_a_I04eKdwn7AdsIf6-RkWq8F5k1iBip0DZLxD26kw</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Glynne-Jones, Robert, Dr</creator><creator>Sebag-Montefiore, David, Prof</creator><creator>Meadows, Helen M, MSc</creator><creator>Cunningham, David, Prof</creator><creator>Begum, Rubina, BSc</creator><creator>Adab, Fawzi, FRCR</creator><creator>Benstead, Kim, MD</creator><creator>Harte, Robert J, MD</creator><creator>Stewart, Jill, FRCR</creator><creator>Beare, Sandy, PhD</creator><creator>Hackshaw, Allan, Prof</creator><creator>Kadalayil, Latha, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Lancet Pub. Group</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Best time to assess complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a post-hoc analysis of randomised controlled phase 3 trial</title><author>Glynne-Jones, Robert, Dr ; Sebag-Montefiore, David, Prof ; Meadows, Helen M, MSc ; Cunningham, David, Prof ; Begum, Rubina, BSc ; Adab, Fawzi, FRCR ; Benstead, Kim, MD ; Harte, Robert J, MD ; Stewart, Jill, FRCR ; Beare, Sandy, PhD ; Hackshaw, Allan, Prof ; Kadalayil, Latha, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c611t-7cf69e40e2cb9389d23b4c3e968783bca331b02d1cfca5784d84a197f303b1473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>5-Fluorouracil</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anal cancer</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anus</topic><topic>Anus Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Anus Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Cisplatin</topic><topic>Cisplatin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorouracil - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mitomycin</topic><topic>Mitomycin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Squamous cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glynne-Jones, Robert, Dr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sebag-Montefiore, David, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meadows, Helen M, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, David, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Begum, Rubina, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adab, Fawzi, FRCR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benstead, Kim, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harte, Robert J, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Jill, FRCR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beare, Sandy, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackshaw, Allan, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadalayil, Latha, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ACT II study group</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The lancet oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glynne-Jones, Robert, Dr</au><au>Sebag-Montefiore, David, Prof</au><au>Meadows, Helen M, MSc</au><au>Cunningham, David, Prof</au><au>Begum, Rubina, BSc</au><au>Adab, Fawzi, FRCR</au><au>Benstead, Kim, MD</au><au>Harte, Robert J, MD</au><au>Stewart, Jill, FRCR</au><au>Beare, Sandy, PhD</au><au>Hackshaw, Allan, Prof</au><au>Kadalayil, Latha, PhD</au><aucorp>ACT II study group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Best time to assess complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a post-hoc analysis of randomised controlled phase 3 trial</atitle><jtitle>The lancet oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Oncol</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>347-356</pages><issn>1470-2045</issn><eissn>1474-5488</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Summary Background Guidelines for anal cancer recommend assessment of response at 6–12 weeks after starting treatment. Using data from the ACT II trial, we determined the optimum timepoint to assess clinical tumour response after chemoradiotherapy. Methods The previously reported ACT II trial was a phase 3 randomised trial of patients of any age with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, squamous cell carcinoma of the anus without metastatic disease from 59 centres in the UK. We randomly assigned patients (by minimisation) to receive either intravenous mitomycin (one dose of 12 mg/m2 on day 1) or intravenous cisplatin (one dose of 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29), with intravenous fluorouracil (one dose of 1000 mg/m2 per day on days 1–4 and 29–32) and radiotherapy (50·4 Gy in 28 daily fractions); and also did a second randomisation after initial therapy to maintenance chemotherapy (fluorouracil and cisplatin) or no maintenance chemotherapy. The primary outcome was complete clinical response (the absence of primary and nodal tumour by clinical examination), in addition to overall survival and progression-free survival from time of randomisation. In this post-hoc analysis, we analysed complete clinical response at three timepoints: 11 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 1), 18 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 2), and 26 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 3) as well as the overall and progression-free survival estimates of patients with complete clinical response or without complete clinical response at each assessment. We analysed both the overall trial population and a subgroup of patients who had attended each of the three assessments by modified intention-to-treat. This study is registered at controlled-trials.com , ISRCTN 26715889. Findings We enrolled 940 patients from June 4, 2001, until Dec 16, 2008. Complete clinical response was achieved in 492 (52%) of 940 patients at assessment 1 (11 weeks), 665 (71%) of patients at assessment 2 (18 weeks), and 730 (78%) of patients at assessment 3 (26 weeks). 691 patients attended all three assessments and in this subgroup, complete clinical response was reported in 441 (64%) patients at assessment 1, 556 (80%) at assessment 2, and 590 (85%) at assessments 3. 151 (72%) of the 209 patients who had not had a complete clinical response at assessment 1 had a complete clinical response by assessment 3. In the overall trial population of 940 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3 was 83% (95% CI 79–86), 84% (81–87), and 87% (84–89), respectively and was 72% (66–78), 59% (49–67), and 46% (37–55) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3, respectively. In the subgroup of 691 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3 was 85% (81–88), 86% (82–88), and 87% (84–90), respectively, and was 75% (68–80), 61% (50–70), and 48% (36–58) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3, respectively. Similarly, progression-free survival in both the overall trial population and the subgroup was longer in patients who had a complete clinical response, compared with patients who did not have a complete clinical response, at all three assessments. Interpretation Many patients who do not have a complete clinical response when assessed at 11 weeks after commencing chemoradiotherapy do in fact respond by 26 weeks, and the earlier assessment could lead to some patients having unnecessary surgery. Our data suggests that the optimum time for assessment of complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus is 26 weeks from starting chemoradiotherapy. We suggest that guidelines should be revised to indicate that later assessment is acceptable. Funding Cancer Research UK.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28209296</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30071-2</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-2045 |
ispartof | The lancet oncology, 2017-03, Vol.18 (3), p.347-356 |
issn | 1470-2045 1474-5488 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5337624 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | 5-Fluorouracil Aged Anal cancer Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Anus Anus Neoplasms - pathology Anus Neoplasms - therapy Biopsy Cancer Cancer therapies Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy Chemoradiotherapy Chemotherapy Cisplatin Cisplatin - administration & dosage Clinical trials Colorectal cancer Disease Dose Fractionation, Radiation Female Fluorouracil - administration & dosage Follow-Up Studies Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Intravenous administration Male Medical imaging Medical research Metastases Metastasis Middle Aged Mitomycin Mitomycin - administration & dosage Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy Neoplasm Staging Patients Prognosis Radiation therapy Remission Induction Squamous cell carcinoma Studies Surgery Survival Rate Time Factors Toxicity Tumors |
title | Best time to assess complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a post-hoc analysis of randomised controlled phase 3 trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T00%3A09%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Best%20time%20to%20assess%20complete%20clinical%20response%20after%20chemoradiotherapy%20in%20squamous%20cell%20carcinoma%20of%20the%20anus%20(ACT%20II):%20a%20post-hoc%20analysis%20of%20randomised%20controlled%20phase%203%20trial&rft.jtitle=The%20lancet%20oncology&rft.au=Glynne-Jones,%20Robert,%20Dr&rft.aucorp=ACT%20II%20study%20group&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=347-356&rft.issn=1470-2045&rft.eissn=1474-5488&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30071-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4318824041%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1874446442&rft_id=info:pmid/28209296&rft_els_id=S1470204517300712&rfr_iscdi=true |