Detection of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Classification Using Resting State Functional Network Connectivity and Fractional Anisotropy

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) may adversely affect a person's thinking, memory, personality, and behavior. While mild TBI (mTBI) diagnosis is challenging, there is a risk for long-term psychiatric, neurologic, and psychosocial problems in some patients that motivates the search for new and bette...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurotrauma 2017-03, Vol.34 (5), p.1045-1053
Hauptverfasser: Vergara, Victor M, Mayer, Andrew R, Damaraju, Eswar, Kiehl, Kent A, Calhoun, Vince
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1053
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1045
container_title Journal of neurotrauma
container_volume 34
creator Vergara, Victor M
Mayer, Andrew R
Damaraju, Eswar
Kiehl, Kent A
Calhoun, Vince
description Traumatic brain injury (TBI) may adversely affect a person's thinking, memory, personality, and behavior. While mild TBI (mTBI) diagnosis is challenging, there is a risk for long-term psychiatric, neurologic, and psychosocial problems in some patients that motivates the search for new and better biomarkers. Recently, diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) has shown promise in detecting mTBI, but its validity is still being investigated. Resting state functional network connectivity (rsFNC) is another approach that is emerging as a promising option for the diagnosis of mTBI. The present work investigated the use of rsFNC for mTBI detection compared with dMRI results on the same cohort. Fifty patients with mTBI (25 males) and age-sex matched healthy controls were recruited. Features from dMRI were obtained using all voxels, the enhanced Z-score microstructural assessment for pathology, and the distribution corrected Z-score. Features based on rsFNC were obtained through group independent component analysis and correlation between pairs of resting state networks. A linear support vector machine was used for classification and validated using leave-one-out cross validation. Classification achieved a maximum accuracy of 84.1% for rsFNC and 75.5% for dMRI and 74.5% for both combined. A t test analysis revealed significant increase in rsFNC between cerebellum versus sensorimotor networks and between left angular gyrus versus precuneus in subjects with mTBI. These outcomes suggest that inclusion of both common and unique information is important for classification of mTBI. Results also suggest that rsFNC can yield viable biomarkers that might outperform dMRI and points to connectivity to the cerebellum as an important region for the detection of mTBI.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/neu.2016.4526
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5333571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1877844553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-56053343bda6b8153bce3d88a9783520f19d2c6cf12e86d013f410c6e122e3c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhyBVZ4sIli7-dXJDKwkKlLUjQni3HcVovWXtrO0X5KfxbnO2HgBOnkTyPnvGMXgBeYrTEqG7eejsuCcJiyTgRj8ACcy6rBjHyGCxKX1YSc3wEnqW0RQhTQeRTcESkkIIQvAC_PthsTXbBw9DDMzd08DzqcaezM_B91M7DU78d4wTbCZ5pc-W8hRuro3f-Eq4GnZLrndEHw0WaH7_ZlOf6Pets4Xr0B70e4Bebf4b4A66C9_PMG5cnqH0H11HfMyfepZBj2E_PwZNeD8m-uKvH4GL98Xz1udp8_XS6OtlUhmOWKy4Qp5TRttOirTGnrbG0q2vdyJpygnrcdMQI02Nia9GVE_QMIyMsJsRSQ-kxeHfr3Y_tznbG-hz1oPbR7XScVNBO_d3x7kpdhhtVxlIucRG8uRPEcD2W5dXOJWOHQXsbxqRwLWXNGOf0P1BGeCMZQQV9_Q-6DWMsJzoICWl4IQtV3VImhpSi7R_-jZGa86FKPtScDzXno_Cv_lz2gb4PBP0NOJy44A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1872295259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Classification Using Resting State Functional Network Connectivity and Fractional Anisotropy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Vergara, Victor M ; Mayer, Andrew R ; Damaraju, Eswar ; Kiehl, Kent A ; Calhoun, Vince</creator><creatorcontrib>Vergara, Victor M ; Mayer, Andrew R ; Damaraju, Eswar ; Kiehl, Kent A ; Calhoun, Vince</creatorcontrib><description>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) may adversely affect a person's thinking, memory, personality, and behavior. While mild TBI (mTBI) diagnosis is challenging, there is a risk for long-term psychiatric, neurologic, and psychosocial problems in some patients that motivates the search for new and better biomarkers. Recently, diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) has shown promise in detecting mTBI, but its validity is still being investigated. Resting state functional network connectivity (rsFNC) is another approach that is emerging as a promising option for the diagnosis of mTBI. The present work investigated the use of rsFNC for mTBI detection compared with dMRI results on the same cohort. Fifty patients with mTBI (25 males) and age-sex matched healthy controls were recruited. Features from dMRI were obtained using all voxels, the enhanced Z-score microstructural assessment for pathology, and the distribution corrected Z-score. Features based on rsFNC were obtained through group independent component analysis and correlation between pairs of resting state networks. A linear support vector machine was used for classification and validated using leave-one-out cross validation. Classification achieved a maximum accuracy of 84.1% for rsFNC and 75.5% for dMRI and 74.5% for both combined. A t test analysis revealed significant increase in rsFNC between cerebellum versus sensorimotor networks and between left angular gyrus versus precuneus in subjects with mTBI. These outcomes suggest that inclusion of both common and unique information is important for classification of mTBI. Results also suggest that rsFNC can yield viable biomarkers that might outperform dMRI and points to connectivity to the cerebellum as an important region for the detection of mTBI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-7151</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/neu.2016.4526</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27676221</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anisotropy ; Brain Concussion - diagnostic imaging ; Brain Concussion - physiopathology ; Cerebellum - diagnostic imaging ; Cerebellum - physiopathology ; Cerebral Cortex - diagnostic imaging ; Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Connectome - methods ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Original ; Public health ; Rehabilitation ; Support Vector Machine ; Traumatic brain injury ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurotrauma, 2017-03, Vol.34 (5), p.1045-1053</ispartof><rights>(©) Copyright 2017, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2017, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-56053343bda6b8153bce3d88a9783520f19d2c6cf12e86d013f410c6e122e3c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-56053343bda6b8153bce3d88a9783520f19d2c6cf12e86d013f410c6e122e3c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27676221$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vergara, Victor M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Andrew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damaraju, Eswar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiehl, Kent A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calhoun, Vince</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Classification Using Resting State Functional Network Connectivity and Fractional Anisotropy</title><title>Journal of neurotrauma</title><addtitle>J Neurotrauma</addtitle><description>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) may adversely affect a person's thinking, memory, personality, and behavior. While mild TBI (mTBI) diagnosis is challenging, there is a risk for long-term psychiatric, neurologic, and psychosocial problems in some patients that motivates the search for new and better biomarkers. Recently, diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) has shown promise in detecting mTBI, but its validity is still being investigated. Resting state functional network connectivity (rsFNC) is another approach that is emerging as a promising option for the diagnosis of mTBI. The present work investigated the use of rsFNC for mTBI detection compared with dMRI results on the same cohort. Fifty patients with mTBI (25 males) and age-sex matched healthy controls were recruited. Features from dMRI were obtained using all voxels, the enhanced Z-score microstructural assessment for pathology, and the distribution corrected Z-score. Features based on rsFNC were obtained through group independent component analysis and correlation between pairs of resting state networks. A linear support vector machine was used for classification and validated using leave-one-out cross validation. Classification achieved a maximum accuracy of 84.1% for rsFNC and 75.5% for dMRI and 74.5% for both combined. A t test analysis revealed significant increase in rsFNC between cerebellum versus sensorimotor networks and between left angular gyrus versus precuneus in subjects with mTBI. These outcomes suggest that inclusion of both common and unique information is important for classification of mTBI. Results also suggest that rsFNC can yield viable biomarkers that might outperform dMRI and points to connectivity to the cerebellum as an important region for the detection of mTBI.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anisotropy</subject><subject>Brain Concussion - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain Concussion - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cerebellum - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cerebellum - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Connectome - methods</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Support Vector Machine</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0897-7151</issn><issn>1557-9042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhyBVZ4sIli7-dXJDKwkKlLUjQni3HcVovWXtrO0X5KfxbnO2HgBOnkTyPnvGMXgBeYrTEqG7eejsuCcJiyTgRj8ACcy6rBjHyGCxKX1YSc3wEnqW0RQhTQeRTcESkkIIQvAC_PthsTXbBw9DDMzd08DzqcaezM_B91M7DU78d4wTbCZ5pc-W8hRuro3f-Eq4GnZLrndEHw0WaH7_ZlOf6Pets4Xr0B70e4Bebf4b4A66C9_PMG5cnqH0H11HfMyfepZBj2E_PwZNeD8m-uKvH4GL98Xz1udp8_XS6OtlUhmOWKy4Qp5TRttOirTGnrbG0q2vdyJpygnrcdMQI02Nia9GVE_QMIyMsJsRSQ-kxeHfr3Y_tznbG-hz1oPbR7XScVNBO_d3x7kpdhhtVxlIucRG8uRPEcD2W5dXOJWOHQXsbxqRwLWXNGOf0P1BGeCMZQQV9_Q-6DWMsJzoICWl4IQtV3VImhpSi7R_-jZGa86FKPtScDzXno_Cv_lz2gb4PBP0NOJy44A</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Vergara, Victor M</creator><creator>Mayer, Andrew R</creator><creator>Damaraju, Eswar</creator><creator>Kiehl, Kent A</creator><creator>Calhoun, Vince</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Detection of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Classification Using Resting State Functional Network Connectivity and Fractional Anisotropy</title><author>Vergara, Victor M ; Mayer, Andrew R ; Damaraju, Eswar ; Kiehl, Kent A ; Calhoun, Vince</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-56053343bda6b8153bce3d88a9783520f19d2c6cf12e86d013f410c6e122e3c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anisotropy</topic><topic>Brain Concussion - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain Concussion - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cerebellum - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cerebellum - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Connectome - methods</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Support Vector Machine</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vergara, Victor M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Andrew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damaraju, Eswar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiehl, Kent A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calhoun, Vince</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurotrauma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vergara, Victor M</au><au>Mayer, Andrew R</au><au>Damaraju, Eswar</au><au>Kiehl, Kent A</au><au>Calhoun, Vince</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Classification Using Resting State Functional Network Connectivity and Fractional Anisotropy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurotrauma</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurotrauma</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1045</spage><epage>1053</epage><pages>1045-1053</pages><issn>0897-7151</issn><eissn>1557-9042</eissn><abstract>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) may adversely affect a person's thinking, memory, personality, and behavior. While mild TBI (mTBI) diagnosis is challenging, there is a risk for long-term psychiatric, neurologic, and psychosocial problems in some patients that motivates the search for new and better biomarkers. Recently, diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) has shown promise in detecting mTBI, but its validity is still being investigated. Resting state functional network connectivity (rsFNC) is another approach that is emerging as a promising option for the diagnosis of mTBI. The present work investigated the use of rsFNC for mTBI detection compared with dMRI results on the same cohort. Fifty patients with mTBI (25 males) and age-sex matched healthy controls were recruited. Features from dMRI were obtained using all voxels, the enhanced Z-score microstructural assessment for pathology, and the distribution corrected Z-score. Features based on rsFNC were obtained through group independent component analysis and correlation between pairs of resting state networks. A linear support vector machine was used for classification and validated using leave-one-out cross validation. Classification achieved a maximum accuracy of 84.1% for rsFNC and 75.5% for dMRI and 74.5% for both combined. A t test analysis revealed significant increase in rsFNC between cerebellum versus sensorimotor networks and between left angular gyrus versus precuneus in subjects with mTBI. These outcomes suggest that inclusion of both common and unique information is important for classification of mTBI. Results also suggest that rsFNC can yield viable biomarkers that might outperform dMRI and points to connectivity to the cerebellum as an important region for the detection of mTBI.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>27676221</pmid><doi>10.1089/neu.2016.4526</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0897-7151
ispartof Journal of neurotrauma, 2017-03, Vol.34 (5), p.1045-1053
issn 0897-7151
1557-9042
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5333571
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Anisotropy
Brain Concussion - diagnostic imaging
Brain Concussion - physiopathology
Cerebellum - diagnostic imaging
Cerebellum - physiopathology
Cerebral Cortex - diagnostic imaging
Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology
Cognition & reasoning
Connectome - methods
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Original
Public health
Rehabilitation
Support Vector Machine
Traumatic brain injury
Young Adult
title Detection of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Classification Using Resting State Functional Network Connectivity and Fractional Anisotropy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T21%3A47%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20Mild%20Traumatic%20Brain%20Injury%20by%20Machine%20Learning%20Classification%20Using%20Resting%20State%20Functional%20Network%20Connectivity%20and%20Fractional%20Anisotropy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurotrauma&rft.au=Vergara,%20Victor%20M&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1045&rft.epage=1053&rft.pages=1045-1053&rft.issn=0897-7151&rft.eissn=1557-9042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/neu.2016.4526&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1877844553%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1872295259&rft_id=info:pmid/27676221&rfr_iscdi=true