Research to Practice: Implementing Physical Activity Recommendations

Introduction Dissemination and implementation science focuses on bridging the gap between research and practice. The Community Preventive Services Task Force published recommendations for increasing physical activity based on scientific review and consensus. Little research on the dissemination and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of preventive medicine 2017-03, Vol.52 (3), p.S300-S303
Hauptverfasser: Davis, Sally M., PhD, Cruz, Theresa H., PhD, Kozoll, Richard L., MD, MPH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S303
container_issue 3
container_start_page S300
container_title American journal of preventive medicine
container_volume 52
creator Davis, Sally M., PhD
Cruz, Theresa H., PhD
Kozoll, Richard L., MD, MPH
description Introduction Dissemination and implementation science focuses on bridging the gap between research and practice. The Community Preventive Services Task Force published recommendations for increasing physical activity based on scientific review and consensus. Little research on the dissemination and implementation of these recommendations has been conducted in under-represented populations at high risk for inactivity and chronic disease. Methods Partnering with one rural community (beta site), the University of New Mexico Prevention Research Center studied the translation of Community Preventive Services Task Force recommendations to practice. Strategies for increasing physical activity were selected, implemented, and analyzed in 2009–2013. Participant observations; content analysis of meeting minutes, field notes, and other documents; and in-depth interviews were conducted over the 5-year period to identify factors important for carrying out Community Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for physical activity in a rural New Mexico community. Results Included among the implementation outcomes were new sidewalks and trails, a community-wide campaign, social support of walking, and park improvements. The following factors were identified as important to the implementation process: an active community–academic partnership; multiple partners; culturally appropriate strategies; and approaches that fit local context and place characteristics (topography, land ownership, population clusters, existing roadways). Conclusions This study illustrates how evidence can be translated to practice and identifies key factors in that process. The successful beta model provides a practical blueprint for dissemination and implementation in rural, under-represented populations. This model is currently being disseminated (scaled up) to other rural New Mexico communities.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5325177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749379716304755</els_id><sourcerecordid>2017035582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c612t-3e665418b4f6a039dc9d51f4e4efe53a21918fd03f3dfd0ab265c8b2ab44c7853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQtRCILoV_gFAkLlwS_G2HA1JVClSqRFXgbDnOpOslibd2dqX993W0Zftx6WlkzZvnee8NQu8Jrggm8vOqsgOsI1Q0vypcV5jqF2hBtGIllVi9RAuseF0yVasj9CalFcZYaVK_RkdUUyKYFgv07QoS2OiWxRSKy2jd5B18Kc6HdQ8DjJMfr4vL5S55Z_viJHe3ftoVV-DCkNutnXwY01v0qrN9gnd39Rj9_X725_RnefHrx_npyUXpJKFTyUBKwYlueCctZnXr6laQjgOHDgSzlNREdy1mHWtzsQ2VwumG2oZzp7Rgx-jrnne9aQZoXd4v2t6sox9s3JlgvXncGf3SXIetEYwKolQm-HRHEMPNBtJkBp8c9L0dIWySyeZhyYXgPEM_PoGuwiaOWZ7JhivMhNA0o_ge5WJIKUJ3WIZgM8dkVmYf0zwlDa5NjimPfXgo5DD0P5d7pZDt3HqIJjkPo4PWR3CTaYN_7oenBK7345ziP9hBOmghJlGDze_5VOZLIZJhroRgt_LWuzU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2017035582</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Research to Practice: Implementing Physical Activity Recommendations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Davis, Sally M., PhD ; Cruz, Theresa H., PhD ; Kozoll, Richard L., MD, MPH</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Sally M., PhD ; Cruz, Theresa H., PhD ; Kozoll, Richard L., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Dissemination and implementation science focuses on bridging the gap between research and practice. The Community Preventive Services Task Force published recommendations for increasing physical activity based on scientific review and consensus. Little research on the dissemination and implementation of these recommendations has been conducted in under-represented populations at high risk for inactivity and chronic disease. Methods Partnering with one rural community (beta site), the University of New Mexico Prevention Research Center studied the translation of Community Preventive Services Task Force recommendations to practice. Strategies for increasing physical activity were selected, implemented, and analyzed in 2009–2013. Participant observations; content analysis of meeting minutes, field notes, and other documents; and in-depth interviews were conducted over the 5-year period to identify factors important for carrying out Community Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for physical activity in a rural New Mexico community. Results Included among the implementation outcomes were new sidewalks and trails, a community-wide campaign, social support of walking, and park improvements. The following factors were identified as important to the implementation process: an active community–academic partnership; multiple partners; culturally appropriate strategies; and approaches that fit local context and place characteristics (topography, land ownership, population clusters, existing roadways). Conclusions This study illustrates how evidence can be translated to practice and identifies key factors in that process. The successful beta model provides a practical blueprint for dissemination and implementation in rural, under-represented populations. This model is currently being disseminated (scaled up) to other rural New Mexico communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-3797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2607</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28215385</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Activity based ; Campaigns ; Chronic illnesses ; Content analysis ; Dissemination ; Exercise ; Health Plan Implementation ; High risk ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Ownership ; Physical activity ; Preventive Health Services ; Preventive medicine ; Public Facilities ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Rural Population ; Social support ; Topography ; Translation ; Walking</subject><ispartof>American journal of preventive medicine, 2017-03, Vol.52 (3), p.S300-S303</ispartof><rights>American Journal of Preventive Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Journal of Preventive Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c612t-3e665418b4f6a039dc9d51f4e4efe53a21918fd03f3dfd0ab265c8b2ab44c7853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c612t-3e665418b4f6a039dc9d51f4e4efe53a21918fd03f3dfd0ab265c8b2ab44c7853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28215385$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Sally M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Theresa H., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozoll, Richard L., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><title>Research to Practice: Implementing Physical Activity Recommendations</title><title>American journal of preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Prev Med</addtitle><description>Introduction Dissemination and implementation science focuses on bridging the gap between research and practice. The Community Preventive Services Task Force published recommendations for increasing physical activity based on scientific review and consensus. Little research on the dissemination and implementation of these recommendations has been conducted in under-represented populations at high risk for inactivity and chronic disease. Methods Partnering with one rural community (beta site), the University of New Mexico Prevention Research Center studied the translation of Community Preventive Services Task Force recommendations to practice. Strategies for increasing physical activity were selected, implemented, and analyzed in 2009–2013. Participant observations; content analysis of meeting minutes, field notes, and other documents; and in-depth interviews were conducted over the 5-year period to identify factors important for carrying out Community Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for physical activity in a rural New Mexico community. Results Included among the implementation outcomes were new sidewalks and trails, a community-wide campaign, social support of walking, and park improvements. The following factors were identified as important to the implementation process: an active community–academic partnership; multiple partners; culturally appropriate strategies; and approaches that fit local context and place characteristics (topography, land ownership, population clusters, existing roadways). Conclusions This study illustrates how evidence can be translated to practice and identifies key factors in that process. The successful beta model provides a practical blueprint for dissemination and implementation in rural, under-represented populations. This model is currently being disseminated (scaled up) to other rural New Mexico communities.</description><subject>Activity based</subject><subject>Campaigns</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Dissemination</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Health Plan Implementation</subject><subject>High risk</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Preventive Health Services</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Public Facilities</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0749-3797</issn><issn>1873-2607</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQtRCILoV_gFAkLlwS_G2HA1JVClSqRFXgbDnOpOslibd2dqX993W0Zftx6WlkzZvnee8NQu8Jrggm8vOqsgOsI1Q0vypcV5jqF2hBtGIllVi9RAuseF0yVasj9CalFcZYaVK_RkdUUyKYFgv07QoS2OiWxRSKy2jd5B18Kc6HdQ8DjJMfr4vL5S55Z_viJHe3ftoVV-DCkNutnXwY01v0qrN9gnd39Rj9_X725_RnefHrx_npyUXpJKFTyUBKwYlueCctZnXr6laQjgOHDgSzlNREdy1mHWtzsQ2VwumG2oZzp7Rgx-jrnne9aQZoXd4v2t6sox9s3JlgvXncGf3SXIetEYwKolQm-HRHEMPNBtJkBp8c9L0dIWySyeZhyYXgPEM_PoGuwiaOWZ7JhivMhNA0o_ge5WJIKUJ3WIZgM8dkVmYf0zwlDa5NjimPfXgo5DD0P5d7pZDt3HqIJjkPo4PWR3CTaYN_7oenBK7345ziP9hBOmghJlGDze_5VOZLIZJhroRgt_LWuzU</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Davis, Sally M., PhD</creator><creator>Cruz, Theresa H., PhD</creator><creator>Kozoll, Richard L., MD, MPH</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Research to Practice: Implementing Physical Activity Recommendations</title><author>Davis, Sally M., PhD ; Cruz, Theresa H., PhD ; Kozoll, Richard L., MD, MPH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c612t-3e665418b4f6a039dc9d51f4e4efe53a21918fd03f3dfd0ab265c8b2ab44c7853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Activity based</topic><topic>Campaigns</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Dissemination</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Health Plan Implementation</topic><topic>High risk</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Preventive Health Services</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Public Facilities</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Sally M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Theresa H., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozoll, Richard L., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Sally M., PhD</au><au>Cruz, Theresa H., PhD</au><au>Kozoll, Richard L., MD, MPH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Research to Practice: Implementing Physical Activity Recommendations</atitle><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Prev Med</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>S300</spage><epage>S303</epage><pages>S300-S303</pages><issn>0749-3797</issn><eissn>1873-2607</eissn><abstract>Introduction Dissemination and implementation science focuses on bridging the gap between research and practice. The Community Preventive Services Task Force published recommendations for increasing physical activity based on scientific review and consensus. Little research on the dissemination and implementation of these recommendations has been conducted in under-represented populations at high risk for inactivity and chronic disease. Methods Partnering with one rural community (beta site), the University of New Mexico Prevention Research Center studied the translation of Community Preventive Services Task Force recommendations to practice. Strategies for increasing physical activity were selected, implemented, and analyzed in 2009–2013. Participant observations; content analysis of meeting minutes, field notes, and other documents; and in-depth interviews were conducted over the 5-year period to identify factors important for carrying out Community Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for physical activity in a rural New Mexico community. Results Included among the implementation outcomes were new sidewalks and trails, a community-wide campaign, social support of walking, and park improvements. The following factors were identified as important to the implementation process: an active community–academic partnership; multiple partners; culturally appropriate strategies; and approaches that fit local context and place characteristics (topography, land ownership, population clusters, existing roadways). Conclusions This study illustrates how evidence can be translated to practice and identifies key factors in that process. The successful beta model provides a practical blueprint for dissemination and implementation in rural, under-represented populations. This model is currently being disseminated (scaled up) to other rural New Mexico communities.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28215385</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.028</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-3797
ispartof American journal of preventive medicine, 2017-03, Vol.52 (3), p.S300-S303
issn 0749-3797
1873-2607
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5325177
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Activity based
Campaigns
Chronic illnesses
Content analysis
Dissemination
Exercise
Health Plan Implementation
High risk
Humans
Internal Medicine
Ownership
Physical activity
Preventive Health Services
Preventive medicine
Public Facilities
Rural areas
Rural communities
Rural Population
Social support
Topography
Translation
Walking
title Research to Practice: Implementing Physical Activity Recommendations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A12%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Research%20to%20Practice:%20Implementing%20Physical%20Activity%20Recommendations&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Davis,%20Sally%20M.,%20PhD&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=S300&rft.epage=S303&rft.pages=S300-S303&rft.issn=0749-3797&rft.eissn=1873-2607&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2017035582%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2017035582&rft_id=info:pmid/28215385&rft_els_id=S0749379716304755&rfr_iscdi=true