Empirical validation of directed functional connectivity

Mapping directions of influence in the human brain connectome represents the next phase in understanding its functional architecture. However, a host of methodological uncertainties have impeded the application of directed connectivity methods, which have primarily been validated via “ground truth”...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2017-02, Vol.146, p.275-287
Hauptverfasser: Mill, Ravi D., Bagic, Anto, Bostan, Andreea, Schneider, Walter, Cole, Michael W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 287
container_issue
container_start_page 275
container_title NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)
container_volume 146
creator Mill, Ravi D.
Bagic, Anto
Bostan, Andreea
Schneider, Walter
Cole, Michael W.
description Mapping directions of influence in the human brain connectome represents the next phase in understanding its functional architecture. However, a host of methodological uncertainties have impeded the application of directed connectivity methods, which have primarily been validated via “ground truth” connectivity patterns embedded in simulated functional MRI (fMRI) and magneto-/electro-encephalography (MEG/EEG) datasets. Such simulations rely on many generative assumptions, and we hence utilized a different strategy involving empirical data in which a ground truth directed connectivity pattern could be anticipated with confidence. Specifically, we exploited the established “sensory reactivation” effect in episodic memory, in which retrieval of sensory information reactivates regions involved in perceiving that sensory modality. Subjects performed a paired associate task in separate fMRI and MEG sessions, in which a ground truth reversal in directed connectivity between auditory and visual sensory regions was instantiated across task conditions. This directed connectivity reversal was successfully recovered across different algorithms, including Granger causality and Bayes network (IMAGES) approaches, and across fMRI (“raw” and deconvolved) and source-modeled MEG. These results extend simulation studies of directed connectivity, and offer practical guidelines for the use of such methods in clarifying causal mechanisms of neural processing.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5321749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811916306553</els_id><sourcerecordid>4316563021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-3d9dcd37e300a65791bb92d853487232d049ece1b0c8775c5fc2ebb425be2413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1TAQhS0EoqXwF1AkNmwSPH7E9gYJqvKQKrHp3nLsSfFVbnyxkyv13-NwS3lsYGVr_M05njmENEA7oNC_2XUzrjnFvbvFjtVKB9BRrh6Rc6BGtkYq9ni7S95qAHNGnpWyo5QaEPopOWNKy54DOyf6an-IOXo3NUc3xeCWmOYmjU2IGf2CoRnX2W_FSvg0z7UYj3G5e06ejG4q-OL-vCA3H65uLj-1118-fr58d936nvZLy4MJPnCFnFLXS2VgGAwLWnKhFeMsUGHQIwzUa6Wkl6NnOAyCyQGZAH5B3p5kD-uwx-BxXrKb7CHX2fOdTS7aP1_m-NXepqOVnIESpgq8vhfI6duKZbH7WDxOk5sxrcVCtdWCawP_gQpQRmkmKvrqL3SX1lx39EOQ9lwZtnnrE-VzKiXj-PBvoHYL0u7sryDtFqQFsDXI2vry97kfGn8mV4H3JwDr8o8Rsy0-4uzxFJwNKf7b5Tud9bR9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1870637929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Empirical validation of directed functional connectivity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Mill, Ravi D. ; Bagic, Anto ; Bostan, Andreea ; Schneider, Walter ; Cole, Michael W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mill, Ravi D. ; Bagic, Anto ; Bostan, Andreea ; Schneider, Walter ; Cole, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><description>Mapping directions of influence in the human brain connectome represents the next phase in understanding its functional architecture. However, a host of methodological uncertainties have impeded the application of directed connectivity methods, which have primarily been validated via “ground truth” connectivity patterns embedded in simulated functional MRI (fMRI) and magneto-/electro-encephalography (MEG/EEG) datasets. Such simulations rely on many generative assumptions, and we hence utilized a different strategy involving empirical data in which a ground truth directed connectivity pattern could be anticipated with confidence. Specifically, we exploited the established “sensory reactivation” effect in episodic memory, in which retrieval of sensory information reactivates regions involved in perceiving that sensory modality. Subjects performed a paired associate task in separate fMRI and MEG sessions, in which a ground truth reversal in directed connectivity between auditory and visual sensory regions was instantiated across task conditions. This directed connectivity reversal was successfully recovered across different algorithms, including Granger causality and Bayes network (IMAGES) approaches, and across fMRI (“raw” and deconvolved) and source-modeled MEG. These results extend simulation studies of directed connectivity, and offer practical guidelines for the use of such methods in clarifying causal mechanisms of neural processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27856312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Acoustic Stimulation ; Adult ; Algorithms ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian analysis ; Brain ; Brain - anatomy &amp; histology ; Brain - physiology ; Brain architecture ; Brain mapping ; Computer Simulation ; Connectome ; Data processing ; Directed connectivity ; EEG ; Effective connectivity ; Female ; fMRI ; Fourier transforms ; Functional connectivity ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Humans ; Information processing ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Magnetoencephalography ; Male ; MEG ; Memory ; Memory - physiology ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Neural networks ; Neural Pathways - anatomy &amp; histology ; Neural Pathways - physiology ; Neurosciences ; Photic Stimulation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensors ; Sensory integration ; Time series ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2017-02, Vol.146, p.275-287</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2016. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-3d9dcd37e300a65791bb92d853487232d049ece1b0c8775c5fc2ebb425be2413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-3d9dcd37e300a65791bb92d853487232d049ece1b0c8775c5fc2ebb425be2413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1870637929?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,3539,27907,27908,45978,64366,64368,64370,72220</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27856312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mill, Ravi D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagic, Anto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bostan, Andreea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><title>Empirical validation of directed functional connectivity</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>Mapping directions of influence in the human brain connectome represents the next phase in understanding its functional architecture. However, a host of methodological uncertainties have impeded the application of directed connectivity methods, which have primarily been validated via “ground truth” connectivity patterns embedded in simulated functional MRI (fMRI) and magneto-/electro-encephalography (MEG/EEG) datasets. Such simulations rely on many generative assumptions, and we hence utilized a different strategy involving empirical data in which a ground truth directed connectivity pattern could be anticipated with confidence. Specifically, we exploited the established “sensory reactivation” effect in episodic memory, in which retrieval of sensory information reactivates regions involved in perceiving that sensory modality. Subjects performed a paired associate task in separate fMRI and MEG sessions, in which a ground truth reversal in directed connectivity between auditory and visual sensory regions was instantiated across task conditions. This directed connectivity reversal was successfully recovered across different algorithms, including Granger causality and Bayes network (IMAGES) approaches, and across fMRI (“raw” and deconvolved) and source-modeled MEG. These results extend simulation studies of directed connectivity, and offer practical guidelines for the use of such methods in clarifying causal mechanisms of neural processing.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain architecture</subject><subject>Brain mapping</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Connectome</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Directed connectivity</subject><subject>EEG</subject><subject>Effective connectivity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Fourier transforms</subject><subject>Functional connectivity</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Magnetoencephalography</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>MEG</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Neural Pathways - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Neural Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Sensory integration</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1TAQhS0EoqXwF1AkNmwSPH7E9gYJqvKQKrHp3nLsSfFVbnyxkyv13-NwS3lsYGVr_M05njmENEA7oNC_2XUzrjnFvbvFjtVKB9BRrh6Rc6BGtkYq9ni7S95qAHNGnpWyo5QaEPopOWNKy54DOyf6an-IOXo3NUc3xeCWmOYmjU2IGf2CoRnX2W_FSvg0z7UYj3G5e06ejG4q-OL-vCA3H65uLj-1118-fr58d936nvZLy4MJPnCFnFLXS2VgGAwLWnKhFeMsUGHQIwzUa6Wkl6NnOAyCyQGZAH5B3p5kD-uwx-BxXrKb7CHX2fOdTS7aP1_m-NXepqOVnIESpgq8vhfI6duKZbH7WDxOk5sxrcVCtdWCawP_gQpQRmkmKvrqL3SX1lx39EOQ9lwZtnnrE-VzKiXj-PBvoHYL0u7sryDtFqQFsDXI2vry97kfGn8mV4H3JwDr8o8Rsy0-4uzxFJwNKf7b5Tud9bR9</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Mill, Ravi D.</creator><creator>Bagic, Anto</creator><creator>Bostan, Andreea</creator><creator>Schneider, Walter</creator><creator>Cole, Michael W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Empirical validation of directed functional connectivity</title><author>Mill, Ravi D. ; Bagic, Anto ; Bostan, Andreea ; Schneider, Walter ; Cole, Michael W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-3d9dcd37e300a65791bb92d853487232d049ece1b0c8775c5fc2ebb425be2413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain architecture</topic><topic>Brain mapping</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Connectome</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Directed connectivity</topic><topic>EEG</topic><topic>Effective connectivity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Fourier transforms</topic><topic>Functional connectivity</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Magnetoencephalography</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>MEG</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Neural Pathways - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Neural Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Sensory integration</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mill, Ravi D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagic, Anto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bostan, Andreea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mill, Ravi D.</au><au>Bagic, Anto</au><au>Bostan, Andreea</au><au>Schneider, Walter</au><au>Cole, Michael W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Empirical validation of directed functional connectivity</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>146</volume><spage>275</spage><epage>287</epage><pages>275-287</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>Mapping directions of influence in the human brain connectome represents the next phase in understanding its functional architecture. However, a host of methodological uncertainties have impeded the application of directed connectivity methods, which have primarily been validated via “ground truth” connectivity patterns embedded in simulated functional MRI (fMRI) and magneto-/electro-encephalography (MEG/EEG) datasets. Such simulations rely on many generative assumptions, and we hence utilized a different strategy involving empirical data in which a ground truth directed connectivity pattern could be anticipated with confidence. Specifically, we exploited the established “sensory reactivation” effect in episodic memory, in which retrieval of sensory information reactivates regions involved in perceiving that sensory modality. Subjects performed a paired associate task in separate fMRI and MEG sessions, in which a ground truth reversal in directed connectivity between auditory and visual sensory regions was instantiated across task conditions. This directed connectivity reversal was successfully recovered across different algorithms, including Granger causality and Bayes network (IMAGES) approaches, and across fMRI (“raw” and deconvolved) and source-modeled MEG. These results extend simulation studies of directed connectivity, and offer practical guidelines for the use of such methods in clarifying causal mechanisms of neural processing.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27856312</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.037</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8119
ispartof NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2017-02, Vol.146, p.275-287
issn 1053-8119
1095-9572
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5321749
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Accuracy
Acoustic Stimulation
Adult
Algorithms
Auditory Perception - physiology
Bayes Theorem
Bayesian analysis
Brain
Brain - anatomy & histology
Brain - physiology
Brain architecture
Brain mapping
Computer Simulation
Connectome
Data processing
Directed connectivity
EEG
Effective connectivity
Female
fMRI
Fourier transforms
Functional connectivity
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
Humans
Information processing
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetoencephalography
Male
MEG
Memory
Memory - physiology
Methods
Middle Aged
Neural networks
Neural Pathways - anatomy & histology
Neural Pathways - physiology
Neurosciences
Photic Stimulation
Reproducibility of Results
Sensors
Sensory integration
Time series
Visual Perception - physiology
Young Adult
title Empirical validation of directed functional connectivity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A07%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Empirical%20validation%20of%20directed%20functional%20connectivity&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Mill,%20Ravi%20D.&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=146&rft.spage=275&rft.epage=287&rft.pages=275-287&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4316563021%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1870637929&rft_id=info:pmid/27856312&rft_els_id=S1053811916306553&rfr_iscdi=true