Manipulating Bodily Presence Affects Cross-Modal Spatial Attention: A Virtual-Reality-Based ERP Study
Earlier studies have revealed cross-modal visuo-tactile interactions in endogenous spatial attention. The current research used event-related potentials (ERPs) and virtual reality (VR) to identify how the visual cues of the perceiver's body affect visuo-tactile interaction in endogenous spatial...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers in human neuroscience 2017-02, Vol.11, p.79-79 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 79 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | Frontiers in human neuroscience |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Harjunen, Ville J Ahmed, Imtiaj Jacucci, Giulio Ravaja, Niklas Spapé, Michiel M |
description | Earlier studies have revealed cross-modal visuo-tactile interactions in endogenous spatial attention. The current research used event-related potentials (ERPs) and virtual reality (VR) to identify how the visual cues of the perceiver's body affect visuo-tactile interaction in endogenous spatial attention and at what point in time the effect takes place. A bimodal oddball task with lateralized tactile and visual stimuli was presented in two VR conditions, one with and one without visible hands, and one VR-free control with hands in view. Participants were required to silently count one type of stimulus and ignore all other stimuli presented in irrelevant modality or location. The presence of hands was found to modulate early and late components of somatosensory and visual evoked potentials. For sensory-perceptual stages, the presence of virtual or real hands was found to amplify attention-related negativity on the somatosensory N140 and cross-modal interaction in somatosensory and visual P200. For postperceptual stages, an amplified N200 component was obtained in somatosensory and visual evoked potentials, indicating increased response inhibition in response to non-target stimuli. The effect of somatosensory, but not visual, N200 enhanced when the virtual hands were present. The findings suggest that bodily presence affects sustained cross-modal spatial attention between vision and touch and that this effect is specifically present in ERPs related to early- and late-sensory processing, as well as response inhibition, but do not affect later attention and memory-related P3 activity. Finally, the experiments provide commeasurable scenarios for the estimation of the signal and noise ratio to quantify effects related to the use of a head mounted display (HMD). However, despite valid a-priori reasons for fearing signal interference due to a HMD, we observed no significant drop in the robustness of our ERP measurements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00079 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5319989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1876500138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-fcdea3f20df5f6b0fdac8b68c77398cdc344ddd8bf4c9ff8cc9e61295b95f53a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctrVDEUh4Mo9qF7VxJw4-aOedzkJi6E6VAf0GJp1W3IzaNNySRjkluY_947bS1tVyeQ7_w453wAvMNoQamQn3y6mtYLgvCwQAgN8gXYx5yTjmGOXz5674GDWq8R4oQz_BrsEUEGRnu-D9ypTmEzRd1CuoRH2Ya4hWfFVZeMg0vvnWkVrkqutTvNVkd4sZnZuS5bc6mFnD7DJfwTSpt07M6djqFtuyNdnYXH52fwok12-wa88jpW9_a-HoLfX49_rb53Jz-__VgtTzrTS9Q6b6zT1BNkPfN8RN5qI0YuzDBQKYw1tO-ttWL0vZHeC2Ok45hINkrmGdX0EHy5y91M49pZMw9YdFSbEta6bFXWQT39SeFKXeYbxSiWUsg54ON9QMl_J1ebWodqXIw6uTxVhcXAGUKYihn98Ay9zlNJ83qKECEHRFmPZwrdUWZ3wuL8wzAYqZ1DdetQ7RyqW4dzy_vHSzw0_JdG_wFnfZsG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2289703541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Manipulating Bodily Presence Affects Cross-Modal Spatial Attention: A Virtual-Reality-Based ERP Study</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Directory of Open Journals (DOAJ)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Harjunen, Ville J ; Ahmed, Imtiaj ; Jacucci, Giulio ; Ravaja, Niklas ; Spapé, Michiel M</creator><creatorcontrib>Harjunen, Ville J ; Ahmed, Imtiaj ; Jacucci, Giulio ; Ravaja, Niklas ; Spapé, Michiel M</creatorcontrib><description>Earlier studies have revealed cross-modal visuo-tactile interactions in endogenous spatial attention. The current research used event-related potentials (ERPs) and virtual reality (VR) to identify how the visual cues of the perceiver's body affect visuo-tactile interaction in endogenous spatial attention and at what point in time the effect takes place. A bimodal oddball task with lateralized tactile and visual stimuli was presented in two VR conditions, one with and one without visible hands, and one VR-free control with hands in view. Participants were required to silently count one type of stimulus and ignore all other stimuli presented in irrelevant modality or location. The presence of hands was found to modulate early and late components of somatosensory and visual evoked potentials. For sensory-perceptual stages, the presence of virtual or real hands was found to amplify attention-related negativity on the somatosensory N140 and cross-modal interaction in somatosensory and visual P200. For postperceptual stages, an amplified N200 component was obtained in somatosensory and visual evoked potentials, indicating increased response inhibition in response to non-target stimuli. The effect of somatosensory, but not visual, N200 enhanced when the virtual hands were present. The findings suggest that bodily presence affects sustained cross-modal spatial attention between vision and touch and that this effect is specifically present in ERPs related to early- and late-sensory processing, as well as response inhibition, but do not affect later attention and memory-related P3 activity. Finally, the experiments provide commeasurable scenarios for the estimation of the signal and noise ratio to quantify effects related to the use of a head mounted display (HMD). However, despite valid a-priori reasons for fearing signal interference due to a HMD, we observed no significant drop in the robustness of our ERP measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1662-5161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1662-5161</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28275346</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Research Foundation</publisher><subject>Brain research ; Computer applications ; Computer science ; Cross-modal ; Event-related potentials ; Information processing ; Information technology ; Neuroscience ; Physiology ; Researchers ; Rubber ; Sensorimotor integration ; Sensory integration ; Studies ; Tactile stimuli ; Visual evoked potentials ; Visual stimuli</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2017-02, Vol.11, p.79-79</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Harjunen, Ahmed, Jacucci, Ravaja and Spapé. 2017 Harjunen, Ahmed, Jacucci, Ravaja and Spapé</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-fcdea3f20df5f6b0fdac8b68c77398cdc344ddd8bf4c9ff8cc9e61295b95f53a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-fcdea3f20df5f6b0fdac8b68c77398cdc344ddd8bf4c9ff8cc9e61295b95f53a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319989/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319989/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28275346$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harjunen, Ville J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Imtiaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacucci, Giulio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravaja, Niklas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spapé, Michiel M</creatorcontrib><title>Manipulating Bodily Presence Affects Cross-Modal Spatial Attention: A Virtual-Reality-Based ERP Study</title><title>Frontiers in human neuroscience</title><addtitle>Front Hum Neurosci</addtitle><description>Earlier studies have revealed cross-modal visuo-tactile interactions in endogenous spatial attention. The current research used event-related potentials (ERPs) and virtual reality (VR) to identify how the visual cues of the perceiver's body affect visuo-tactile interaction in endogenous spatial attention and at what point in time the effect takes place. A bimodal oddball task with lateralized tactile and visual stimuli was presented in two VR conditions, one with and one without visible hands, and one VR-free control with hands in view. Participants were required to silently count one type of stimulus and ignore all other stimuli presented in irrelevant modality or location. The presence of hands was found to modulate early and late components of somatosensory and visual evoked potentials. For sensory-perceptual stages, the presence of virtual or real hands was found to amplify attention-related negativity on the somatosensory N140 and cross-modal interaction in somatosensory and visual P200. For postperceptual stages, an amplified N200 component was obtained in somatosensory and visual evoked potentials, indicating increased response inhibition in response to non-target stimuli. The effect of somatosensory, but not visual, N200 enhanced when the virtual hands were present. The findings suggest that bodily presence affects sustained cross-modal spatial attention between vision and touch and that this effect is specifically present in ERPs related to early- and late-sensory processing, as well as response inhibition, but do not affect later attention and memory-related P3 activity. Finally, the experiments provide commeasurable scenarios for the estimation of the signal and noise ratio to quantify effects related to the use of a head mounted display (HMD). However, despite valid a-priori reasons for fearing signal interference due to a HMD, we observed no significant drop in the robustness of our ERP measurements.</description><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Cross-modal</subject><subject>Event-related potentials</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Neuroscience</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Rubber</subject><subject>Sensorimotor integration</subject><subject>Sensory integration</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tactile stimuli</subject><subject>Visual evoked potentials</subject><subject>Visual stimuli</subject><issn>1662-5161</issn><issn>1662-5161</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctrVDEUh4Mo9qF7VxJw4-aOedzkJi6E6VAf0GJp1W3IzaNNySRjkluY_947bS1tVyeQ7_w453wAvMNoQamQn3y6mtYLgvCwQAgN8gXYx5yTjmGOXz5674GDWq8R4oQz_BrsEUEGRnu-D9ypTmEzRd1CuoRH2Ya4hWfFVZeMg0vvnWkVrkqutTvNVkd4sZnZuS5bc6mFnD7DJfwTSpt07M6djqFtuyNdnYXH52fwok12-wa88jpW9_a-HoLfX49_rb53Jz-__VgtTzrTS9Q6b6zT1BNkPfN8RN5qI0YuzDBQKYw1tO-ttWL0vZHeC2Ok45hINkrmGdX0EHy5y91M49pZMw9YdFSbEta6bFXWQT39SeFKXeYbxSiWUsg54ON9QMl_J1ebWodqXIw6uTxVhcXAGUKYihn98Ay9zlNJ83qKECEHRFmPZwrdUWZ3wuL8wzAYqZ1DdetQ7RyqW4dzy_vHSzw0_JdG_wFnfZsG</recordid><startdate>20170222</startdate><enddate>20170222</enddate><creator>Harjunen, Ville J</creator><creator>Ahmed, Imtiaj</creator><creator>Jacucci, Giulio</creator><creator>Ravaja, Niklas</creator><creator>Spapé, Michiel M</creator><general>Frontiers Research Foundation</general><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170222</creationdate><title>Manipulating Bodily Presence Affects Cross-Modal Spatial Attention: A Virtual-Reality-Based ERP Study</title><author>Harjunen, Ville J ; Ahmed, Imtiaj ; Jacucci, Giulio ; Ravaja, Niklas ; Spapé, Michiel M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-fcdea3f20df5f6b0fdac8b68c77398cdc344ddd8bf4c9ff8cc9e61295b95f53a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Cross-modal</topic><topic>Event-related potentials</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Neuroscience</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Rubber</topic><topic>Sensorimotor integration</topic><topic>Sensory integration</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tactile stimuli</topic><topic>Visual evoked potentials</topic><topic>Visual stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harjunen, Ville J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Imtiaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacucci, Giulio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravaja, Niklas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spapé, Michiel M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in human neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harjunen, Ville J</au><au>Ahmed, Imtiaj</au><au>Jacucci, Giulio</au><au>Ravaja, Niklas</au><au>Spapé, Michiel M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Manipulating Bodily Presence Affects Cross-Modal Spatial Attention: A Virtual-Reality-Based ERP Study</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in human neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Front Hum Neurosci</addtitle><date>2017-02-22</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>79</spage><epage>79</epage><pages>79-79</pages><issn>1662-5161</issn><eissn>1662-5161</eissn><abstract>Earlier studies have revealed cross-modal visuo-tactile interactions in endogenous spatial attention. The current research used event-related potentials (ERPs) and virtual reality (VR) to identify how the visual cues of the perceiver's body affect visuo-tactile interaction in endogenous spatial attention and at what point in time the effect takes place. A bimodal oddball task with lateralized tactile and visual stimuli was presented in two VR conditions, one with and one without visible hands, and one VR-free control with hands in view. Participants were required to silently count one type of stimulus and ignore all other stimuli presented in irrelevant modality or location. The presence of hands was found to modulate early and late components of somatosensory and visual evoked potentials. For sensory-perceptual stages, the presence of virtual or real hands was found to amplify attention-related negativity on the somatosensory N140 and cross-modal interaction in somatosensory and visual P200. For postperceptual stages, an amplified N200 component was obtained in somatosensory and visual evoked potentials, indicating increased response inhibition in response to non-target stimuli. The effect of somatosensory, but not visual, N200 enhanced when the virtual hands were present. The findings suggest that bodily presence affects sustained cross-modal spatial attention between vision and touch and that this effect is specifically present in ERPs related to early- and late-sensory processing, as well as response inhibition, but do not affect later attention and memory-related P3 activity. Finally, the experiments provide commeasurable scenarios for the estimation of the signal and noise ratio to quantify effects related to the use of a head mounted display (HMD). However, despite valid a-priori reasons for fearing signal interference due to a HMD, we observed no significant drop in the robustness of our ERP measurements.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Research Foundation</pub><pmid>28275346</pmid><doi>10.3389/fnhum.2017.00079</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1662-5161 |
ispartof | Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2017-02, Vol.11, p.79-79 |
issn | 1662-5161 1662-5161 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5319989 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Directory of Open Journals (DOAJ); PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Brain research Computer applications Computer science Cross-modal Event-related potentials Information processing Information technology Neuroscience Physiology Researchers Rubber Sensorimotor integration Sensory integration Studies Tactile stimuli Visual evoked potentials Visual stimuli |
title | Manipulating Bodily Presence Affects Cross-Modal Spatial Attention: A Virtual-Reality-Based ERP Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T17%3A18%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Manipulating%20Bodily%20Presence%20Affects%20Cross-Modal%20Spatial%20Attention:%20A%20Virtual-Reality-Based%20ERP%20Study&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20human%20neuroscience&rft.au=Harjunen,%20Ville%20J&rft.date=2017-02-22&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=79&rft.pages=79-79&rft.issn=1662-5161&rft.eissn=1662-5161&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1876500138%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2289703541&rft_id=info:pmid/28275346&rfr_iscdi=true |