Nicotine delivery to users from cigarettes and from different types of e-cigarettes

Background Delivering nicotine in the way smokers seek is likely to be the key factor in e-cigarette (EC) success in replacing cigarettes. We examined to what degree different types of EC mimic nicotine intake from cigarettes. Methods Twelve participants (‘dual users’ of EC and cigarettes) used thei...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychopharmacology 2017-03, Vol.234 (5), p.773-779
Hauptverfasser: Hajek, Peter, Przulj, Dunja, Phillips, Anna, Anderson, Rebecca, McRobbie, Hayden
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 779
container_issue 5
container_start_page 773
container_title Psychopharmacology
container_volume 234
creator Hajek, Peter
Przulj, Dunja
Phillips, Anna
Anderson, Rebecca
McRobbie, Hayden
description Background Delivering nicotine in the way smokers seek is likely to be the key factor in e-cigarette (EC) success in replacing cigarettes. We examined to what degree different types of EC mimic nicotine intake from cigarettes. Methods Twelve participants (‘dual users’ of EC and cigarettes) used their own brand cigarette and nine different EC brands. Blood samples were taken at baseline and at 2-min intervals for 10 min and again at 30 min. Results Eleven smokers provided usable data. None of the EC matched cigarettes in nicotine delivery ( C max  = 17.9 ng/ml, T max  = 4 min and AUC 0–>30  = 315 ng/ml/min). The EC with 48 mg/ml nicotine generated the closest PK profile ( C max  = 13.6 ng/ml, T max  = 4 min, AUC 0–>30  = 245 ng/ml/min), followed by a third generation EC using 20 mg/ml nicotine ( C max  = 11.9 ng/ml, T max  = 6 min, AUC 0–>30  = 232 ng/ml/min), followed by the tank system using 20 mg/ml nicotine ( C max  = 9.9 ng/ml, T max  = 6 min, AUC 0–>30  = 201 ng/ml/min). Cig-a-like PK values were similar, ranging from C max 7.5 to 9.7 ng/ml, T max 4-6 min, and AUC 0–>30 144 to 173 ng/ml/min. Moderate differences in e-liquid nicotine concentrations had little effect on nicotine delivery, e.g. the EC with 24 mg/ml cartridge had the same PK profile as ECs with 16 mg/ml cartridges. Using similar strength e-liquid, the tank EC provided significantly more nicotine than cig-a-like ECs. Conclusions EC brands we tested do not deliver nicotine as efficiently as cigarettes, but newer EC products deliver nicotine more efficiently than cig-a-like brands. Moderate variations in nicotine content of e-liquid have little effect on nicotine delivery. Smokers who are finding cig-a-like EC unsatisfactory should be advised to try more advanced systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00213-016-4512-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5306435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A551029337</galeid><sourcerecordid>A551029337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-f413979acea9e5dc66311660a4c135a6c7489e53da8df1f85e480add64cd41bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFksuKFTEQhoMoznH0AdxIgxs3PVbu3RthGLzBoAt1HTJJ5Zihu3NMugfO208OPc5FFJNFoOqrn0rVT8hLCicUQL8tAIzyFqhqhaSsVY_IhgrOWgaaPSYbAM5bTmV3RJ6Vcgn1iE48JUesAw2KwYZ8-xJdmuOEjcchXmHeN3NqloK5NCGnsXFxazPOM5bGTn6N-RgCZpzmZt7vaiKFBts78Dl5EuxQ8MXNe0x-fHj__exTe_714-ez0_PWSQ1zGwTlve6tQ9uj9E4pTqlSYIWjXFrltOhqgnvb-UBDJ1F0YL1XwnlBLzw_Ju9W3d1yMaJ3taFsB7PLcbR5b5KN5mFmij_NNl0ZyUEJLqvAmxuBnH4tWGYzxuJwGOyEaSmGdlp3Elgd8v9RqbmuS9EVff0HepmWPNVJVErpnvVCyTtqawc0cQqptugOouZUSgqs5_ygdfIXql6PY13chCHW-IMCuha4nErJGG7HQcEcTGNW05hqGnMwjVG15tX9Od5W_HZJBdgKlJqatpjv_eifqtfdJMtV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1867929465</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nicotine delivery to users from cigarettes and from different types of e-cigarettes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Hajek, Peter ; Przulj, Dunja ; Phillips, Anna ; Anderson, Rebecca ; McRobbie, Hayden</creator><creatorcontrib>Hajek, Peter ; Przulj, Dunja ; Phillips, Anna ; Anderson, Rebecca ; McRobbie, Hayden</creatorcontrib><description>Background Delivering nicotine in the way smokers seek is likely to be the key factor in e-cigarette (EC) success in replacing cigarettes. We examined to what degree different types of EC mimic nicotine intake from cigarettes. Methods Twelve participants (‘dual users’ of EC and cigarettes) used their own brand cigarette and nine different EC brands. Blood samples were taken at baseline and at 2-min intervals for 10 min and again at 30 min. Results Eleven smokers provided usable data. None of the EC matched cigarettes in nicotine delivery ( C max  = 17.9 ng/ml, T max  = 4 min and AUC 0–&gt;30  = 315 ng/ml/min). The EC with 48 mg/ml nicotine generated the closest PK profile ( C max  = 13.6 ng/ml, T max  = 4 min, AUC 0–&gt;30  = 245 ng/ml/min), followed by a third generation EC using 20 mg/ml nicotine ( C max  = 11.9 ng/ml, T max  = 6 min, AUC 0–&gt;30  = 232 ng/ml/min), followed by the tank system using 20 mg/ml nicotine ( C max  = 9.9 ng/ml, T max  = 6 min, AUC 0–&gt;30  = 201 ng/ml/min). Cig-a-like PK values were similar, ranging from C max 7.5 to 9.7 ng/ml, T max 4-6 min, and AUC 0–&gt;30 144 to 173 ng/ml/min. Moderate differences in e-liquid nicotine concentrations had little effect on nicotine delivery, e.g. the EC with 24 mg/ml cartridge had the same PK profile as ECs with 16 mg/ml cartridges. Using similar strength e-liquid, the tank EC provided significantly more nicotine than cig-a-like ECs. Conclusions EC brands we tested do not deliver nicotine as efficiently as cigarettes, but newer EC products deliver nicotine more efficiently than cig-a-like brands. Moderate variations in nicotine content of e-liquid have little effect on nicotine delivery. Smokers who are finding cig-a-like EC unsatisfactory should be advised to try more advanced systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2072</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00213-016-4512-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28070620</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Area Under Curve ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cross-Over Studies ; Electronic cigarettes ; Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems ; Evaluation ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neurosciences ; Nicotine ; Nicotine - administration &amp; dosage ; Nicotine - blood ; Nicotinic Agonists - administration &amp; dosage ; Nicotinic Agonists - blood ; Original Investigation ; Pharmacology ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Physiological aspects ; Psychiatry ; Smoking ; Smoking - blood ; Tobacco Products ; Vaping ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychopharmacology, 2017-03, Vol.234 (5), p.773-779</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Psychopharmacology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-f413979acea9e5dc66311660a4c135a6c7489e53da8df1f85e480add64cd41bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-f413979acea9e5dc66311660a4c135a6c7489e53da8df1f85e480add64cd41bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00213-016-4512-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00213-016-4512-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28070620$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hajek, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Przulj, Dunja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McRobbie, Hayden</creatorcontrib><title>Nicotine delivery to users from cigarettes and from different types of e-cigarettes</title><title>Psychopharmacology</title><addtitle>Psychopharmacology</addtitle><addtitle>Psychopharmacology (Berl)</addtitle><description>Background Delivering nicotine in the way smokers seek is likely to be the key factor in e-cigarette (EC) success in replacing cigarettes. We examined to what degree different types of EC mimic nicotine intake from cigarettes. Methods Twelve participants (‘dual users’ of EC and cigarettes) used their own brand cigarette and nine different EC brands. Blood samples were taken at baseline and at 2-min intervals for 10 min and again at 30 min. Results Eleven smokers provided usable data. None of the EC matched cigarettes in nicotine delivery ( C max  = 17.9 ng/ml, T max  = 4 min and AUC 0–&gt;30  = 315 ng/ml/min). The EC with 48 mg/ml nicotine generated the closest PK profile ( C max  = 13.6 ng/ml, T max  = 4 min, AUC 0–&gt;30  = 245 ng/ml/min), followed by a third generation EC using 20 mg/ml nicotine ( C max  = 11.9 ng/ml, T max  = 6 min, AUC 0–&gt;30  = 232 ng/ml/min), followed by the tank system using 20 mg/ml nicotine ( C max  = 9.9 ng/ml, T max  = 6 min, AUC 0–&gt;30  = 201 ng/ml/min). Cig-a-like PK values were similar, ranging from C max 7.5 to 9.7 ng/ml, T max 4-6 min, and AUC 0–&gt;30 144 to 173 ng/ml/min. Moderate differences in e-liquid nicotine concentrations had little effect on nicotine delivery, e.g. the EC with 24 mg/ml cartridge had the same PK profile as ECs with 16 mg/ml cartridges. Using similar strength e-liquid, the tank EC provided significantly more nicotine than cig-a-like ECs. Conclusions EC brands we tested do not deliver nicotine as efficiently as cigarettes, but newer EC products deliver nicotine more efficiently than cig-a-like brands. Moderate variations in nicotine content of e-liquid have little effect on nicotine delivery. Smokers who are finding cig-a-like EC unsatisfactory should be advised to try more advanced systems.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Electronic cigarettes</subject><subject>Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Nicotine</subject><subject>Nicotine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Nicotine - blood</subject><subject>Nicotinic Agonists - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Nicotinic Agonists - blood</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking - blood</subject><subject>Tobacco Products</subject><subject>Vaping</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0033-3158</issn><issn>1432-2072</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFksuKFTEQhoMoznH0AdxIgxs3PVbu3RthGLzBoAt1HTJJ5Zihu3NMugfO208OPc5FFJNFoOqrn0rVT8hLCicUQL8tAIzyFqhqhaSsVY_IhgrOWgaaPSYbAM5bTmV3RJ6Vcgn1iE48JUesAw2KwYZ8-xJdmuOEjcchXmHeN3NqloK5NCGnsXFxazPOM5bGTn6N-RgCZpzmZt7vaiKFBts78Dl5EuxQ8MXNe0x-fHj__exTe_714-ez0_PWSQ1zGwTlve6tQ9uj9E4pTqlSYIWjXFrltOhqgnvb-UBDJ1F0YL1XwnlBLzw_Ju9W3d1yMaJ3taFsB7PLcbR5b5KN5mFmij_NNl0ZyUEJLqvAmxuBnH4tWGYzxuJwGOyEaSmGdlp3Elgd8v9RqbmuS9EVff0HepmWPNVJVErpnvVCyTtqawc0cQqptugOouZUSgqs5_ygdfIXql6PY13chCHW-IMCuha4nErJGG7HQcEcTGNW05hqGnMwjVG15tX9Od5W_HZJBdgKlJqatpjv_eifqtfdJMtV</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Hajek, Peter</creator><creator>Przulj, Dunja</creator><creator>Phillips, Anna</creator><creator>Anderson, Rebecca</creator><creator>McRobbie, Hayden</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Nicotine delivery to users from cigarettes and from different types of e-cigarettes</title><author>Hajek, Peter ; Przulj, Dunja ; Phillips, Anna ; Anderson, Rebecca ; McRobbie, Hayden</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-f413979acea9e5dc66311660a4c135a6c7489e53da8df1f85e480add64cd41bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Electronic cigarettes</topic><topic>Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Nicotine</topic><topic>Nicotine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Nicotine - blood</topic><topic>Nicotinic Agonists - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Nicotinic Agonists - blood</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking - blood</topic><topic>Tobacco Products</topic><topic>Vaping</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hajek, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Przulj, Dunja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McRobbie, Hayden</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychopharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hajek, Peter</au><au>Przulj, Dunja</au><au>Phillips, Anna</au><au>Anderson, Rebecca</au><au>McRobbie, Hayden</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nicotine delivery to users from cigarettes and from different types of e-cigarettes</atitle><jtitle>Psychopharmacology</jtitle><stitle>Psychopharmacology</stitle><addtitle>Psychopharmacology (Berl)</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>234</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>773</spage><epage>779</epage><pages>773-779</pages><issn>0033-3158</issn><eissn>1432-2072</eissn><abstract>Background Delivering nicotine in the way smokers seek is likely to be the key factor in e-cigarette (EC) success in replacing cigarettes. We examined to what degree different types of EC mimic nicotine intake from cigarettes. Methods Twelve participants (‘dual users’ of EC and cigarettes) used their own brand cigarette and nine different EC brands. Blood samples were taken at baseline and at 2-min intervals for 10 min and again at 30 min. Results Eleven smokers provided usable data. None of the EC matched cigarettes in nicotine delivery ( C max  = 17.9 ng/ml, T max  = 4 min and AUC 0–&gt;30  = 315 ng/ml/min). The EC with 48 mg/ml nicotine generated the closest PK profile ( C max  = 13.6 ng/ml, T max  = 4 min, AUC 0–&gt;30  = 245 ng/ml/min), followed by a third generation EC using 20 mg/ml nicotine ( C max  = 11.9 ng/ml, T max  = 6 min, AUC 0–&gt;30  = 232 ng/ml/min), followed by the tank system using 20 mg/ml nicotine ( C max  = 9.9 ng/ml, T max  = 6 min, AUC 0–&gt;30  = 201 ng/ml/min). Cig-a-like PK values were similar, ranging from C max 7.5 to 9.7 ng/ml, T max 4-6 min, and AUC 0–&gt;30 144 to 173 ng/ml/min. Moderate differences in e-liquid nicotine concentrations had little effect on nicotine delivery, e.g. the EC with 24 mg/ml cartridge had the same PK profile as ECs with 16 mg/ml cartridges. Using similar strength e-liquid, the tank EC provided significantly more nicotine than cig-a-like ECs. Conclusions EC brands we tested do not deliver nicotine as efficiently as cigarettes, but newer EC products deliver nicotine more efficiently than cig-a-like brands. Moderate variations in nicotine content of e-liquid have little effect on nicotine delivery. Smokers who are finding cig-a-like EC unsatisfactory should be advised to try more advanced systems.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28070620</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00213-016-4512-6</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3158
ispartof Psychopharmacology, 2017-03, Vol.234 (5), p.773-779
issn 0033-3158
1432-2072
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5306435
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adult
Area Under Curve
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Cross-Over Studies
Electronic cigarettes
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
Evaluation
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neurosciences
Nicotine
Nicotine - administration & dosage
Nicotine - blood
Nicotinic Agonists - administration & dosage
Nicotinic Agonists - blood
Original Investigation
Pharmacology
Pharmacology/Toxicology
Physiological aspects
Psychiatry
Smoking
Smoking - blood
Tobacco Products
Vaping
Young Adult
title Nicotine delivery to users from cigarettes and from different types of e-cigarettes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A48%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nicotine%20delivery%20to%20users%20from%20cigarettes%20and%20from%20different%20types%20of%20e-cigarettes&rft.jtitle=Psychopharmacology&rft.au=Hajek,%20Peter&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=234&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=773&rft.epage=779&rft.pages=773-779&rft.issn=0033-3158&rft.eissn=1432-2072&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00213-016-4512-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA551029337%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1867929465&rft_id=info:pmid/28070620&rft_galeid=A551029337&rfr_iscdi=true