Insulin Degludec in Clinical Practice: A Review of Japanese Real-World Data

Introduction In this literature review we evaluated the real-world clinical effectiveness of switching Japanese diabetic patients from their current insulin regimen to insulin degludec (IDeg). Methods Studies were identified from Japanese Diabetes Society (JDS) abstracts (2014–2015) and PubMed (2012...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes therapy 2017-02, Vol.8 (1), p.189-195
Hauptverfasser: Kaku, Kohei, Wolden, Michael Lyng, Hyllested-Winge, Jacob, Nørtoft, Emil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 195
container_issue 1
container_start_page 189
container_title Diabetes therapy
container_volume 8
creator Kaku, Kohei
Wolden, Michael Lyng
Hyllested-Winge, Jacob
Nørtoft, Emil
description Introduction In this literature review we evaluated the real-world clinical effectiveness of switching Japanese diabetic patients from their current insulin regimen to insulin degludec (IDeg). Methods Studies were identified from Japanese Diabetes Society (JDS) abstracts (2014–2015) and PubMed (2012 onwards). Inclusion criteria were: Japanese population, >15 participants, and studies switching patients from basal or basal–bolus insulin regimens to IDeg. Randomized controlled trials and case reports were excluded. Weighted mean changes in safety and effectiveness endpoints were calculated using the number of patients in each study. Results In total, 81 JDS abstracts and seven manuscripts met the search criteria, representing 4238 patients [1028 with type 1 diabetes (T1D), 602 with type 2 diabetes (T2D), 2608 with unspecified or mixed diabetes]. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ) was reported in 93% of studies, with an improvement in 84% of these (51% significant, 33% numerical), no change in 12%, and worsening in 4% (3% numerical, 1% significant). Across all studies, the weighted mean absolute change in HbA 1c was −0.3% (−2.7 mmol/mol). Basal insulin dose was reported in 58% of studies and was lower in 60% of these (30% significant, 30% numerical), numerically unchanged in 26%, and higher in 14% (2% significant, 12% numerical). The weighted mean change in basal insulin dose was −4.8% and −3.0% for all studies and for studies with only significant results, respectively. The weighted mean change in basal dose based on all studies was −8.9, −5.5, and −2.9% for the T1D, T2D, and unspecified patient populations, respectively. Hypoglycemia was recorded in 31% of the studies. After switching treatment to IDeg, 55% of studies reported decreased hypoglycemia, 29% no change, and 16% an increase. Quality of life (QoL) was measured in 11% of studies, of which 82% reported improved QoL after switching, and 18% reported no change in QoL. Conclusion Switching from a conventional basal insulin to IDeg has the potential to improve HbA 1c with a lower insulin dose. Switching to IDeg may also provide a reduced risk of hypoglycemia and improvement in QoL. Funding Novo Nordisk.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13300-017-0225-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5306124</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1861529537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-5cb01965a85d9f435bfae3ecd3acdc7af92d5360ec46871289ea6c2a638db62f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rGzEQhkVJaIKTH5BLWegll230sdJKPRSCnTZf0FISchRj7ay7Qd51pF2H-tdHxolJA4HqomHmmVeaeQk5YvQLo7Q8iUwISnPKypxyLvPVB7LPtDK5MortbGMp9shhjPc0HWGMYewj2eOaGqZLvU-uLto4-KbNJjjzQ4UuS_E4JRoHPvsVwPWNw6_ZafYblw0-Zl2dXcICWoyYUuDzuy74KptADwdktwYf8fD5HpHb72c34_P8-uePi_Hpde4kFX0u3ZQyoyRoWZm6EHJaAwp0lQBXuRJqwyspFEVXKF0yrg2CchyU0NVU8VqMyLeN7mKYzrFy2PYBvF2EZg7hr-2gsf9W2uaPnXVLKwVVjBdJ4PhZIHQPA8bezpvo0Ps0VjdEm1ZTaqFEof8DVUzytOUyoZ_foPfdENq0iTVVSsVosabYhnKhizFgvf03o3ZtrN0Ya5Oxdm2sXaWeT68H3na82JgAvgFiKrUzDK-eflf1CfMsrV4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1867561047</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insulin Degludec in Clinical Practice: A Review of Japanese Real-World Data</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kaku, Kohei ; Wolden, Michael Lyng ; Hyllested-Winge, Jacob ; Nørtoft, Emil</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaku, Kohei ; Wolden, Michael Lyng ; Hyllested-Winge, Jacob ; Nørtoft, Emil</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction In this literature review we evaluated the real-world clinical effectiveness of switching Japanese diabetic patients from their current insulin regimen to insulin degludec (IDeg). Methods Studies were identified from Japanese Diabetes Society (JDS) abstracts (2014–2015) and PubMed (2012 onwards). Inclusion criteria were: Japanese population, &gt;15 participants, and studies switching patients from basal or basal–bolus insulin regimens to IDeg. Randomized controlled trials and case reports were excluded. Weighted mean changes in safety and effectiveness endpoints were calculated using the number of patients in each study. Results In total, 81 JDS abstracts and seven manuscripts met the search criteria, representing 4238 patients [1028 with type 1 diabetes (T1D), 602 with type 2 diabetes (T2D), 2608 with unspecified or mixed diabetes]. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ) was reported in 93% of studies, with an improvement in 84% of these (51% significant, 33% numerical), no change in 12%, and worsening in 4% (3% numerical, 1% significant). Across all studies, the weighted mean absolute change in HbA 1c was −0.3% (−2.7 mmol/mol). Basal insulin dose was reported in 58% of studies and was lower in 60% of these (30% significant, 30% numerical), numerically unchanged in 26%, and higher in 14% (2% significant, 12% numerical). The weighted mean change in basal insulin dose was −4.8% and −3.0% for all studies and for studies with only significant results, respectively. The weighted mean change in basal dose based on all studies was −8.9, −5.5, and −2.9% for the T1D, T2D, and unspecified patient populations, respectively. Hypoglycemia was recorded in 31% of the studies. After switching treatment to IDeg, 55% of studies reported decreased hypoglycemia, 29% no change, and 16% an increase. Quality of life (QoL) was measured in 11% of studies, of which 82% reported improved QoL after switching, and 18% reported no change in QoL. Conclusion Switching from a conventional basal insulin to IDeg has the potential to improve HbA 1c with a lower insulin dose. Switching to IDeg may also provide a reduced risk of hypoglycemia and improvement in QoL. Funding Novo Nordisk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1869-6953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1869-6961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13300-017-0225-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28091878</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cheshire: Springer Healthcare</publisher><subject>Brief Report ; Cardiology ; Diabetes ; Drug dosages ; Drug therapy ; Endocrinology ; Hypoglycemia ; Insulin ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Quality of life</subject><ispartof>Diabetes therapy, 2017-02, Vol.8 (1), p.189-195</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>Diabetes Therapy is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-5cb01965a85d9f435bfae3ecd3acdc7af92d5360ec46871289ea6c2a638db62f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-5cb01965a85d9f435bfae3ecd3acdc7af92d5360ec46871289ea6c2a638db62f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306124/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306124/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28091878$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaku, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolden, Michael Lyng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyllested-Winge, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nørtoft, Emil</creatorcontrib><title>Insulin Degludec in Clinical Practice: A Review of Japanese Real-World Data</title><title>Diabetes therapy</title><addtitle>Diabetes Ther</addtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction In this literature review we evaluated the real-world clinical effectiveness of switching Japanese diabetic patients from their current insulin regimen to insulin degludec (IDeg). Methods Studies were identified from Japanese Diabetes Society (JDS) abstracts (2014–2015) and PubMed (2012 onwards). Inclusion criteria were: Japanese population, &gt;15 participants, and studies switching patients from basal or basal–bolus insulin regimens to IDeg. Randomized controlled trials and case reports were excluded. Weighted mean changes in safety and effectiveness endpoints were calculated using the number of patients in each study. Results In total, 81 JDS abstracts and seven manuscripts met the search criteria, representing 4238 patients [1028 with type 1 diabetes (T1D), 602 with type 2 diabetes (T2D), 2608 with unspecified or mixed diabetes]. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ) was reported in 93% of studies, with an improvement in 84% of these (51% significant, 33% numerical), no change in 12%, and worsening in 4% (3% numerical, 1% significant). Across all studies, the weighted mean absolute change in HbA 1c was −0.3% (−2.7 mmol/mol). Basal insulin dose was reported in 58% of studies and was lower in 60% of these (30% significant, 30% numerical), numerically unchanged in 26%, and higher in 14% (2% significant, 12% numerical). The weighted mean change in basal insulin dose was −4.8% and −3.0% for all studies and for studies with only significant results, respectively. The weighted mean change in basal dose based on all studies was −8.9, −5.5, and −2.9% for the T1D, T2D, and unspecified patient populations, respectively. Hypoglycemia was recorded in 31% of the studies. After switching treatment to IDeg, 55% of studies reported decreased hypoglycemia, 29% no change, and 16% an increase. Quality of life (QoL) was measured in 11% of studies, of which 82% reported improved QoL after switching, and 18% reported no change in QoL. Conclusion Switching from a conventional basal insulin to IDeg has the potential to improve HbA 1c with a lower insulin dose. Switching to IDeg may also provide a reduced risk of hypoglycemia and improvement in QoL. Funding Novo Nordisk.</description><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><issn>1869-6953</issn><issn>1869-6961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rGzEQhkVJaIKTH5BLWegll230sdJKPRSCnTZf0FISchRj7ay7Qd51pF2H-tdHxolJA4HqomHmmVeaeQk5YvQLo7Q8iUwISnPKypxyLvPVB7LPtDK5MortbGMp9shhjPc0HWGMYewj2eOaGqZLvU-uLto4-KbNJjjzQ4UuS_E4JRoHPvsVwPWNw6_ZafYblw0-Zl2dXcICWoyYUuDzuy74KptADwdktwYf8fD5HpHb72c34_P8-uePi_Hpde4kFX0u3ZQyoyRoWZm6EHJaAwp0lQBXuRJqwyspFEVXKF0yrg2CchyU0NVU8VqMyLeN7mKYzrFy2PYBvF2EZg7hr-2gsf9W2uaPnXVLKwVVjBdJ4PhZIHQPA8bezpvo0Ps0VjdEm1ZTaqFEof8DVUzytOUyoZ_foPfdENq0iTVVSsVosabYhnKhizFgvf03o3ZtrN0Ya5Oxdm2sXaWeT68H3na82JgAvgFiKrUzDK-eflf1CfMsrV4</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Kaku, Kohei</creator><creator>Wolden, Michael Lyng</creator><creator>Hyllested-Winge, Jacob</creator><creator>Nørtoft, Emil</creator><general>Springer Healthcare</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Insulin Degludec in Clinical Practice: A Review of Japanese Real-World Data</title><author>Kaku, Kohei ; Wolden, Michael Lyng ; Hyllested-Winge, Jacob ; Nørtoft, Emil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-5cb01965a85d9f435bfae3ecd3acdc7af92d5360ec46871289ea6c2a638db62f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaku, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolden, Michael Lyng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyllested-Winge, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nørtoft, Emil</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Diabetes therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaku, Kohei</au><au>Wolden, Michael Lyng</au><au>Hyllested-Winge, Jacob</au><au>Nørtoft, Emil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insulin Degludec in Clinical Practice: A Review of Japanese Real-World Data</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes therapy</jtitle><stitle>Diabetes Ther</stitle><addtitle>Diabetes Ther</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>195</epage><pages>189-195</pages><issn>1869-6953</issn><eissn>1869-6961</eissn><abstract>Introduction In this literature review we evaluated the real-world clinical effectiveness of switching Japanese diabetic patients from their current insulin regimen to insulin degludec (IDeg). Methods Studies were identified from Japanese Diabetes Society (JDS) abstracts (2014–2015) and PubMed (2012 onwards). Inclusion criteria were: Japanese population, &gt;15 participants, and studies switching patients from basal or basal–bolus insulin regimens to IDeg. Randomized controlled trials and case reports were excluded. Weighted mean changes in safety and effectiveness endpoints were calculated using the number of patients in each study. Results In total, 81 JDS abstracts and seven manuscripts met the search criteria, representing 4238 patients [1028 with type 1 diabetes (T1D), 602 with type 2 diabetes (T2D), 2608 with unspecified or mixed diabetes]. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ) was reported in 93% of studies, with an improvement in 84% of these (51% significant, 33% numerical), no change in 12%, and worsening in 4% (3% numerical, 1% significant). Across all studies, the weighted mean absolute change in HbA 1c was −0.3% (−2.7 mmol/mol). Basal insulin dose was reported in 58% of studies and was lower in 60% of these (30% significant, 30% numerical), numerically unchanged in 26%, and higher in 14% (2% significant, 12% numerical). The weighted mean change in basal insulin dose was −4.8% and −3.0% for all studies and for studies with only significant results, respectively. The weighted mean change in basal dose based on all studies was −8.9, −5.5, and −2.9% for the T1D, T2D, and unspecified patient populations, respectively. Hypoglycemia was recorded in 31% of the studies. After switching treatment to IDeg, 55% of studies reported decreased hypoglycemia, 29% no change, and 16% an increase. Quality of life (QoL) was measured in 11% of studies, of which 82% reported improved QoL after switching, and 18% reported no change in QoL. Conclusion Switching from a conventional basal insulin to IDeg has the potential to improve HbA 1c with a lower insulin dose. Switching to IDeg may also provide a reduced risk of hypoglycemia and improvement in QoL. Funding Novo Nordisk.</abstract><cop>Cheshire</cop><pub>Springer Healthcare</pub><pmid>28091878</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13300-017-0225-z</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1869-6953
ispartof Diabetes therapy, 2017-02, Vol.8 (1), p.189-195
issn 1869-6953
1869-6961
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5306124
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Brief Report
Cardiology
Diabetes
Drug dosages
Drug therapy
Endocrinology
Hypoglycemia
Insulin
Internal Medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Quality of life
title Insulin Degludec in Clinical Practice: A Review of Japanese Real-World Data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A46%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insulin%20Degludec%20in%20Clinical%20Practice:%20A%20Review%20of%20Japanese%20Real-World%20Data&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20therapy&rft.au=Kaku,%20Kohei&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=195&rft.pages=189-195&rft.issn=1869-6953&rft.eissn=1869-6961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13300-017-0225-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1861529537%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1867561047&rft_id=info:pmid/28091878&rfr_iscdi=true