Determining the factors affecting the distribution of Muscari latifolium, an endemic plant of Turkey, and a mapping species distribution model

Species distribution modeling was used to determine factors among the large predictor candidate data set that affect the distribution of Muscari latifolium, an endemic bulbous plant species of Turkey, to quantify the relative importance of each factor and make a potential spatial distribution map of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology and evolution 2017-02, Vol.7 (4), p.1112-1124
Hauptverfasser: Yilmaz, Hatice, Yilmaz, Osman Yalçın, Akyüz, Yaşar Feyza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1124
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1112
container_title Ecology and evolution
container_volume 7
creator Yilmaz, Hatice
Yilmaz, Osman Yalçın
Akyüz, Yaşar Feyza
description Species distribution modeling was used to determine factors among the large predictor candidate data set that affect the distribution of Muscari latifolium, an endemic bulbous plant species of Turkey, to quantify the relative importance of each factor and make a potential spatial distribution map of M. latifolium. Models were built using the Boosted Regression Trees method based on 35 presence and 70 absence records obtained through field sampling in the Gönen Dam watershed area of the Kazdağı Mountains in West Anatolia. Large candidate variables of monthly and seasonal climate, fine‐scale land surface, and geologic and biotic variables were simplified using a BRT simplifying procedure. Analyses performed on these resources, direct and indirect variables showed that there were 14 main factors that influence the species’ distribution. Five of the 14 most important variables influencing the distribution of the species are bedrock type, Quercus cerris density, precipitation during the wettest month, Pinus nigra density, and northness. These variables account for approximately 60% of the relative importance for determining the distribution of the species. Prediction performance was assessed by 10 random subsample data sets and gave a maximum the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.93 and an average AUC value of 0.8. This study provides a significant contribution to the knowledge of the habitat requirements and ecological characteristics of this species. The distribution of this species is explained by a combination of biotic and abiotic factors. Hence, using biotic interaction and fine‐scale land surface variables in species distribution models improved the accuracy and precision of the model. The knowledge of the relationships between distribution patterns and environmental factors and biotic interaction of M. latifolium can help develop a management and conservation strategy for this species. Muscari latifolium is an endemic bulbous species of Turkey. Factors were determined that affect the distribution on M. latifolium. We used a large environmental variable data set and simplified them with BRTs. We used biotic interactions in the model. The information obtained in the study can be used to support management, conservation, and, if needed, restoration programs for this species.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ece3.2766
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5306017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2035628661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4766-acef6aafc6c9c812383b6ed25300ba0da8bf34c63ce5cdeb058bcbdcd86d994b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9uFSEUhydGY5vahS9gSNxo4m0ZmGG4G5Pmev2T1LipawKHQ0udGUZgNPclfGYZb9u0JiaygXC-fHDgV1XPa3pSU8pOEZCfsE6IR9Uho0276rpWPr63PqiOU7qmZQjKGto9rQ6Y5JTXkh1Wv95hxjj40Y-XJF8hcRpyiIlo5xDy7a71KUdv5uzDSIIjn-cEOnrS6-xd6P08vCF6JDhaHDyQqddjXriLOX7D3VKzRJNBT9NiTBOCx_TQOgSL_bPqidN9wuOb-aj6-n57sfm4Ov_y4dPm7HwFTel0pQGd0NqBgDXImnHJjUDLWk6p0dRqaRxvQHDAFiwa2koDxoKVwq7XjeFH1du9d5rNgBZwzFH3aop-0HGngvbqYWX0V-oy_FDlBEHrrghe3Qhi-D5jymrwCbAvjWOYk6plJyVjHVv_D8pk-Zd2sb78C70OcxzLSyhGeSuYFKIu1Os9BTGkFNHd3bumasmEWjKhlkwU9sX9Ru_I2wQU4HQP_PQ97v5tUtvNlv9R_gaFzcQc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2035628661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining the factors affecting the distribution of Muscari latifolium, an endemic plant of Turkey, and a mapping species distribution model</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Yilmaz, Hatice ; Yilmaz, Osman Yalçın ; Akyüz, Yaşar Feyza</creator><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Hatice ; Yilmaz, Osman Yalçın ; Akyüz, Yaşar Feyza</creatorcontrib><description>Species distribution modeling was used to determine factors among the large predictor candidate data set that affect the distribution of Muscari latifolium, an endemic bulbous plant species of Turkey, to quantify the relative importance of each factor and make a potential spatial distribution map of M. latifolium. Models were built using the Boosted Regression Trees method based on 35 presence and 70 absence records obtained through field sampling in the Gönen Dam watershed area of the Kazdağı Mountains in West Anatolia. Large candidate variables of monthly and seasonal climate, fine‐scale land surface, and geologic and biotic variables were simplified using a BRT simplifying procedure. Analyses performed on these resources, direct and indirect variables showed that there were 14 main factors that influence the species’ distribution. Five of the 14 most important variables influencing the distribution of the species are bedrock type, Quercus cerris density, precipitation during the wettest month, Pinus nigra density, and northness. These variables account for approximately 60% of the relative importance for determining the distribution of the species. Prediction performance was assessed by 10 random subsample data sets and gave a maximum the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.93 and an average AUC value of 0.8. This study provides a significant contribution to the knowledge of the habitat requirements and ecological characteristics of this species. The distribution of this species is explained by a combination of biotic and abiotic factors. Hence, using biotic interaction and fine‐scale land surface variables in species distribution models improved the accuracy and precision of the model. The knowledge of the relationships between distribution patterns and environmental factors and biotic interaction of M. latifolium can help develop a management and conservation strategy for this species. Muscari latifolium is an endemic bulbous species of Turkey. Factors were determined that affect the distribution on M. latifolium. We used a large environmental variable data set and simplified them with BRTs. We used biotic interactions in the model. The information obtained in the study can be used to support management, conservation, and, if needed, restoration programs for this species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2766</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28303182</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Abiotic factors ; Bedrock ; biotic factors ; boosted regression modeling ; bulbous plant ; Distribution patterns ; Endemic species ; Environmental factors ; Mecranium latifolium ; Model accuracy ; Mountains ; Muscari ; Original Research ; Pine trees ; Pinus nigra ; Plant species ; Quercus cerris ; Rainfall ; Regression analysis ; Spatial distribution ; Species ; species distribution modeling ; Watersheds ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2017-02, Vol.7 (4), p.1112-1124</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4766-acef6aafc6c9c812383b6ed25300ba0da8bf34c63ce5cdeb058bcbdcd86d994b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4766-acef6aafc6c9c812383b6ed25300ba0da8bf34c63ce5cdeb058bcbdcd86d994b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4614-9447</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306017/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306017/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,1418,11567,27929,27930,45579,45580,46057,46481,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303182$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Hatice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Osman Yalçın</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akyüz, Yaşar Feyza</creatorcontrib><title>Determining the factors affecting the distribution of Muscari latifolium, an endemic plant of Turkey, and a mapping species distribution model</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Species distribution modeling was used to determine factors among the large predictor candidate data set that affect the distribution of Muscari latifolium, an endemic bulbous plant species of Turkey, to quantify the relative importance of each factor and make a potential spatial distribution map of M. latifolium. Models were built using the Boosted Regression Trees method based on 35 presence and 70 absence records obtained through field sampling in the Gönen Dam watershed area of the Kazdağı Mountains in West Anatolia. Large candidate variables of monthly and seasonal climate, fine‐scale land surface, and geologic and biotic variables were simplified using a BRT simplifying procedure. Analyses performed on these resources, direct and indirect variables showed that there were 14 main factors that influence the species’ distribution. Five of the 14 most important variables influencing the distribution of the species are bedrock type, Quercus cerris density, precipitation during the wettest month, Pinus nigra density, and northness. These variables account for approximately 60% of the relative importance for determining the distribution of the species. Prediction performance was assessed by 10 random subsample data sets and gave a maximum the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.93 and an average AUC value of 0.8. This study provides a significant contribution to the knowledge of the habitat requirements and ecological characteristics of this species. The distribution of this species is explained by a combination of biotic and abiotic factors. Hence, using biotic interaction and fine‐scale land surface variables in species distribution models improved the accuracy and precision of the model. The knowledge of the relationships between distribution patterns and environmental factors and biotic interaction of M. latifolium can help develop a management and conservation strategy for this species. Muscari latifolium is an endemic bulbous species of Turkey. Factors were determined that affect the distribution on M. latifolium. We used a large environmental variable data set and simplified them with BRTs. We used biotic interactions in the model. The information obtained in the study can be used to support management, conservation, and, if needed, restoration programs for this species.</description><subject>Abiotic factors</subject><subject>Bedrock</subject><subject>biotic factors</subject><subject>boosted regression modeling</subject><subject>bulbous plant</subject><subject>Distribution patterns</subject><subject>Endemic species</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Mecranium latifolium</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Muscari</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pinus nigra</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Quercus cerris</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species distribution modeling</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9uFSEUhydGY5vahS9gSNxo4m0ZmGG4G5Pmev2T1LipawKHQ0udGUZgNPclfGYZb9u0JiaygXC-fHDgV1XPa3pSU8pOEZCfsE6IR9Uho0276rpWPr63PqiOU7qmZQjKGto9rQ6Y5JTXkh1Wv95hxjj40Y-XJF8hcRpyiIlo5xDy7a71KUdv5uzDSIIjn-cEOnrS6-xd6P08vCF6JDhaHDyQqddjXriLOX7D3VKzRJNBT9NiTBOCx_TQOgSL_bPqidN9wuOb-aj6-n57sfm4Ov_y4dPm7HwFTel0pQGd0NqBgDXImnHJjUDLWk6p0dRqaRxvQHDAFiwa2koDxoKVwq7XjeFH1du9d5rNgBZwzFH3aop-0HGngvbqYWX0V-oy_FDlBEHrrghe3Qhi-D5jymrwCbAvjWOYk6plJyVjHVv_D8pk-Zd2sb78C70OcxzLSyhGeSuYFKIu1Os9BTGkFNHd3bumasmEWjKhlkwU9sX9Ru_I2wQU4HQP_PQ97v5tUtvNlv9R_gaFzcQc</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Yilmaz, Hatice</creator><creator>Yilmaz, Osman Yalçın</creator><creator>Akyüz, Yaşar Feyza</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4614-9447</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Determining the factors affecting the distribution of Muscari latifolium, an endemic plant of Turkey, and a mapping species distribution model</title><author>Yilmaz, Hatice ; Yilmaz, Osman Yalçın ; Akyüz, Yaşar Feyza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4766-acef6aafc6c9c812383b6ed25300ba0da8bf34c63ce5cdeb058bcbdcd86d994b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abiotic factors</topic><topic>Bedrock</topic><topic>biotic factors</topic><topic>boosted regression modeling</topic><topic>bulbous plant</topic><topic>Distribution patterns</topic><topic>Endemic species</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Mecranium latifolium</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Muscari</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pinus nigra</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Quercus cerris</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species distribution modeling</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Hatice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Osman Yalçın</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akyüz, Yaşar Feyza</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yilmaz, Hatice</au><au>Yilmaz, Osman Yalçın</au><au>Akyüz, Yaşar Feyza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining the factors affecting the distribution of Muscari latifolium, an endemic plant of Turkey, and a mapping species distribution model</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1112</spage><epage>1124</epage><pages>1112-1124</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Species distribution modeling was used to determine factors among the large predictor candidate data set that affect the distribution of Muscari latifolium, an endemic bulbous plant species of Turkey, to quantify the relative importance of each factor and make a potential spatial distribution map of M. latifolium. Models were built using the Boosted Regression Trees method based on 35 presence and 70 absence records obtained through field sampling in the Gönen Dam watershed area of the Kazdağı Mountains in West Anatolia. Large candidate variables of monthly and seasonal climate, fine‐scale land surface, and geologic and biotic variables were simplified using a BRT simplifying procedure. Analyses performed on these resources, direct and indirect variables showed that there were 14 main factors that influence the species’ distribution. Five of the 14 most important variables influencing the distribution of the species are bedrock type, Quercus cerris density, precipitation during the wettest month, Pinus nigra density, and northness. These variables account for approximately 60% of the relative importance for determining the distribution of the species. Prediction performance was assessed by 10 random subsample data sets and gave a maximum the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.93 and an average AUC value of 0.8. This study provides a significant contribution to the knowledge of the habitat requirements and ecological characteristics of this species. The distribution of this species is explained by a combination of biotic and abiotic factors. Hence, using biotic interaction and fine‐scale land surface variables in species distribution models improved the accuracy and precision of the model. The knowledge of the relationships between distribution patterns and environmental factors and biotic interaction of M. latifolium can help develop a management and conservation strategy for this species. Muscari latifolium is an endemic bulbous species of Turkey. Factors were determined that affect the distribution on M. latifolium. We used a large environmental variable data set and simplified them with BRTs. We used biotic interactions in the model. The information obtained in the study can be used to support management, conservation, and, if needed, restoration programs for this species.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>28303182</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.2766</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4614-9447</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-7758
ispartof Ecology and evolution, 2017-02, Vol.7 (4), p.1112-1124
issn 2045-7758
2045-7758
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5306017
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection; PubMed; Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Abiotic factors
Bedrock
biotic factors
boosted regression modeling
bulbous plant
Distribution patterns
Endemic species
Environmental factors
Mecranium latifolium
Model accuracy
Mountains
Muscari
Original Research
Pine trees
Pinus nigra
Plant species
Quercus cerris
Rainfall
Regression analysis
Spatial distribution
Species
species distribution modeling
Watersheds
Wildlife conservation
title Determining the factors affecting the distribution of Muscari latifolium, an endemic plant of Turkey, and a mapping species distribution model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T19%3A59%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20the%20factors%20affecting%20the%20distribution%20of%20Muscari%20latifolium,%20an%20endemic%20plant%20of%20Turkey,%20and%20a%20mapping%20species%20distribution%20model&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Yilmaz,%20Hatice&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1112&rft.epage=1124&rft.pages=1112-1124&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.2766&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2035628661%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2035628661&rft_id=info:pmid/28303182&rfr_iscdi=true