Comparative effectiveness of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis options for the patient undergoing total hip and knee replacement: a network meta‐analysis

Essentials Despite trial data, guidelines have not endorsed direct oral Xa inhibitors above other options. We provide profiles of venous thromboembolism and hemorrhage risk for 12 options. Direct oral Xa inhibitors had a favorable profile compared with low‐molecular‐weight heparin. Other options did...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis 2017-02, Vol.15 (2), p.284-294
Hauptverfasser: Kapoor, A., Ellis, A., Shaffer, N., Gurwitz, J., Chandramohan, A., Saulino, J., Ishak, A., Okubanjo, T., Michota, F., Hylek, E., Trikalinos, T. A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 294
container_issue 2
container_start_page 284
container_title Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis
container_volume 15
creator Kapoor, A.
Ellis, A.
Shaffer, N.
Gurwitz, J.
Chandramohan, A.
Saulino, J.
Ishak, A.
Okubanjo, T.
Michota, F.
Hylek, E.
Trikalinos, T. A
description Essentials Despite trial data, guidelines have not endorsed direct oral Xa inhibitors above other options. We provide profiles of venous thromboembolism and hemorrhage risk for 12 options. Direct oral Xa inhibitors had a favorable profile compared with low‐molecular‐weight heparin. Other options did not have favorable profiles compared with low‐molecular‐weight heparin. Summary Background There are numerous trials and several meta‐analyses comparing venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis options after total hip and knee replacement (THR and TKR). None have included simultaneous comparison of new with older options. Objective To measure simultaneously the relative risk of VTE and hemorrhage for 12 prophylaxis options. Methods We ed VTE and hemorrhage information from randomized controlled trials published between January 1990 and June 2016 comparing 12 prophylaxis options. We then constructed networks to compute the relative risk for each option, relative to once‐daily dosing with low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) Low. Results Main: Relative to LMWH Low, direct oral Xa inhibitors had the lowest risk of total deep vein thrombosis (DVT)‐asymptomatic and symptomatic‐ (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35–0.57), translating to 53–139 fewer DVTs per 1000 patients. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) titrated to International Normalized Ratio [INR] 2–3 predicted 56% more DVT events (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.14–2.14). Aspirin performed similarly (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.34–1.86), although small numbers prohibit firm conclusions. Direct oral Xa inhibitors did not lead to significantly more bleeding (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.79‐1.90). Secondary: Relative to LMWH Low, direct oral Xa inhibitors prevented 4‐fold more symptomatic DVTs (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13–0.47). Conclusions Relative to LMWH Low, direct oral Xa inhibitors had a more favorable profile of VTE and hemorrhage risk, whereas VKAs had a less favorable profile. The profile of other agents was not more or less favorable. Clinicians should consider these profiles when selecting prophylaxis options.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jth.13566
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5305416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2291824586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4716-b2657b316fcc9848236e6b79712a3d48e190e84eac4d50f1b607b3ca40c1802f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1qFTEYhgdRbK0uvAEJuHJx2vxMMhkXQjmoVQpu6jpkMl_O5HQmGZNM69l5CV6AV-eVmHraogsNhLyQh4fv462q5wQfk3JOtnk4JowL8aA6JJzJVSOZeHiXW8YOqicpbTEmLaf4cXVAJcFUEH5Y_ViHadZRZ3cFCKwFc5M8pISCRSWFJaE8xDB1AcodXZrQHMM87Eb91RVqzi74hGyIhQM0FxX4jBbfQ9wE5zcoh6xHNLgZad-jSw-AIsyjNjAV8jXSyEO-DvESTZD1z2_ftdfjLrn0tHpk9Zjg2e17VH1-9_ZifbY6__T-w_r0fGXqhohVRwVvOkaENaaVtaRMgOiatiFUs76WQFoMsgZt6p5jSzqBC250jQ2RmFp2VL3Ze-elm6A3ZaqoRzVHN-m4U0E79fePd4PahCvFGeY1EUXw8lYQw5cFUlbbsMSyRVKUtkTSmsv_UkSKphalFFqoV3vKxJBSBHs_B8Hqpm5V6la_6y7siz8Hvyfv-i3AyR64diPs_m1SHy_O9spfbia5sw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1867461022</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative effectiveness of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis options for the patient undergoing total hip and knee replacement: a network meta‐analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kapoor, A. ; Ellis, A. ; Shaffer, N. ; Gurwitz, J. ; Chandramohan, A. ; Saulino, J. ; Ishak, A. ; Okubanjo, T. ; Michota, F. ; Hylek, E. ; Trikalinos, T. A</creator><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, A. ; Ellis, A. ; Shaffer, N. ; Gurwitz, J. ; Chandramohan, A. ; Saulino, J. ; Ishak, A. ; Okubanjo, T. ; Michota, F. ; Hylek, E. ; Trikalinos, T. A</creatorcontrib><description>Essentials Despite trial data, guidelines have not endorsed direct oral Xa inhibitors above other options. We provide profiles of venous thromboembolism and hemorrhage risk for 12 options. Direct oral Xa inhibitors had a favorable profile compared with low‐molecular‐weight heparin. Other options did not have favorable profiles compared with low‐molecular‐weight heparin. Summary Background There are numerous trials and several meta‐analyses comparing venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis options after total hip and knee replacement (THR and TKR). None have included simultaneous comparison of new with older options. Objective To measure simultaneously the relative risk of VTE and hemorrhage for 12 prophylaxis options. Methods We ed VTE and hemorrhage information from randomized controlled trials published between January 1990 and June 2016 comparing 12 prophylaxis options. We then constructed networks to compute the relative risk for each option, relative to once‐daily dosing with low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) Low. Results Main: Relative to LMWH Low, direct oral Xa inhibitors had the lowest risk of total deep vein thrombosis (DVT)‐asymptomatic and symptomatic‐ (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35–0.57), translating to 53–139 fewer DVTs per 1000 patients. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) titrated to International Normalized Ratio [INR] 2–3 predicted 56% more DVT events (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.14–2.14). Aspirin performed similarly (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.34–1.86), although small numbers prohibit firm conclusions. Direct oral Xa inhibitors did not lead to significantly more bleeding (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.79‐1.90). Secondary: Relative to LMWH Low, direct oral Xa inhibitors prevented 4‐fold more symptomatic DVTs (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13–0.47). Conclusions Relative to LMWH Low, direct oral Xa inhibitors had a more favorable profile of VTE and hemorrhage risk, whereas VKAs had a less favorable profile. The profile of other agents was not more or less favorable. Clinicians should consider these profiles when selecting prophylaxis options.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-7933</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1538-7836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-7836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jth.13566</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28102615</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Aged ; Antagonists ; Anticoagulants - therapeutic use ; anticoagulation ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Aspirin ; Clinical trials ; Coagulation ; Comparative Effectiveness Research ; Factor Xa Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Female ; Health risk assessment ; Hemorrhage ; Hemorrhage - chemically induced ; Hemorrhage - drug therapy ; Heparin ; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight - therapeutic use ; Hip ; Humans ; Knee ; Male ; Meta-analysis ; Middle Aged ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Odds Ratio ; Patient Safety ; Prophylaxis ; Risk ; Thromboembolism ; Thromboembolism - drug therapy ; Thrombosis ; total hip replacement ; total knee replacement ; venous thromboembolism ; Venous Thromboembolism - chemically induced ; Venous Thromboembolism - prevention &amp; control ; Venous Thrombosis - drug therapy ; Vitamin K</subject><ispartof>Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis, 2017-02, Vol.15 (2), p.284-294</ispartof><rights>2016 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis</rights><rights>2016 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4716-b2657b316fcc9848236e6b79712a3d48e190e84eac4d50f1b607b3ca40c1802f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4716-b2657b316fcc9848236e6b79712a3d48e190e84eac4d50f1b607b3ca40c1802f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28102615$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurwitz, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandramohan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saulino, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishak, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okubanjo, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michota, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hylek, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trikalinos, T. A</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative effectiveness of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis options for the patient undergoing total hip and knee replacement: a network meta‐analysis</title><title>Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis</title><addtitle>J Thromb Haemost</addtitle><description>Essentials Despite trial data, guidelines have not endorsed direct oral Xa inhibitors above other options. We provide profiles of venous thromboembolism and hemorrhage risk for 12 options. Direct oral Xa inhibitors had a favorable profile compared with low‐molecular‐weight heparin. Other options did not have favorable profiles compared with low‐molecular‐weight heparin. Summary Background There are numerous trials and several meta‐analyses comparing venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis options after total hip and knee replacement (THR and TKR). None have included simultaneous comparison of new with older options. Objective To measure simultaneously the relative risk of VTE and hemorrhage for 12 prophylaxis options. Methods We ed VTE and hemorrhage information from randomized controlled trials published between January 1990 and June 2016 comparing 12 prophylaxis options. We then constructed networks to compute the relative risk for each option, relative to once‐daily dosing with low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) Low. Results Main: Relative to LMWH Low, direct oral Xa inhibitors had the lowest risk of total deep vein thrombosis (DVT)‐asymptomatic and symptomatic‐ (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35–0.57), translating to 53–139 fewer DVTs per 1000 patients. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) titrated to International Normalized Ratio [INR] 2–3 predicted 56% more DVT events (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.14–2.14). Aspirin performed similarly (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.34–1.86), although small numbers prohibit firm conclusions. Direct oral Xa inhibitors did not lead to significantly more bleeding (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.79‐1.90). Secondary: Relative to LMWH Low, direct oral Xa inhibitors prevented 4‐fold more symptomatic DVTs (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13–0.47). Conclusions Relative to LMWH Low, direct oral Xa inhibitors had a more favorable profile of VTE and hemorrhage risk, whereas VKAs had a less favorable profile. The profile of other agents was not more or less favorable. Clinicians should consider these profiles when selecting prophylaxis options.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antagonists</subject><subject>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>anticoagulation</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Aspirin</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Coagulation</subject><subject>Comparative Effectiveness Research</subject><subject>Factor Xa Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Hemorrhage</subject><subject>Hemorrhage - chemically induced</subject><subject>Hemorrhage - drug therapy</subject><subject>Heparin</subject><subject>Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Network Meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Thromboembolism</subject><subject>Thromboembolism - drug therapy</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><subject>total hip replacement</subject><subject>total knee replacement</subject><subject>venous thromboembolism</subject><subject>Venous Thromboembolism - chemically induced</subject><subject>Venous Thromboembolism - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Venous Thrombosis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Vitamin K</subject><issn>1538-7933</issn><issn>1538-7836</issn><issn>1538-7836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1qFTEYhgdRbK0uvAEJuHJx2vxMMhkXQjmoVQpu6jpkMl_O5HQmGZNM69l5CV6AV-eVmHraogsNhLyQh4fv462q5wQfk3JOtnk4JowL8aA6JJzJVSOZeHiXW8YOqicpbTEmLaf4cXVAJcFUEH5Y_ViHadZRZ3cFCKwFc5M8pISCRSWFJaE8xDB1AcodXZrQHMM87Eb91RVqzi74hGyIhQM0FxX4jBbfQ9wE5zcoh6xHNLgZad-jSw-AIsyjNjAV8jXSyEO-DvESTZD1z2_ftdfjLrn0tHpk9Zjg2e17VH1-9_ZifbY6__T-w_r0fGXqhohVRwVvOkaENaaVtaRMgOiatiFUs76WQFoMsgZt6p5jSzqBC250jQ2RmFp2VL3Ze-elm6A3ZaqoRzVHN-m4U0E79fePd4PahCvFGeY1EUXw8lYQw5cFUlbbsMSyRVKUtkTSmsv_UkSKphalFFqoV3vKxJBSBHs_B8Hqpm5V6la_6y7siz8Hvyfv-i3AyR64diPs_m1SHy_O9spfbia5sw</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Kapoor, A.</creator><creator>Ellis, A.</creator><creator>Shaffer, N.</creator><creator>Gurwitz, J.</creator><creator>Chandramohan, A.</creator><creator>Saulino, J.</creator><creator>Ishak, A.</creator><creator>Okubanjo, T.</creator><creator>Michota, F.</creator><creator>Hylek, E.</creator><creator>Trikalinos, T. A</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Comparative effectiveness of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis options for the patient undergoing total hip and knee replacement: a network meta‐analysis</title><author>Kapoor, A. ; Ellis, A. ; Shaffer, N. ; Gurwitz, J. ; Chandramohan, A. ; Saulino, J. ; Ishak, A. ; Okubanjo, T. ; Michota, F. ; Hylek, E. ; Trikalinos, T. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4716-b2657b316fcc9848236e6b79712a3d48e190e84eac4d50f1b607b3ca40c1802f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antagonists</topic><topic>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>anticoagulation</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Aspirin</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Coagulation</topic><topic>Comparative Effectiveness Research</topic><topic>Factor Xa Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Hemorrhage</topic><topic>Hemorrhage - chemically induced</topic><topic>Hemorrhage - drug therapy</topic><topic>Heparin</topic><topic>Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Network Meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Thromboembolism</topic><topic>Thromboembolism - drug therapy</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><topic>total hip replacement</topic><topic>total knee replacement</topic><topic>venous thromboembolism</topic><topic>Venous Thromboembolism - chemically induced</topic><topic>Venous Thromboembolism - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Venous Thrombosis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Vitamin K</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurwitz, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandramohan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saulino, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishak, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okubanjo, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michota, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hylek, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trikalinos, T. A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kapoor, A.</au><au>Ellis, A.</au><au>Shaffer, N.</au><au>Gurwitz, J.</au><au>Chandramohan, A.</au><au>Saulino, J.</au><au>Ishak, A.</au><au>Okubanjo, T.</au><au>Michota, F.</au><au>Hylek, E.</au><au>Trikalinos, T. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative effectiveness of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis options for the patient undergoing total hip and knee replacement: a network meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis</jtitle><addtitle>J Thromb Haemost</addtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>284</spage><epage>294</epage><pages>284-294</pages><issn>1538-7933</issn><issn>1538-7836</issn><eissn>1538-7836</eissn><abstract>Essentials Despite trial data, guidelines have not endorsed direct oral Xa inhibitors above other options. We provide profiles of venous thromboembolism and hemorrhage risk for 12 options. Direct oral Xa inhibitors had a favorable profile compared with low‐molecular‐weight heparin. Other options did not have favorable profiles compared with low‐molecular‐weight heparin. Summary Background There are numerous trials and several meta‐analyses comparing venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis options after total hip and knee replacement (THR and TKR). None have included simultaneous comparison of new with older options. Objective To measure simultaneously the relative risk of VTE and hemorrhage for 12 prophylaxis options. Methods We ed VTE and hemorrhage information from randomized controlled trials published between January 1990 and June 2016 comparing 12 prophylaxis options. We then constructed networks to compute the relative risk for each option, relative to once‐daily dosing with low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) Low. Results Main: Relative to LMWH Low, direct oral Xa inhibitors had the lowest risk of total deep vein thrombosis (DVT)‐asymptomatic and symptomatic‐ (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35–0.57), translating to 53–139 fewer DVTs per 1000 patients. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) titrated to International Normalized Ratio [INR] 2–3 predicted 56% more DVT events (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.14–2.14). Aspirin performed similarly (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.34–1.86), although small numbers prohibit firm conclusions. Direct oral Xa inhibitors did not lead to significantly more bleeding (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.79‐1.90). Secondary: Relative to LMWH Low, direct oral Xa inhibitors prevented 4‐fold more symptomatic DVTs (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13–0.47). Conclusions Relative to LMWH Low, direct oral Xa inhibitors had a more favorable profile of VTE and hemorrhage risk, whereas VKAs had a less favorable profile. The profile of other agents was not more or less favorable. Clinicians should consider these profiles when selecting prophylaxis options.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>28102615</pmid><doi>10.1111/jth.13566</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1538-7933
ispartof Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis, 2017-02, Vol.15 (2), p.284-294
issn 1538-7933
1538-7836
1538-7836
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5305416
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Administration, Oral
Aged
Antagonists
Anticoagulants - therapeutic use
anticoagulation
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods
Aspirin
Clinical trials
Coagulation
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Factor Xa Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Female
Health risk assessment
Hemorrhage
Hemorrhage - chemically induced
Hemorrhage - drug therapy
Heparin
Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight - therapeutic use
Hip
Humans
Knee
Male
Meta-analysis
Middle Aged
Network Meta-Analysis
Odds Ratio
Patient Safety
Prophylaxis
Risk
Thromboembolism
Thromboembolism - drug therapy
Thrombosis
total hip replacement
total knee replacement
venous thromboembolism
Venous Thromboembolism - chemically induced
Venous Thromboembolism - prevention & control
Venous Thrombosis - drug therapy
Vitamin K
title Comparative effectiveness of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis options for the patient undergoing total hip and knee replacement: a network meta‐analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T00%3A00%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20effectiveness%20of%20venous%20thromboembolism%20prophylaxis%20options%20for%20the%20patient%20undergoing%20total%20hip%20and%20knee%20replacement:%20a%20network%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20thrombosis%20and%20haemostasis&rft.au=Kapoor,%20A.&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=284&rft.epage=294&rft.pages=284-294&rft.issn=1538-7933&rft.eissn=1538-7836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jth.13566&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2291824586%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1867461022&rft_id=info:pmid/28102615&rfr_iscdi=true